Abstract
Grasslands cover about 40% of the ice-free global terrestrial surface, but their contribution to local and regional water and carbon fluxes and sensitivity to climatic perturbations such as drought remains uncertain. Here, we assess the direction and magnitude of net ecosystem carbon exchange (NEE) and its components, ecosystem carbon assimilation (A c) and ecosystem respiration (R E), in a southeastern United States grassland ecosystem subject to periodic drought and harvest using a combination of eddy-covariance measurements and model calculations. We modeled A c and evapotranspiration (ET) using a big-leaf canopy scheme in conjunction with ecophysiological and radiative transfer principles, and applied the model to assess the sensitivity of NEE and ET to soil moisture dynamics and rapid excursions in leaf area index (LAI) following grass harvesting. Model results closely match eddy-covariance flux estimations on daily, and longer, time steps. Both model calculations and eddy-covariance estimates suggest that the grassland became a net source of carbon to the atmosphere immediately following the harvest, but a rapid recovery in LAI maintained a marginal carbon sink during summer. However, when integrated over the year, this grassland ecosystem was a net C source (97 g C m−2 a−1) due to a minor imbalance between large A c (−1,202 g C m−2 a−1) and R E (1,299 g C m−2 a−1) fluxes. Mild drought conditions during the measurement period resulted in many instances of low soil moisture (θ<0.2 m3m−3), which influenced A c and thereby NEE by decreasing stomatal conductance. For this experiment, low θ had minor impact on R E. Thus, stomatal limitations to A c were the primary reason that this grassland was a net C source. In the absence of soil moisture limitations, model calculations suggest a net C sink of −65 g C m−2 a−1 assuming the LAI dynamics and physiological properties are unaltered. These results, and the results of other studies, suggest that perturbations to the hydrologic cycle are key determinants of C cycling in grassland ecosystems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aubinet M, Grelle A, Ibron A, Rannik Ü, Moncrieff J, Foken T, Kowalski AS, Martin PH, Berbigier P, Bernhofer Ch, Clement R, Elbers J, Granier A, Grünwald T, Morgenstern K, Pilegaard K, Rebmann C, Snijders W, Valentini R, Vesala T (2000) Estimates of the annual net carbon and water exchange of forests: the EUROFLUX methodology. Adv Ecol Res 30:113–175
Baldocchi DD, Wilson KB (2001) Modeling CO2 and water vapor exchange of a temperate broadleaf forest across hourly to decadal time scales. Ecol Modell 142:155–184
Baldocchi D, Falge E, Gu L, Olson R, Hollinger D, Running S, Anthoni P, Bernhofer Ch, Davis K, Evans R, Fuentes J, Goldstein A, Katul G, Law B, Lee X, Malhi Y, Meyers T, Munger W, Oechel W, Paw UKT, Peilgaard K, Schmid HP, Valentini R, Verma S, Vesala T, Wilson K, Wofsy S (2001) FLUXNET: a new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 82:2415–2434
Barford CC, Wofsy SC, Goulden ML, Munger JW, Pyle EH, Urbanski SP, Hutyra L, Saleska SR, Fitzjarrald D, Moore K (2001) Factors controlling long- and short-term sequestration of atmospheric CO2 in a mid-latitude forest. Science 294:1688–1691
Bellot J, Sanchez JR, Chirinu E, Hernandez N, Abdelli F, Martinez JM (1999) Effect of different vegetation type cover on the soil water balance in semi-arid areas of southeastern Spain. Phys Chem Earth Part B – Hydrol Oceans Atmos 4:353–357
Bremer DJ, Ham JM (2002) Measurement and modeling of soil CO2 flux in a temperate grassland under mowed and burned regimes. Ecol Appl 12:1318–1328
Bremer DJ, Ham JM, Owensby CE, Knapp AK (1998) Responses in soil respiration to clipping and grazing in a tallgrass prairie. J Environ Qual 27:1539–1548
Bruce JP, Frome M, Haites E, Janzen H, Lal R, Paustian K (1999) Carbon sequestration in soils. J Soil Water Conserv 54:382–389
Brutsaert W (1982) Evaporation into the atmosphere: theory, history and applications. Reidel, Boston
Brutsaert W, Sugita M (1992) Application of self-preservation in the diurnal evolution of the surface-energy budget to determine daily evaporation. J Geophys Res 97:18377–18382
Campbell GS, Norman JM (1998) An introduction to environmental biophysics, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Clark KL, Gholz HL, Moncrieff JB, Cropley F, Loescher HW (1999) Environmental controls over net exchanges of carbon dioxide from contrasting Florida ecosystems. Ecol Appl 9:936–948
