Skip to main content
Log in

Engineering novel habitats on urban infrastructure to increase intertidal biodiversity

  • Conservation Ecology - Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urbanization replaces natural shorelines with built infrastructure, seriously impacting species living on these “new” shores. Understanding the ecology of developed shorelines and reducing the consequences of urban development to fauna and flora cannot advance by simply documenting changes to diversity. It needs a robust experimental programme to develop ways in which biodiversity can be sustained in urbanized environments. There have, however, been few such experiments despite wholesale changes to shorelines in urbanized areas. Seawalls––the most extensive artificial infrastructure––are generally featureless, vertical habitats that support reduced levels of local biodiversity. Here, a mimic of an important habitat on natural rocky shores (rock-pools) was experimentally added to a seawall and its impact on diversity assessed. The mimics created shaded vertical substratum and pools that retained water during low tide. These novel habitats increased diversity of foliose algae and sessile and mobile animals, especially higher on the shore. Many species that are generally confined to lowshore levels, expanded their distribution over a greater tidal range. In fact, there were more species in the constructed pools than in natural pools of similar size on nearby shores. There was less effect on the abundances of mobile animals, which may be due to the limited time available for recruitment, or because these structures did not provide appropriate habitat. With increasing anthropogenic intrusion into natural areas and concomitant loss of species, it is essential to learn how to build urban infrastructure that can maintain or enhance biodiversity while meeting societal and engineering criteria. Success requires melding engineering skills and ecological understanding. This paper demonstrates one cost-effective way of addressing this important issue for urban infrastructure affecting nearshore habitats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Able KW, Manderson JP, Studholme AL (1998) The distribution of shallow water juvenile fishes in an urban estuary: the effects of manmade structures in the lower Hudson river. Estuaries 21:731–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Airoldi L, Abbiati M, Beck MW, Hawkins SJ, Jonsson PR, Martin D, Moschella PS, Sundelöf A, Thompson RC, Åberg P (2005) An ecological perspective on the deployment and design of low-crested and other hard coastal defence structures. Coast Eng 52:1073–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Aust Ecol 26:32–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astles KL (1993) Patterns of abundance and distribution of species in intertidal rock pools. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 73:555–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti-Cecchi L, Cinelli F (1995) Habitat heterogeneity, sea urchin grazing and the distribution of algae in littoral rock pools on the west coast of Italy (Western Mediterranean). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 126:203–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti-Cecchi L, Cinelli F (1996) Patterns of disturbance and recovery in littoral rock pools: nonhierarchical competition and spatial variability in secondary succession. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 135:145–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergen SD, Bolton SM, Fridley JL (2001) Design principles for ecological engineering. Ecol Eng 18:201–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blockley DJ (2007) Effect of wharves on intertidal assemblages on seawalls in Sydney Harbour, Australia. Mar Environ Res 63:409–427

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blockley DJ, Chapman MG (2006) Recruitment determines differences between assemblages on shaded or unshaded seawalls. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 327:27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozek CM, Burdick DM (2005) Impacts of seawalls on saltmarsh plant communities in the Great Bay Estuary, New Hampshire USA. Wetl Ecol Manage 13:553–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brawley SH, Johnson LE (1991) Survival of fucoid embryos in the intertidal zone depends upon developmental stage and microhabitat. J Phycol 27:179–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray JR, Curtis JT (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecol Mongr 27:325–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulleri F (2005) The introduction of artificial structures on marine soft- and hard-bottoms: ecological implications of epibiota. Environ Conserv 32:101–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulleri F, Airoldi L (2005) Artificial marine structures facilitate the spread of a non-indigenous green alga, Codium fragile ssp. tomentosoides, in the north Adriatic Sea. J Appl Ecol 42:1063–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulleri F, Chapman MG, Underwood AJ (2005) Intertidal assemblages on seawalls and rocky shores in Sydney Harbour (Australia). Aust Ecol 30:655–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman MG (2003) Paucity of mobile species on constructed seawalls: effects of urbanization on biodiversity. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 264:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman MG (2006) Intertidal seawalls as habitats for molluscs. J Molluscan Stud 72:247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman MG, Bulleri F (2003) Intertidal seawalls––new features of landscape in intertidal environments. Landsc Urban Plan 62:159–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman MG, Underwood AJ (1994) Dispersal of the intertidal snail, Nodilittorina pyramidalis in response to the topographic complexity of the substratum. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 179:145–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clergeau P, Croci S, Jokimäki J, Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki ML, Dinetti M (2006) Avifauna homogenisation by urbanisation: analysis at different European latitudes. Biol Conserv 127:336–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clynick BG, Chapman MG, Underwood AJ (2008) Fish assemblages associated with urban structures and natural reefs in Sydney, Australia. Aust Ecol 33:140–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1975) Some mechanisms producing structure in natural communities: a model and evidence from field experiments. In: Cody MS, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 460–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor EF, McCoy ED (1979) The statistics and biology of the species–area relationship. Am Nat 113:791–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis JLD, Levin LA, Walther SM (2002) Artificial armored shorelines: sites for open-coast species in a southern California bay. Mar Biol 140:1249–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downes BJ, Lake PS, Schreiber ESG, Glaister A (1998) Habitat structure and regulation of local species diversity in a stony, upland stream. Ecol Monogr 68:237–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather PG (1988) Movements of intertidal whelks (Morula marginalba and Thais orbita) in relation to availability of prey and shelter. Mar Biol 100:63–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasby TM (1999) Differences between subtidal epibiota on pier pilings and rocky reefs at marinas in Sydney, Australia. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 48:281–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasby TM, Connell SD (1999) Urban structures as marine habitats. Ambio 28:595–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilderbrand RH, Watts AC, Randle AM (2005) The myths of restoration ecology. Ecol Soc 10:U648–U658

