Abstract
Diverse global change processes are reshaping the biogeochemistry of stream ecosystems. Nutrient enrichment is a common stressor that can modify flows of biologically important elements such as carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P) through stream foodwebs by altering the stoichiometric composition of stream organisms. However, enrichment effects on concentrations of other important essential and trace elements in stream taxa are less understood. We investigated shifts in macroinvertebrate ionomes in response to changes in coarse benthic organic matter (CBOM) stoichiometry following N and P enrichment of five detritus-based headwater streams. Concentrations of most elements (17/19) differed among three insect genera (Maccaffertium sp., Pycnopsyche spp., and Tallaperla spp.) prior to enrichment. Genus-specific changes in the body content of: P, magnesium, and sodium (Na) in Tallaperla; P, Na, and cadmium in Pycnopsyche; and P in Maccaffertium were also found across CBOM N:P gradients. These elements increased in Tallaperla but decreased in the other two taxa due to growth dilution at larger body sizes. Multivariate elemental differences were found across all taxa, and ionome-wide shifts with dietary N and P enrichment were also observed in Tallaperla and Pycnopsyche. Our results show that macroinvertebrates exhibit distinct differences in elemental composition beyond C, N, and P and that the ionomic composition of common stream taxa can vary with body size and N and P enrichment. Thus, bottom-up changes in N and P supplies could potentially influence the cycling of lesser studied biologically essential elements in aquatic environments by altering their relative proportions in animal tissues.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The biogeochemistry of stream ecosystems is currently being altered in myriad ways, including increases in alkalinity, heavy metals, and nutrients (Ferreira et al. 2016; Kaushal et al. 2018; Wurtsbaugh et al. 2019). Elevated concentrations of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) are arguably the most ubiquitous changes, affecting a large proportion of global rivers and streams (USEPA 2016; UNEP 2019). Nutrient loading can impact streams by altering the relative proportions of biologically essential elements in producer and consumer tissues and modifying their flows through aquatic foodwebs (Cross et al. 2003; Singer and Battin 2007; Evans-White et al. 2009; Morse et al. 2012; Johnson et al. 2013). Further, these changes can also influence a variety of ecosystem functions including primary production, secondary production, decomposition rate, and whole-stream metabolism (Cross et al. 2006; Scott et al. 2008; Woodward et al. 2012; Dodds and Smith 2016; Demi et al. 2018; Kominoski et al. 2018). As these responses are collectively governed by bottom-up changes in elemental mass balance, it is critical to understand how N and P enrichment affects both organismal and ecosystem-level processes.
Significant progress towards this goal has been made by using the theory of ecological stoichiometry to study the effects of nutrient availability on stream ecosystems. Here, we focus on detritus-based streams where increased dissolved N and P inputs can stimulate microbial production (Gulis and Suberkropp 2003; Baldy et al. 2007; Suberkropp et al. 2010) and immobilization of these nutrients typically decreases detrital C:N and C:P ratios (Cross et al. 2003; Webster et al. 2009; Scott et al. 2013; Danger et al. 2016). This microbial conditioning reduces stoichiometric N and P imbalances between detrital basal food resources and detritivorous macroinvertebrates, providing higher quality food resources to consumers (Frost et al. 2002; Cross et al. 2005). Once assimilated, dietary N and P are used to build key biomolecules such as proteins and ribonucleic acids (Elser et al. 1996) that are in-turn used to construct new macroinvertebrate biomass, sometimes resulting in altered consumer body stoichiometry under excess nutrient supplies (Cross et al. 2003; Small and Pringle 2010; Morse et al. 2012). These changes at lower trophic levels may further propagate up the food web by influencing the nutrition and production of top-level predators in headwater streams (Davis et al. 2010; Bumpers et al. 2015, 2017) suggesting that resource supply stoichiometry is a primary factor controlling flows of C, N, and P through detritus-based ecosystems (Cross et al. 2007; Benstead et al. 2009). Overall, this body of research has revealed the intricate connections between environmental supply of macroelements, organismal metabolism, and ecosystem-level processes and highlights the need to consider these relationships when predicting ecological effects of stream nutrient enrichment.
Despite the substantial progress towards a mechanistic understanding of C, N and P cycling in headwater stream ecosystems, N and P enrichment effects on dynamics of the other ~ 20 inorganic elements that are necessary to sustain life remain understudied. These elements, collectively referred to as the ionome (Salt et al. 2008) or elementome (Peñuelas et al. 2019), play key biological roles including: signal transduction [sodium (Na), potassium (K), and calcium (Ca)], enzyme function [iron (Fe), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), and Ca], and structure (Si and Ca; Frausto da Silva and Williams 2001). Similarly to C, N, and P, they are also connected through complex metabolic networks and can exhibit system-wide proportional changes under differential elemental supplies (e.g., Fe or P; Baxter et al. 2008; Jeyasingh et al. 2017). It is important to stress that most ionomic elements are essential by definition and that they have been demonstrated to limit biological production in organisms ranging from single-celled bacteria up to large vertebrates, including humans (Watanabe et al. 1997; Frausto da Silva and Williams 2001; Soetan et al. 2010). Thus, although comprising a relatively minor proportion of total body mass, changes in these elements in response to nutrient enrichment could have disproportionately strong effects on organismal metabolism. Nevertheless, the ecological importance of relatively few ionomic elements has been explored until recently due to a predominant focus on the law of the minimum and its emphasis on single macronutrient limitation (Kaspari and Powers 2016).
