Abstract
Islands are often considered easier to invade than mainland locations because of lower biotic resistance, but this hypothesis is difficult to test. We compared invasion success (the probability of establishing a wild reproducing population) for bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) introduced to enclosures on 26 farms on islands in the Zhoushan archipelago and 15 farms in neighboring mainland China. Bullfrogs were more likely to invade farms located on islands with lower native frog species richness than mainland farms, consistent with the biotic resistance hypothesis. However, human frog hunting pressure also differed between islands and the mainland and, along with the number of bullfrogs raised in enclosures, was a stronger predictor of invasion success than native frog richness in multiple regression. Variation in hunting pressure was also able to account for the difference in invasion success between islands and mainlands: islands had lower hunting pressure and thus higher invasion probability. We conclude that the ease with which bullfrogs have invaded islands of the Zhoushan archipelago relative to the mainland has little to do with biotic resistance but results from variation in factors under human control.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson I (1989) Introduced animals and extinction. In: Western D, Pearl M (eds) Conservation for the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press, New York
Beirne BP (1975) Biological control attempts by introductions against pest insects in the field in Canada. Can Entomol 107:225–236
Berggren A (2001) Colonization success in Roesel’s bush cricket Matrioptera roeseli: the effects of propagule size. Ecology 82:274–280
Blackburn TM, Duncan TM (2001) Determinants of establishment success in introduced birds. Nature 414:195–197
Blaustein AR, Wake DB, Sousa WP (1994) Amphibian declines: judging stability, persistence, and susceptibility of populations to local and global extinction. Conserv Biol 8:60–71
Bury RB, Luckenbach RA (1976) Introduced amphibians and reptiles in California. Biol Conserv 10:1–14
Bury RB, Whelan JA (1985) Ecology and management of the bullfrog. Publications Unit, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.
Carlquist S (1965) Island life. Natural History Press, Carden City, N.Y.
Case TJ (1991) Invasion resistance, species build-up and community collapse in metapopulation models with interspecies competition. Biol J Linn Soc 42:239–266
Case TJ (1996) Global patterns in the establishment and distribution of exotic birds. Biol Conserv 78:69–96
Cassey P (2003) A comparative analysis of the relative success of introduced land birds on islands. Evol Ecol Res 5:1011–1021
Cassey P, Blackburn TM, Sol D, Duncan RP, Lockwood JL (2004) Global patterns of introduction effort and establishment success in birds. Biol Lett. DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0199
Crowell KL (1973) Experimental zoogeography: introductions of mice to small islands. Am Nat 107:535–558
D’Antonio CM, Dudley TL (1995) Biological invasions as agents of change on islands versus mainlands. In: Vitousek PM, Loope LL, Adsersen H (eds) Islands: biological diversity and ecosystem function. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 103–121
Duncan RP (1997) The role of competition and introduction effort in the success of passeriform birds introduced to New Zealand. Am Nat 149:903–915
Duncan RP, Blackburn TM, Sol D (2003) The ecology of bird introductions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:71–98
Ebenhard T (1988) Introduced birds and mammals and their ecological effects. Swed Wild Res Viltrevy 13:1–107
Ehler LE, Hall RW (1982) Evidence for competitive exclusion of introduced natural enemies in biological control. Environ Entomol 11:1–4
Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, London
Fisher RN, Shaffer HB (1996) The decline of amphibians in California’s great central valley. Conserv Biol 10:1387–1397
Forsyth DM, Duncan RP (2001) Propagate size and the relative success of exotic ungulate and bird introductions to New Zealand. Am Nat 157:583–595
Goodman D (1987) The demography of chance extinction. In: Soulé ME (eds) Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 11–43
Griffith B, Scott JM, Carpenter JW, Reed C (1989) Translocation as a species conservation tool: status and strategy. Science 245:477–480
Hopper KR, Roush RT (1993) Mate finding, dispersal, number released, and the success of biological control introduction. Ecol Entomol 18:321–331
Huang MH (1990) Fauna of Zhejiang: Amphibia, Reptilia (in Chinese). Zhejiang Science and Technology Publishing House, Hangzhou
ISSG (Invasive Species Specialist Group) (2002) Global invasive species database: Rana catesbeiana (amphibian) http://www.issg.org/database/species/ecology.asp?si=80&fr=1&sts=tss. (20 November 2002)
Kats LB, Ferrer RP (2003) Alien predators and amphibian decline: review of two decades of science and transition to conservation. Divers Distrib 9:99–110
Kiesecker JM, Blaustein AR (1997) Population differences in responses of red-legged frogs (Rana aurora) to introduced bullfrogs. Ecology 78:1752–1760
Kolar CK, Lodge DM (2001) Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol 16:199–204
Kupferberg SJ (1997) Bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) invasion of California river: the role of larval competition. Ecology 78:1736–1751
Lande R (1993) Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes. Am Nat 142:911–927
Levine JM, D’Antonio CM (1999) Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invisibility. Oikos 87:15–26
MacArthur RH (1955) Fluctuations of animal populations and a measure of community stability. Ecology 36:533–536
MacArthur RH (1970) Species-packing and competitive equilibrium for many species. Theor Popul Biol 1:1–11
MacArthur RH (1972) Geographical ecology: patterns in distribution of species. Harper and Row, New York
MacDonald IAW, Cooper J (1995) Insular lessons for global biodiversity conservation with particular reference to alien invasions. In: Vitousek PM, Loope LL, Adsersen H (eds) Islands: biological diversity and ecosystem function. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 189–203
Mayr E (1965) The nature of colonization in birds. In: Baker HG, Stebbins GL (eds) The genetics of colonizing species. Academic Press, New York, pp 29–47
Moyle PB (1973) Effects of introduced bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana, on the native frogs of the San Joaquin Valley, California. Copeia 1973:18–22
Pimm SL (1991) The balance of nature? University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.
R Development Core Team (2005) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org
Ricciardi A, Atkinson S (2004) Distinctiveness magnifies the impact of biological invaders in aquatic ecosystems. Ecol Lett 7:781–784
Simberloff D (1995) Why do introduced species appear to devastate islands more than mainland areas. Pacific Sci 49:87–97
Sol D (2000) Are islands more susceptible to be invaded than continents? Birds say no. Ecography 23:687–692
Veltman CJ, Nee S, Crawley MJ (1996) Correlates of introduction success in exotic New Zealand birds. Am Nat 147:542–557
Wang JT, Wang PX (1980) The relationship between sea level rising and climate change on east of China (in Chinese with English abstract). Chin J Geogr 16:299–313
Wilson EO (1965) The challenge from related species. In: Baker HG, Stebbin GL (eds) The genetics of colonizing species. Academic Press, New York, pp 7–24
Wilson EO, Bossert WH (1971) A primer of population biology. Sinauer, Stamford, Conn.
Wolf CM, Garland C Jr, Griffith B (1998) Predictors of avian and mammalian translocation success: reanalysis with phylogenetically independent contrasts. Biol Conserv 86:243–255
Wu ZJ (2005) Study on ecology of frogs in Zhoushan archipelago—seasonal food availability, body size, species–area relationships and potential threat of bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) (in Chinese with English abstract). PhD thesis, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Wu ZJ, Wang YP, Li YM (2004) Natural populations of bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) and their potential threat in the east of Zhejiang Province. Biodivers Sci 12:441–446
Yiming L, Niemelä J, Dianmo L (1998) Nested distribution of amphibians in the Zhoushan archipelago, China: can selective extinction cause nested subsets of species? Oecologia 113:557–564
Yu KZ (1989) Collection of agriculture plans in Zhejiang (in Chinese). Mapping Press, Beijing
Zhou JL (1987) Integrated agriculture plans in Zhoushan city. Zhejiang People's Press, Hangzhou
Zhuge Y (1990) Fauna of Zhejiang: Mammalia (in Chinese). Zhejiang Science and Technology, Hangzhou
Acknowledgements
We thank Y. P. Wang for helping with the fieldwork. We are grateful to Steve Kohler and two anonymous reviewers for useful comments on previous versions of the manuscript. This study was supported by the National Science Foundation (no. 30270264) and CAS Innovation Program (KSCX3-IOZ-02 and KSCX2-SW-118). The work complies with the current laws of China in which it was performed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Steven Kohler
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yiming, L., Zhengjun, W. & Duncan, R.P. Why islands are easier to invade: human influences on bullfrog invasion in the Zhoushan archipelago and neighboring mainland China. Oecologia 148, 129–136 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0355-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0355-x