Skip to main content
Log in

Transport and deposition processes of the hydrothermal blast of the 6 August 2012 Te Maari eruption, Mt. Tongariro

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Volcanology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 2012 eruption of Tongariro volcano (New Zealand) produced highly mobile, low-temperature, blast-derived pyroclastic density currents after partial collapse of the western flank of the Upper Te Maari crater. Despite a low volume (340,000 m3), the flows traveled up to 2.5 km from source, covering a total area of 6.1 km2. Along one of the blast axes, freshly exposed, proximal-to-distal sedimentary structures and grain-size data suggest emplacement of the fining upward tripartite depositional sequence (massive, stratified, and laminated) under a dilute and strongly longitudinally zoned turbulent density current. While the zoning formed in the deposit in the first 1500 m of runout, the current progressively waned to the extent where it transported a nearly homogenous grain-size mixture at the liftoff position. Our data indicate that after the passage of an erosive flow front, massive unit A was deposited under a rapid-suspension sedimentation regime. Unit B was deposited under a traction-dominated regime generated by a subsequent portion of the flow moving at lower velocities and with lower sediment transport capacity than the portion depositing unit A. The final and slowest flow zone deposited the finest particles under weakly tractive conditions. Transport and emplacement dynamics inferred in this study show strong similarities between hydrothermal explosions, magmatic blasts, and high-energy dilute PDCs. The common occurrence of hydrothermal fields on volcanic flanks points to this hazard being an under-appreciated one at stratovolcanoes worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen JRL, Leeder MR (1980) Criteria for the instability of upper-stage plane beds. Sedimentology 27(2):209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews BJ, Manga M (2012) Experimental study of turbulence, sedimentation, and coignimbrite mass partitioning in dilute pyroclastic density currents. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 225–226:30–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter PJ, Boyle R, Cole P, Neri A, Spence R, Zuccaro G (2005) The impacts of pyroclastic surges on buildings at the eruption of the Soufriere Hills volcano, Montserrat. Bull Volcanol 67(4):292–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belousov A (1996) Deposits of the 30 March 1956 directed blast at Bezymianny Volcano, Kamchatka, Russia. Bull Volcanol 57(8):649–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belousov A, Voight B, Belousova M (2007) Directed blasts and blast-generated pyroclastic density currents: a comparison of the Bezymianny 1956, Mount St Helens 1980, and Soufriere Hills, Montserrat 1997 eruptions and deposits. Bull Volcanol 69(7):701–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belousova M, Belousov A, Patia H, Hoblitt RP (2011) The January 21, 1951 blast of mount lamington in Papua New Guinea: sequence of events and characteristics of the deposits. Am Geophys Union Fall Meet 2011:Abstract V51F-2567

  • Branney M, Kokelaar P (2002) Pyroclastic density currents and the sedimentation of ignimbrites. Geological Society Publishing House, Bath, p 143

    Google Scholar 

  • Breard ECP, Lube G, Cronin SJ, Fitzgerald R, Kennedy B, Scheu B, Montanaro C, White JDL, Tost M, Procter JN, Moebis A (2014) Using the spatial distribution and lithology of ballistic blocks to interpret eruption sequence and dynamics: August 6 2012 Upper Te Maari eruption, New Zealand. J Volcanol Geotherm Res (0)

  • Bursik MI, Kurbatov AV, Sheridan MF, Woods AW (1998) Transport and deposition in the May 18, 1980, Mount St Helens Blast. Flow Geol 26(2):155–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chough SK, Sohn YK (1990) Depositional mechanics and sequences of base surges, Songaksan tuff ring, Cheju Island, Korea. Sedimentology 37(6):1115–1135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke AB, Voight B (2000) Pyroclastic current dynamic pressure from aerodynamics of tree or pole blow-down. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 100(1-4):395–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin SJ, Lube G, Dayudi DS, Sumarti S, Subrandiyo S, Surono (2013) Insights into the October–November 2010 Gunung Merapi eruption (Central Java, Indonesia) from the stratigraphy, volume and characteristics of its pyroclastic deposits. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 261:244–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dade WB (2003) The emplacement of low-aspect ratio ignimbrites by turbulent parent flows. J Geophys Res 108(B4):9

    Google Scholar 

  • Dellino P, Isaia R, Veneruso M (2004) Turbulent boundary layer shear flows as an approximation of base surges at Campi Flegrei (southern Italy). J Volcanol Geotherm Res 133(1-4):211–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dellino P, La Volpe L (2000) Structures and grain size distribution in surge deposits as a tool for modelling the dynamics of dilute pyroclastic density currents at La Fossa di Vulcano (Aeolian Islands, Italy). J Volcanol Geotherm Res 96(1-2):57–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dellino P, Mele D, Bonasia R, Braia G, La Volpe L, Sulpizio R (2005) The analysis of the influence of pumice shape on its terminal velocity. Geophys Res Lett 32(21):4

