Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diet specialization in a generalist population: the case of breeding great tits Parus major in the Mediterranean area

  • Highlighted Student Research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The analysis of diet specialization provides key information on how different individuals deal with similar food and habitat constraints within populations. Characterizing parental diet specialization at the moment of breeding, and the consistency of these preferences under different levels of effort, may help us to understand why parents exploit alternative resources. We investigated these questions in a species commonly considered a generalist: a breeding population of Mediterranean great tits Parus major. Our aim was to determine whether they are specialists or generalists at the pair level, and the consistency of this behaviour under different levels of effort. Using proportional similarity and mean pairwise overlap indices, we found that parents showed great variability in prey selection between territories. That is, they displayed a small niche overlap. Interestingly, the most specialized breeding pairs showed a tendency to have larger broods. Additionally, we experimentally manipulated brood size and found that parents showed high short-term consistency in their foraging behaviour. They precisely adjusted the number of provisioning trips to the number of nestlings, while they were unable to modify prey proportions or prey size after brood size was changed. We can therefore characterize their foraging strategies as highly consistent. Our results suggest that although the great tit may be considered a generalist at the species or population level, there was a tendency for trophic specialization among breeding pairs. This high inter- and intrapopulation plasticity could account for their great success and wide distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aplin LM, Farine DR, Morand-Ferron J, Cockburn A, Thornton A, Sheldon BC (2015) Experimentally induced innovations lead to persistent culture via conformity in wild birds. Nature 518:538–541. doi:10.1038/nature13998

  • Ardia DR (2007) Site-and sex-level differences in adult feeding behaviour and its consequences to offspring quality in tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) following brood-size manipulation. Can J Zool 85:847–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold KE, Ramsay SL, Henderson L, Larcombe SD (2010) Seasonal variation in diet quality: antioxidants, invertebrates and blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus. Biol J Linn Soc 99:708–717

  • Atiénzar F, Visser ME, Greño JL, Holleman LJ, Belda EJ, Barba E (2010) Across and within-forest effects on breeding success in Mediterranean great tits Parus major. Ardea 98:77–89

  • Baňbura J, Blondel J, de Wilde-Lambrechts H, Galán MJ, Maistre M (1994) Nestling diet variation in an insular Mediterranean population of Blue Tits Parus caeruleus—effects of years, territories and individuals. Oecologia 100:413–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baňbura J, Lambrechts MM, Blondel J, Perret P, Cartan-Son M (1999) Food handling time of blue tit chicks: constraints and adaptation to different prey types. J Avian Biol 30:263–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barba E, Gil-Delgado JA (1990) Seasonal-variation in nestling diet of the Great tit Parus major in orange groves in eastern Spain. Ornis Scand 21:296–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barba E, Lopez JA, Gil-Delgado JA (1996) Prey preparation by adult Great Tits Parus major feeding nestlings. Ibis 138:532–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beja PR (1996) Seasonal breeding and food resources of otters, Lutra lutra (Carnivora, Mustelidae), in south-west Portugal: a comparison between coastal and inland habitats. Mammalia 60:27–34

  • Blondel J (2007) Coping with habitat heterogeneity: the story of Mediterranean blue tits. J Ornithol 148:3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blondel J, Dervieux A, Maistre M, Perret P (1991) Feeding ecology and life history variation of the blue tit in Mediterranean deciduous and sclerophyllous habitats. Oecologia 88:9–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blondel J, Aronson J, Bodiou JY, Boeuf G (2010) The Mediterranean region: biological diversity in space and time. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolnick DI, Yang LH, Fordyce JA, Davis JM, Svanbäck R (2002) Measuring individual-level resource specialization. Ecology 83:2936–2941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolnick DI, Svanbäck R, Fordyce JA, Yang LH, Davis JM, Hulsey CD, Forister ML (2003) The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am Nat 161:1–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolnick DI, Amarasekare P, Araújo MS, Bürger R, Levine JM, Novak M, Rudolf VH, Schreiber SJ, Urban MC, Vasseur DA (2011) Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 26:183–192

