Skip to main content
Log in

Predator avoidance in phytophagous mites: response to present danger depends on alternative host quality

  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied whether volatiles released by putative host plants affect the antipredator response of an herbivorous mite, Tetranychus urticae, when the patch was invaded by Phytoseiulus persimilis. Tetranychus urticae laid a lower number of eggs on tomato leaves than on lima bean leaves, suggesting that lima bean is a preferred host food source for T. urticae. In addition, T. urticae preferred lima bean plant volatiles to tomato plant volatiles in a Y-tube olfactometer test. To investigate the antipredator response of T. urticae, we examined the migration of T. urticae from a lima bean leaf disc to a neighbouring leaf disc (either a tomato or lima bean leaf disc) when ten predators were introduced into the original lima bean disc. A Parafilm bridge allowed for migration between the leaf discs. No migrations occurred between leaf discs when there were no predators introduced to the original leaf disc. However, when predators were introduced migrations did occur. When the neighbouring leaf disc was upwind of the original disc, the migration rate of the mite from original lima bean leaf disc to a neighbouring tomato leaf disc was significantly lower than that to a neighbouring lima bean leaf disc. By contrast, when the neighbouring leaf disc was downwind of the original leaf disc, there was no difference in the migration rates between lima bean leaf discs and tomato leaf discs. The number of T. urticae killed by P. persimilis for each treatment was not different, and this clearly shows that the danger was the same in all treatments regardless of the decision made by T. urticae. From these results, we conclude that T. urticae change their antipredator response by evaluating the difference in host plant volatiles in the patch they inhabit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahams M, Dill LM (1989) A determination of the energetic equivalence of the risk of predation. Ecology 70:999–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aina OJ, Rodriguez JG, Knavel DE (1972) Characterizing resistance to Tetranychus urticae in tomato. J Econ Entomol 65:641–643

    Google Scholar 

  • Athias-Binche F (1993) Dispersal in varying environments: the case of phoretic uropodid mites. Can J Zool 71:1793–1798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernays EA, Chapman RF (1994) Host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwood JS, Schausberger P, Croft BA (2001) Prey-stage preference in generalist and specialist phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) when offered Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) eggs and larvae. Environ Entomol 30:1103–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolland H, Gutierrez J, Flechtmann C (1998) World catalogue of the spider mite family. Brill, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatzivasileiadis EA, Sabelis MW (1997) Toxicity of methyl ketones from tomato trichomes to Teranychus urticae Koch. Exp Appl Acarol 21:473–484

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chatzivasileiadis EA, Boon JJ, Sabelis MW (1999) Accumulation and turnover of 2-tridecanone in Teranychus urticae and its consequences for resistance of wild and cultivated tomatoes. Exp Appl Acarol 23:1011–1021

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dicke M (1986) Volatile spider-mite pheromone and host-plant kairomone, involved in spaced-out gregariousness in the spider mite Tetranychus urticae. Physiol Entomol 11:251–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicke M (2000) Chemical ecology of host-plant selection by herbivorous arthropods: a multiple perspectives. Biochem Syst Ecol 28:601–617

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grand TC, Dill LM (1997) The energetic equivalence of cover to juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch): ideal free distribution theory applied. Behav Ecol 8:437–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grostal P, Dicke M (1999) Direct and indirect cues of predation risk influence behavior and reproduction of prey: a case for acarine interactions. Behav Ecol 10:422–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holte AE, Houck MA, Collie NC (2001) Potential role of parasitism in the evolution of mutualism in astigmatid mites: Hemisarcoptes cooremani as a model. Exp Appl Acarol 25:97–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horiuchi J, Arimura G, Ozawa R, Shimoda T, Dicke M, Takabayashi J, Nishioka T (2003) A comparison of the response of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) and Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to volatiles emitted from lima bean leaves with different levels of damage made by T. urticae or Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Appl Entomol Zool 38:365–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kishida O, Nishimura K (2004) Bulgy tadpoles: inducible defense morph. Oecologia 140:414–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kondo A, Takafuji A (1985) Resource utilization pattern of two species of tetranychid mites (Avarina: Tetranychidae). Res Popul Ecol 27:145–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Margolies DC (1993) Quantitative genetics of aerial dispersal behaviour and life-history traits in Tetranychus urticae. Heredity 70: 544–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL (1998) Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioral, reproductive, and ecological perspectives. Adv Study Behav 27:215–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losey JE, Denno RF (1998a) The escape response of pea aphid to foliar-foraging predators: factors affecting dropping behaviour. Ecol Entomol 23:53–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losey JE, Denno RF (1998b) Interspecific variation in the escape responses of aphids: effect on risk of predation from foliar-foraging and ground-foraging predators. Oecologia 115:245–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magalhães S, Janssen A, Hanna R, Sabelis MW (2002) Flexible antipredator behaviour in herbivorous mites through vertical migration in a plant. Oecologia 132:143–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto T, Itioka T, Nishida T (2002) Fitness cost of parasitoid avoidance behavior in the arrowhead scale, Unaspis yanonensis Kuwana. Entomol Exp Appl 105:83–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallini A, Janssen A, Sabelis MW (1999) Spider mites avoid plants with predators. Exp Appl Acarol 23:803–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Relyea RA (2003) How prey respond to combined predators: a review and an empirical test. Ecology 84:1827–1839

    Google Scholar 

  • Takabayashi J, Dicke M (1992) Response of predatory mites with different rearing histories to volatiles of uninfested plants. Entomol Exp Appl 64:187–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollrian R (1995) Predator-induced morphological defenses: costs, life history shifts, and maternal effects in Daphnia pulex. Ecology 76:1691–1705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tollrian R, Harvell CD (1999) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Villagra CA, Ramírez CC, Niemeyer HM (2002) Antipredator responses of aphids to parasitoids change as a function of aphid physiological state. Anim Behav 64:677–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser JH (1986) Host odor perception in phytophagous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 31:121–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yano S (2004) Does Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranichidae) use flying insects as vectors for phoretic dispesal? Exp Appl Acarol 32:243–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology of the Japan Science and Technology Corporation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junji Takabayashi.

Additional information

Communicated by Stefan Scheu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choh, Y., Takabayashi, J. Predator avoidance in phytophagous mites: response to present danger depends on alternative host quality. Oecologia 151, 262–267 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0590-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0590-1

Keywords

Navigation