Abstract
Given a graph (directed or undirected) with costs on the edges, and an integer $k$, we consider the problem of finding a $k$-node connected spanning subgraph of minimum cost. For the general instance of the problem (directed or undirected), there is a simple $2k$-approximation algorithm. Better algorithms are known for various ranges of $n,k$. For undirected graphs with metric costs Khuller and Raghavachari gave a $( 2+{2(k-1)}/{n})$-approximation algorithm. We obtain the following results: (i) For arbitrary costs, a $k$-approximation algorithm for undirected graphs and a $(k+1)$-approximation algorithm for directed graphs. (ii) For metric costs, a $(2+({k-1})/{n})$-approximation algorithm for undirected graphs and a $(2+{k}/{n})$-approximation algorithm for directed graphs. For undirected graphs and $k=6,7$, we further improve the approximation ratio from $k$ to $\lceil (k+1)/2 \rceil=4$; previously, $\lceil (k+1)/2 \rceil$-approximation algorithms were known only for $k \leq 5$. We also give a fast $3$-approximation algorithm for $k=4$. The multiroot problem generalizes the min-cost $k$-connected subgraph problem. In the multiroot problem, requirements $k_u$ for every node $u$ are given, and the aim is to find a minimum-cost subgraph that contains $\max\{k_u,k_v\}$ internally disjoint paths between every pair of nodes $u,v$. For the general instance of the problem, the best known algorithm has approximation ratio $2k$, where $k=\max k_u$. For metric costs there is a 3-approximation algorithm. We consider the case of metric costs, and, using our techniques, improve for $k \leq 7$ the approximation guarantee from $3$ to $2+{\lfloor (k-1)/2 \rfloor}/{k} < 2.5$.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kortsarz, G., Nutov, Z. Approximating Node Connectivity Problems via Set Covers. Algorithmica 37, 75–92 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-003-1027-4
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-003-1027-4