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, Berlin

  • Cherel Y, Kernaléguen L, Richard P, Guinet C (2009) Whisker isotopic signature depicts migration patterns and multi-year intra-and inter-individual foraging strategies in fur seals. Biol Lett 5:830–832

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cole EF, Cram DL, Quinn JL (2011) Individual variation in spontaneous problem-solving performance among wild great tits. Anim Behav 81:491–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole EF, Morand-Ferron J, Hinks AE, Quinn JL (2012) Cognitive ability influences reproductive life history variation in the wild. Curr Biol 22:1808–1812

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cuthill IC, Houston AI (1997) Managing time and energy. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Wiley, UK, pp 97–120

  • Drent RH, Daan S (1980) The prudent parent—energetic adjustments in avian breeding. Ardea 68:225–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy JE, Cardinale BJ, France KE, McIntyre PB, Thébault E, Loreau M (2007) The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: incorporating trophic complexity. Ecol Lett 10:522–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eeva T, Sillanpää S, Salminen JP (2009) The effects of diet quality and quantity on plumage colour and growth of great tit Parus major nestlings: a food manipulation experiment along a pollution gradient. J Avian Biol 40:491–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eide NE, Jepsen JU, Prestrud P (2004) Spatial organization of reproductive Arctic foxes Alopex lagopus: responses to changes in spatial and temporal availability of prey. J Anim Ecol 73:1056–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estes JA, Riedman ML, Staedler MM, Tinker MT, Lyon BE (2003) Individual variation in prey selection by sea otters: patterns, causes and implications. J Anim Ecol 72:144–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estók P, Zsebők S, Siemers BM (2010) Great tits search for, capture, kill and eat hibernating bats. Biol Lett 6:59–62

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fargallo JA (2004) Latitudinal trends of reproductive traits in the Blue Tit Parus caeruleus. Ardeola 51:177–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer A, Dixon AF, Hemptinne J (2008) Prey preference of ladybird larvae and its impact on larval mortality, some life-history traits of adults and female fitness. Bull Insect 61:5–10

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Navas V, Sanz JJ (2010) Flexibility in the foraging behavior of Blue Tits in response to short-term manipulations of brood size. Ethology 116:744–754

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Navas V, Ferrer ES, Sanz JJ (2012) Plumage yellowness predicts foraging ability in the blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus. Biol J Linn Soc 106:418–429

  • Gilroy JJ, Anderson GQ, Grice PV, Vickery JA, Watts PN, Sutherland WJ (2009) Foraging habitat selection, diet and nestling condition in Yellow Wagtails Motacilla flava breeding on arable farmland. Bird Study 56:221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grieco F (2001) Short-term regulation of food-provisioning rate and effect on prey size in blue tits, Parus caeruleus. Anim Behav 62:107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grieco F (2002) Time constraint on food choice in provisioning blue tits, Parus caeruleus: the relationship between feeding rate and prey size. Anim Behav 64:517–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grundel R (1990) The role of dietary diversity, prey capture sequence and individuality in prey selection by parent mountain chickadees (Parus gambeli). J Anim Ecol 59:959–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heithaus ER, Fleming TH, Opler PA (1975) Foraging patterns and resource utilization in seven species of bats in a seasonal tropical forest. Ecology 56:841–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinde CA, Kilner RM (2007) Negotiations within the family over the supply of parental care. P R Soc Lond Ser B Bio 274:53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JF (1996) Effects of substrate on prey use by belted kingfishers (Ceryle alcyon): a test of the prey abundance–availability assumption. Can J Zool 74:693–697

  • Kölliker M, Brinkhof MW, Heeb P, Fitze PS, Richner H (2000) The quantitative genetic basis of offspring solicitation and parental response in a passerine bird with biparental care. P R Soc Lond Ser B Bio 267:2127–2132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Křivan V (2010) Evolutionary stability of optimal foraging partial preferences in the diet and patch models. J Theor Biol 267:486–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kvist L, Arbabi T, Packert M, Orell M, Martens J (2007) Population differentiation in the marginal populations of the great tit (Paridae: Parus major). Biol J Linn Soc 90:201–210

