Skip to main content
Log in

Functional feeding responses of piscivorous fishes from the northeast US continental shelf

  • Ecosystem ecology - Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The functional feeding response forms of piscivorous fishes used in multispecies and ecosystem modeling have been questioned because they were mostly conjectural or solely based on laboratory studies. Here, we investigate the functional feeding response of seven species of piscivorous fishes on four species of their prey from the northeast US continental shelf using field data that spans 30 years. Our study confirmed that Holling’s types II and III functional responses are the most common functional responses for piscivorous fishes in this region. However, our analyses also revealed that differences exist between piscivorous fishes’ functional responses, and, therefore, combining functional responses of piscivores is probably not appropriate in multispecies and ecosystem modeling. In the absence of specific predator–prey functional responses, we suggest that, for cruising, actively attacking predators, a type II functional response is slightly preferable; for a sedentary, ambush predator, a type III functional response is slightly preferable; at low prey densities for a generic fish predator, a type III functional response should be used; and at moderate to high prey densities, either should work sufficiently. Because we have shown that the functional response of a particular predator to individual prey species varies, these relationships must be further evaluated as we continue to develop and employ multispecies and ecosystem modeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams PA (1990) The effects of adaptive behavior on the type-2 functional response. Ecology 71:877–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams PA, Ginzburg LR (2000) The nature of predation. prey dependent, ratio dependent, or neither. Trends Ecol Evol 15:337–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaki F (eds) Second international symposium on information theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp 267–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Azarovitz TR (1981) A brief historical review of the Woods Hole Laboratory trawl survey time series. In: Doubleday WG, Rivard D (ed) Bottom trawl surveys. Can Spec Publ Fish Aquat Sci 58:62–67

  • Bailey KM (1994) Predation on juvenile flatfish and recruitment variability. Neth J Sea Res 32:175–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bax NJ (1998) The significance and prediction of predation in marine fishes. ICES J Mar Sci 55:997–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begon M, Harper JL, Townsend CR (1986) Ecology. Individuals, populations and communities. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckel JA, Stoner AW (2000) Functional response and switching behavior of young-of-the-year piscivorous bluefish. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 245:25–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckel JA, Conover DO, Steinberg ND, McKown KA (1999) Impact of age-0 bluefish predation on age-0 fishes in the Hudson River estuary: evidence for density-dependent loss of juvenile striped bass. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:275–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • NEFC (Northeast Fisheries Center) (1998) An evaluation of the bottom trawl survey program of the Northeast Fisheries Center. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/NEC-52, Woods Hole, MA

  • Colton TF (1987) Extending functional response models to include a second prey type: an experimental test. Ecology 68):900–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durbin EG, Durbin AG, Langton RW, Bowman RE (1983) Stomach contents of silver hake, Merluccius bilinearis, and Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua, and estimation of their daily rations. Fish Bull 81:437–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers DM (1977) Factors in interpreting data obtained by diel sampling of fish stomachs. J Fish Res Board Can 34:290–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot JM, Persson L (1978) The estimation of daily rates of food consumption for fish. J Anim Ecol 47:977–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton EA, Smith ADM, Johnson CR (2003) Mortality and predation in ecosystem models: is it important how these are expressed. Ecol Model 169:157–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison L, Link J (2004) An expanded multispecies virtual population analysis approach (MSVPA-X) to evaluate predator–prey interactions in exploited fish ecosystems. Version 1.1, Users Manual and Model Description. Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission. April 17, 2004

  • Gerking SD (1994) Feeding ecology of fish. Academic, San Diego, CA

  • Hanson JM, Chouinard GA (2002) Diet of Atlantic cod in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence as an index of ecosystem change. J Fish Biol 60:902–922

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell MP (ed) (1978) The dynamics of arthropod predator–prey systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell MP, Varley GC (1969) New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control. Nature 223:1133–1136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heikinheimo O (2001) Effect of predation on the low-density dynamics of vendace: significance of the functional response. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:1909–1923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1959) The components of predation as revealed by a study of small mammal predation of European pine sawfly. Can Entomol 91:293–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1965) The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation. Mem Entomol Soc Can 45:3–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzwarth T, Mountain D (1992) Surface and bottom temperature distributions from the Northeast Fisheries Science Center spring and fall bottom trawl survey program, 1963–1987. Northeast Fisheries Science Center Reference Document 90–03, Woods Hole, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Juanes F, Buckel JA, Scharf FS (2002) Feeding ecology of piscivorous fishes. In: Hart PJB, Reynolds JD (eds) The handbook of fish biology and fisheries, vol 1. Fish biology. Blackwell, London, pp 267–283

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koen-Alonso M, Yodzis P (2005) Multispecies modelling of some components of the marine community of northern and central Patagonia, Argentina. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:1490–1512

    Google Scholar 

  • Link JS, Almeida FP (2000) An overview and history of the food web dynamics program of the Northeast Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Technical Memorandum, NMFS-NE-159, Woods Hole, MA, 60 p