Collatz CJ, Ball JT, Grivet C, Berry JA (1991) Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis, and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer. Agric For Meteorol 54:107–136
Cowan IR (1977) Stomatal behaviour and environment. Adv Bot Res 4:117–228
Dennis JE Jr (1977) Nonlinear least-squares. In: Jacobs D (ed) State of the art in numerical analysis. Academic Press, pp269–312
Dugas WA, Heuer ML, Mayeux HS (1999) Carbon dioxide fluxes over bermudagrass, native prairie, and sorghum. Agric For Meteorol 93:121–139
Emmerich WE (2003) Carbon dioxide fluxes in a semiarid environment with high carbonate soils. Agric For Meteorol 116:91–102
Everson CS (2001) The water balance of a first order catchment in the montane grasslands of South Africa. J Hydrol 241:110–123
Falge E, Baldocchi D, Olson R, Anthoni P, Aubinet M, Bernhofer C, Burba G, Ceulemans R, Clement R, Dolman H, Granier A, Gross P, Grunwald T, Hollinger D, Jensen NO, Katul G, Keronen P, Kowalski A, Lai CT, Law BE, Meyers T, Moncrieff H, Moors E, Munger JW, Pilegaard K, Rannik Ü, Rebmann C, Suyker A, Tenhunen J, Tu K, Verma S, Vesala T, Wilson K, Wofsy S (2001a) Gap filling strategies for defensible annual sums of net ecosystem exchange. Agric For Meteorol 107:43–69
Falge E, Baldocchi D, Olson R, Anthoni P, Aubinet M, Bernhofer C, Burba G, Ceulemans G, Clement R, Dolman H, Granier A, Gross P, Grunwald T, Hollinger D, Jensen NO, Katul G, Keronen P, Kowalski A, Lai CT, Law BE, Meyers T, Moncrieff J, Moors E, Munger JW, Pilegaard K, Rannik Ü, Rebmann C, Suyker A, Tenhunen J, Tu K, Verma S, Vesala T, Wilson K, Wofsy S (2001b) Gap filling strategies for long term energy flux data sets. Agric For Meteorol 107:71–77
Fang C, Moncreiff JB (2001) The dependence of soil CO2 efflux on temperature. Soil Biol Biochem 33:155–165
Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA (1980) A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149:78–90
Flanagan LB, Wever LA, Carlson PJ (2002) Seasonal and interannual variation in carbon dioxide exchange and carbon balance in a northern temperate grassland. Glob Change Biol 8:599–615
Frank AB, Dugas WA (2001) Carbon dioxide fluxes over a northern, semiarid, mixed-grass prairie. Agric For Meteorol 108:317–326
Frank AB, Sims PL, Bradford JA, Mielnick PC, Dugas WA, Mayeux HS (2001) Carbon dioxide fluxes over three great plains grasslands. In: Follett RF, Kimble JM, Lal R (eds) The potential of US grazing lands to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. Lewis, Boca Raton, pp167–187
Gill RA, Polley HW, Johnson HB, Anderson LJ, Maherali H, Jackson RB (2002) Nonlinear grassland responses to past and future atmospheric CO2. Nature 417:279–282
Gilmanov TG, Johnson DA, Saliendra NZ (2003a) Growing season CO2 fluxes in a sagebrush-steppe ecosystem in Idaho: Bowen ratio/energy balance measurements and modeling. Basic Appl Ecol 4:167–183
Gilmanov TG, Johnson DA, Saliendra NZ, Akshalov K, Wylie BK (2003b) Gross primary productivity of the true steppe in central Asia in relation to NDVI: scaling up of CO2 fluxes. Environ Manage (in press)
Goulden ML, Munger JW, Fan SM, Daube BC, Wofsy SC (1996) Measurements of carbon sequestration by long-term eddy covariance: methods and a critical evaluation of accuracy. Glob Change Biol 2:169–182
Grace J, Lloyd J, Miranda AC, Miranda H, Gash JHC (1998) Fluxes of carbon dioxide and water vapour over a C-4 pasture in south-western Amazonia (Brazil). Aust J Plant Physiol 25:519–530
Ham JM, Knapp AK (1998) Fluxes of CO2, water vapor, and energy from a prairie ecosystem during the seasonal transition from carbon sink to carbon source. Agric For Meteorol 89:1–14
Hoff JH van’t (1898) Lectures on theoretical and physical chemistry. In: Chemical dynamics part I. Arnold, London, pp224–229
Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Nouger M, van der Linden PJ, Day X, Maskell K, Johnson CA (eds) (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Third assessment report of Working Group I. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hsieh C-I, Katul GG, Chi T (2000) An approximate analytical model for footprint estimation of scalar fluxes in thermally stratified atmospheric flows. Adv Water Resour 23:765–772