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Arico S, Aronson J, Baron JS, Bridgewater P, Cramer VA, Epstein PR, Ewel JE, Klink CA, Lugo AE, Norton D, Ojima D, Richardson DM, Sanderson EW, Valladeres F, Vila M, Zamora R, Zobel M (2006) Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson AC, Chapman MG, Underwood AJ (2008) Ecological interactions in the provision of habitat by urban development: whelks and engineering by oysters on artificial seawalls. Aust Ecol 33:307–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laasonen P, Muotka T, Kikijarvi I (1998) Recovery of macroinvertebrate communities from stream habitat restoration. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 8:101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin D, Bertasi F, Colangelo MA, de Vries M, Frost M, Hawkins SJ, Macpherson E, Moschella PS, Satta MP, Thompson RC, Ceccherelli VU (2005) Ecological impact of coastal defence structures on sediment and mobile fauna: evaluating and forecasting consequences of unavoidable modifications of native habitats. Coastal Eng 52:1027–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM (2005) Island biogeography for an urbanizing world: how extinction and colonization may determine biological diversity in human-dominated landscapes. Urban Ecosyst 8:157–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA, Groffman P, Bohlen P, Pouyat RV, Zipperer WC, Parmelee RW, Carreiro MM, Medley K (1997) Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urban Ecosyst 1:21–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR, Hobbs RJ (2002) Conservation where people live and work. Conserv Biol 16:330–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ (1996) Ecological engineering: a new paradigm for engineers and ecologists. In: Schulze PC (ed) Engineering within ecological constraints. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 111–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreira J, Chapman MG, Underwood AJ (2006) Seawalls do not sustain viable populations of limpets. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 322:179–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreira J, Chapman MG, Underwood AJ (2007) Maintenance of chitons on seawalls using crevices on sandstone blocks as habitat in Sydney Harbour, Australia. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 347:134–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moschella PS, Abbiati M, Åberg P, Airoldi L, Anderson JT, Bacchiocchi F, Bulleri F, Dinesen GE, Frost M, Gacia E, Granhag L, Jonsson PR, Satta MP, Sundelöf A, Thompson RC, Hawkins SJ (2005) Low-crested coastal defence structures as artificial habitats for marine life: using ecological criteria in design. Coastal Eng 52:1053–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakocinski CF, Heard RW, Lecroy SE, Mclelland JA, Simons T (1996) Responses by macrobenthic assemblages to extensive beach restoration at Perdido Key, Florida, USA. J Coastal Res 12:326–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger DM, Holland AF, Gainey C (2004) Cumulative impacts of dock shading on Spartina alterniflora in South Carolina estuaries. Environ Manage 33:741–748

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suchanek TH (1994) Temperate coastal marine communities: biodiversity and threats. Am Zool 34:110–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson RC, Crowe TP, Hawkins SJ (2002) Rocky intertidal communities: past environmental changes, present status and predictions for the next 25 years. Environ Conserv 29:168–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ (1976) Analysis of patterns of dispersion of intertidal prosobranch gastropods in relation to macroalgae and rock pools. Oecologia 25:145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ (1981) Structure of a rocky intertidal community in New South Wales: patterns of vertical distribution and seasonal change. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 51:57–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ (1991) The logic of ecological experiments: a case history from studies of the distribution of macro-algae on rocky intertidal shores. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 71:841–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ (2004) Landing on one’s foot: small-scale topographic features of habitat and the dispersion of juvenile intertidal gastropods. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 268:173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ, Skilleter GA (1996) Effects of patch-size on the structure of assemblages in rock pools. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 197:63–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ, Chapman MG, Crowe TP (2004) Identifying and understanding preferences for habitat or prey. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 300:161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolter C (2001) Conservation of fish species diversity in navigable waterways. Landsc Urban Plan 53:135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Australian Research Council through its Special Research Grant Scheme and a Linkage Grant. Thanks to all of our Industry Collaborators, particularly North Sydney Council who funded the construction, to MacLeod Consultants for creating these habitats and John Thompson of John Nixon Pty. Ltd. for an incredible amount of on-site assistance. Numerous Research Support staff in the Centre assisted with data collection and analysis. Tony Underwood and two anonymous reviewers provided useful criticism on an earlier draft of this paper. The work described in this paper and the production and authorship of the paper, conform in every respect to the University of Sydney’s Policies on Ethical and Responsible Behaviour in Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. G. Chapman.

Additional information

Communicated by Barbara Downes.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Figure S1 (PDF 355 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chapman, M.G., Blockley, D.J. Engineering novel habitats on urban infrastructure to increase intertidal biodiversity. Oecologia 161, 625–635 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1393-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1393-y

Keywords

Navigation