Skip to main content
Log in

CWM and Rao’s quadratic diversity: a unified framework for functional ecology

  • Community ecology - Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessing the effects of environmental constraints on community structure often relies on methods that consider changes in species functional traits in response to environmental processes. Various indices have been proposed to measure relevant aspects of community trait composition from different viewpoints and perspectives. Among these, the ‘community-weighted mean trait value’ (CWM) and the Rao coefficient have been widely used in ecological research for summarizing different facets of functional composition and diversity. Analyzing changes in functional diversity of bee communities along a post-fire successional gradient in southern Switzerland we show that these two measures may be used to describe two complementary aspects of community structure, such as the mean and the dispersion of functional traits within a given species assemblage. While CWM can be adequately used to summarize shifts in mean trait values within communities due to environmental selection for certain functional traits, the Rao coefficient can be effectively applied to analyze patterns of trait convergence or divergence compared to a random expectation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerly D, Cornwell W (2007) A trait-based approach to community assembly: partitioning of species trait values into within- and among-community components. Ecol Lett 10:135–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Agresti A (2007) An introduction to categorical data analysis. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Aust Ecol 26:32–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ (2006) Distance-based tests for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions. Biometrics 62:245–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biesmeijer JC, Roberts SP, Reemer M, Ohlemueller R, Edwards M, Peeters T, Schaffers A, Potts SG, Kleukers R, Thomas CD, Settele J, Kunin WE (2006) Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and The Netherlands. Science 313:351–354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Botta-Dukat Z (2005) Rao’s quadratic entropy as a measure of functional diversity based on multiple traits. J Veg Sci 16:533–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Champely S, Chessel D (2002) Measuring biological diversity using Euclidean metrics. Environ Ecol Stat 9:167–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevenet F, Dolédec S, Chessel D (1994) A fuzzy coding approach for the analysis of ecological data. Freshw Biol 31:295–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2001) A further biodiversity index applicable to species lists: variation in taxonomic distinctness. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 216:265–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz S, Lavorel S, de Bello F, Quetier F, Grigulis K, Robson TM (2007) Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:20684–20689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine C, Dajoz I, Meriguet J, Loreau M (2006) Functional diversity of plant–pollinator interaction webs enhances the persistence of plant communities. PLoS Biol 4:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnier E, Cortez J, Billes G, Navas ML, Roumet C, Debussche M, Laurent G, Blanchard A, Aubry D, Bellmann A, Neill C, Toussaint JP (2004) Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology 85:2630–2637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gower JC, Legendre P (1986) Metric and Euclidean properties of dissimilarity coefficients. J Classif 3:5–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1998) Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. J Ecol 86:902–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (2006) Trait convergence and trait divergence in herbaceous plant communities: mechanisms and consequences. J Veg Sci 17:255–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper DU, Chapin FS III, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge D, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B, Setälä H, Symstad AJ, Vandermeer J, Wardle DA (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge and needs for future research. Ecol Monogr 75:3–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izsák J, Papp L (2000) A link between ecological diversity indices and measures of biodiversity. Ecol Model 130:151–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laliberté E, Legendre P (2010) A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology 91:299–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lavorel S, Grigulis K, McIntyre S, Garden D, Williams N, Dorrough J, Berman S, Quétier F, Thébault A, Bonis A (2008) Assessing functional diversity in the field-methodology matters! Funct Ecol 22:134–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepš J, de Bello F, Lavorel S, Berman S (2006) Quantifying and interpreting functional diversity of natural communities: practical considerations matter. Preslia 78:481–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason NWH, Mouillot D, Lee WG, Wilson JB (2005) Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: the primary components of functional diversity. Oikos 111:112–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michener CD (2000) The bees of the world. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokany K, Ash J, Roxburgh S (2008) Functional identity is more important than diversity in influencing ecosystem processes in a temperate native grassland. J Ecol 96:884–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moretti M, Legg C (2009) Combining plant and animal traits to assess community functional responses to disturbance. Ecography 32:299–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moretti M, Conedera M, Duelli P, Edwards PJ (2002) The effect of wildfire on ground-active spiders in deciduous forests on the Swiss southern slopes of the Alps. J Appl Ecol 39:321–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moretti M, Obrist KM, Duelli P (2004) Arthropod biodiversity after forest fires: winners and losers in the winter fire regime of the southern Alps. Ecography 27:173–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moretti M, Duelli P, Obrist MK (2006) Biodiversity and resilience of arthropod communities after fire disturbance in temperate forests. Oecologia 149:312–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moretti M, de Bello F, Roberts SPM, Potts SG (2009) Taxonomical vs. functional responses of bee communities to fire in two contrasting climatic regions. J Anim Ecol 78:98–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mouchet MA, Villéger S, Mason NWH, Mouillot D (2010) Functional diversity measures: an overview of their redundancy and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules. Funct Ecol 24:867–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norberg J (2004) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a complex adaptive systems approach. Limnol Oceanogr 49:1269–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavoine S, Dolédec S (2005) The apportionment of quadratic entropy: a useful alternative for partitioning diversity in ecological data. Environ Ecol Stat 12:125–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pavoine S, Ollier S, Pontier D (2005) Measuring diversity from dissimilarities with Rao’s quadratic entropy: are any dissimilarities suitable? Theor Popul Biol 67:231–239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pavoine S, Vallet J, Dufour A-B, Gachet S, Daniel H (2009) On the challenge of treating various types of variables: application for improving the measurement of functional diversity. Oikos 118:391–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2002) Functional diversity (FD), species richness, and community composition. Ecol Lett 5:402–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2006) Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecol Lett 9:74–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petchey OL, Hector A, Gaston KJ (2004) How do different measures of functional diversity perform? Ecology 85:847–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petchey OL, Evans KL, Fishburn IS, Gaston KJ (2007) Low functional diversity and no redundancy in British avian assemblages. J Anim Ecol 76:977–985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pillar VD, Duarte LdS (2010) A framework for metacommunity analysis of phylogenetic structure. Ecol Lett 13:587–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pillar VD, Sosinski EE (2003) An improved method for searching plant functional types by numerical analysis. J Veg Sci 14:323–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillar VD, Duarte LdS, Sosinski EE, Joner F (2009) Discriminating trait-convergence and trait-divergence assembly patterns in ecological community gradients. J Veg Sci 20:334–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podani J (2005) Multivariate exploratory analysis of ordinal data in ecology: pitfalls, problems and solutions. J Veg Sci 16:497–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poos MS, Walker SC, Jackson DA (2009) Functional-diversity indices can be driven by methodological choices and species richness. Ecology 90:341–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rao CR (1982) Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients—a unified approach. Theor Popul Biol 21:24–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao CR (2010) Quadratic entropy and analysis of diversity. Sankhya 72:70–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds HT (1984) Analysis of nominal data. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricotta C (2005) Through the jungle of biological diversity. Acta Biotheor 53:29–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ricotta C, Moretti M (2010) Assessing the functional turnover of species assemblages with tailored dissimilarity matrices. Oikos 119:1089–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricotta C, Szeidl L (2006) Towards a unifying approach to diversity measures: bridging the gap between the Shannon entropy and Rao’s quadratic index. Theor Popul Biol 70:237–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ricotta C, Szeidl L (2009) Diversity partitioning of Rao’s quadratic entropy. Theor Popul Biol 76:299–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schleuter D, Daufresne M, Massol F, Argillier C (2010) A user’s guide to functional diversity indices. Ecol Monogr 80:469–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmera D, Podani J, Erös T (2009) Measuring the contribution of community members to functional diversity. Oikos 118:961–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher J, Roscher C (2009) Differential effects of functional traits on aboveground biomass in semi-natural grasslands. Oikos 118:1659–1668

