Skip to main content
Log in

Climate change affects the outcome of competitive interactions—an application of principal response curves

  • Community Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been hypothesised that climate change may affect vegetation by changing the outcome of competitive interactions. We use a space-for-time approach to evaluate this hypothesis in the context of alpine time-of-snowmelt gradients. Principal response curves, a multivariate repeated-measurement analysis technique, are used to analyse for compositional differences in local ridge-to-snowbed gradients among 100 m altitudinal bands from 1,140 to 1,550 m a.s.l., corresponding to a temperature gradient of 2.5°C (local lapse rate is 0.6°C). The interaction between time-of-snowmelt and altitude is strongly significant statistically, indicating that the altitudinal gradient cannot be explained simply by the physiological responses of the species, but that there are also changes in the outcome of competitive interactions. At higher altitudes, there is a decrease in the time-of-snowmelt ranges of species which have intermediate times-of-snowmelt optima, whereas snowbed (chinophilous) species have wider time-of-snowmelt ranges. As snowbed species can survive, grow and reproduce at very early snow-free sites at high altitudes, the most likely explanation for their absence from all but the latest time-of-snowmelt habitats at lower altitudes is competitive exclusion by more vigorous lee-side species. This suggests that with future climate change snowbed species will experience, in addition to habitat fragmentation and reduced size of habitats due to increased temperature and snowmelt, an indirect effect due to competitive exclusion from late-snowmelt sites by species that have their optima outside snowbeds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arft AM and 28 other authors (1999) Responses of tundra plants to experimental warming: meta-analysis of the International Tundra Experiment. Ecol Monogr 69:491–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Aune E (1993) Temperatur normaler normalperiode 1961–1990. Det Norske Meteorologiske Institutt. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo

  • Billings WD, Bliss LC (1959) An alpine snowbank environment and its effects on vegetation, plant development, and productivity. Ecology 40:388–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Braak CJF ter (1994) Canonical community ordination. Part I: basic theory and linear methods. Ecoscience 1:127–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Braak CJF ter, Šmilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and user’s guide. User’s guide: software for canonical community ordination (v. 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, N.Y.

  • Brink PJ van den, ter Braak CJF (1997) Ordination of responses to toxic stress in experimental ecosystems. Tox Ecot News 4:173–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Brink PJ van den, ter Braak CJF (1999) Principle Response Curves: analysis of time-dependent multivariate responses of a biological community to stress. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:138–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Brink PJ van den, Hattink J, Bransen F, Van Donk E, Brock TCM (2000) Impact of the fungicide carbendazim in freshwater microcosms. II. Zooplankton, primary producers and final conclusions. Aquat Toxicol 48:251–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brink PJ van den, van den Brink NW, ter Braak CJF (2003) Multivariate analysis of ecotoxicological data using ordination: demonstrations of utility on the basis of various examples. Aust J Ecotoxicol 9:141–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III, Jefferies RL, Reynolds JF, Shaver GR, Svoboda J (1992) Arctic plant physiological ecology: a challenge for the future. In: Chapin FS III, Jefferies RL, Reynolds JF, Shaver GR, Svoboda J (eds) Arctic ecosystems in a changing climate: an ecophysiological perspective. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.

  • Choler P, Michalet R, Callaway RM (2001) Facilitation and competition on gradients in alpine plant communities. Ecology 82:3295–3308

    Google Scholar 

  • Dungan JL, Perry JN, Dale MRT, Legendre P, Citron-Pousty S, Fortin M-J, Jakomulska A, Miriti M, Rosenberg MS (2002) A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis. Ecography 25:626–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Førland EJ (1993) Nedbørnormaler normalperiode 1961–1990. Det Norske Meteorologiske Institutt. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo

  • Fortin M, Jacquez GM (2000) Randomization tests and spatially autocorrelated data. Bull Ecol Soc Am 81:201–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin M, Drapeau P, Legendre P (1989) Spatial autocorrelation and sampling design in plant ecology. Vegetatio 83:209–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton GK, van den Brink PJ, Gould PJL (2000) Effects of spring drought and irrigation on farmland arthropods in southern Britain. J Appl Ecol 37:865–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisvoll AA, Elvebakk A, Flatberg KI, Økland RH (1995) Sjekkliste over norske mosar. NINA Temahefte 4:1–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjærevoll O (1956) The plant communities of the Scandinavian alpine snow-beds. Det KGL Norske Videnskabers Selskabs Skrifter 1:1–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried M, Pauli H, Grabherr G (1998) Prediction of vegetation patterns at the limits of plant life: a new view of the alpine-nival ecotone. Arct Antarct Alp Res 30:207–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried M, Pauli H, Reiter K, Grabherr G (1999) A fine-scaled predictive model for changes in species distribution patterns of high mountain plants induced by climate warming. Divers Distrib 5:241–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried M, Pauli H, Reiter K, Grabherr G (2002) Potential effects of climate change on alpine and nival plants in the Alps. In: Körner C, Spehn E (eds) Mountain biodiversity—a global assessment. Parthenon, Boca Raton

