Skip to main content
Log in

Habitat complexity modifies ant–parasitoid interactions: implications for community dynamics and the role of disturbance

  • Community Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Species must balance effective competition with avoidance of mortality imposed by predators or parasites to coexist within a local ecological community. Attributes of the habitat in which species interact, such as structural complexity, have the potential to affect how species balance competition and mortality by providing refuge from predators or parasites. Disturbance events such as fire can drastically alter habitat complexity and may be important modifiers of species interactions in communities. This study investigates whether the presence of habitat complexity in the form of leaf litter can alter interactions between the behaviorally dominant host ants Pheidole diversipilosa and Pheidole bicarinata, their respective specialist dipteran parasitoids (Phoridae: Apocephalus sp. 8 and Apocephalus sp. 25) and a single species of ant competitor (Dorymyrmex insanus). We used a factorial design to manipulate competition (presence/absence of competitors), mortality risk (presence/absence of parasitoids) and habitat complexity (presence/absence of leaf litter). Parasitoid presence reduced soldier caste foraging, but refuge from habitat complexity allowed increased soldier foraging in comparison to treatments in which no refuge was available. Variation in soldier foraging behavior correlated strongly with foraging success, a proxy for colony fitness. Habitat complexity allowed both host species to balance competitive success with mortality avoidance. The effect of fire on habitat complexity was also studied, and demonstrated that the immediate negative impact of fire on habitat complexity can persist for multiple years. Our findings indicate that habitat complexity can increase dominant host competitive success even in the presence of parasitoids, which may have consequences for coexistence of subordinate competitors and community diversity in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonzo SH (2002) State-dependent habitat selection games between predators and prey: the importance of behavioral interactions and expected lifetime reproductive success. Evol Ecol Res 4:759–778

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AN (1985) Immediate effects of fire on ants in the semi-arid mallee region of north-western Victoria. J Ecol 10:25–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Andow DA, Prokrym DR (1990) Plant structural complexity and host-finding by a parasitoid. Oecologia 82:162–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell SS, McCoy ED, Mushinsky HR (1991) Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bestelmeyer BT, Schooley RL (1999) The ants of the southern Sonoran desert: community structure and the role of trees. Biodiversity Conserv 8:643–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerdá X, Retana J, Cros S (1997). Thermal disruption of transitive hierarchies in Mediterranean ant communities. J Anim Ecol 66:363–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler C, Cheney P, Thomas P, Trabaud L, Williams D (1983) Fire in forestry vol 1. Forest fire behavior and effects. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase JM, Abrams PA, Grover JP, Diehl S, Chesson P, Holt RD, Richards SA, Nisbet RM, Case TJ (2002) The interaction between predation and competition: a review and synthesis. Ecol Lett 5:302–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark TL, Messina FJ (1998) Plant architecture and the foraging success of ladybird beetles attacking the Russian wheat aphid. Entomol Exp Appl 86:153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DW (1977) Species diversity and community organization in desert seed-eating ants. Ecology 58:711–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DW, Inouye RS, Brown JH (1984) Granivory in a desert ecosystem: experimental evidence for indirect facilitation of ants by rodents. Ecology 65:1780–1786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downes BL, Lake PS, Schreiber ES, Glaister A (1998) Habitat structure and regulation of local species-diversity in a stony, upland stream. Ecol Monogr 68:237–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellner SP, et al. (2001) Habitat structure and population persistence in and experimental community. Nature 412:538–543

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feener DH Jr (1981) Competition between ant species: outcome controlled by parasitic flies. Science 214:815–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feener DH Jr (2000) Is the assembly of ant communities mediated by parasitoids? Oikos 90:79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finke DL, Denno RF (2002) Intraguild predation diminished in complex-structured vegetation: implications for prey suppression. Ecology 83:643–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher WJ, Underwood AJ (1987) Interspecific competition among subtidal limpets-effect of substratum heterogeneity. Ecology 68:387–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser DF, Huntingford FA (1986) Feeding and avoiding predation hazard: the behavioral response of the prey. Ethology 73:56–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosselin LA, Bourget E (1989) Individual performance in relation to structural heterogeneity: the influence of substratum topography on an intertidal predator, Thais lapillus. J Anim Ecol 58:287–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen RA (2000) Effects of habitat complexity and composition on a diverse litter microarthropod assemblage. Ecology 81:1120–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck KL, Wetstone GS (1977) Habitat complexity and invertebrate species richness and abundance in tropical seagrass meadows. J Biogeogr 4:135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoddle MS (2003) The effect of prey species and environmental complexity on the functional response of Franklinothrips orizabensis: a test of the fractal foraging model. Ecol Entomol 28:309–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holway DA (1999) Competitive mechanisms underlying the displacement of native ants by the invasive Argentine ant. Ecology 80:238–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby KN (1993) Advance data analysis with SYSTAT. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneitel JM, Chase JM (2004) Trade-offs in community ecology: linking spatial scales and species coexistence. Ecol Lett 7:69–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBrun EG (2003) When to lose your head: ant-phorid fly interactions, community level impacts and evolutionary significance. Dissertation. Graduate Degree Program in Ecology and Evolution, University of Utah, Utah

  • LeBrun EG (2005) Who is the top dog in ant communities? Resources, parasitoids, and multiple competitive hierarchies. Oecologia 142:643–652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LeBrun EG, Feener DH Jr (2002) Linked indirect effects in ant-phorid interactions: impacts on ant assemblage structure. Oecologia 133:599–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, MacArthur JW (1961) On bird species diversity. Ecology 42:594–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehdiabadi NJ, Gilbert LE (2002) Colony-level impacts of parasitoid flies on fire ants. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 269:1695–1699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison LW (1997) Oviposition behavior and development of Pseudacteon flies (Diptera: Phoridae), parasitoids of Solenopsis fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Environ Entomol 26:716–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison LW (1999) Indirect effects of phorid fly parasitoids on the mechanisms of interspecific competition among ants. Oecologia 113:122

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison LW, Porter SD (2005) Testing for population-level impacts of introduced Pseudacteon tricuspis flies, phorid parasitoids of Solenopsis invicta fire ants. Biol Control 33:9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison WL, Kawazoe AE, Guerra R, Gilbert LE (2000) Ecological interactions of Pseudacteon parasitoids and Solenopsis ant hosts: environmental correlates of activity and effects on competitive hierarchies. Ecol Entomol 25:433–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton AP, English Loeb G, Belden E (2001) Host plant manipulation of natural enemies: leaf domatia protect beneficial mites from insect predators. Oecologia 126:535–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor NA (1991) The effects of habitat complexity on the macroinvertebrates colonizing wood substrates in a lowland stream. Oecologia 85:504–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr MR, Seike SH, Benson WW, Gilbert LE (1995) Flies suppress fire ants. Nature 26:292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr MR, Dahlsten DL, Benson WW (2003) Ecological interactions among ants in the genus Linepithema, their phorid parasitoids, and ant competitors. Ecol Entomol 28:203–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Orth RJ, Heck KL et al (1984) Faunal communities in seagrass beds: a review of the influence of plant structure and prey characteristics on predator–prey relationships. Estuaries 7A:339–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pianka ER (1966) Convexity, desert lizards, and spatial heterogeneity. Ecology 47:1055–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripple WJ, Beschta RL (2004) Wolves and the ecology of fear: can predation risk structure ecosystems. BioScience 54:755–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothley KD, Schmidtz OJ, Cohon JL (1997) Foraging to balance conflicting demands: novel insights from grasshoppers under predation risk. Behav Ecol 8:551–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryti RT, Case TJ (1988) Field experiments on desert ants: testing for competition between ants. Ecology 69:1993–2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1974) Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185:27–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DRR (1985) Habitat use by colonies of Philoponella republicanna (Araneae, Uroboridae) J Arachnol 13:363–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal and Rohlf (1995) Biometry. Freeman, New York

  • Swetnam TW, Baisan CH (1996) Fire histories of montane forests in the Madrean Borderlands. In: Folliott PF et al. (technical coordinators) Effects of fire on Madrean Province Ecosystems. Proceedings. USDA Forest Service general technical report RM-GTR-289, pp 15–36

  • Swetnam TW, Betancourt JL (1998) Mesoscale disturbance and ecological response to decadal climate variability in the American Southwest. J Climate 11:3128–3147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SYSTAT, Inc. (2004) SYSTAT version 11. Richmond, CA

  • Tilman D (1994) Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75:2–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Peacor SD (2003) A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 84:1083–1100

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford WG, Forbes GS, Kerley GI (1995) Diversity, spatial variability, and functional roles of invertebrates in desert grassland ecosystems. In: McClaran MP, Van Devender TR (eds) The desert grassland. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Ariz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams CB (1943) Area and the number of species. Nature 152:264–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisdom WA, Whitford WG (1981) Effects of vegetation change on ant communities of arid rangelands. Environ Entomol 10:893–897

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Ed LeBrun provided crucial training and input at the inception of this study. This manuscript benefited substantially from the comments of two anonymous reviewers and Craig Osenberg. Jessica Pearce, Philipp Wiescher, Roxana Arauco, Ryan Bixenmann, Arne Hultquist and Martin Moyano also provided useful comments on the manuscript. Thanks to Stefan Cover for identifying host ants and the Sperry lab at the University of Utah for use of their drying ovens. This study would not have been possible without the assistance of Joe and Valer Austin, the facilities of the Southwestern Research Station and the help of Robert Minckely. Mary Wilkinson provided much needed support. We would like to acknowledge funding from the American Museum of Natural History Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Fund, Sigma Xi, the University of Utah Biology Department and the Associated Students of the University of Utah. A NSF Dissertation Improvement Grant to E. B. Wilkinson partially funded this work. D. H. Feener Jr wishes to acknowledge support from NSF grant DEB 03-16524. These experiments comply with the current laws of the countries in which they were performed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elliot B. Wilkinson.

Additional information

Communicated by Andrew Gonzales.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilkinson, E.B., Feener , D.H. Habitat complexity modifies ant–parasitoid interactions: implications for community dynamics and the role of disturbance. Oecologia 152, 151–161 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0634-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0634-6

Keywords

Navigation