Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Significance of instream autotrophs in trophic dynamics of the Upper Mississippi River

  • Ecosystem Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Trophic dynamics of large river–floodplain ecosystems are still not well understood despite development of several conceptual models over the last 25 years. To help resolve questions about the relative contribution of algal and detrital organic matter to food webs in the Upper Mississippi River, we (1) separated living and detrital components of ultrafine and fine transported organic matter (UTOM and FTOM, respectively) by colloidal silica centrifugation; (2) identified stable isotope signatures (δ13C and δ15N) for these two portions of transported organic matter and other potential organic matter sources; and (3) employed a multiple source, dual-isotope mixing model to determine the relative contribution of major energy sources to primary consumers and the potential contribution of basal sources to the biomass of secondary consumers. The δ13C and δ15N of living and detrital fractions of UTOM and FTOM were distinct, indicating clear differences in isotopic composition of the algal and detrital fractions of transported organic matter. Living and detrital transported organic matter also differed from other potential organic matter sources by either δ13C or δ15N. A six-source mixing model using both δ13C and δ15N indicated that algal transported organic matter was the major resource assimilated by primary consumers. The contribution of detrital transported organic matter was small in most cases, but there were a small number of taxa for which it could potentially contribute to more than half the assimilated diet. Colloidal dissolved organic matter, which includes heterotrophic bacteria, accounted for only a small fraction of the organic matter assimilated by most primary consumers, indicating that coupling between microbial processes and metazoan production is minimal. Terrestrial C3 litter from the floodplain forest floor and aquatic macrophytes were also relatively unimportant to the assimilated diet of primary consumers. Application of the mixing model to compare basal source isotopic ratios to secondary consumers revealed that most organic matter moving from primary to secondary consumers originated from algal TOM. Our findings indicate that autochthonous organic matter is the major energy source supporting metazoan production in the main channel of this large river, at least during the summer. This study joins a number of other investigations performed globally that indicate organic matter originating from instream production of sestonic and benthic microalgae is a major driver in the trophic dynamics of large river ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bayley PB (1989) Aquatic environments in the Amazon Basin, with an analysis of carbon sources, fish production, and yield. In: Dodge D (ed) International Large River Symposium, vol. 106. Canadian Special Publication for Fisheries and Aquatic Science, pp 399–408

  • Bunn SE, Davies PM (1999) Aquatic food webs in turbid, arid zone rivers: preliminary data from Cooper Creek, western Queensland. In: Kingsford RT (ed) Free-flowing river: the ecology of the Paroo River. New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service, Sydney, pp 67–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Delong MD (2005) The Upper Mississippi River. In: Benke AC, Cushing C (eds) Rivers of North America. Academic, New York, in press

  • Delong MD, Thorp JH, Greenwood KS, Miller MC (2001) Responses of consumers and food resources to a high magnitude, unpredicted flood in the Upper Mississippi River basin. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 17:217–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • France RL (1995) Carbon-13 enrichment in benthic compared to planktonic algae: food web implications. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 124:307–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galat DA, Fredickson LH, Humburh DD, Bataille KJ, Bodie JR, Dohrenwend J, Gelwicks GT, Havel JE, Helmers DL, Hooker JB, Jones JR, Knowlton MF, Kubisiak J, Mazourek J, McColpin AC, Renken RB, Semlitsch RD (1998) Flooding to restore connectivity of regulated, large-river wetlands. Bioscience 48:721–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gore JA, Shield FD Jr (1995) Can large rivers be restored? Bioscience 45:134–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton SK, Lewis WM Jr (1992) Stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes in algae and detritus from the Orinoco River floodplain, Venezuela. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 56:4237–4246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton SK, Lewis WM Jr, Sippel SJ (1992) Energy sources for aquatic animals in the Orinoco River floodplain: evidence from stable isotopes. Oecologia 89:324–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges JI, Mayorga E, Tsamakis E, McClain ME, Aufdenkampe A, Quay P, Richey JE, Benner R, Opsahl S, Black B, Pimentel T, Quintanilla J, Maurice L (2000) Organic matter in Bolivian tributaries of the Amazon River: a comparison to the lower mainstream. Limnol and Oceanogr 45:1449–1466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hein T, Baranyi C, Herndl GJ, Wanek W, Schiemer F (2003) Allochthonous and autochthonous particulate organic matter in floodplains of the River Danube: the importance of hydrological connectivity. Freshwater Biol 48:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junk WJ (1984) Ecology of the várvea floodplain of Amazonian whitewater rivers. In: Sioli H (ed) The Amazon, vol 56. Junk, Dordrecht, pp 215–244