  • Lambrechts MM, Caro S, Charmantier A, Gross N, Galan MJ, Perret P, Cartan-Son M, Dias PC, Blondel J, Thomas DW (2004) Habitat quality as a predictor of spatial variation in blue tit reproductive performance: a multi-plot analysis in a heterogeneous landscape. Oecologia 141:555–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Layman CA, Allgeier JE (2012) Characterizing trophic ecology of generalist consumers: a case study of the invasive lionfish in The Bahamas. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 448:131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mägi M, Mänd R, Tamm H, Sisask E, Kilgas P, Tilgar V (2009) Low reproductive success of great tits in the preferred habitat: a role of food availability. Ecoscience 16:145–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magrath MJ, Van Lieshout E, Visser GH, Komdeur J (2004) Nutritional bias as a new mode of adjusting sex allocation. P R Soc Lond Ser B Bio 271:S347–S349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maziarz M, Wesołowski T (2010) Timing of breeding and nestling diet of Wood Warbler Phylloscopus sibilatrix in relation to changing food supply. Bird Study 57:540–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naef-Daenzer B (2012) Understanding individual life-histories and habitat choices: implications for explaining population patterns and processes (Chapter 16). In: Fuller RJ (ed) Birds and habitat: relationships in changing landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 408–431

  • Naef-Daenzer L, Naef-Daenzer B, Nager RG (2000) Prey selection and foraging performance of breeding great tits Parus major in relation to food availability. J Avian Biol 31:206–214

  • Neuenschwander S, Brinkhof MW, Kölliker M, Richner H (2003) Brood size, sibling competition, and the cost of begging in great tits (Parus major). Behav Ecol 14:457–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newsome SD, Tinker MT, Monson DH, Oftedal OT, Ralls K, Staedler MM, Fogel ML, Estes JA (2009) Using stable isotopes to investigate individual diet specialization in California sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis). Ecology 90:961–974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaus M, Michler SP, Ubels R, Van Der Velde M, Komdeur J, Both C, Tinbergen JM (2009) Sex-specific effects of altered competition on nestling growth and survival: an experimental manipulation of brood size and sex ratio. J Anim Ecol 78:414–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaus M, Mathot KJ, Araya-Ajoy YG, Mutzel A, Wijmenga JJ, Kempenaers B, Dingemanse NJ (2015) Does coping style predict optimization? An experimental test in a wild passerine bird. P R Soc Lond Ser B Bio 282:2014–2405

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson JA (2002) Metabolic consequences of hard work. P R Soc Lond Ser B Bio 269:1735–1739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosil P (2002) Transition rates between specialization and generalization in phytophagous insects. Evolution 56:1701–1706

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orell M, Rytkonen S, Koivula K, Ronkainen M, Rahiala M (1996) Brood size manipulations within the natural range did not reveal intragenerational cost of reproduction in the Willow Tit Parus montanus. Ibis 138:630–637

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagani-Núñez E, Senar JC (2013) One hour of sampling is enough: great tit Parus major parents feed their nestlings consistently across time. Acta Ornithol 48:194–200

  • Pagani-Núñez E, Senar JC (2014) Are colorful males of great tits Parus major better parents? Parental investment is a matter of quality. Acta Oecol 55:23–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagani-Núñez E, Ruiz I, Quesada J, Negro JJ, Senar JC (2011) The diet of Great Tit Parus major nestlings in a Mediterranean Iberian forest: the important role of spiders. Anim Biodivers Conserv 34:355–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagani-Núñez E, Uribe F, Hernández-Gómez S, Muñoz G, Senar JC (2014) Habitat structure and prey composition generate contrasting effects on carotenoid-based colouration of Great tit Parus major nestlings. Biol J Linn Soc 113:547–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson JE, Steinberg BD, Litzgus JD (2012) Generally specialized or especially general? Habitat selection by snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina) in central Ontario. Can J Zool 90:139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrins CM, McCleery RH (1989) Laying dates and clutch size in the great tit. Wilson Bull 101:236–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Pienkowski MW, Watkinson AR, Kerby G, Naughton-Treves LISA, Treves A, Chapman C, Wrangham R (1998) Temporal patterns of crop-raiding by primates: linking food availability in croplands and adjacent forest. J Appl Ecol 35:596–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quevedo M, Svanbäck R, Eklöv P (2009) Intrapopulation niche partitioning in a generalist predator limits food web connectivity. Ecology 90:2263–2274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quiroga MF, Bonansea MI, Vaira M (2011) Population diet variation and individual specialization in the poison toad, Melanophryniscus rubriventris (Vellard, 1947). Amphib Reptilia 32:261–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2003. Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org