Hunt JE, Kelliher FM, McSeveny TM, Byers JN (2002) Evaporation and carbon dioxide exchange between the atmosphere and a tussock grassland during a summer drought. Agric For Meteorol 111:65–82
Jackson RB, Carpenter SR, Dahm CN, McKnight DM, Naiman RJ, Postel SL, Running SW (2001) Water in a changing world. Ecol Appl 11:1027–1045
Jackson RB, Banner JL, Jobbágy EG, Pockman WT, Wall DH (2002) Ecosystem carbon loss with woody plant invasion of grasslands. Nature 418:623–626
Janssens IA, Pilegaard K (2003) Large seasonal changes in Q(10) of soil respiration in a beech forest. Glob Change Biol 9:911–918
Jarvis PG (1976) The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 273:593–610
Katul GG, Oren R, Ellsworth D, Hsieh CI, Phillips N, Lewin K (1997) A lagrangian dispersion model for predicting CO2 sources, sinks, and fluxes in a uniform loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) stand. J Geophys Res 102:9309–9321
Katul GG, Ellsworth DS, Lai C-T (2000) Modeling assimilation and intercellular CO2 from measured conductance: a synthesis of approaches. Plant Cell Environ 23:1313–1328
Kelliher FM, Leuning R, Schulze ED (1993) Evaporation and canopy characteristics of coniferous forests and grasslands. Oecologia 95:153–163
Kim J, Verma SB (1991) Modeling canopy stomatal conductance in a temperate grassland ecosystem. Agric For Meteorol 55:149–166
Kim J, Verma SB, Clement RJ (1992) Carbon dioxide budget in a temperate grassland ecosystem. J Geophys Res 97:6057–6063
Kirschbaum MUF (2000) Will changes in soil organic carbon act as a positive or negative feedback on global warming? Biogeochemistry 48:21–51
Knapp AK, Smith MD (2001) Variations among biomes in temporal dynamics of aboveground primary productivity. Science 291:481–484
Knapp AK, Conard SL, Blair JM (1998) Determinants of soil CO2 flux from a sub-humid grassland: effects of fire and fire history. Ecol Appl 8:760–770
Lai C-T, Katul GG (2000) The dynamic role of root-water uptake in coupling potential to actual transpiration. Adv Water Res 23:427–439
Leuning R (1995) A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal-photosynthesis model for C3 plants. Plant Cell Environ 18:339–355
Lloyd J, Taylor JA (1994) On the temperature dependence of soil respiration. Funct Ecol 8:315–323
Long SP, Jones MB, Roberts MJ (eds) (1992) Primary productivity of grass ecosystems of the tropics and sub-tropics. Chapman and Hall, London
Medlyn BE, Dreyer E, Ellsworth D, Forstreuter M, Harley PC, Kirschbaum MUF, Le Roux X, Loustau D, Montpied P, Strassemeyer J, Walcroft A, Wang K (2002) Temperature response of parameters of a biochemically-based model of photosynthesis. II. A review of experimental data. Plant Cell Environ 25:1167–1175
Meyers TP (2001) A comparison of summertime water and CO2 fluxes over rangeland for well watered and drought conditions. Agric For Meteorol 106:205–214
Miranda AC, Miranda HS, Lloyd J, Grace J, Francey RJ, McIntyre JA, Meir P, Riggan P, Lockwood R, Brass J (1997) Fluxes of carbon, water and energy over Brazilian cerrado: an analysis using eddy covariance and stable isotopes. Plant Cell Environ 20:315–328
Norman JM, Campbell GS (1989) Canopy structure. In: Pearcy RW, Ehleringer J, Mooney HA, Rundel PW (eds) Plant physiological ecology field methods and instrumentation. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 301–325
Nouvellon Y, Rambal S, Lo Seen D, Moran MS, Lhomme JP, Bégué A, Chehbouni AG, Kerr Y (2000) Modelling of daily fluxes of water and carbon from shortgrass steppes. Agric For Meteorol 100:137–153
Ojima DS, Dirks BOM, Glenn EP, Owensby CE, Scurlock JO (1993) Assessment of C budget for grasslands and drylands of the world. Water Air Soil Pollut 70:95-109
Oren R, Sperry JS, Katul GG, Pataki DE, Ewers BE, Phillips N, Schäfer KVR (1999) Survey and synthesis of intra- and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit. Plant Cell Environ 22:515–1526
Oren R, Ellsworth DS, Johnsen KH, Phillips N, Ewers BE, Maier C, Schäfer KVR, McCarthy H, Hendrey G, McNulty SG, Katul GG (2001) Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2-enriched atmosphere. Nature 411:469–472
Parton WJ, Scurlock JMO, Ojima DS, Gilmanov TG, Scholes RJ, Schimel DS, Kirchner T, Menaut JC, Seastedt T, Moya EG, Kamnalrut A, Kinyamario JI (1993) Observations and modeling of biomass and soil organic matter dynamics for the grassland biome worldwide. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 7:785–809