    Google Scholar 

  • Dellino P, Mele D, Sulpizio R, La Volpe L, Braia G (2008) A method for the calculation of the impact parameters of dilute pyroclastic density currents based on deposit particle characteristics. J Geophys Res 113, B07206. doi:10.1029/2007JB005365

  • Doronzo DM, Dellino P (2013) Hydraulics of subaqueous ash flows as deduced from their deposits: 2. Water entrainment, sedimentation, and deposition, with implications on pyroclastic density current deposit emplacement. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 258:176–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druitt TH (1992) Emplacement of the 18 May 1980, lateral blast deposit ENE of Mount St. Helens, Washington. Bull Volcanol 54(7):554–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druitt TH, Kokelaar BP (2002) The eruption of Soufrière Hills volcano, Montserrat, from 1995 to 1999. Geol Soc London Mem 21:845

    Google Scholar 

  • Efford JT, Bylsma RJ, Clarkson BD, Pittari A, Mauriohooho K, Moon VG (2014) Vegetation dieback as a proxy for temperature within a wet pyroclastic density current: A novel experiment and observations from the 6th of August 2012 Tongariro eruption. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 286:367–372

  • Esposti Ongaro T, Clarke AB, Neri A, Voight B, Widiwijayanti C (2008) Fluid dynamics of the 1997 Boxing Day volcanic blast on Montserrat, West Indies. J Geophys Res 113

  • Esposti Ongaro T, Clarke AB, Voight B, Neri A, Widiwijayanti C (2012) Multiphase flow dynamics of pyroclastic density currents during the May 18, 1980 lateral blast of Mount St. Helens. J Geophys Res 117(B6), B06208

    Google Scholar 

  • Esposti Ongaro T, Widiwijayanti C, Clarke AB, Voight B, Neri A (2011) Multiphase-flow numerical modeling of the 18 May 1980 lateral blast at Mount St. Helens, USA. Geology 39(6):535–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RV (1990) Transport and deposition of a pyroclastic surge across an area of high relief; the 18 May 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens, Washington. Geol Soc Am Bull 102(8):1038–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RV, Smith AL, Roobol MJ (1980) Destruction of St. Pierre, Martinique, by ash-cloud surges, May 8 and 20, 1902. Geology (Boulder) 8(10):472–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RV, Waters AC (1970) Base surge bed forms in maar volcanoes. Am J Sci 268(2):157–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald RH, Tsunematsu K, Kennedy BM, Breard ECP, Lube G, Wilson TM, Jolly AD, Pawson J, Rosenberg MD, Cronin SJ (2014) The application of a calibrated 3D ballistic trajectory model to ballistic hazard assessments at Upper Te Maari, Tongariro. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 286:248–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujinawa A, Ban M, Ohba T, Kontani K, Miura K (2008) Characterization of low-temperature pyroclastic surges that occurred in the northeastern Japan arc during the late 19th century. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 178(1):113–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glicken H, Nakamura Y (1988) Restudy of the 1888 eruption of Bandai Volcano. Japan. Natl. Inst. Res. Advancement, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorshkov GS (1959) Gigantic eruption of the volcano Bezymianny. Bull Volcanol 20:77–109

  • Graettinger AH, Valentine GA, Sonder I (2015b) Circum-crater variability of deposits from discrete, laterally and vertically migrating volcanic explosions: experimental evidence and field implications. J Volcanol Geotherm Res (in press)

  • Graettinger AH, Valentine GA, Sonder I, Ross P-S, White JDL (2015b) Facies distribution of ejecta in analog tephra rings from experiments with single and multiple subsurface explosions. Bull Volcanol 77:66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graettinger AH, Valentine GA, Sonder I, Ross PS, White JDL, Taddeucci J (2014) Maar-diatreme geometry and deposits; subsurface blast experiments with variable explosion depth. Geochem Geophys Geosyst - G3 15(3):740–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeon YM, Kwon CW, Sohn YK (2011) Deposition from pyroclastic surges partially blocked by a topographic obstacle; an example from the Ilchulbong tuff cone, Jeju Island, Korea. Geosci J (Seoul) 15(2):121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolly AD, Jousset P, Lyons JJ, Carniel R, Fournier N, Fry B, Miller C (2014) Seismo-acoustic evidence for an avalanche driven phreatic eruption through a beheaded hydrothermal system: an example from the 2012 Tongariro eruption. J Volcanol Geotherm Res (0)