  • Ramos-Fernández G, Mateos JL, Miramontes O, Cocho G, Larralde H, Ayala-Orozco B (2004) Lévy walk patterns in the foraging movements of spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:223–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau P, Desrochers A, Hadley AS (2012) Habitat selection and fidelity by white-throated sparrows (Zonotrichia albicollis): generalist species, specialist individuals? Can J Zool 90:595–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutz C, Bijlsma RG (2006) Food-limitation in a generalist predator. Proc R Soc B 273:2069–2076

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rytkonen S, Krams I (2003) Does foraging behaviour explain the poor breeding success of great tits Parus major in northern Europe? J Avian Biol 34:288–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rytkonen S, Orell M (2001) Great tits, Parus major, lay too many eggs: experimental evidence in mid-boreal habitats. Oikos 93:439–450

  • Saino N, Calza S, Møller AP (1997) Immunocompetence of nestling barn swallows in relation to brood size and parental effort. J Anim Ecol 66:827–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanz JJ (1998) Effects of geographic location and habitat on breeding parameters of great tits. Auk 115:1034–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanz JJ, Tinbergen JM (1999) Energy expenditure, nestling age, and brood size: an experimental study of parental behavior in the great tit Parus major. Behav Ecol 10:598–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider SS, McNally LC (1993) Spatial foraging patterns and colony energy status in the African honey bee, Apis mellifera scutellata. J Insect Behav 6:195–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seamon JO, Adler GH (1996) Population performance of generalist and specialist rodents along habitat gradients. Can J Zool 74:1130–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siikamäki P, Haimi J, Hovi M, Rätti O (1998) Properties of food loads delivered to nestlings in the pied flycatcher: effects of clutch size manipulation, year, and sex. Oecologia 115:579–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair ARE, Mduma S, Brashares JS (2003) Patterns of predation in a diverse predator–prey system. Nature 425:288–290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slagsvold T, Wiebe KL (2007) Learning the ecological niche. P R Soc Lond Ser B Bio 274:19–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slagsvold T, Wiebe KL (2011) Social learning in birds and its role in shaping a foraging niche. Philos T R Soc B 366:969–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith HG, Källander H, Fontell K, Ljungström M (1988) Feeding frequency and parental division of labour in the double-brooded great tit Parus major. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:447–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spalinger DE, Hobbs NT (1992) Mechanisms of foraging in mammalian herbivores: new models of functional response. Am Nat 140:325–348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft (2001) STATISTICA data analysis software system, version 6.0. StatSoft Inc., Tulsa

  • Stephens DW, Brown JS, Ydenberg RC (2007) Foraging: behavior and ecology. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stoehr AM, McGraw KJ, Nolan PM, Hill GE (2001) Parental care in relation to brood size in the house finch. J Field Ornithol 72:412–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svanbäck R, Persson L (2004) Individual diet specialization, niche width and population dynamics: implications for trophic polymorphisms. J Anim Ecol 73:973–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terraube J, Arroyo B, Madders M, Mougeot F (2011) Diet specialisation and foraging efficiency under fluctuating vole abundance: a comparison between generalist and specialist avian predators. Oikos 120:234–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen JM, Verhulst S (2000) A fixed energetic ceiling to parental effort in the great tit? J Anim Ecol 69:323–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinker MT, Mangel M, Estes JA (2008) Food limitation leads to behavioral diversification and dietary specialization in sea otters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:560–565