Pioneering work examining the influence of altered nutrient supply on organismal ionomes began in model plant systems (Baxter et al. 2008), and these effects are increasingly being studied in metazoans. For example, N- and P-limitation may alter the composition of several elements including manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), and zinc (Zn) in both marine cyanobacteria and freshwater bacterial isolates (Twining et al. 2010; Jeyasingh et al. 2017). Ionomic shifts have also been detected in the aquatic consumer Daphnia (Jeyasingh et al. 2020) and in terrestrial weevil larvae (Ji et al. 2017) grown across dietary P gradients. When N and P supplies are sufficient, Na enrichment can increase insect abundance and diversity in tallgrass prairies (Prather et al. 2018). Ecologically relevant variation can also be found at higher trophic levels as ionomic differences have been documented across species and ontogenic stages of salamanders (Prater et al. 2019) and in threespine sticklebacks where morphological and ionomic adaptation to marine vs. freshwater environments can influence fish elemental uptake and excretion (Rudman et al. 2019). Like early stoichiometric work, these studies separately demonstrate correlations among environmental elemental supplies, consumer elemental composition, phylogeny/taxonomy, and phenotypic traits. However, our understanding of how consumer ionomic responses to dietary food quality influence higher-order ecological dynamics remains limited. To this end, taxon-specific differences in consumer ionomes under variable nutrient supplies can be explored to help advance our multi-elemental view of consumer ecology.
Here, we examined the effects of stream nutrient enrichment on the ionomes of three macroinvertebrate taxa: Maccaffertium sp. (Order Ephemeroptera), Pycnopsyche spp. (Tricoptera), and Tallaperla spp. (Plecoptera) using animals collected during a dissolved N and P addition experiment (Rosemond et al. 2015). Based on empirical tests of stoichiometric theory, we expected macroinvertebrate ionomes to differ with nutrient enrichment (hypothesis H1) but that these effects would largely depend on taxonomy (H2; Cross et al. 2003; Evans-White et al. 2005; González et al. 2018) and organismal body size (H3; Back and King 2013). We tested predictions that study organisms would show neutral or positive relationships between dietary and macroinvertebrate body N and P content and that these responses would be correlated with genus-specific ionomic changes. We also tested predictions that macroinvertebrate N, P, and other elements (excluding C) would be negatively related to body size (i.e., through growth dilution). Finally, we quantified the extent of ionomic differences among taxa and explored the potential for macroinvertebrate ionomic shifts in response to N and P enrichment to influence higher-order ecological processes by altering the production and community composition of these taxa in study streams.
Methods
Study sites, nutrient enrichment, and sample collection
We collected coarse benthic organic matter (CBOM) samples and macroinvertebrates as part of an experimental five-stream manipulative study conducted at the U.S.D.A Forest Service Coweeta Hydrological Laboratory, which serves as a long-term ecological research site in southwestern North Carolina, US. Study streams were located in the Dryman Fork watershed, which is a heavily forested and low-nutrient catchment (Rosemond et al. 2015). All streams shared similar topography, riparian vegetation, and physio-chemical properties and did not differ in macroinvertebrate abundance or biomass pre-enrichment (Bumpers et al. 2015; Manning et al. 2016; Demi et al. 2018).
Stream enrichment methods in these sites have been detailed extensively (Bumpers et al. 2015; Rosemond et al. 2015), but briefly, data for the current study were collected during one pre-enrichment year (July 2010–2011) and during 1 year of experimental dissolved N and P additions (July 2011–2012). We manipulated stream N:P ratios by dripping dissolved N (NH4NO3) and P (H3PO4) into 70-m stream reaches at discharge-weighted concentrations. Dissolved molar N:P target ratios of 2:1, 8:1, 16:1, 32:1, and 128:1 were achieved by covarying both N (81–650 μg L−1) and P (90–11 μg L−1) concentrations. We collected leaf litter CBOM at monthly intervals from each stream (Demi et al. 2018). Stream CBOM was collected across the entire wetted channel width from eight randomly selected 0.15 m transects, transported back to the laboratory at 4 °C, and dried at 60 °C for at least 24 h. We collected macroinvertebrates randomly during the first year of enrichment and 9 months post enrichment either by hand or D-frame net. Fresh specimens were sorted in the field, returned to the laboratory, and allowed to clear their guts for 24 h. Then, they were identified to genus and measured (total body length) to the nearest mm under at least 10 × magnification on a stereoscopic microscope affixed with a graduated stage. Animals were separated by size-classes, placed into trace-clean polyethylene tubes, and frozen. Frozen animals were later lyophilized for a minimum of 24 h.
We used mean annual CBOM N:P as our metric of nutrient enrichment to integrate temporal variation in resource quality over the course of pre and post-enrichment periods. We focused on leaf material N:P rather than dissolved nutrients because macroinvertebrates are known to obtain N and P from their diets rather than from dissolved uptake and detrital material represented the primary dietary material flows to all study taxa across both years (Demi et al. 2020; Supplementary Table 1). While all study taxa are primarily detritivores, it is important to note that there were smaller portions of other food resource items in the guts of animals collected alongside our study specimens (Demi et al. 2020). Similarly, there are also differences in functional feeding groups among these taxa as the Pycnopsyche and Tallaperla are classified as shredding macroinvertebrates and Maccaffertium are classified as scrapers and facultative collector-gatherers (Merritt et al. 2008). As discussed below, these factors are likely related to taxonomic differences in macroinvertebrate ionomes.
