Skip to main content
Log in

Getting the timing right: antler growth phenology and sexual selection in a wild red deer population

  • Population ecology - Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There has been growing interest in the determinants of the annual timing of biological phenomena, or phenology, in wild populations, but research on vertebrate taxa has primarily focused on the phenology of reproduction. We present here analyses of the phenology of the annual growth of a secondary sexual characteristic, antlers in red deer (Cervus elaphus) males. The long-term individual-based data from a wild population of red deer on the Isle of Rum, Scotland allow us to consider ecological factors influencing variation in the phenology of growth of antlers, and the implications of variation in antler growth phenology with respect to the phenotype of antler grown (antler mass) and annual breeding success. The phenology of antler growth was influenced by local environmental conditions: higher population density delayed both the start date (during spring) and the relative end date (in late summer) of antler growth, and warmer temperatures in the September and April prior to growth advanced start and end dates, respectively. Furthermore, there was variation between individuals in this phenotypic plasticity of start date, although not in that of end date of growth. The phenology of antler growth impacted on the morphology of antlers grown, with individuals who started and ended growth earliest having the heaviest antlers. The timing of antler growth phenology was associated with breeding success in the following mating season, independently of the mass of antlers grown: an earlier start of antler growth was associated with siring a higher number of the calves born the following spring. Our results suggest that the phenology of traits that are not directly correlated with offspring survival may also regularly show correlations with fitness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albon SD, Clutton-Brock TH, Langvatn R (1992) Cohort variation in reproduction and survival: implications for population demography. In: Brown RD (ed) The biology of deer. Springer, New York, pp 15–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Albon SD, Coulson TN, Brown D, Guinness FE, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH (2000) Temporal changes in key factors and key age groups influencing the population dynamics of female red deer. J Anim Ecol 69:1099–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartos L (1980) The date of antler casting, age and social hierarchy relationships in the red deer stag. Behav Process 5:293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartos L, Bahbouh R (2006) Antler size and fluctuating asymmetry in red deer (Cervus elaphus) stags and probability of becoming a harem holder in rut. Biol J Linn Soc 87:59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates D (2007) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.99875-9

  • Bety J, Gauthier G, Giroux JF (2003) Body condition, migration, and timing of reproduction in snow geese: a test of the condition-dependent model of optimal clutch size. Am Nat 162:110–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breslow N (2003) Whither PQL? UW biostatistics working paper series, University of Washington

  • Breslow NE, Clayton DG (1993) Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J Am Stat Assoc 88:9–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breslow N, Lin X (1995) Bias correction in generalised linear mixed models with a single component of dispersion. Biometrika 82:81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bubenik GA, Schams D, White RJ, Rowell J, Blake J, Bartos L (1997) Seasonal levels of reproductive hormones and their relationship to the antler cycle of male and female reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 116:269–277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cargnelli LM, Neff BD (2006) Condition-dependent nesting in bluegill sunfish Lepomis macrochirus. J Anim Ecol 75:627–633. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01083.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charmantier A, McCleery RH, Cole LR, Perrins C, Kruuk LEB, Sheldon BC (2008) Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in response to climate change in a wild bird population. Science 320:800–803. doi:10.1126/science.1157174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (1982) The functions of antlers. Behaviour 79:108–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD (1982) Red deer: behaviour and ecology of two sexes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn A, Osmond HL, Double MC (2008) Swingin’ in the rain: condition dependence and sexual selection in a capricious world. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 275:605–612. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltman DW, Festa-Bianchet M, Jorgenson JT, Strobeck C (2002) Age-dependent sexual selection in bighorn rams. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 269:165–172. doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coulson T, Kruuk LEB, Tavecchia G, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH (2003) Estimating selection on neonatal traits in red deer using elasticity path analysis. Evolution 57:2879–2892

