Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Power densities and microbial communities of brewery wastewater-fed microbial fuel cells according to the initial substrates

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Single-chamber microbial fuel cells (MFCs) acclimated with glucose, butyrate, propionate, acetate, and a mixture of the four were operated with brewery wastewater (BWW) under a fed-batch mode. Glucose-fed MFC (GW-MFC) showed the highest maximum power density (PDmax) of 1,519 mW/m2, followed in order by acetate-fed MFC (AW-MFC), mixed substrates-fed MFC (MW-MFC), butyrate-fed MFC (BW-MFC), and propionate-fed MFC (PW-MFC). After changing to BWW, power production was decreased for all MFCs. MFC acclimated with glucose showed the highest PDmax of 890 ± 12 mW/m2, followed in order by MW-MFC, AW-MFC, BW-MFC, and PW-MFC. The PDmax in BWW-MFC, which was acclimated and operated with BWW, of 552 mW/m2 was less than that of GW-MFC and MW-MFC but more than that of AW-MFC, BW-MFC, and PW-MFC. MFCs with fermentable substrates were less affected by the BWW. Gammaproteobacteria, including Pseudomonas sp., Acinetobacter sp. and Xanthomonas axonopodis, were found in all MFCs with pure substrates and Rubrivivax benzoatilyticus, thiobacillus sp. and Denitratisoma oestradiolicum belonging to Betaproteobacteria were newly detected in all MFCs when the substrate was changed to BWW.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chae KJ, Choi MJ, Lee JW, Kim KY, Kim IS (2009) Effect of different substrates on the performance, bacterial diversity, and bacterial viability in microbial fuel cells. Bioresour Technol 100:3518–3525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng S, Liu H, Logan BE (2006) Increased performance of single-chamber microbial fuel cells using an improved cathode structure. Electrochem Commun 8:489–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fabrbach M, Kuever J, Meinke R, Kämpfer P, Hollender H (2006) Denitratisoma oestradiolicum gen. nov., sp. nov., a 17β-oestradiol-degrading, denitrifying betaproteobacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:1547–1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fornero JJ, Rosenbaum M, Angenert L (2010) Electric power generation from municipal, food, and animal wastewaters using microbial fuel cells. Electroanalysis 22:832–843

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Freguia S, The EH, Boon N, Leung KM, Keller J, Rabaey K (2010) Microbial fuel cells operating on mixed fatty acids. Bioresour Technol 101:1233–1238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Bergey DH (2005) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology (The proteobacteria, Part B), 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Bergey DH (2005) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology (The proteobacteria, Part C), 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jung S, Regan JM (2007) Comparison of anode bacterial communities and performance in microbial fuel cells with different electron donors. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 77:393–402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim B, Park H, Kim H, Kim G, Chang I, Lee J, Phung N (2004) Enrichment of microbial community generating electricity using a fuel-cell-type electrochemical cell. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 63:672–681

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee HS, Parameswaran P, Kato-marcus A, Torres CI, Rittmann BE (2008) Evaluation of energy-conversion efficiencies in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) utilizing fermentable and non-fermentable substrates. Wat Res 42:1501–1510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu H, Cheng S, Logan BE (2005) Production of electricity from acetate or butyrate using a single-chamber microbial fuel cell. Environ Sci Technol 39:658–662

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Logan BE, Regan JM (2006) Electricity-producing bacterial communities in microbial fuel cells. Trends Microbiol 14:512–518

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Oh ST, Kim JR, Premier GC, Lee TH, Kim C, Sloan WT (2010) Sustainable wastewater treatment: how might microbial fuel cells contribute. Biotechnol Adv 28:871–881

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pant D, Van Bogaert G, Diels L, Vanbroekhoven K (2010) A review of the substrates used in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) for sustainable energy production. Bioresour Technol 101:1533–1543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Parameswaran P, Torres CI, Lee HS, Krajmalnik-Brown R, Rittmann BE (2009) Syntrophic interactions among anode respiring bacteria (ARB) and Non-ARB in a biofilm anode: electron balances. Biotechnol Bioeng 103:513–523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rabaey K, Boon N, Siciliano SD, Verhaege M, Verstraete W (2004) Biofuel cells select for microbial consortia that self-mediate electron transfer. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:5373–5382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Teng SX, Tong ZH, Li WW, Wang SG, Sheng GP, Shi XY, Liu XW, Yu HQ (2010) Electricity generation from mixed volatile fatty acids using microbial fuel cells. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 87:2365–2372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu J, Park Y, Cho H, Chun J, Seon J, Cho S, Lee T (2012) Variations of electron flux and microbial community in air-cathode microbial fuel cells fed with different substrates. Water Sci Technol 66:748–753

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu J, Seon J, Park Y, Cho S, Lee T (2012) Electricity generation and microbial community in a submerged-exchangeable microbial fuel cell system for low-strength domestic wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol 117:172–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang Y, Min B, Huang L, Angelidaki I (2011) Electricity generation and microbial community response to substrate changes in microbial fuel cell. Bioresour Technol 102:1166–1173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2010-0021578) and by the MFC Research and Business Development (R&BD) center co-funded with K-water, Hanhwa E&C, and Taeyoung E&C.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Engineering, Silla University, Busan, Korea

    Jaecheul Yu

  2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea

    Younghyun Park & Taeho Lee

  3. MFC R&BD Center, K-water Institute, Daejeon, Korea

    Byunggoon Kim

Authors
  1. Jaecheul Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Younghyun Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Byunggoon Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Taeho Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaecheul Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, J., Park, Y., Kim, B. et al. Power densities and microbial communities of brewery wastewater-fed microbial fuel cells according to the initial substrates. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 38, 85–92 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-014-1246-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-014-1246-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation