Skip to main content
Log in

Relationships between species’ floral traits and pollinator visitation in a temperate grassland

  • Plant Animal Interactions
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Knowledge about plant–plant interactions for pollinator service at the plant community level is still scarce, although such interactions may be important to seed production and hence the population dynamics of individual plant species and the species compositions of communities. An important step towards a better understanding of pollination interactions at the community level is to assess if the variation in floral traits among plant species explain the variation in flower visitation frequency among those species. We investigated the relative importance of various floral traits for the visitation frequency of all insects, and bumblebees and flies separately, to plant species by measuring the visitation frequency to all insect-pollinated species in a community during an entire flowering season. Visitation frequency was identified to be strongly positive related to the visual display area and the date of peak flowering of plant species. Categorical variables, such as flower form and symmetry, were important to the visitation frequency of flies only. We constructed floral similarity measures based on the species’ floral traits and found that the floral similarity for all species’ traits combined and the continuous traits separately were positively related to individual visitation frequency. On the other hand, plant species with similar categorical floral traits did not have similar visitation frequencies. In conclusion, our results show that continuous traits, such as flower size and/or density, are more important for the variation in visitation frequency among plant species than thought earlier. Furthermore, differences in visitation frequency among pollinator groups give a poor support to the expectations derived from the classical pollination syndromes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aizen MA (2001) Flower sex ratio, pollinator abundance, and the seasonal pollination dynamics of a protandrous plant. Ecology 82:127–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch J, Retana J, Cerda X (1997) Flowering phenology, floral traits and pollinator composition in a herbaceous Mediterranean plant community. Oecologia 109:583–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DR, Motten AF (1985) The mechanism of competition for pollination between two forest herbs. Ecology 66:554–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caruso CM (1999) Pollination of Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae): Effects of intra- vs. interspecific competition. Am J Bot 86:663–668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conner JK, Rush S (1996) Effects of flower size and number on pollinator visitation to wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Oecologia 105:509–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell JE, Galen C (1991). Frequency dependent selection and adaptive surfaces for floral character combinations: the pollination of Polemonium viscosum. Am Nat 138:1342–1353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicks LV, Corbet SA, Pywell RF (2002) Compartmentalization in plant-insect flower visitor webs. J Anim Ecol 71:32–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DNMI (2003) Meteorologisk institutt, Oslo. http://met.no/observasjoner/sogn_og_fjordane/2003/juli/index.html?month. Cited 3 Jan 2005

  • Duffield GE, Gibson RC, Gilhooly PM, Hesse AJ, Inkley CR, Gilbert FS, Barnard CJ (1993) Choice of flowers by foraging honey-bees (Apis mellifera): possible morphological cues. Ecol Entomol 18:191–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupont YL, Hansen DM, Olesen JM (2003) Structure of a plant-flower-visitor network in the high-altitude sub-alpine desert of Tenerife, Canary Islands. Ecography 26:301–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elberling H, Olesen JM (1999) The structure of a high latitude plant-flower visitor system: the dominance of flies. Ecography 22:314–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faegri K, van der Pijl L (1979) The principles of pollination ecology, 3rd edn. Pergamon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinsinger P (1987) Effects of plant-species on each others pollination: is community structure influenced. Trends Ecol Evol 2:123–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenster CB, Armbruster WS, Wilson P, Dudash MR, Thomson JD (2004) Pollination syndromes and floral specialisation. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:375–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fremstad E (1997) Vegetasjonstyper i Norge. NINA, Trondheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Glantz SA, Slinker BK (2001) Primer of applied regression and analysis of variance. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulson D (2003) Bumblebees: behaviour and ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulson D, Stout JC, Hawson SA, Allen JA (1998) Floral display size in comfrey, Symphytum officinale L. (Boraginaceae): relationships with visitation by three bumblebee species and subsequent seed set. Oecologia 113:502–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera J (1988) Pollination relationships in southern Spanish Mediterranean shrublands. J Ecol 76:274–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue K, Maki M, Masuda M (1995) Different responses of pollinating bees to size variation and sexual phases in flowers of Campanula. Ecol Res 10:267–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inouye DW, Pyke GH (1988) Pollination biology in the Snowy Mountains of Australia: comparisons with montane Colorado, USA. Aust J Ecol 13:191–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordano P (1987) Patterns of mutualistic interactions in pollination and seed dispersal: connectance, dependence asymmetries, and coevolution. Am Nat 129:657–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandori I (2002) Diverse visitors with various pollinator importance and temporal change in the important pollinators of Geranium thunbergii (Geraniaceae). Ecol Res 17:283–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lack AJ (1982) The ecology of flowers of chalk grassland and their insect pollinators. J Ecol 70:773–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laverty TM (1992) Plant interactions for pollinator visits: a test of the magnet species effect. Oecologia 89:502–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Lid J, Lid DT (1994) Norsk flora. Samlaget, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall C, Primack RB (1992) Influence of flower characteristics, weather, time of day, and season on insect visitation rates in three plant communities. Am J Bot 79:434–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medel R, Botto-Mahan C, Kalin-Arroyo M (2003) Pollinator-mediated selection on the nectar guide phenotype in the Andean Monkey flower, Mimulus luteus. Ecology 84:1721–1732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memmott J (1999) The structure of a plant–pollinator food web. Ecol Lett 2:276–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meynie S, Bernard R (1997) Pollinator efficiency of some insects in relation to wild species populations of Helianthus L. Agronomie 17:43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohashi K, Yahara T (1998) Effects of variation in flower number on pollinator visits in Cirsium purpuratum (Asteraceae). Am J Bot 85:219–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olesen JM, Jordano P (2002) Geographic patterns in plant–pollinator mutualistic networks. Ecology 83:2416–2424