Sample analyses
We ground CBOM samples into powder and measured N content of subsamples using an elemental analyzer (Carlo Erba NA 1500; Milan, Italy). We measured subsample P content by combustion (500 °C) and acid digestion of CBOM material followed by standard colorimetric/spectrophotometric P analysis (Allen 1974; APHA 1992). To minimize ontogenic effects on macroinvertebrate elemental profiles and to generate complete profiles on single individuals when possible (~ 50% of all measurements for Pycnopsyche and Tallaperla), we conducted elemental analyses on the largest specimens available for each taxon. All other measurements were conducted on composite tissues from 2–3 organisms from the same 1 mm size class.
Before conducting elemental analyses, we homogenized macroinvertebrate tissues in separate tubes using a motorized pestle. We then measured the C and N content from a subsample of each tube using a vario MICRO cube analyzer (Elemental Americas Inc., Mt. Laurel, NJ). Separate subsamples were digested using trace a 2:1 v/v solution of trace-metal grade nitric acid and hydrogen peroxide for a minimum of 24 h or until all tissues were completely dissolved. Following digestion, we diluted each sample with 10 ml of trace metal grade water and measured elemental profiles through inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES; Thermo Scientific iCAP 7400, Waltham, MA). All elemental concentrations were then divided by the subsample mass to express elemental composition as percentages. In all, we generated 80 ionomic profiles from taxa representing 3 common aquatic insect orders: Maccaffertium (N = 22), Tallaperla (N = 30), and Pycnopsyche (N = 28). These profiles consisted of estimates of 19 total elements: aluminum (Al), barium (Ba), C, Ca, cadmium (Cd), cobalt (Co), Cu, Fe, potassium (K), lithium (Li), magnesium (Mg), Mn, N, Na, P, sulfur (S), Si, strontium (Sr), and Zn. Limits of detection for ICP analyses are reported in Supplementary Table 2.
Statistical Analyses: To test the hypothesized effects of dietary N:P enrichment (H1), taxonomy (H2), and body size (H3) on macroinvertebrate elemental composition, we conducted a series of complementary analyses. Beginning with univariate tests, we contrasted elemental differences among genera (H2) using data from pre-enrichment animals only. Then, we examined genus-specific responses to dietary N:P enrichment (H1) and the influence of body size (H3) on organismal elemental composition using both pre and post-enrichment animals combined. Finally, we demonstrated how both of these factors were related to full ionomic changes in multivariate space using combined pre and post-enrichment datasets.
Prior to running parametric statistics, all elemental percentages were log transformed to better meet normality and variance assumptions (Goos et al. 2017; Prater et al. 2019). To compare taxonomic differences in elemental composition prior to enrichment, we first ran a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post hoc least squares mean t-tests among genera with significant differences determined by P values that were Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons (P < 0.05/3 = 0.017). We also used this procedure to test for differences in macroinvertebrate body size between pre-enrichment and enrichment years for each genus.
To contrast the relative influence of taxonomic differences and CBOM N:P enrichment on invertebrate elemental composition, we ran separate univariate mixed effects models for each element including the fixed effects g for genus, e for CBOM N:P, and g × e for genus × CBOM N:P interactions using combined pre and post-enrichment data. We also included body size b and genus × body size interactions g × b as fixed effects to test and control for effects of our intentional specimen size-selection procedure. Stream s was added as a random effect to account for non-independence of errors between elemental measurements on genera collected from the same stream, yielding a final model equation of:
This model was retained for all elements showing significant b or g × b effects, but was simplified to:
using backward selection for elements unaffected by body size according to Zuur et al. (2009). For elements showing significant g × e effects after Bonferroni correction, we quantified genus-specific responses to food quality of each taxon across CBOM N:P gradients using the mixed effect model:
removing the term b when insignificant. Please note that, while all statistics were conducted on transformed data, untransformed elemental concentrations are reported in tables and figures for ease of interpretation and to facilitate comparisons across studies.
To examine multivariate changes in consumer ionomic profiles, we conducted principal components analysis (PCA) on combined pre and post-enrichment datasets. This analysis was performed using a correlational matrix, which standardizes variables to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of one to control for large differences in elemental concentration and variation within the dataset (Quinn and Keough 2002). We selected the optimal number of PCA components to retain using a broken-stick method (Jackson 1993). Eigen vector arrows depict the relative strength of relationships between each element and principle component. To facilitate visual interpretation of macroinvertebrate ionomes, PCA scores (i.e., individual points for each specimen measured shown in Euclidian space) were standardized by the square root of their eigen values (Oksanen et al. 2019).
To complement these ordinations, we first tested for ionomic differences among genera by comparing their PC scores while controlling for random stream effects using a mixed linear model. Then, we examined genus-specific ionomic changes across food quality gradients using Eq. 3. Finally, we contrasted variation in ionomic profiles vs. stoichiometric ratios among taxa using percentage differences of mean PCA centroids and mean C:N, C:P, and N:P ratios for each taxon. All statistics were conducted in R (version 3.5.3) using the package lme4 (Bates et al. 2015) for mixed models and vegan for PCA (Oksanen et al. 2019).