Paz A, Neira A, Castelao A (1996) Soil water regime under pasture in the humid zone of Spain: validation of an empirical model and prediction of irrigation requirements. Agric Water Manage 29:147–161
Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (1992) Numerical recipes in Fortran. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Raich JW, Potter CS (1995) Global patterns of carbon dioxide emissions from soils. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 9:23–36
Raich JW, Schlesinger WH (1992) The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus 44B:81–99
Redmann RE (1978) Seasonal dynamics of carbon dioxide exchange in a mixed grassland ecosystem. Can J Bot 56:1999–2005
Reichstein M, Tenhunen JD, Roupsard O, Ourcival JM, Rambal S, Dore S, Valentini R (2002) Ecosystem respiration in two Mediterranean evergreen holm oak forests: drought effects and decomposition dynamics. Funct Ecol 16:27–39
Ripley EA, Saugier B (1974) Microclimate and production of a native grassland: a micrometeorological study. Oecol Plant 9:333–363
Ripley EA, Saugier B (1978) Biophysics of a natural grassland: evaporation. J Appl Ecol 15:459–479
Rosenzweig C, Tubiello FN, Goldberg R, Mills E, Bloomfield J (2002) Increased crop damage in the US from excess precipitation under climate change. Glob Environ Change 12:197–202
Saigusa N, Oikawa T, Liu S (1998) Seasonal variations of the exchange of CO2 and H2O between a grassland and the atmosphere: an experimental study. Agric For Meteorol 89:131–139
Sarmiento JL, Wofsy SC (co-chairs) (1999) A US carbon cycle science plan: a report of the Carbon and Climate Working Group. US Global Change Research Program, Washington, D.C.
Scurlock JMO, Johnson K, Olson RJ (2002) Estimating net primary productivity from grassland biomass dynamics measurements. Glob Change Biol 8:736–753
Shaw MR, Zavaleta ES, Chiariello NR, Cleland EE, Mooney HA, Field CB (2002) Grassland responses to global environmental changes suppressed by elevated CO2. Science 298:1987–1990
Sims PL, Bradford JA (2001) Carbon dioxide fluxes in a southern plains prairie. Agric For Meteorol 109:117–134
Suyker AE, Verma SB (2001) Year-round observations of the net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide in a native tallgrass prairie. Glob Change Biol 7:279–289
Suyker AE, Verma SB, Burba GG (2003) Interannual variability in net CO2 exchange of a native tallgrass prairie. Glob Change Biol 9:255–265
Tappeiner U, Cernusca A (1996) Microclimate and fluxes of water vapour, sensible heat and carbon dioxide in structurally differing subalpine plant communities in the central Caucasus. Plant Cell Environ 19:403–417
Tjoelker MG, Oleksyn J, Reich PB (2001) Modelling respiration of vegetation: evidence for a general temperature-dependent Q10. Glob Change Biol 7:223–230
Valentini R, Gamon JA, Field CB (1995) Ecosystem gas exchange in a California grassland: seasonal patterns and implications for scaling. Ecology 76:1940–1952
Valentini R, Matteucci G, Dolman AJ, Schulze E-D, Rebmann C, Moors EJ, Granier A, Gross P, Jensen NO, Pilegaard K, Lindroth A, Grelle A, Bernhofer C, Grünwald T, Aubinet M, Ceulemans R, Kowalski AS, Vesala T, Rannik Ü, Berbigier P, Loustau D, Gumundsson J, Thorgeirsson H, Ibrom A, Morgenstern K, Clement R, Moncrieff J, Montagnani L, Minerbi S, Jarvis PJ (2000) Respiration as the main determinant of carbon balance in European forests. Nature 404:861–865
Vörösmarty CJ, Sahagian D (2000) Anthropogenic disturbance of the terrestrial water cycle. Bioscience 50:753–765
Wagai R, Brye KR, Gower ST, Norman JM, Bundy LG (1998) Land use and environmental factors influencing soil surface CO2 flux and microbial biomass in natural and managed ecosystems in southern Wisconsin. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1501–1509
Webb EK, Pearman GI, Leuning R (1980) Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapour transfer. Q J R Meteorol Soc 106:85–100
Wever LA, Flanagan LB, Carlson PJ (2002) Seasonal and interannual variation in evapotranspiration, energy balance and surface conductance in a northern temperate grassland. Agric For Meteorol 112:31–49
White R, Murray S, Rohweder M (2000) Pilot Analysis of Global Ecosystems (PAGE): grassland ecosystems. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.