  • Link JS, Garrison LP (2002) Changes in piscivory associated with fishing induced changes to the finfish community on Georges Bank. Fish Res 55:71–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipcius RN, Hines AH (1986) Variable functional response of a marine predator in dissimilar homogenous microhabitats. Ecology 67:361–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie BR, Leggett WC, Peters RH (1990) Estimating larval fish ingestion rates: can laboratory derived values be reliably extrapolated to the wild? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 67:209–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackinson S, Blanchard JL, Pinnegar JK, Scott R (2003) Consequences of alternative functional response formulations in models exploring whale-fishery interactions. Mar Mamm Sci 19:661–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann KS (2000) The diversity–stability debate. Nature 405:228–233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan DG, Morse WW (1999) Essential fish habitat source document: spiny dogfish, Squalus acanthias, life history and habitat characteristics, September 1999, NOAA Tech. Memorandum, NMFS-NE-150

  • Messier F, Joly DO (2000) Comment: regulation of moose populations by wolf predation. Can J Zool 78:506–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middlemas SJ, Barton TR, Armstrong JD, Thompson PM (2006) Functional and aggregative responses of harbour seal predation to changes in salmonid abundance. Proc R Soc B 273:193–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch WW (1969) Switching in general predators: experiments on predator specificity and stability of prey populations. Ecol Monogr 39:335–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch WW (1973) The functional response of predators. J Appl Ecol 10:335–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch WW, Oaten A (1975) Predation and population stability. Adv Ecol Res 9:1–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch WM, Avery S, Smyth MEB (1975) Switching in predatory fish. Ecology 56:1094–1105

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch WW, Briggs CJ, Nisbet RM (2003) Consumer-resource dynamics. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Overholtz WJ, Link JS (2007) Consumption impacts by marine mammals, fish, and seabirds on the Gulf of Maine—Georges Bank Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) complex during the years 1977–2002. ICES J Mar Sci 64:83

    Google Scholar 

  • Overholtz WJ, Link JS, Suslowitcz LE (2000) Consumption of important pelagic fish and squid by predatory fish in the northeastern USA shelf ecosystem with some fishery comparisons. ICES J Mar Sci 57:1147–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington M (1985) Estimating the average food consumption by fish from stomach content data. Dana 5:81–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen JH, DeAngelis DL (1992) Functional response and capture timing in an individual-based model: predation by northern squawfish (Ptychocheilus oregonensis) on juvenile salmonids in the Columbia River. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49:2551–2565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaganyi EE (2007) Models for an ecosystem approach to fisheries. Food and Agriculture Organization Fisheries Technical Paper, Number 477. Rome, FAO

  • Real LA (1977) The kinetics of functional response. Am Nat 111:289–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Real LA (1979) Ecological determinations of functional response. Ecology 60:481–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (2002) SAS®. Version 8.2 [computer program]. SAS Institute, Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz OJ (2008) Effects of predator hunting model on grassland ecosystem function. Science 319:952–954

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon ME (1949) The natural control of animal populations. J Anim Ecol 18:1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparre (1991) Introduction to multispecies population analysis. ICES Mar Sci Symp 193:12–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor DL, Collie JS (2003) Effect of temperature on the functional response and foraging behavior of the sand shrimp Crangon septemspinosa preying on juvenile winter flounder Pseudopleuronectes americanus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 263:217–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turchin P (2003) Complex population dynamics: a theoretical/empirical synthesis. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters C, Kitchell JF (2001) Cultivation/depensation effects on juvenile survival and recruitment: implications for the theory of fishing. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters CJ, Christensen V, Pauly D (1997) Structuring dynamic models of exploited ecosystems from trophic mass-balance assessments. Rev Fish Biol Fish 7:139–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters CJ, Christensena V, Martella SJ, Kitchellb JF (2005) Possible ecosystem impacts of applying MSY policies from single-species assessment. ICES J Mar Sci 62:558–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Wennhage H (2002) Vulnerability of newly settled plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.) to predation: effects of habitat structure and predator functional response. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 269:129–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilga CD, Motta PJ (1998) Conservation and variation in the feeding mechanism of the spiny dogfish Squalus acanthias. J Exp Biol 201:1345–1358

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yodzis P (1994) Predator–prey theory and management of multispecies fisheries. Ecol Appl 4:51–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yodzis P (2000) Diffuse effects in food webs. Ecology 81:261–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the present and past members of the Food Web Dynamics Program (NOAA/NEFSC) for maintaining the database that supported this work. We are grateful to two anonymous referees whose comments and suggestions considerably improved the manuscript. This work was supported by Lenfest Ocean Program Grant No 2004-001492-105.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Moustahfid.

Additional information

Communicated by Marc Mangel.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Appendix Tables (DOC 47 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moustahfid, H., Tyrrell, M.C., Link, J.S. et al. Functional feeding responses of piscivorous fishes from the northeast US continental shelf. Oecologia 163, 1059–1067 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1596-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1596-2

Keywords

Navigation