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Cortes LA, Sorensen D (2001) Alternative implementations of Monte Carlo EM algorithms for likelihood inferences. Genet Sel Evol 33:443–452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goss RJ (1968) Inhibition of growth and shedding of antlers by sex hormones. Nature 220:83–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goss R (1983) Deer antlers, regeneration, evolution and function. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Green WCH, Rothstein A (1993) Persistent influences of birth date on dominance, growth and reproductive success in bison. J Zool 230:177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadfield JD (2010) MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J Stat Softw 33:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16:1099–1106. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kerkhoff AJ, Enquist BJ (2009) Multiplicative by nature: why logarithmic transformation is necessary in allometry. J Theor Biol 257:519–521. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.12.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruuk LEB, Slate J, Pemberton JM, Brotherstone S, Guinness F, Clutton-Brock T (2002) Antler size in red deer: heritability and selection but no evolution. Evolution 56:1683–1695

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langvatn R, Albon SD, Burkey T, CluttonBrock TH (1996) Climate, plant phenology and variation in age of first reproduction in a temperate herbivore. J Anim Ecol 65:653–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li CY, Suttie JM, Clark DE (2004) Morphological observation of antler regeneration in red deer (Cervus elaphus). J Morphol 262:731–740. doi:10.1002/jmor.10273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln GA (1992) Biology of antlers. J Zool 226:517–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mysterud A, Meisingset E, Langvatn R, Yoccoz NG, Stenseth NC (2005) Climate-dependent allocation of resources to secondary sexual traits in red deer. Oikos 111:245–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussey DH, Wilson AJ, Brommer JE (2007) The evolutionary ecology of individual phenotypic plasticity in wild populations. J Evol Biol 20:831–844. doi:10.1111/j.1420-91001.2007.01300.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton JM, Albon SD, Guinness FE, Cluttonbrock TH, Dover GA (1992) Behavioral estimates of male mating success tested by DNA fingerprinting in a polygynous mammal. Behav Ecol 3:66–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrins CM (1970) Timing of birds breeding seasons. Ibis 112:242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci M (2001) Phenotypic plasticity. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Post ES, Pedersen C, Wilmers CC, Forchhammer MC (2008) Phenological sequences reveal aggregate life history response to climatic warming. Ecology 89:363–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Price T, Kirkpatrick M, Arnold SJ (1988) Directional selection and the evolution of breeding date in birds. Science 240:798–799

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausher MD (1992) The measurement of selection on quantitative traits—biases due to environmental covariances between traits and fitness. Evolution 46:616–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt KT, Stien A, Albon SD, Guinness FE (2001) Antler length of yearling red deer is determined by population density, weather and early life-history. Oecologia 127:191–197. doi:10.1007/s004420000583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen D, Gianola D (2002) Likelihood, Bayseian and MCMC methods in quantitative genetics. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Torbjorn von S, Grahn M, Goransson G (1994) Intersexual selection and reproductive success in the Pheasant Phasianus colchicus. Am Nat 144:510–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhulst S, van Balen JH, Tinbergen JM (1995) Seasonal decline in reproductive success of the great tie—variation in time or quality? Ecology 76:2392–2403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson A (1971) Climate and the antler-shedding and performance of red deer in North-East Scotland. J Appl Ecol 8:53–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Scottish Natural Heritage for permission to work on Rum and the Rum community for their continued support. We are grateful to all of the field researchers and many volunteers throughout the life of the project, but especially to Fiona Guinness, Sean Morris, Alison Morris and Martyn Baker. We are also grateful to Jarrod Hadfield for MCMCglmm and statistical assistance, to Dan Nussey and Craig Walling for discussion and to Marco Festa-Bianchet, Jean-Michel Gaillard and two anonymous referees for their constructive comments. The Rum red deer project is funded by NERC; M. N. C. is funded by a NERC studentship with the Macaulay Institute as a CASE partner; and L. E. B. K. is supported by a Royal Society University Research fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle N. Clements.

Additional information

Communicated by Jörg Ganzhorn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clements, M.N., Clutton-Brock, T.H., Albon, S.D. et al. Getting the timing right: antler growth phenology and sexual selection in a wild red deer population. Oecologia 164, 357–368 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1656-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1656-7

Keywords

Navigation