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellmyr O (2002) Pollination by animals. In: Herrera CM, Pellmyr O (eds) Plant-animal interactions: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 157–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Petanidou T, Vokou D (1993) Pollination ecology of Labiatae in a phryganic (east Mediterranean) ecosystem. Am J Bot 80:892–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering CM (2001) Size and sex of floral displays affect insect visitation rates in the dioecious Australian alpine herb, Aciphylla glacialis. Nord J Bot 21:401–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pleasants JM (1980) Competition for bumblebee pollinators in Rocky Mountain plant communities. Ecology 61:1446–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schemske DW, Willson MF, Melampy MN, Miller LJ, Verner L, Schemske KM, Best LB (1978) Flowering ecology of some spring woodland herbs. Ecology 59:351–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton ML, Preston RE (1988) Ecological consequences and phenotypic correlates of petal size variation in wild radish, Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 75:528–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JD (1978) Effects of stand composition on insect visitation in two-species mixtures of Hieracium. Am Midl Nat 100:431–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JD (1981) Spatial and temporal components of resource assessment by flower-feeding insects. J Anim Ecol 50:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JD (1982) Patterns of visitation by animal pollinators. Oikos 39:241–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Totland O (1993) Pollination in alpine Norway: flowering phenology, insect visitors, and visitation rates in two plant-communities. Can J Bot 71:1072–1079

    Google Scholar 

  • Totland O, Matthews I (1998) Determinants of pollinator activity and flower preference in the early spring blooming Crocus vernus. Acta Oecol 19:155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM, Fugate ML (1986) Pollen precedence and stigma closure: a mechanism of competition for pollination between Delphinium nelsonii and Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia 70:573–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM, Chittka L, Price MV, Williams NM, Ollerton J (1996) Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77:1043–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson L (2003) SYSTAT 10.0. SPSS Inc, Chigaco

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Sondre Eikås, Vegard Eldholm, Peter Greve, Maria Collett Knagenhjelm, Torkjell Solbraa, and Knut Fredrik φ i for their invaluable field assistance, Luc Boeke for statistical advices, and Anne-Line Bjerknes, Andreas Jürgens, Anders Nielsen and two anonymous reviewers for very constructive comments on the manuscript. We also thank Christen Knagenhjelm for letting us use the meadow in Rudsviki. The study is financed by the Norwegian Research Council through the Biodiversity-program (project number 154185/720).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stein Joar Hegland.

Additional information

Communicated by Christian Koerner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hegland, S.J., Totland, Ø. Relationships between species’ floral traits and pollinator visitation in a temperate grassland. Oecologia 145, 586–594 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0165-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0165-6

Keywords

Navigation