  • Grabherr G, Gottfried M, Gruber A, Pauli H (1995) Patterns and current changes in alpine plant diversity. In: Chapin FS III, Körner C (eds) Arctic and alpine biodiversity: patterns, causes and ecosystem and consequences. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  • Hall DK (1988) Assessment of polar climate change using satellite technology. Rev Geophys 26:26–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartgers EM, Aalderink GHR, van den Brink PJ, Gylstra R, Wiegman JWF, Brock TCM (1998) Ecotoxicological threshold levels of a mixture of herbicides (atrazine, diuron and metolachlor) in freshwater microcosms. Aquat Ecol 32:135–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heegaard E (2002) A model of alpine species distribution in relation to snowmelt time and altitude. J Veg Sci 13:493–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton JT, Merio Filho LG, Callander BA, Harris N, Kattenburg A, Maskell K (eds) (2001) Climate change 1995—the science of climate change. Working group I, Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambrige University Press, New York

  • Karivera PM, Kingsolver JG, Huey RB (1993) Biotic interactions and global change. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.

  • Körner C (1999) Alpine plant life. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  • Krog H, Østhagen H, Tønsberg T (1994) Lavflora: norske buske- og bladlav. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo

  • Legendre P (1993) Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74:1659–1673

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  • Leonard AW, Hyne RV, Lim RP, Pablo F, van den Brink PJ (2000) Riverine endosulfan concentrations in the Namoi river, Australia: link to cotton field runoff and macroinvertebrate population densities. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:1540–1551

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lid J, Lid DT (1994) Norsk flora, 6th edn. Det Norske Samlaget, Oslo

  • Matthews JA (1992) The ecology of recently-deglaciated terrain. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Maxwell B (1992) Arctic climate: potential for change under global warming. In: Chapin FS III, Jefferies R, Reynolds J, Shaver GR, Svoboda J (eds) Arctic ecosystem in a changing climate: an ecophysiological perspective. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.

  • Méot A, Legendre P, Borcard D (1998) Partialling out spatial component of ecological variation: questions and propositions in the linear modelling framework. Environ Ecol Stat 5:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney HA (1991) Biological responses to climate change: an agenda for research. Ecol Appl 1:112–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Onipchenko VG, Blinnikov MS, Aksenova AA (2001) Experimental evaluation of shading effects in seasonal dynamics of four alpine communities in Northwestern Caucasus, Russia. Arct Antarct Alp Res 33:330–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauli H, Gottfried M, Grabherr G (1999) Vascular plants distribution patterns at the low-temperature limits of plant life—the alpine-nival ecotone of Mount Schrankogel (Tyrol, Austria). Phytocoenologia 29:297–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson RG, Dawson TP (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecol Biogeogr 12:361–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry JN, Liebhold AM, Rosenberg MS, Dungan J, Miriti M, Jakomulska A, Citron-Pousty S (2002) Illutrations and guidelines for selecting statistical methods for quantifying spatial pattern in ecological data. Ecography 25:578–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roots EF (1989) Climate change: high-latitude regions. Clim Change 15:223–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandvik SM, Totland Ø (2000) Short-term effects of simulated environmental changes on phenology, reproduction, and growth in the late-flowering snowbed herb Saxifraga stellaris L. Ecoscience 7:201–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandvik SM, Heegaard E, Elven R, Vandvik V (2004) Responses to long-term experimental warming in an alpine snow bed vegetation at Finse, south-western Norway. Ecoscience (in press)

  • Totland Ø, Nyhlén J (1998) Assessment of environmental change effects on performance and density of Bistorta vivipara by multivariate analysis and experimental manipulations. J Ecol 86:989–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandvik V (2004) Gap dynamics in perennial subalpine grasslands: trends and processes change during secondary succession. J Ecol 92:86–96

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank John Birks, Petr Šmilauer, Michael Gottfried, Christian Körner, and two anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. We thank the Norwegian Research Council for financial support (140874/720 and 151637/432). This is publication no. A46 of the Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Einar Heegaard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heegaard, E., Vandvik, V. Climate change affects the outcome of competitive interactions—an application of principal response curves. Oecologia 139, 459–466 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1523-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1523-5

Keywords

Navigation