Results
There were significant taxonomic differences in elemental composition for all but two elements (Ca and P) prior to enrichment. Tallaperla and Maccaffertium had the highest body N content, and Tallaperla %C was higher than the other two taxa (Table 1). The relative proportions of other elements also differed with Maccaffertium having the highest body content of most elements including Cd, Cu, Fe, S, and Si whereas Pycnopsyche showed the highest proportions of Ba, K, and Mn.
In addition to elemental differences among taxa, N and P enrichment and body size affected macroinvertebrate elemental composition. Body Ba and S content increased similarly across CBOM N:P gradients in all taxa (Table 2). However, there were also genus-specific responses to dietary N and P enrichment. Tallaperla showed decreased %P, Mg, and Na at higher food N:P ratios (Fig. 1). In contrast, Pycnopsyche body P, Cd, and Na content and Maccaffertium %P increased across these gradients. We were unable to identify any other univariate elemental changes due to high within-stream variance in macroinvertebrate elemental composition. Part of this variation could be explained by body size effects (Table 2), as concentrations of most elements were negatively related to body size in all taxa. However, %C increased in larger Maccaffertium and Pycnopsyche but stayed relatively consistent in Tallaperla. Body %P, Ca, Mg, and Zn increased with body size in Tallaperla while either decreasing (Ca and Mg) or not changing (Zn) in the other two taxa. It is important to note that body size was not related to nutrient enrichment, as body size did not differ between pre and post-enrichment years for any genus (Maccaffertium, P = 0.610; Pycnopsyche, P = 0.973; Tallaperla, P = 0.090).
In addition to univariate responses, multivariate ionomic profiles also differed among genera and across dietary nutrient gradients. Principal components analysis explained 71.5% of macroinvertebrate ionomic variation with significant genus differences found across PC’s 1 and 2 (P < 0.001). Tallaperla and Maccaffertium profiles exhibited the most distinct elemental composition and separated out across PC1 (Fig. 2), while Pycnopsyche profiles separated out across PC2 and were positively related to CBOM N:P along this axis (Table 3; Fig. 3c). Macroinvertebrate ionomes showed a greater degree of overlap across PC3 but were differentially influenced by N and P enrichment as PC3 scores of Pycnopsyche decreased and Tallaperla scores increased across CBOM N:P gradients (Fig. 3e).
Body size also affected macroinvertebrate ionomes. Body size variation was strongly related to PC1, where loadings decreased with body size in all taxa (Table 3; Fig. 3b). No body size effects were found for PC2, but body size differentially affected ionomic profiles across PC3 as Maccaffertium and Pycnopsyche scores increased with body size, while Tallaperla scores did not change (Fig. 3f). Since body size and CBOM N:P effects on Tallaperla were orthogonal (i.e., affecting separate axes), body size did not overly influence their PC3 scores. Thus, Tallaperla ionomic changes along this axis are consistent with decreased body %P, Mg, and Na across CBOM N:P gradients reported above and were also associated with decreased Ca, Zn, Sr, and N content in this genus (Figs. 2a and 3e). Similar decreases in these elements along with lower S, Li, and Cu concentrations and higher Ba, K, and Mn content were indicated by changes in Pycnopsyche PC2 scores across CBOM N:P gradients (Figs. 2b and 3c). However, body size differences across PC3 masked nutrient enrichment effects along this axis for Pycnopsyche and likely explain our inability to detect CBOM N and P enrichment effects on Maccaffertium ionomes (Fig. 3f).
Discussion
This study documented ionomic variation in three common macroinvertebrate detritivores collected from streams undergoing N and P enrichment. These genera differed in traditionally studied stoichiometric elements (i.e., C and N) in addition to 15 other elements prior to nutrient enrichment. There were also unique genus-specific changes in elemental composition, as Tallaperla and Pycnopsyche showed ionomic shifts across CBOM N:P gradients, while Maccaffertium elemental concentrations were weakly related to nutrient enrichment due to confounding effects of body size. These results extend previous observations of both taxonomic and body size mediated effects on consumer responses to dietary nutrient content (Cross et al. 2003; Evans-White et al. 2005; Karimi and Folt 2006; Benstead et al. 2014) suggesting that, in addition to N and P, stream nutrient enrichment could potentially alter the cycling of many other biologically essential elements in detritus-based ecosystems.
Macroinvertebrate elemental composition differed substantially across study taxa. While %P was similar among genera before enrichment, Tallaperla had the highest body C content out of the three and higher N content than Maccaffertium, confirming general patterns in macroinvertebrate stoichiometry documented in the region (Cross et al. 2003). Consistent with prior work (Karimi and Folt 2006), there were also taxonomic differences in multivariate macroinvertebrate ionomes that accounted for a considerable amount of elemental variation. Whole ionomic variation was far more extensive than stoichiometric C, N, and P variation across study taxa (Table 4), supporting the idea that multivariate elemental analyses provide a more detailed way for studying taxonomic differences in organismal elemental composition (Peñuelas et al. 2019; Prater et al. 2019). However, it should be noted that ionomic patterns are unlikely to be controlled strictly by taxonomy, as consumer elemental composition is a complex function of life-history trait evolution/expression, consumer nutritional physiology, and feeding behavior—processes themselves which are tied to environmental elemental supplies.
