Skip to main content
Log in

Chemoenzymatic synthesis of the chiral side-chain of statins: application of an alcohol dehydrogenase catalysed ketone reduction on a large scale

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The chemoenzymatic synthesis of the tert-butyl (S)-6-chloro-5-hydroxy-3-ketohexanoate is described. Our approach relies on a highly regio- and enantioselective reduction of a β,δ-diketohexanoate ester catalysed by NADP(H)-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase of Lactobacillus brevis (LBADH). A detailed description of the scale-up of the enzymatic synthesis of the hydroxyketo ester is given which includes a scale-up of the substrate synthesis as well, i.e. the preparation of diketo ester on a 100 g scale. Furthermore, studies directed towards improving the co-catalyst [NADP(H)] consumption of the enzymatic key step by kinetic studies and application of a biphasic reaction medium were performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Scheme 1
Scheme 1a
Scheme 2
Scheme 3
Scheme 4
Scheme 5
Scheme 6
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. After finishing the work described here, we became aware of several sources that reported about difficulties on attempted preparation of terminally chlorinated β,δ-diketo esters [22, pp 46–47]. Attempts to synthesize methyl 3,5-dioxo-6-chlorohexanoate […] using a literature procedure (Yamaguchi et al. [25]) were unsuccessful. The chloro 3,5-dioxo ester […] remained the most elusive in the syntheses described in this section.”

  2. This is in contrast to the finding of Langer et al., who report failure of this reaction [20, 21].

  3. Attempted acylation under the same conditions (T < −65 °C, 1 eq, bisenolate) using methyl propionate and methyl butanoate as acylation reagents—two esters that do not carry an α-heteroatom substituent—resulted in poor yields (<25%). Large amounts of unreacted tert-butyl acetoacetate were found in the crude products of these reactions. These results are in accordance with the findings of Huckin and Weiler [23, 24]. Presumably, the α-chloro substituent of methyl chloroacetate 14 can stabilise the primary tetrahedral addition intermediate which prevents the harmful liberation of the newly formed keto group prior to hydrolytic work-up. The same protective effect is assigned to the N-methoxy group of Weinreb amides in this kind of ketone synthesis [2628].

  4. The thermodynamic equilibrium is constant and is determined to be \( K_{{{\text{prod}}}} = \frac{{{\left[ {{\text{NADP}}} \right]}{\left[ \bf 9 \right]}}} {{{\left[ {{\text{NADPH}}} \right]}{\left[ {H^{ + } } \right]}{\left[ {\bf 10} \right]}}} \ge 1.4 \times 10^{8} \) For determination of equilibrium conversion in biphasic catalysed reactions; cf. [29].

  5. In terms of process parameters like pH, temperature, stirring, presence of organic solvent, etc. the requirement of a coupled second enzymatic system for cofactor regeneration can narrow the operational window to an unacceptable extent in difficult cases. In the present case, such a coupled enzyme reaction for cofactor regeneration would have to be compatible not only with the relative low pH, but also with the high load of 2-propanol, the high shear forces of the applied type of mixing, and the presence of the reactive alkylator 10 to name but a few. As an example, we observed strong inhibitory effects of 10 on formate dehydrogenase and metabolic activity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in another study directed towards enzymatic reduction of 10.

  6. The reverse reaction, i.e. the oxidation of 910 is also catalysed by LBADH. At 25 °C and the concentration of 9 being 15 and 2 mM NADP, the activity measured for oxidation is 3.5 U/mgenzyme. This value corresponds to 1% of the standard activity. Given the low reaction rate and equilibrium position under high 2-propanol concentration employed in this work, this reaction can be regarded as less important. Indeed it was seldom observed in the course of experimental work. Therefore it is disconsidered for our purposes.

  7. Nevertheless, determination of V max and the relative activity is not necessary for the fed batch process development.

  8. Similar observations were made in respect to HLADH [35].

  9. For phosphate/citrate buffer solution at pH 5.5 it is 0.0008 h−1.

  10. As reaction volume only the aqueous phase is considered. The organic phase can be regarded as an inert reservoir of substrate. Hence, the real concentration of substrate in the aqueous phase is not increased in the biphasic system [38].