  • Kieffer SW (1981) Fluid dynamics of the May 18 blast at Mount St. Helens. U. S. Geol Surv Prof Pap 379–400

  • Komorowski J-C, Jenkins S, Baxter PJ, Picquout A, Lavigne F, Charbonnier S, Gertisser R, Preece K, Cholik N, Budi-Santoso A, Surono (2013) Paroxysmal dome explosion during the Merapi 2010 eruption: processes and facies relationships of associated high-energy pyroclastic density currents. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 261:260–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lajoie J, Boudon G, Bourdier JL (1989) Depositional mechanics of the 1902 pyroclastic nuee-ardente deposits of Mt. Pelee, Martinique. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 38(1-2):131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipman PW, Mullineaux DRE (1981) The 1980 eruptions of Mount St. Helens, Washington. U. S. Geol Surv Prof Pap 844–844

  • Lube G, Breard ECP, Cronin SJ, Procter JN, Brenna M, Moebis A, Pardo N, Stewart RB, Jolly A, Fournier N (2014) Dynamics of surges generated by hydrothermal blasts during the 6 August 2012 Te Maari eruption, Mt. Tongariro, New Zealand. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 286:348–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton GV (1967) Experiments on density and turbidity currents: III. Deposition of sediment. Can J Earth Sci Rev Can Sci Terre 4(3):475–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton GV, Neal WJ (1989) Experiments on the thickness of beds deposited by turbidity currents. J Sediment Petrol 59(2):297–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Procter JN, Cronin SJ, Zernack AV, Lube G, Stewart RB, Nemeth K, Keys H (2014) Debris flow evolution and the activation of an explosive hydrothermal system; Te Maari, Tongariro, New Zealand. J Volcanol Geotherm Res (0)

  • Schmincke HU, Fisher RV, Waters AC (1973) Antidune and chute and pool structures in the base surge deposits of the Laacher See area, Germany. Sedimentology 20(4):553–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigurdsson H, Carey SN, Fisher RV (1987) The 1982 eruption of El Chichon Volcano, Mexico: 3. Physical properties of pyroclastic surges. Bull Volcanol 49(2):467–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohn YK (1997) On traction-carpet sedimentation. J Sediment Res 67(3):502–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohn YK, Chough SK (1989) Depositional processes of the Suwolbong tuff ring, Cheju Island (Korea). Sedimentology 36(5):837–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks RSJ, Barclay J, Calder ES, Herd RA, Komorowski JC, Luckett R, Norton GE, Ritchie LJ, Voight B, Woods AW (2002) Generation of a debris avalanche and violent pyroclastic density current on 26 December (Boxing Day) 1997 at Soufriere Hills Volcano, Montserrat. Memoirs Geol Soc Lond 21:409–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulpizio R, Dellino P (2008) Sedimentology, depositional mechanisms and pulsating behaviour of pyroclastic density currents. In: Martí, J., Gottsman, J. (Eds.) Caldera volcanism: analysis, modelling and response. Developments in Volcanology, 10, Elsevier:57–96

  • Sulpizio R, Dellino P, Doronzo DM, Sarocchi D (2014) Pyroclastic density currents: state of the art and perspectives. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 283:36–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulpizio R, Mele D, Dellino P, La Volpe L (2007) Deposits and physical properties of pyroclastic density currents during complex Subplinian eruptions: the AD 472 (Pollena) eruption of Somma-Vesuvius, Italy. Sedimentology 54(3):607–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine GA (1987) Stratified flow in pyroclastic surges. Bull Volcanol 49(4):616–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine GA (1998) Damage to structures by pyroclastic flows and surges, inferred from nuclear weapons effects. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 87(1-4):117–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voight B (1981) Time scale for the first movements of the May 18 eruption. In: Lipman PW, Mullineaux DR (eds) The 1980 eruptions of Mount St. Helens Washington. US Geol Surv Prof Pap 1250:69–86

  • Voight B, Komorowski JC, Norton GE, Belousov AB, Belousova M, Boudon G, Francis PW, Franz W, Heinrich P, Sparks RSJ, Young SR (2002) The 26 December (Boxing Day) 1997 sector collapse and debris avalanche at Soufriere Hills Volcano, Montserrat. Memoirs Geol Soc Lond 21:363–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker GPL, Hayashi JN, Self S (1995) Travel of pyroclastic flows as transient waves: implications for the energy line concept and particle-concentration assessment. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 66(1-4):265–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohletz KH (1998) Pyroclastic surges and compressible two-phase flow. Dev Volcanol 247–312