In addition to taxonomy, macroinvertebrate elemental content also differed across resource stoichiometry gradients. Tallaperla body %P was negatively related to CBOM N:P and was higher than the other two groups after nutrient enrichment. Elevated Tallaperla body %P was accompanied by increased %Mg and %Na along with a suite of multivariate changes, illustrating the complex metabolic regulation of ionomes under nutrient enrichment (Baxter et al. 2008). In contrast, Pycnopsyche body P, Cd, and Na content and Maccaffertium body %P was positively related to CBOM N:P. Based on previous work, we expected to see either no change or negative relationships between macroinvertebrate body %P and detrital N:P for these taxa (Cross et al. 2003; Kendrick and Benstead 2013; Halvorson et al. 2019), making it initially difficult to reconcile the positive relationships found in our study. However, upon closer inspection these effects can largely be attributed to artifacts of stochastic body size variation within/among streams.
Body size-stoichiometry relationships are well established in animals (Elser et al. 1996; El-Sabaawi et al. 2012; Back and King 2013) but have only recently started to be explored at the ionomic level (Ma et al. 2015). Incorporating these relationships into ionomic frameworks is essential as they can strongly influence ecological interpretations from field-collected animals. For example, body size-ionome correlations can explain our contradictory findings of increases in Pycnopsyche body P and other correlated elements with CBOM P enrichment across PC2 but opposite patterns across PC3 (Fig. 3). Body size was not correlated to PC2, but it explained > 40% more variation than CBOM enrichment effects on PC3, effectively overriding and masking enrichment effects along this axis. Focusing on PC2, Pycnopsyche body %P changes are consistent with a priori predictions of positive relationships between dietary and organismal N:P, and ionomic responses are remarkably similar to those of Tallaperla. Positive relationships between Pycnopsyche body size and %C and decreases in all other elements across PC3 indicate that ionomic shifts along this axis most likely resulted from growth dilution in larger individuals. Similar patterns across aquatic nutrient gradients have been reported for several macroinvertebrate taxa (Karimi et al. 2010) and seem to also partially explain Maccaffertium ionomic shifts across PC3, highlighting the importance of accounting for body size effects in ionomic studies.
In addition to body size, it is likely that other biological factors also influenced macroinvertebrate elemental composition. Stream CBOM P enrichment did not lead to increased Maccaffertium P content unlike previous observations from the region (Cross et al. 2003). We did confirm higher P content (along with Ca, Mg, and Zn) in larger-sized Tallaperla, but these results are counter to consistent negative relationships between body size and %P reported across several macroinvertebrate orders (Back and King 2013). These inconsistencies along with extensive elemental variation in our study animals suggest that other factors such as sex (Back and King 2013; Goos et al. 2017) or nutrient storage (Bertram et al. 2008) could also play an important role in shaping ionomic composition in these populations. Variation in food preference (or simply stochastic resource availability) is also plausible for Maccaffertium because, while functioning predominately a detritivore in this study, its diatom consumption increased with P enrichment and higher algal biomass in our study streams (Bumpers et al. 2017; Demi et al. 2020). Diatom supplementation may further explain the high Si concentrations in this genus and potentially of other trace elements such as Co, Fe, Al and Cd as well. We cannot properly quantify the effects of dietary shifts within our dataset, but these results reinforce the idea that autotrophic diet supplementation under N and P enrichment can be an important factor affecting animal nutritional ecology in stream food webs (Brett et al. 2017; Crenier et al. 2017).
Higher-order ecological consequences of ionomic changes in consumers have yet to be systematically explored, but there are at least two potential pathways for these changes to occur in our study area. First, macroinvertebrate community production increased with stream N and P enrichment (Demi et al. 2018), but production did not change symmetrically across all taxa as Tallaperla and Maccaffertium production increased more on average than Pycnopsyche (Supplementary Table 3). As Tallaperla and Maccaffertium are the two most common prey items by biomass for an important salamander species in these streams (Desmognathus quadramaculatus), changes in their production and/or elemental composition under nutrient enrichment could feed back to influence nutrition and production of these vertebrate predators (Bumpers et al. 2017). Secondly, previous work has documented negative relationships between body K and Ca composition and excretion in four common taxa in Coweeta streams, including Maccaffertium, which suggests that taxonomic changes in macroinvertebrate communities may alter nutrient cycling in these streams in a stoichiometric manner (Webster and Patten 1979). While preliminary, these observations indicate that in addition to affecting individual elemental composition, N and P enrichment of basal food resources could also alter flows of other elements through detrital foodwebs by differentially affecting production (Demi et al. 2020) and/or excretion of individual genera with distinct elemental phenotypes (Rudman et al. 2019).