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shimatani K (2001) On the measurement of species diversity incorporating species differences. Oikos 93:135–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K, Petchey OL, Askew AP, Dunnett NP, Beckerman AP, Willis AJ (2010) Little evidence for limiting similarity in a long-term study of a roadside plant community. J Ecol 98:480–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandewalle M, de Bello F, Berg MP, Bolger T, Dolédec S, Dubs F, Feld CK, Harrington R, Harrison PA, Lavorel S, da Silva PM, Moretti M, Niemela J, Santos P, Sattler T, Sousa JP, Sykes MT, Vanbergen AJ, Woodcock BA (2010) Functional traits as indicators of biodiversity response to land use changes across ecosystems and organisms. Biodivers Conserv 19:2921–2947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vile D, Shipley B, Garnier E (2006) Ecosystem productivity relates to species’ potential relative growth rate: a field test and a conceptual framework. Ecol Lett 9:1061–1067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Villéger S, Mason NWH, Mouillot D (2008) New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. Ecology 89:2290–2301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waldbusser GG, Marinelli RL, Whitlatch RB, Visscher PT (2004) The effects of infaunal biodiversity on biogeochemistry of coastal marine sediments. Limnol Oceanogr 49:1482–1492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Kinzig A, Langridge J (1999) Plant attribute diversity, resilience, and ecosystem function: the nature and significance of dominant and minor species. Ecosystems 2:95–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiher E, Keddy PA (1999) Relative abundance and evenness patterns along diversity and biomass gradients. Oikos 87:355–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westrich P (1989) Die Wildbienen Baden-Württembergs. Ulmer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Andreas Mueller (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich) and Stuart P.M. Roberts (University of Reading) for providing bee traits. Insightful comments and suggestions of two anonymous referees on a previous draft of this paper are also warmly acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlo Ricotta.

Additional information

Communicated by Roland Brandl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ricotta, C., Moretti, M. CWM and Rao’s quadratic diversity: a unified framework for functional ecology. Oecologia 167, 181–188 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-1965-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-1965-5

Keywords

Navigation