  • Wohletz KH, Sheridan MF (1979) A model of pyroclastic surge. Spec Pap Geol Soc Am 180:177–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto T, Nakamura Y, Glicken H (1999) Pyroclastic density current from the 1888 phreatic eruption of Bandai Volcano, NE Japan. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 90(3-4):191–207

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the New Zealand Department of Conservation and Dr. Harry Keys for his support to carry out mapping of the August 6, 2012 deposits. Roberto Sulpizio and an anonymous reviewer provided thoughtful reviews and allowed us to clarify the observations and interpretations presented in the manuscript. This study was partially supported by the Marsden Fund grant MAU0906 through the Royal Society of New Zealand and NZ Natural Hazards Research Platform C05X0907.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. C. P. Breard.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: R.J. Brown

Appendix

Appendix

Method for estimation of the total blast grain-size distribution

The total grain-size distribution was computed for each PDC unit (A, B, and C) and ballistic grain-size distributions using a total of 24 sampling locations inside a 5° fan bracketing the WNW axis (Fig. 1d). An axisymmetric geometry was chosen because of the radial spreads of both the PDC flow directionality vectors (Lube et al. 2014; Fig. 1c) and the ballistic block fans (Breard et al. 2014), and because along the WNW axis significant drainage and channeling into topographic lows and deviating from the axisymmetric spreading trend is absent (Lube et al. 2014). PDC deposit grain-size distributions are those introduced in this paper, while ballistic grain-size distributions are those reported in Breard et al. (2014) and Fitzgerald et al. (2014).

The volume of ballistic blocks was estimated as follows:

  1. 1.

    We mapped ballistic craters in the 5° fan and obtained a crater-size distribution.

  2. 2.

    We found an empirical law that relates block and crater diameters (Fig. 13).

    Fig. 13
    figure 13

    Crater diameter versus ballistic block diameter

  3. 3.

    Ballistic blocks were approximated as spheres, allowing us to estimate the total volume of ballistics from the block-size distribution within the fan.

The integration of each grain-size fraction of the PDC deposit was done as follows:

  1. 1.

    We numerically integrated the particle volumetric concentration C of a given size fraction (for a given unit X) noted “ i ” with distance “x” from source: \( {C}_i\left(\mathrm{unit}\;X\right)=\frac{1}{r}*{\displaystyle {\int}_{x=0}^rf\left({C}_i\right)}\;dx \), where r is the final flow runout.

  2. 2.

    The arc length, s, with distance is given by: \( {s}_x=\frac{\theta \ast \pi }{180}\ast x \), where θ is the spreading angle (5°) in degrees.

  3. 3.

    C i of each unit can then be rewritten as:

$$ {C}_i\left(\mathrm{unit}\kern0.5em X\right)=\frac{1}{A_{\mathrm{PDC}}}{\displaystyle {\int}_{x=0}^rf\left({C}_i\right)*{s}_xdx} $$

where the area of the deposit (A PDC) in the fan is expressed as follows: \( {A}_{\mathrm{PDC}}=\frac{0.5*\theta *\pi }{180}*{r}^2 \).

By calculating the C i for all fractions, we obtained the grain-size distribution of the three units. The total distribution of the PDC has been calculated using the respective volume of each unit A, B, and C. The volume of a certain unit X (V unit X ) is estimated from the area of the fan and from the thickness of the unit T unit X :

$$ \begin{array}{c}\hfill {V}_{\mathrm{unit}\kern0.5em X}={A}_{\mathrm{PDC}}*\frac{1}{r}{\displaystyle {\int}_{x=0}^r{T_{\mathrm{unit}}}_{\kern0.5em X}\kern0.5em dx}\hfill \\ {}\hfill {C}_i\left(\operatorname{PDC}\right)=\frac{C_i\left(\mathrm{unit}\kern0.5em \mathrm{A}\right)*{V}_{\mathrm{unit}\kern0.5em \mathrm{A}}+{C}_i\left(\mathrm{unit}\kern0.5em \mathrm{B}\right)*{V}_{\mathrm{unit}\kern0.5em \mathrm{B}}+{C}_i\left(\mathrm{unit}\kern0.5em \mathrm{C}\right)*{V}_{\mathrm{unit}\kern0.5em \mathrm{C}}}{V_{\mathrm{PDC}}}\hfill \end{array} $$

The full distribution of the blast was estimated from combining total distributions of A, B, C and ballistic blocks. Fine ash, which lifted off as a co-ignimbrite plume, was neglected in the calculation as the fallout had been deposited at further distances.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Breard, E.C.P., Lube, G., Cronin, S.J. et al. Transport and deposition processes of the hydrothermal blast of the 6 August 2012 Te Maari eruption, Mt. Tongariro. Bull Volcanol 77, 100 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-015-0980-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-015-0980-5

Keywords

Navigation