Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mammalian predator–prey interaction in a fragmented landscape: weasels and voles

  • Population ecology - Original research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between predators and prey is thought to change due to habitat loss and fragmentation, but patterns regarding the direction of the effect are lacking. The common prediction is that specialized predators, often more dependent on a certain habitat type, should be more vulnerable to habitat loss compared to generalist predators, but actual fragmentation effects are unknown. If a predator is small and vulnerable to predation by other larger predators through intra-guild predation, habitat fragmentation will similarly affect both the prey and the small predator. In this case, the predator is predicted to behave similarly to the prey and avoid open and risky areas. We studied a specialist predator’s, the least weasel, Mustela nivalis nivalis, spacing behavior and hunting efficiency on bank voles, Myodes glareolus, in an experimentally fragmented habitat. The habitat consisted of either one large habitat patch (non-fragmented) or four small habitat patches (fragmented) with the same total area. The study was replicated in summer and autumn during a year with high avian predation risk for both voles and weasels. As predicted, weasels under radio-surveillance killed more voles in the non-fragmented habitat which also provided cover from avian predators during their prey search. However, this was only during autumn, when the killing rate was also generally high due to cold weather. The movement areas were the same for both sexes and both fragmentation treatments, but weasels of both sexes were more prone to take risks in crossing the open matrix in the fragmented treatment. Our results support the hypothesis that habitat fragmentation may increase the persistence of specialist predator and prey populations if predators are limited in the same habitat as their prey and they share the same risk from avian predation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brandt MJ, Lambin X (2007) Movement patterns of a specialist predator, the weasel Mustela nivalis exploiting asynchronous cyclic field vole Microtus agrestis populations. Acta Theriol 52:13–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS (1988) Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS, Kotler BP, Mitchell WA (1997) Competition between birds and mammals: a comparison of givingup densities between crested larks and gerbils. Evol Ecol 11:757–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bujalska G (1986) Sex ratio in an island population of Clethrionomys glareolus. Acta Theriol 31:71–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dalkvist T, Sibly RM, Topping CJ (2011) How predation and landscape fragmentation affect vole population dynamics. PLoS ONE 6:e22834

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erlinge S (1974) Distribution, territoriality and numbers of the weasel Mustela nivalis in relation to prey abundance. Oikos 25:308–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 34:487–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehring TM, Swihart RK (2004) Home range and movements of long-tailed weasels in a landscape fragmented by agriculture. J Mammal 85:79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorini L, Linnell JDC, May R, Panzacci M, Boitani L, Odden M, Nilsen EB (2012) Habitat heterogeneity and mammalian predator–prey interactions. Mammal Rev 42:55–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haapakoski M, Ylönen H (2010) Effect of fragmented breeding habitat and resource distribution on behaviour and survival of the bank vole (Myodes glareolus). Popul Ecol 52:427–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haapakoski M, Ylönen H (2013) Snow evens fragmentation effects and food determines overwintering success in ground-dwelling voles. Ecol Res. doi:10.1007/s11284-012-1020-y (in press)

  • Henttonen H, Oksanen T, Jortikka A, Haukisalmi V (1987) How much do weasels shape microtine cycles in the northern Fennoscandian taiga? Oikos 50:353–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoset KS, Koivisto E, Huitu O, Ylönen H, Korpimäki E (2009) Multiple predators induce risk reduction in coexisting vole species. Oikos 118:1421–1429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ims RA (1987) Responses in spatial organization and behaviour to manipulations of the food resource in the vole Clethrionomys rufocanus. J Anim Ecol 56:585–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jedrzejewska B, Jedrzejewski W (1989) Seasonal surplus killing as hunting strategy of the weasel Mustela nivalis—test of the hypothesis. Acta Theriol 34:347–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallio ER, Begon M, Henttonen H, Koskela E, Mappes T, Vaheri A, Vapalahti O (2009) Cyclic hantavirus epidemics in humans–predicted by rodent host dynamics. Epidemics 1:101–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Korpimäki E (1994) Rapid or delayed tracking of multiannual vole cycles by avian predators. J Anim Ecol 63:619–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpimäki E, Norrdahl K (1989) Avian predation on mustelids in Europe 1: occurrence and effects on body size variation and life traits. Oikos 55:205–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler BP, Blaustein L, Brown JS (1992) Predator facilitation: the combined effect of snakes and owls on the foraging behaviour of gerbils. Ann Zool Fenn 29:199–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J (2006) Habitat fragmentation and landscape change: an ecological and conservation synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Magrini C, Manzo E, Zapponi L, Angelici FM, Boitani L, Cento M (2009) Weasel Mustela nivalis spatial ranging behaviour and habitat selection in agricultural landscape. Acta Theriol 54:137–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakagiri N, Tainaka KI, Tao T (2001) Indirect relation between species extinction and habitat destruction. Ecol Model 137:109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norrdahl K, Korpimäki E (1995) Effects of predator removal on vertebrate prey populations: birds of prey and small mammals. Oecologia 103:241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norrdahl K, Korpimäki E (2002) Seasonal changes in the numerical responses of predators to cyclic vole populations. Ecography 25:428–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen T (1983) Prey caching in the hunting strategy of small mustelids. Acta Zool Fenn 174:197–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, (2010) The R Development Core Team nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1–97

