Skip to main content
Log in

Interference competition and temporal niche shifts: elephants and herbivore communities at waterholes

  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scarcity of resources may result in high levels of animal aggregation; interference competition can occur in such a scenario and play a role in resource acquisition. Here, we test the hypothesis that animals could minimize interference competition by shifting their temporal niches in relation to competitors. In Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe, we monitored waterholes in order to study agonistic interactions between elephants and other herbivore species. We also used a long-term data set from a yearly survey of waterhole attendance by herbivores to evaluate the influence of the presence of elephants on the use of waterholes by other herbivore species. Our results show that in drier years, waterholes are crowded with elephants early in the afternoon. In general, the species most affected by interference competition with elephants shift their temporal niches at the waterholes, thus maintaining a constant temporal overlaps with elephants. The species less affected by interference competition with elephants show no temporal niche shifts and increase their temporal overlap with elephants at waterholes, as predicted from a noncompetition hypothesis. This study provides evidence that interference competition with a behaviorally dominant large species influences the temporal niches of smaller species, and suggests that the potential costs associated with interference between elephants and other herbivores at waterholes are linked to shifts in diurnal activities rather than interactions and water acquisition itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2a–c
Fig. 3a–b
Fig. 4a–b

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams PA (1986) Character displacement and niche shift analysed using consumer-resource models of competition. Theor Popul Biol 29:107–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams PA, Chen X (2002) The evolution of traits affecting resource acquisition and predator vulnerability: character displacement under real and apparent competition. Am Nat 160:692–704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abramsky Z, Rosenzweig ML, Subach A (2001) The cost of interspecific competition in two gerbil species. J Anim Ecol 70:561–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler FR, Mosquera J (2000) Is space necessary? Interference competition and limits to biodiversity. Ecology 81:3226–3232

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht M, Gotelli NJ (2001) Spatial and temporal niche partitioning in grassland ants. Oecologia 126:134–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amarasekare P (2002) Interference competition and species coexistence. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:2541–2550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger J, Cunningham C (1998) Behavioural ecology in managed reserves: gender-based asymmetries in interspecific dominance in African elephants and rhinos. Anim Conserv 1:33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein C, Kacelnik A, Krebs JR (1991) Individual decisions and the distribution of predators in a patchy environment. II. The influence of travels costs and structure of the environment. J Anim Ecol 60:205–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanc JJ, Barnes RFW, Craig GC, Douglas-Hamilton I, Dublin HT, Hart JA, Thouless CR (2005) Changes in elephant numbers in major savanna populations in eastern and southern Africa. Pachyderm 38:19–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond WJ (1993) Keystone species. In: Schulze ED, Mooney HA (eds) Biodiversity and ecosystem function. Springer, Berlin, pp 237–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Bothma JP (1989) Game ranch management. van Schaik Uitgewers, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro TM, Stoner CJ (2003) The potential for interspecific competition among African carnivores. Biol Conserv 110:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carothers JH, Jaksic FM (1984) Time as a niche difference: the role of interference competition. Oikos 42:403–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case TJ, Gilpin ME (1974) Interference competition and niche theory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71:3073–3077

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chamaillé-Jammes S (2006) Under the African sky: from climatic fluctuations to the regulation of populations, the role of surface-water in the spatio-temporal dynamics of an elephant population. Ph.D. thesis, University of Paris 6, France

  • Chase JM, Abrams PA, Grover JP, Diehl S, Chesson P, Holt RD, Richards SA, Nisbet RM, Case TJ (2002) The interaction between predation and competition: a review and synthesis. Ecol Lett 5:302–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox DR, Snell EJ (1989) Analysis of binary data. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell W (1998) Variation in the strength of interference with resource density in blackbirds, Turdus merula. Oikos 81:152–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickman CR (1991) Mechanisms of competition among insectivorous mammals. Oecologia 85:464–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolman PM (1995) The intensity of interference varies with resource density: evidence from a field study with snow buntings, Plectrophenox nivalis. Oecologia 102:511–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • du Toit JT, Yetman CA (2005) Effects of body size on the diurnal activity budgets of African browsing ruminants. Oecologia 143:317–325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eccard JA, Ylönen H (2002) Direct interference or indirect exploitation? An experimental study of fitness costs of interspecific competition in voles. Oikos 99:580–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ens BJ, Goss-Custard JD (1984) Interference among oystercatchers, Haematopus ostralegus, feeding on mussels, Mytilus edulis, on the Exe estuary. J Anim Ecol 53:217–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher NI (1993) Statistical analysis of circular data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin D, Boyce MS, Merrill EH, Fryxell JH (2004) Foraging costs of vigilance in large mammalian herbivores. Oikos 107:172–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goss-Custard JD (1980) Competition for food and interference among waders. Ardea 68:31–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1978) Some comments on the measurement of niche metrics. Ecology 59:168–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin G (1960) The competitive exclusion principle. Science 131:1292–1297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holway DA (1999) Competitive mechanisms underlying the displacement of native ants by the invasive argentine ant. Ecology 80:238–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler BP, Brown JS, Subach A (1993) Mechanisms of species coexistence of optimal foragers: temporal partitioning by two species of sand dune gerbils. Oikos 67:548–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeuille N, Loreau M (2005) Evolutionary emergence of size-structured food webs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:5761–5766

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M (1989) On testing temporal niche differentiation in carabid beetles. Oecologia 81:89–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palomares F, Caro TM (1999) Interspecific killing among mammalian carnivores. Am Nat 153:492–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson L (1985) Asymmetrical competition: are larger animals competitively superior? Am Nat 126:261–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters RH (1983) The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfern JV, Grant R, Biggs H, Getz W (2003) Surface-water constraints on herbivore foraging in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. Ecology 84:2092–2107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (1999) SAS/STAT software, v8. SAS Institute Inc., Carey, NC

  • Schoener TW (1968) The Anolis lizards of Bimini: resource partitioning in a complex fauna. Ecology 49:704–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am Nat 122:240–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair ARE, Mduma S, Brashares JS (2003) Patterns of predation in a diverse predator–prey system. Nature 425:288–290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tokeshi M (1999) Species coexistence: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Blackwell Science, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Trash I, Theron GK, Bothma JP (1995) Dry season herbivore densities around drinking troughs in the Kruger National Park. J Arid Environ 29:213–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triplet P, Stillman RA, Goss-Custard JD (1999) Prey abundance and the strength of interference in a foraging shorebird. J Anim Ecol 68:254–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vahl WK, van der Meer J, Weissing FJ, van Dullemen D, Piersma T (2005) The mechanisms of interference competition: two experiments on foraging waders. Behav Ecol 16:845–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valeix M, Fritz H, Dubois S, Kanengoni K, Alleaume S, Said S (2007) Vegetation change and herbivore abundance over a period of increasing elephant abundance in Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe. J Trop Ecol 23:87–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir J, Davison E (1965) Daily occurrence of African game animals at waterholes during dry weather. Afr Zool 1:353–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson BR (1975) Seasonal distribution of elephant in Wankie National Park. Arnoldia 11:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, London

  • Ziv Y, Abramsky Z, Kotler BP, Subach A (1993) Interference competition and temporal and habitat partitioning in two gerbil species. Oikos 66:237–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Director General of the Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority is acknowledged for providing the opportunity to carry out this research and for permission to publish this manuscript. We are indebted to the Wildlife Environment Zimbabwe for their indispensable data. Marion Valeix and Simon Chamaillé-Jammes were supported by a Ph.D. grant from the French “Ministère de la Recherche” through the “Ecole Doctorale Diversité du Vivant” of “Université Pierre et Marie Curie.” This research was carried out within the framework of the HERD project (Hwange Environmental Research Development), funded by the French “Ministère des Affaires Etrangères,” the “Ambassade de France au Zimbabwe,” the CIRAD, the CNRS and the IFB “Global Change and Biodiversity.” We also want to acknowledge Sébastien Le Bel, CIRAD representative in Zimbabwe. We thank Johan du Toit, Michel Loreau, Patrick Duncan, William Eldridge, Donna Robertson and three anonymous referees for their fruitful comments on previous drafts. Special thanks go to the rangers, students and volunteers who participated in the fieldwork.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marion Valeix.

Additional information

Communicated by Roland Brandl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Valeix, M., Chamaillé-Jammes, S. & Fritz, H. Interference competition and temporal niche shifts: elephants and herbivore communities at waterholes. Oecologia 153, 739–748 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0764-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0764-5

Keywords

Navigation