  11. Analytical data of diketo ester 10, hydroxy keto ester 9 and furanone 18 have been published elsewhere [1517].

  12. Analytical data of diketo ester 10, hydroxy keto ester 9 and furanone 18 have been published elsewhere [1517].

References

  1. Manns D (1999) Pharm Unserer Zeit 28:147–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Endo A, Hasumi K (1993) Nat Prod Rep 10:541–550

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Müller M (2005) Angew Chem 117:366–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Müller M (2005) Angew Chem Int Ed 44:362–365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Baumann KL, Butler DE, Deering CF, Mennen KE, Millar A, Nanninga TN, Palmer CW, Roth BD (1992) Tetrahedron Lett 33:2283–2284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wess G, Kesseler K, Baader E, Bartmann W, Beck G, Bergmann A, Jendralla H, Bock K, Holzstein G, Kleine H, Schnierer M (1990) Tetrahedron Lett 31:2545–2548

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Beck G, Jendralla H, Kesseler K (1995) Synthesis 8:1014–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thottathil JK, Pendri Y, Li WS, Kronenthal DR (1994) Squibb & Sons Inc., US 5278313

  9. Mitsuda M, Miyazaki M, Inoue K (2001) Kaneka Corp., EP 1077212

  10. Kizaki N, Yamada Y, Yasohara Y, Nishiyama A, Miyazaki M, Mitsuda M, Kondo T, Ueyama N, Inoue K (2000) Kaneka Corp., EP 1024139

  11. Jennewein S, Schürmann M, Wolberg M, Hilker I, Luiten R, Wubbolts M, Mink D (2006) Biotechnol J 1:537–548

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kierkels JGT, Mink D, Panke S, Lommen FAM, Heemskerk D (2003) DSM, WO 03/006656

  13. Kooistra JMHH, Zeegers HJM, Mink D, Mulders JMCA (2002) DSM, WO 02/06266

  14. Mink D, Wolberg M, Boesten WHJ, Sereinig N (2004) WO 2004/096788

  15. Wolberg M, Hummel W, Wandrey C, Müller M (2000) Angew Chem 112:4476–4478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolberg M, Hummel W, Wandrey C, Müller M (2000) Angew Chem Int Ed 39:4306–4308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wolberg M, Hummel W, Müller M (2001) Chem Eur J 7:4562–4571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Villela Filho M, Stillger T, Müller M, Liese A, Wandrey C (2003) Angew Chem 115:3101–3104 (Preliminary communication)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Villela Filho M, Stillger T, Müller M, Liese A, Wandrey C (2003) Angew Chem Int Ed 42:2993–2996 (Preliminary communication)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Langer P, Krummel T (2000) Chem Commun 967–968

  21. Langer P, Krummel T (2001) Chem Eur J 7:1720–1727

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson DV (1992) Dissertation, University of Exeter, citation, pp 46–47

  23. Huckin SN, Weiler L (1972) Tetrahedron Lett 23:2405–2408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Huckin SN, Weiler L (1974) Can J Chem 52:1343–1351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamaguchi M, Shibato K, Nakashima H, Minami T (1988) Tetrahedron 44:4767–4775

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nahm S, Weinreb SM (1981) Tetrahedron Lett 39:3815–3818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Singh J, Satyamurthi N, Singh Aidhen I (2000) J Prakt Chem 342:340–347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mentzel M, Hoffmann HMR (1997) J Prakt Chem 339:517–524

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Eckstein MF, Lembrecht J, Schumacher J, Eberhard W, Spiess AC, Peters M, Roosen C, Greiner L, Leitner W, Kragl U (2006) Adv Synth Catal 348:1597–1604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kragl U, Niedermeyer U, Kula M-R, Wandrey C (1990) Ann N Y Acad Sci 613:167–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Villela Filho M (2003) Dissertation, University of Bonn

  32. Weckbecker A, Humme W (2006) Biocatal Biotransform 24:380–389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Schubert T, Hummel W, Müller M (2002) Angew Chem 114:656–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Schubert T, Hummel W, Müller M (2002) Angew Chem Int Ed 41:634–637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zaks A, Klibanov AM (1988) J Biol Chem 263:8017–8021

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Cornish-Bowden A (1981) Fundamentals of enzyme kinetics. Butterworth & Co. Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  37. Biselli M, Kragl U, Wandrey C (2002) Reaction Engineering for enzyme-catalyzed biotransformations. In: Drauz K, Waldmann H (eds) Enzyme catalysis in organic synthesis. Wiley, Weinheim, pp 185–257

    Google Scholar 

  38. Carrea G (1984) Biocatalysis in water-organic solvent two-phase systems. Trends Biotechnol 2:102–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Müller.

Additional information

Dedicated to Prof. C. Wandrey on the occasion of his 65th birthday.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolberg, M., Filho, M.V., Bode, S. et al. Chemoenzymatic synthesis of the chiral side-chain of statins: application of an alcohol dehydrogenase catalysed ketone reduction on a large scale. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 31, 183–191 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-008-0205-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-008-0205-9

Keywords

Navigation