  • Prakash S, De Roos AM (2002) Habitat destruction in a simple predator–prey patch model: how predators enhance prey persistence and abundance. Theor Popul Biol 62:231–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org/

  • Ryall KL, Fahrig L (2006) Response of predators to loss and fragmentation of prey habitat: a review of theory. Ecology 87:1086–1093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salo P, Banks PB, Dickman CR, Korpimäki E (2010) Predator manipulation experiments: impact on populations of vertebrate prey. Ecol Monogr 80:531–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv Biol 5:18–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solheim R (1984) Caching behaviour, prey choice and surplus killing by Pygmy owl Claucidium passerinum during winter, a functional response of generalist predator. Ann Zool Fenn 21:301–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundell J, Ylönen H (2004) Behaviour and choice of refuge by voles under predation risk. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:263–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundell J, Ylönen H (2008) Specialist predator in a multi-species prey community: boreal voles and weasels. J Integr Zool 3:51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundell J, Eccard JA, Tiilikainen R, Ylönen H (2003) Predation rate, prey preference and predator switching: experiments on voles and weasels. Oikos 101:615–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundell J, Huitu O, Henttonen H, Kaikusalo A, Korpimäki E, Pietiäinen H, Saurola P, Hanski IS (2004) Large-scale spatial dynamics of vole populations in Finland revealed by the breeding success of vole-eating avian predators. J Anim Ecol 73:167–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundell J, Trebatická L, Oksanen T, Ovaskainen O, Haapakoski M, Ylönen H (2008) Antipredatory response and survival of two vole species with a shared predator. Popul Ecol 50:257–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valkama J, Vepsäläinen V, Lehikoinen A (2011) The third Finnish breeding bird Atlas. Finnish Museum of Natural History and Ministry of Environment. http://atlas3.lintuatlas.fi/english (cited 19.3.2013) ISBN 978-952-10-7145-4

  • Ylönen H, Jacob J, Davis M, Singleton GR (2002) Predation risk and habitat selection of Australian house mice (Mus domesticus) during an incipient plague: desperate behaviour due to food depletion. Oikos 99:285–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ylönen H, Pech R, Davis S (2003) Heterogeneous landscapes and the role of refuge on the population dynamics of a specialist predator and its prey. Evol Ecol 17:349–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all the helpers in the field during radio-tracking, Nelika Hughes, Hanne Vihervaara, Janika Aaltonen, Audrey Proust, Netta Seppälä, Sirke Piirainen and Lenka Trebaticka. We thank technicians of the Konnevesi Research Station for maintenance of the enclosures. John Loehr commented manuscript and corrected the language. The study was supported by the Finnish Academy to the CoE in Evolutionary Ecology at University of Jyväskylä. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest. Experiment and animal handling was conducted with animal experimentation permission at Jyväskylä University no. 35/31.5.2004.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marko Haapakoski.

Additional information

Communicated by Roland Brandl.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 29 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haapakoski, M., Sundell, J. & Ylönen, H. Mammalian predator–prey interaction in a fragmented landscape: weasels and voles. Oecologia 173, 1227–1235 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2691-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2691-y

Keywords

Navigation