  • Tinker M, Bentall G, Estes JA (2009) Learning to be different: acquired skills, social learning, frequency dependence, and environmental variation can cause behaviourally mediated foraging specializations. Evol Ecol Res 11:841–869

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay I, Thomas DW, Lambrechts MM, Blondel J, Perret P (2003) Variation in Blue Tit breeding performance across gradients in habitat richness. Ecology 84:3033–3043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay I, Thomas D, Blondel J, Perret P, Lambrechts MM (2005) The effect of habitat quality on foraging patterns, provisioning rate and nestling growth in Corsican Blue Tits Parus caeruleus. Ibis 147:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trowbridge CD (1991) Diet specialization limits herbivorous sea slug’s capacity to switch among food species. Ecology 72:1880–1888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Overveld T, Adriaensen F, Matthysen E (2011) Postfledging family space use in great tits in relation to environmental and parental characteristics. Behav Ecol 22:899–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Zanden HB, Bjorndal KA, Reich KJ, Bolten AB (2010) Individual specialists in a generalist population: results from a long-term stable isotope series. Biol Let 6:711–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhulst S, Tinbergen JM (1997) Clutch size and parental effort in the great tit Parus major. Ardea 85:111–126

  • Visscher PK, Seeley TD (1982) Foraging strategy of honeybee colonies in a temperate deciduous forest. Ecology 63:1790–1801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagenmakers EJ, Farrell S (2004) AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psychonomic Bull Rev 11:192–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White RG (1983) Foraging patterns and their multiplier effects on productivity of northern ungulates. Oikos 40:377–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesenborn WD (2012) Sulfur contents of spiders and insects in desert riparian habitat. Florida Ent 95:952–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkin TA, King LE, Sheldon BC (2009) Habitat quality, nestling diet, and provisioning behaviour in great tits Parus major. J Avian Biol 40:135–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woo KJ, Elliott KH, Davidson M, Gaston AJ, Davoren GK (2008) Individual specialization in diet by a generalist marine predator reflects specialization in foraging behaviour. J Anim Ecol 77:1082–1091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright J, Cuthill I (1990) Manipulation of sex differences in parental care: the effect of brood size. Anim Behav 40:462–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zabala J, Zuberogoitia I (2014) Individual quality explains variation in reproductive success better than territory quality in a long-lived territorial raptor. PLoS One 9:e90254

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ziane N, Chabi Y, Lambrechts MM (2006) Breeding performance of Blue Tits Cyanistes caeruleus ultramarinus in relation to habitat richness of oak forest patches in north-eastern Algeria. Acta Ornithol 41:163–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Sergio Hernández-Gómez for his help in the field, and Jaime Resano-Mayor, Pierre-Olivier Montiglio and an anonymous referee for their advice regarding improvements to an earlier version of the manuscript. We also thank Carolyn Newey for editing the English version of the manuscript, Llüisa Arroyo for her help in the lab, and the Gil family—owners of Can Catà—for allowing us to work on their property. This study was funded by the research project CGL-2012-38262 (to J. C. S.) and by the FPI grant BES2010-040359 from the Ministry of Science and Innovation, Spanish Research Council (to E. P. N.). Birds were handled with the permission of the Departament de Medi Ambient, Generalitat de Catalunya. Rings were provided by the Catalan Ringing Office (ICO).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Evolutionary Ecology Associate Research Unit (CSIC), Natural History Museum of Barcelona, Psg. Picasso s/n., 08003, Barcelona, Spain

    E. Pagani-Núñez, M. Valls & J. C. Senar

  2. Behavioral and Community Ecology, Conservation Biology Group, College of Forestry, Guangxi University, No. 100 Daxue Road, Nanning, 530005, Guangxi, People’s Republic of China

    E. Pagani-Núñez

Authors
  1. E. Pagani-Núñez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Valls
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. C. Senar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Pagani-Núñez.

Additional information

Communicated by Ola Olsson.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 209 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (PDF 429 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pagani-Núñez, E., Valls, M. & Senar, J.C. Diet specialization in a generalist population: the case of breeding great tits Parus major in the Mediterranean area. Oecologia 179, 629–640 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3334-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3334-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation