Abstract
Plant–soil feedback is one of the mechanisms affecting co-existence of species, ecological succession, and species invasiveness. However, in contrast to conspecific plant–soil feedback, general patterns in heterospecific feedback are mostly unknown. We used a meta-analysis to search for correlations between heterospecific feedback and species relatedness, functional traits, and field co-occurrence patterns. We searched published literature and compiled a data set of 618 PSF interactions. We gathered data on species traits reflecting plant size and growth rate (height, specific leaf area, and life span), co-occurrence in habitats and phylogenetic distance between species pairs. We found that species grew better in soil conditioned by (i) close relatives than in conspecific soil, whereas there was no relationship with phylogeny for distantly related species, (ii) species of greater plant height (but there was no relationship with species SLA or life span), and (iii) species more frequently co-occurring in the field. The results show that heterospecific plant–soil feedback can be explained by plant traits (height) and is reflected in co-occurrence patterns. Phylogeny was a significant predictor of feedbacks over short phylogenetic distance, suggesting fast evolution of traits related to feedback. The low variability explained by the models, however, indicates that other factors such as environmental conditions possibly alter plant–soil feedback responses.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerly D (2009) Conservatism and diversification of plant functional traits: evolutionary rates versus phylogenetic signal. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:19699–19706. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901635106
Adler PB, Fajardo A, Kleinhesselink AR, Kraft NJB (2013) Trait-based tests of coexistence mechanisms. Ecol Lett 16:1294–1306. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12157
Agrawal AA, Kotanen PM, Mitchell CE, Power AG, Godsoe W, Klironomos J (2005) Enemy release? An experiment with congeneric plant pairs and diverse above- and belowground enemies. Ecology 86:2979–2989. https://doi.org/10.1890/05-0219
Augspurger CK, Wilkinson HT (2007) Host specificity of pathogenic Pythium species: implications for tree species diversity. Biotropica 39:702–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00326.x
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Bauer J, Mack K, Bever J (2015) Plant–soil feedbacks as drivers of succession: evidence from remnant and restored tallgrass prairies. Ecosphere 6:158. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00480.1
Baxendale C, Orwin KH, Poly F, Pommier T, Bardgett RD (2014) Are plant–soil feedback responses explained by plant traits? New Phytol 204:408–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12915
Bennett JA, Maherali H, Reinhart KO, Lekberg Y, Hart MM, Klironomos J (2017) Plant–soil feedbacks and mycorrhizal type influence temperate forest population dynamics. Science 355:181–184. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aai8212
Bever JD, Westover KM, Antonovics J (1997) Incorporating the soil community into plant population dynamics: the utility of the feedback approach. J Ecol 85:561–573. https://doi.org/10.2307/2960528
Bever JD, Dickie IA, Facelli E, Facelli JM, Klironomos J, Rillig MC, Stock WD, Tibbett M, Zobel M (2010) Rooting theories of plant community ecology in microbial interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 8:468–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.05.004
Bezemer TM, Lawson CS, Hedlund K, Edwards AR, Brook AJ, Igual JM, Mortimer SR, Van Der Putten WH (2006) Plant species and functional group effects on abiotic and microbial soil properties and plant–soil feedback responses in two grasslands. J Ecol 94:893–904. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01158.x
Bradley JD, Gilbert GS, Martiny JBH (2008) Pathogens promote plant diversity through a compensatory response. Ecol Lett 11:461–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01162.x
Brinkman EP, Van der Putten WH, Bakker E-J, Verhoeven KJF (2010) Plant–soil feedback: experimental approaches, statistical analyses and ecological interpretations. J Ecol 98:1063–1073. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01695.x
Burns JH, Strauss SY (2011) More closely related species are more ecologically similar in an experimental test. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:5302–5307. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1013003108
Chamberlain SA, Hovick SM, Dibble CJ, Rasmussen NL, Van Allen BG, Maitner BS, Ahern JR, Bell-Dereske LP, Roy CL, Meza-Lopez M, Carrillo J, Siemann E, Lajeunesse MJ, Whitney KD (2012) Does phylogeny matter? Assessing the impact of phylogenetic information in ecological meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 15:627–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01776.x
Chesson P (2000) Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:343–366. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343
Chytrý M, Otýpková Z (2003) Plot sizes used for phytosociological sampling of European vegetation. J Veg Sci 14:563–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02183.x
Chytrý M, Rafajová M (2003) Czech National Phytosociological Database: basic statistics of the available vegetation-plot data. Preslia 75:1–15
Chytrý M, Pyšek P, Tichý L, Knollová I, Danihelka J (2005) Invasions by alien plants in the Czech Republic: a quantitative assessment across habitats. Preslia 77:339–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01398.x
de Vries FT, Manning P, Tallowin JRB, Mortimer SR, Pilgrim ES, Harrison KA, Hobbs PJ, Quirk H, Shipley B, Cornelissen JHC, Kattge J, Bardgett RD (2012) Abiotic drivers and plant traits explain landscape-scale patterns in soil microbial communities. Ecol Lett 15:1230–1239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01844.x
Dostál P, Palečková M (2010) Does relatedness of natives used for soil conditioning influence plant–soil feedback of exotics? Biol Invasions 13:331–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-010-9824-6
Durka W, Michalski SG (2012) Daphne: a dated phylogeny of a large European flora for phylogenetically informed ecological analyses. Ecology 93:2297. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-0743.1
Ehrenfeld JG, Ravit B, Elgersma K (2005) Feedback in the plant–soil system. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:75–115. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144212
Fitzpatrick CR, Gehant L, Kotanen PM, Johnson MTJ (2017) Phylogenetic relatedness, phenotypic similarity and plant–soil feedbacks. J Ecol 105:786–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12709
Freckleton RP, Harvey PH, Pagel M (2002) Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am Nat 160:712–726. https://doi.org/10.1086/343873
Garnier E, Cortez J, Billes G, Navas M-L, Roumet C, Debussche M, Laurent G, Blanchard A, Aubry D, Bellmann A, Neill C, Toussaint J-P (2004) Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology 85:2630–2637. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-0799
Grigulis K, Lavorel S, Krainer U, Legay N, Baxendale C, Dumont M, Kastl E, Arnoldi C, Bardgett RD, Poly F, Pommier T, Schloter M, Tappeiner U, Bahn M, Clément J-C (2013) Relative contributions of plant traits and soil microbial properties to mountain grassland ecosystem services. J Ecol 101:47–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12014
Harrison KA, Bardgett R (2010) Influence of plant species and soil conditions on plant–soil feedback in mixed grassland communities. J Ecol 98:384–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01614.X
Jaccard P (1901) Distribution de la flore alpine dans le Bassin des Drouces et dans quelques regions voisines. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 37:241–272
Johnson PCD (2014) Extension of Nakagawa and Schielzeth’s R2GLMM to random slopes models. Methods Ecol Evol 5:944–946. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12225
Johnson NC, Wilson GWT, Bowker MA, Wilson JA, Miller RM (2010) Resource limitation is a driver of local adaptation in mycorrhizal symbioses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:2093–2098. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906710107
Kardol P, Bezemer TM, van der Putten W (2006) Temporal variation in plant–soil feedback controls succession. Ecol Lett 9:1080–1088. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00953.x
Kelly S, Greyner R, Scotland RW (2014) Phylogenetic trees do not reliably predict feature diversity. Divers Distrib 20:600–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12188
Kleyer M, Bekker RM, Knevel IC, Bakker JP, Thompson K, Sonnenschein M, Poschlod P, van Groenendael JM, Klimeš L, Klimešová J, Klotz S, Rusch GM, Hermy M, Adriaens D, Boedeltje G, Bossuyt B, Dannemann A, Endels P, Götzenberger L, Hodgson JG, Jackel A-K, Kühn I, Kunzmann D, Ozinga WA, Römermann C, Stadler M, Schlegelmilch J, Steendam HJ, Tackenberg O, Wilmann B, Cornelissen JHC, Eriksson O, Garnier E, Peco B (2008) The LEDA Traitbase: a database of life-history traits of Northwest European flora. J Ecol 96:1266–1274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01430.x
Klironomos JN (2002) Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature 417:67–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/417067a
Klironomos JN (2003) Variation in plant response to native and exotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Ecology 84:2292–2301. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-0413
Koricheva J, Gurevitch J (2014) Uses and misuses of meta-analysis in plant ecology. J Ecol 102:828–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12224
Kubát K, Hrouda L, Chrtek J Jr, Kaplan Z, Kirschner J, Štěpánek J (2002) Klíč ke květeně České republiky. Academia, Praha
Kulmatiski A, Beard KH, Stevens JR, Cobbold SM (2008) Plant–soil feedbacks: a meta-analytical review. Ecol Lett 11:980–992. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01209.x
Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB (2016) lmerTest: tests in linear mixed effects models. R package version 2.0-33. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest
Laughlin DC (2011) Nitrification is linked to dominant leaf traits rather than functional diversity. J Ecol 99:1091–1099. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01856.x
Laughlin DC, Leppert JJ, Moore MM, Sieg CH (2010) A multi-trait test of the leaf-height-seed plant strategy scheme with 133 species from a pine forest flora. Funct Ecol 24:493–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01672.x
Lefcheck JS (2016) piecewiseSEM: piecewise structural equation modelling in r for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Methods Ecol Evol 7:573–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12512
Letten AD, Cornwell WK (2015) Trees, branches and. square. roots: why evolutionary relatedness is not linearly related to functional distance. Methods Ecol Evol 6:439–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12237
Mack KML, Bever JD (2014) Coexistence and relative abundance in plant communities are determined by feedbacks when the scale of feedback and dispersal is local. J Ecol 102:1995. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12269