In this study, we documented taxonomic differences and changes in macroinvertebrate consumer ionomes across detrital N:P gradients. These observations build on previous stoichiometric work by showing how N and P enrichment can cause shifts in macroinvertebrate communities that could influence the dynamics of other non-typically studied elements in streams. As similar ionomic changes have been reported for many other plant, microbial, and consumer taxa (Baxter et al. 2008; Jeyasingh et al. 2017; Ji et al. 2017), they are likely to play an important role in the cycling of many biologically essential elements. Because of the inherent difficulties in precisely quantifying the ionomic composition of macroinvertebrate diets, we were unable to separate the effects of altered resource N:P from other elemental changes or to investigate the effects of proportional shifts in basal food resource biomass and ionomic composition on macroinvertebrate elemental composition. Since our work was exploratory and relied on specimens previously collected to address different objectives, experiments explicitly designed to manipulate and track flows of these elements through organisms and ecosystems are needed to fully appreciate the effects of N and P enrichment on stream foodwebs. This study adds to the growing body of work demonstrating the importance of extending our focus beyond traditionally studied elements (Jeyasingh et al. 2014, 2017; Kaspari and Powers 2016; Peñuelas et al. 2019) and suggests that, by broadening the scope of elemental ecology, we can gain a more complete understanding of how nutrient enrichment influences organismal metabolism and ultimately shapes ecosystem productivity.
References
Allen SE (ed) (1974) Chemical analyses of ecological materials. Wiley, New York
APHA (1992) APHA Method 4500-P: Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18th edn. American Public Health Associattion, Washington DC
Back JA, King RS (2013) Sex and size matter: ontogenetic patterns of nutrient content of aquatic insects. Freshw Sci 32:837–848. https://doi.org/10.1899/12-181.1
Baldy V, Gobert V, Guerold F et al (2007) Leaf litter breakdown budgets in streams of various trophic status: effects of dissolved inorganic nutrients on microorganisms and invertebrates. Freshw Biol 52:1322–1335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01768.x
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker BM, Walker SC (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Baxter IR, Vitek O, Lahner B et al (2008) The leaf ionome as a multivariable system to detect a plant’s physiological status. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:12081–12086. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804175105
Benstead JP, Rosemond AD, Cross WF et al (2009) Nutrient enrichment alters storage and fluxes of detritus in a headwater stream ecosystem. Ecology 90:2556–2566. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-0862.1
Benstead JP, Hood JM, Whelan NV et al (2014) Coupling of dietary phosphorus and growth across diverse fish taxa: A meta-analysis of experimental aquaculture studies. Ecology 95:2757–2767. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-1859.1
Bertram SM, Bowen M, Kyle M, Schade JD (2008) Extensive natural intraspecific variation in stoichiometric (C:N:P) composition in two terrestrial insect species. J insect Sci 8:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1673/031.008.2601
Brett MT, Bunn SE, Chandra S et al (2017) How important are terrestrial organic carbon inputs for secondary production in freshwater ecosystems? Freshw Biol 62:833–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12909
Bumpers PM, Maerz JC, Rosemond AD, Benstead JP (2015) Salamander growth rates increase along an experimental stream phosphorous gradient. Ecology 96:2994–3004. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1772.1
Bumpers PM, Rosemond AD, Maerz JC, Benstead JP (2017) Experimental nutrient enrichment of forest streams increases energy flow to predators along greener food-web pathways. Freshw Biol 62:1794–1805. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12992
Crenier C, Arce-Funck J, Bec A et al (2017) Minor food sources can play a major role in secondary production in detritus-based ecosystems. Freshw Biol 62:1155–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12933
Cross WF, Benstead JP, Rosemond AD, Wallace JB (2003) Consumer-resource stoichiometry in detritus-based streams. Ecol Lett 6:721–732. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00481.x
Cross WF, Benstead JP, Frost PC, Thomas SA (2005) Ecological stoichiometry in freshwater benthic systems: recent progress and perspectives. Freshw Biol 50:1895–1912. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01458.x
Cross WF, Wallace JB, Rosemond AD, Eggert SL (2006) Whole-system nutrient enrichment increases secondary production in a detrital-based ecosystem. Ecology 87:1556–1565. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1556:WNEISP]2.0.CO;2
Cross WF, Wallace JB, Rosemond AD (2007) Nutrient enrichment reduces constraints on material flows in a detritus-based food web. Ecology 88:2563–2575. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1348.1
Danger M, Gessner MO, Bärlocher F (2016) Ecological stoichiometry of aquatic fungi: current knowledge and perspectives. Fungal Ecol 19:100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2015.09.004
Davis JM, Rosemond AD, Eggert SL et al (2010) Long-term nutrient enrichment decouples predator and prey production. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:121–126. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908497107
Demi LM, Benstead JP, Rosemond AD, Maerz JC (2018) Litter P content drives consumer production in detritus-based streams spanning an experimental N: P gradient. Ecology 99:347–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2118
Demi LM, Benstead JP, Rosemond AD, Maerz JC (2020) Experimental N and P additions relieve stoichiometric constraints on organic-matter flows through five stream food webs. J Anim Ecol 89:1468–1481. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13197
Dodds WK, Smith VH (2016) Nitrogen, phosphorus, and eutrophication in streams. Inl Waters 6:155–164. https://doi.org/10.5268/IW-6.2.909
El-Sabaawi RW, Zandonà E, Kohler TJ et al (2012) Widespread intraspecific organismal stoichiometry among populations of the Trinidadian guppy. Funct Ecol 26:666–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.01974.x
Elser JJ, Dobberfuhl DR, MacKay NA, Schampel JH (1996) Organism size, life history, and N: P stoichiometry: toward a unified view of cellular and ecosystem processes. Bioscience 46:674–684. https://doi.org/10.2307/1312897
Evans-White MA, Stelzer RS, Lamberti GA (2005) Taxonomic and regional patterns in benthic macroinvertebrate elemental composition in streams. Freshw Biol 50:1786–1799. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01455.x
Evans-White MA, Dodds WK, Huggins DG, Baker DS (2009) Thresholds in macroinvertebrate biodiversity and stoichiometry across water-quality gradients in Central Plains (USA) streams. J North Am Benthol Soc 28:855–868. https://doi.org/10.1899/08-113.1
Ferreira V, Koricheva J, Duarte S et al (2016) Effects of anthropogenic heavy metal contamination on litter decomposition in streams—A meta-analysis. Environ Pollut 210:261–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.12.060
Frausto da Silva JJR, Williams RJP (2001) The biological chemistry of the elements, 2nd edn. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford
Frost PC, Stelzer RS, Lamberti GA, Elser JJ (2002) Ecological stoichiometry of trophic interactions in the benthos: understanding the role of C:N: P ratios in lentic and lotic habitats. J North Am Benthol Soc 21:515–528. https://doi.org/10.2307/1468427
González AL, Céréghino R, Dézerald O et al (2018) Ecological mechanisms and phylogeny shape invertebrate stoichiometry: a test using detritus-based communities across Central and South America. Funct Ecol 32:2448–2463. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13197
Goos JM, Cothran RD, Jeyasingh PD (2017) Within-population variation in the chemistry of life: the stoichiometry of sexual dimorphism in multiple dimensions. Evol Ecol 31:635–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-017-9900-9
Gulis V, Suberkropp K (2003) Interaction between stream fungi and bacteria associated with decomposing leaf litter at different levels of nutrient availability. Aquat Microb Ecol 30:149–157. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame030149
Halvorson HM, Fuller CL, Entrekin SA et al (2019) Interspecific homeostatic regulation and growth across aquatic invertebrate detritivores: a test of ecological stoichiometry theory. Oecologia 190:229–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04409-w
Jackson DA (1993) Stopping rules in principal components analysis: a comparison of heuristical and statistical approaches. Ecology 74:2204–2214. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939574
Jeyasingh PD, Cothran RD, Tobler M (2014) Testing the ecological consequences of evolutionary change using elements. Ecol Evol 4:528–538. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.950
Jeyasingh PD, Goos JM, Thompson SK et al (2017) Ecological stoichiometry beyond Redfield: an ionomic perspective on elemental homeostasis. Front Microbiol 8:722. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00722
Jeyasingh PD, Goos JM, Lind PP et al (2020) Phosphorus supply shifts the quotas of multiple elements in algae and Daphnia: ionomic basis of stoichiometric constraints. Ecol Lett 23:1064–1072. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13505
Ji H, Du B, Liu C (2017) Elemental stoichiometry and compositions of weevil larvae and two acorn hosts under natural phosphorus variation. Sci Rep 7:45810. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45810
Johnson RC, Jin HS, Carreiro MM, Jack JD (2013) Macroinvertebrate community structure, secondary production and trophic-level dynamics in urban streams affected by non-point-source pollution. Freshw Biol 58:843–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12090
Karimi R, Folt CL (2006) Beyond macronutrients: element variability and multielement stoichiometry in freshwater invertebrates. Ecol Lett 9:1273–1283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00979.x
Karimi R, Fisher NS, Folt CL (2010) Multielement stoichiometry in aquatic invertebrates: when growth dilution matters. Am Nat 176:699–709. https://doi.org/10.1086/657046
Kaspari M, Powers JS (2016) Biogeochemistry and geographical ecology: embracing all twenty-five elements required to build organisms. Am Nat 188:S62–S73. https://doi.org/10.1086/687576
Kaushal SS, Likens GE, Pace ML et al (2018) Freshwater salinization syndrome on a continental scale. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115:E574–E583. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711234115
Kendrick MR, Benstead JP (2013) Temperature and nutrient availability interact to mediate growth and body stoichiometry in a detritivorous stream insect. Freshw Biol 58:1820–1830. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12170
Kominoski JS, Rosemond AD, Benstead JP et al (2018) Experimental nitrogen and phosphorus additions increase rates of stream ecosystem respiration and carbon loss. Limnol Oceanogr 63:22–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10610
Ma S, Lee S, Kim EB et al (2015) Organization of the mammalian ionome according to organ origin, lineage specialization and longevity. Cell Rep 13:1319–1326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.03.040
Manning DWP, Rosemond AD, Gulis V et al (2016) Convergence of detrital stoichiometry predicts thresholds of nutrient-stimulated breakdown in streams. Ecol Appl 26:1745–1757. https://doi.org/10.1890/15-1217.1
Merritt RW, Cummins KW, Berg MB (eds) (2008) An Introduction to the aquatic insects of North America, 4th edn. Kendall Hunt, Dubuque
Morse NB, Wollheim WM, Benstead JP, McDowell WH (2012) Effects of suburbanization on foodweb stoichiometry of detritus-based streams. Freshw Sci 31:1202–1213. https://doi.org/10.1899/12-004.1
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M et al (2019) vegan: community ecology package. R package: v.2.5-6. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html
Peñuelas J, Fernández-Martínez M, Ciais P et al (2019) The bioelements, the elementome, and the biogeochemical niche. Ecology 100:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2652