  • Junk WJ, Bayley PB, Sparks RE (1989) The flood pulse concept in river–floodplain ecosystems, in Dodge, D. P. (Ed.), In: Dodge D (ed) International Large River Symposium, vol. 106. Canadian Special Publication for Fisheries and Aquatic Science, pp 11–127

  • Kendall C, Silva SR, Kelly VJ (2001) Carbon and nitrogen isotopic composition of particulate organic matter in four large river systems across the United States. Hydrol Process 15:1301–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis WM Jr, Hamilton SK, Rodriquez MA, Saunders JF III, Lasi MA (2001) Foodweb analysis of the Orinoco floodplain based on production estimates and stable isotope data. Journal N Am Benthol Soc 20:241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt RW, Cummins KW (1996) An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America, 3rd edn, Kendall/Hunt Publishing, Dubuque, IA, USA, 862 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsome SD, Phillips DL, Culleton BJ, Guilderson PT, Koch PL (2004) Dietary reconstruction of an early to middle Holocene human population from the central California coast: insights from advanced stable isotope mixing models. Journal of Archaeol Sci 31:1101–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson BJ, Howarth RW, Garritt RH (1985) Multiple stable isotopes used to trace the flow of organic matter in estuarine food webs. Science 67:1361–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips DL (2001) Mixing models in analyses of diet using multiple stable isotopes: a critique. Oecologia 127:171–179 (erratum Oecologia 128:204)

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips DL, Gregg JW (2003) Source partitioning using stable isotopes: coping with too many sources. Oecologia 136:261–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips DL, Newsome SD, Gregg JW (2005) Combining sources in stable isotope mixing models: alternative methods. Oecologia 144:520–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Post DM (2002) Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 83:703–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds CS, Descy J-P, Padisak J (1994) Are phytoplankton dynamics in rivers so different from those in shallow lakes? Hydrobiologia 289:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiemer F, Keckeis H, Reckendorfer W, Winkler G (2001) The ’inshore retention concept’ and its significance for large rivers. Arch Hydrobiol, Suppl 135:509–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks RE (1995) Need for ecosystem management of large rivers and their floodplains. Bioscience 45:168–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks RE, Nelson JC, Yin Y (1998) Naturalization of the flood regime in regulated rivers. Bioscience 48:706–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorp JH, Delong MD (1994) The riverine productivity model: an heuristic view of carbon sources and organic processing in large river ecosystems. Oikos 70:305–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorp JH, Delong MD (2002) Dominance of autotrophic autochthonous carbon in food webs of heterotrophic rivers. Oikos 96:543–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorp JH, Delong MD, Greenwood KS, Casper AF (1998) Isotopic analysis of three food web theories in constricted and floodplain regions of a large river. Oecologia 117:551–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Zanden MJ, Rasmussen JB (1999) Primary consumer δ13C and δ15N and the trophic position of aquatic consumers. Ecology 80:1393–1404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Sedell JR, Cushing CE (1980) The river continuum concept. Can J Fisheries Aquatic Sci 37:130–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehr JD, Thorp JH (1997) Effects of navigation dams, tributaries, and littoral zones on phytoplankton communities in the Ohio River. Can J of Fisheries Aquatic Sci 54:378–395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Leila Desotelle, Paul Hoppe, Beth Rycyzyn, Kelly Slattery, and Paige Wein for their assistance in the collection of samples. Steve Hamilton gave advice on the colloidal silica separation technique. Don Phillips’ assistance in the application of the IsoSource program was greatly appreciated. David Post and an anonymous reviewer provided many helpful comments on the content of the manuscript. Support for this project was provided by Winona State University through a Summer Research Fellowship (MDD). This report represents contribution number 2004-01 from the undergraduate research program of the Large River Studies Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael D. Delong.

Additional information

Communicated by David Post

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Delong, M.D., Thorp, J.H. Significance of instream autotrophs in trophic dynamics of the Upper Mississippi River. Oecologia 147, 76–85 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0241-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0241-y

Keywords

Navigation