Mangan SA, Schnitzer SA, Herre EA, Mack KML, Valencia MC, Sanchez EI, Bever JD (2010) Negative plant–soil feedback predicts tree-species relative abundance in a tropical forest. Nature 466:752–755. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09273
Mehrabi Z, Tuck SL (2014) Relatedness is a poor predictor of negative plant–soil feedbacks. New Phytol 205:1071–1075. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13238
Mehrabi Z, Bell T, Lewis OT (2015) Plant–soil feedbacks from 30-year family-specific soil cultures: phylogeny, soil chemistry and plant life stage. Ecol Evol 5:2333–2339. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1487
Meisner A, Hol WHG, de Boer W, Krumins JA, Wardle DA, van der Putten WH (2014) Plant–soil feedbacks of exotic plant species across life forms: a meta-analysis. Biol Invasions 16:2551–2561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-014-0685-2
Münzbergová Z, Šurinová M (2015) The importance of species phylogenetic relationships and species traits for the intensity of plant–soil feedback. Ecosphere 6:234. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES15-00206.1
Orwin KH, Buckland SM, Johnson D, Turner BL, Smart S, Oakley S, Bardgett RD (2010) Linkages of plant traits to soil properties and the functioning of temperate grassland. J Ecol 98:1074–1083. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01679.x
Pánková H, Münzbergová Z, Rydlová J, Vosátka M (2011) The response of Aster amellus, Asteraceae. To mycorrhiza depends on the origins of both the soil and the fungi. Am J Bot 98:850–858. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900350
Perkins LB, Nowak RS (2013) Native and non-native grasses generate common types of plant–soil feedbacks by altering soil nutrients and microbial communities. Oikos 122:199–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20592.x
Redman RS, Dunigan DD, Rodriguez RJ (2001) Fungal symbiosis from mutualism to parasitism: who controls the outcome, host or invader? New Phytol 151:705–716. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0028-646x.2001.00210.x
Revilla TA, Veen GF, Eppinga MB, Weissing FJ (2013) Plant–soil feedback and the coexistence of competing plants. Theor Ecol 6:99–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-012-0163-3
Semchenko M, Abakumova M, Lepik A, Zobel K (2013) Plants are least suppressed by their frequent neighbours: the relationship between competitive ability and spatial aggregation patterns. J Ecol 101:1313–1321. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12127
R Development Core Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org/
terHorst CP, Zee PC (2016) Eco-evolutionary dynamics in plant–soil feedbacks. Funct Ecol 30:1062–1072. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12671
van der Putten WH, Van Dijk C, Peters BAM (1993) Plant-specific soil-borne diseases contribute to succession in foredune vegetation. Nature 362:53–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/362053a0
van der Voorde TFJ, van der Putten WH, Bezemer TM (2011) Intra- and heterospecific plant–soil interactions and priority effects during old-field succession. J Ecol 99:945–953. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01815.x
Van Nuland ME, Wooliver RC, Pfennigwerth AA, Read QD, Ware IM, Mueller L, Fordyce JA, Schweitzer JA, Bailey JK (2016) Plant–soil feedbacks: connecting ecosystem ecology and evolution. Funct Ecol 30:1032–1042. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12690
Veresoglou SD, Rillig MC (2014) Do closely related plants host similar arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities? A meta-analysis. Plant Soil 377:395–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-2008-2
Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M, Flexas J, Garnier E, Groom PK, Gulias J, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee T, Lee W, Lusk C, Midgley JJ, Navas M-L, Niinemets Ü, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Poot P, Prior L, Pyankov VI, Roumet C, Thomas SC, Tjoelker MG, Veneklaas EJ, Villar R (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821–827. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02403
Yang Q, Carrillo J, Jin H, Shang L, Hovick SM, Nijjer S, Gabler C, Li B, Siemann E (2013) Plant–soil biota interactions of an invasive species in its native and introduced ranges: implications for invasion success. Soil Biol Biochem 65:78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.05.004
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Paul Kardol for provision of his experimental data. We are grateful to three anonymous reviewers and all the co-workers from the “poseminář” and POPEKOL discussion groups for their helpful comments. The study was supported by the Czech Science Foundation (project GAČR 16-09659S) and by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (RVO 67985939).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the design of this study. EK was responsible for gathering the data, and wrote the first draft. EK and TH performed the analyses. TH and ZM also contributed to obtaining the data, and they participated on writing the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Sarah M Emery.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuťáková, E., Herben, T. & Münzbergová, Z. Heterospecific plant–soil feedback and its relationship to plant traits, species relatedness, and co-occurrence in natural communities. Oecologia 187, 679–688 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4145-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4145-z