Prater C, Scott DE, Lance SL et al (2019) Understanding variation in salamander ionomes: a nutrient balance approach. Freshw Biol 64:294–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13216
Prather CM, Laws AN, Cuellar JF et al (2018) Seeking salt: herbivorous prairie insects can be co-limited by macronutrients and sodium. Ecol Lett 21:1467–1476. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13127
Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Rosemond AD, Benstead JP, Bumpers PM et al (2015) Experimental nutrient additions accelerate terrestrial carbon loss from stream ecosystems. Science 347:1142–1145. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1958
Rudman SM, Goos JM, Burant JB et al (2019) Ionome and elemental transport kinetics shaped by parallel evolution in threespine stickleback. Ecol Lett 22:645–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13225
Salt DE, Baxter I, Lahner B (2008) Ionomics and the study of the plant ionome. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:709–733. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092942
Scott JT, Back JA, Taylor JM, King RS (2008) Does nutrient enrichment decouple algal–bacterial production in periphyton? J North Am Benthol Soc 27:332–344. https://doi.org/10.1899/07-108.1
Scott EE, Prater C, Norman E et al (2013) Leaf-litter stoichiometry is affected by streamwater phosphorus concentrations and litter type. Freshw Sci 32:753–761. https://doi.org/10.1899/12-215.1
Singer GA, Battin TJ (2007) Anthropogenic subsidies alter stream consumer—resource stoichiometry, biodiversity, and food chains. Ecol Appl 17:376–389. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-0229
Small GE, Pringle CM (2010) Deviation from strict homeostasis across multiple trophic levels in an invertebrate consumer assemblage exposed to high chronic phosphorus enrichment in a Neotropical stream. Oecologia 162:581–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1489-4
Soetan KO, Olaiya CO, Oyewole OE (2010) The importance of mineral elements for humans, domestic animals and plants: a review. African J Food Sci 4:200–222. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-017-0116-y
Suberkropp K, Gulis V, Rosemond AD, Benstead JP (2010) Ecosystem and physiological scales of microbial responses to nutrients in a detritus-based stream: results of a 5-year continuous enrichment. Limnol Oceanogr 55:149–160. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.1.0149
Twining BS, Nun D, Vogt S et al (2010) Variations in Synechococcus cell quotas of phosphorus, sulfur, manganese, iron, nickel, and zinc within mesoscale eddies in the Sargasso Sea. Limnol Ocean 55:492–506. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.2.0492
UNEP (2019) Global Environmental Outlook (GEO6): healthy planet. Healthy People, Cambridge
USEPA (2016) National rivers and streams assessment: a collaborative survey (EPA/841/R-16/007), Washington, DC. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-03/documents/nrsa_0809_march_2_final.pdf
Watanabe T, Kiron V, Satoh S (1997) Aquaculture trace minerals in fish nutrition. Aquaculture 151:185–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(96)01503-7
Webster JR, Patten BC (1979) Effects of watershed perturbation on stream potassium and calcium dynamics. Ecol Monogr 49:51–72. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942572
Webster JR, Newbold JD, Thomas SA et al (2009) Nutrient uptake and mineralization during leaf decay in streams—a model simulation. Int Rev Hydrobiol 94:372–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.200811158
Woodward G, Gessner MO, GIller PS et al (2012) Continental-scale effects of nutrient pollution on stream ecosystem functioning. Science 336:1438–1440
Wurtsbaugh WA, Paerl HW, Dodds WK (2019) Nutrients, eutrophication and harmful algal blooms along the freshwater to marine continuum. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 6:1–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1373
Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ et al (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York
Acknowledgements
We thank J. Benstead for providing access to macroinvertebrate specimens and production data, along with R. Sherman, P. Lind, and J. Goos for help generating consumer elemental profiles. We also thank J. Kominoski, D. Manning, and K. Norris for their efforts in maintaining the nutrient addition infrastructure throughout the experiment and acknowledge these researchers along with J. Coombs for their role in collecting, processing, and analyzing the leaf litter stoichiometry samples. C. Tran assisted with the collection and processing of the macroinvertebrate samples. We thank D. Plank and The Andersons Inc. for donating the ammonium nitrate, as well as R. Case, D. Hutcheson, and K. Simpson of YSI Integrated Systems and Services for engineering the project infrastructure. We also thank A. Conine and S. Wenger for statistical consultation. Comments from two anonymous reviewers and feedback from R. Hall greatly helped to improve the manuscript. This study was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF; DEB‐0918904 to J. P. Benstead, DEB‐0918894 to A. D. Rosemond) and leveraged logistical support from the CWT LTER program at the University of Georgia, which was supported by an NSF award DEB‐0823293 (J. C. Maerz co‐PI). Ionomic analyses were facilitated by an NSF grant to P. D. Jeyasingh (IOS-1256867).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ADR and collaborators designed the original field study from which experimental animals were collected. CP, PDJ, and ADR designed the current study. ADR, PMB, and LMB conducted the field experiments and collected animals. CP and PDJ conducted the ionomic analyses, and CP analysed the data. CP and PDJ drafted the initial manuscript and received substantial input on data analyses and manuscript synthesis from all other authors.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Robert O. Hall .
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Prater, C., Bumpers, P.M., Demi, L.M. et al. Differential responses of macroinvertebrate ionomes across experimental N:P gradients in detritus-based headwater streams. Oecologia 193, 981–993 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04720-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04720-x