Wilsey BJ, Parent G, Roulet NT, Moore TR, Potvin C. (2002) Tropical pasture carbon cycling: relationships between C source/sink strength, above-ground biomass and grazing. Ecol Lett 5:367–376
Wilson KB, Baldocchi DD (2001) Comparing independent estimates of carbon dioxide exchange over 5 years at a deciduous forest in the southeastern United States. J Geophys Res 106:34167–34178
Acknowledgements
Support was provided by the National Science Foundation (NSF-EAR and NSF-DMS), the Biological and Environmental Research (BER) Program, United States Department of Energy, through the Southeast Regional Center (SERC) of the National Institute for Global Environmental Change (NIGEC), and through the Terrestrial Carbon Processes Program (TCP) and the FACE project. The authors appreciate the contributions of data collection from Ben Poulter and Heather McCarthy. The footprint model of Hsieh et al. (2000) [in Matlab] is available upon request.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A: leaf-level assimilation model
According to Farquhar et al. (1980), as later modified by Collatz et al. (1991) and Campbell and Norman (1998), the net photosynthetic rate at the leaf scale depends on light, CO2 concentration, and leaf temperature (T l) and can be described as:
where J E and J C are the assimilation rates restricted by light-driven electron transport processes and ribulose bisphosphate (RuBP) carboxylase-oxygenase activity (Rubisco), respectively, and R d is dark respiration. For leaf-level processes we adopt the ecophysiological convention of positive fluxes into the leaf. When these fluxes are scaled to the canopy we revert to the micrometeorological convention. J E is given by:
where α is the leaf absorptivity [not to be confused with the apparent quantum efficiency (α a)] for photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), e m is the maximum quantum efficiency for leaf CO2 uptake, Q p is PAR irradiance on the leaf, and \(\overline{{C_{{\text{i}}} }} \) is the mean intercellular CO2 concentration. The values of all parameters are listed in Table 3. The photosynthetic CO2 compensation point, Γ*, is given by:
where [O2] is the oxygen concentration in air (210 mmol mol−1), and τ is a ratio of kinetic parameters describing the partitioning of RuBP to the carboxylase or oxygenase reactions of Rubisco. J c is computed from
where Vc max is the maximum catalytic capacity of Rubisco per unit leaf area (μmol m−2s−1), and K c and \(K_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }} \) are the Michaelis constants for CO2 fixation and O2 inhibition with respect to CO2, respectively. J c increases linearly with increasing \(\overline{{C_{{\text{i}}} }} \), but approaches a maximum under a high CO2 concentration state rarely encountered under present conditions, though likely under future climate scenarios.
Temperature dependence of kinetic variables is computed following the equations in Campbell and Norman (1998). Five kinetic parameters are needed to adjust for temperature: K c, \(K_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }} \) , τ, Vc max and R d. For the first two parameters, a modified exponential temperature function of the form:
is employed, where k is defined at the leaf surface temperature or T l, k 25 is the value of the parameter at 25°C, and γ is the temperature coefficient for that parameter. τ is assumed to be 1.3.
Vc max and R d are adjusted by:
and
where Vc max, 25 and R d, 25 are values of Vc max and R d at 25°C, respectively (Campbell and Norman 1998).
Following Collatz et al. (1991), the dark respiration rate at 25°C (R d, 25) can be estimated using
Appendix B: the boundary line analysis
Stomatal conductance was modeled according to Oren et al. (1999), with the parameters m and g ref generated from a boundary line analysis. The boundary line analysis sorts the measured conductance data into 10 bins characterized by increasing mean light levels. A logarithmic function relating conductance to VPD is generated for each light level (i) using data points falling above the mean plus one standard deviation, after removing outliers at each light level. The function is given by:
where i=1–10 (for ten light levels). The slope (a i) and intercept (b i) for each i were computed via regression analysis, and the parameter m is the ratio of these two vectors:
in this study, m=0.64, which is consistent with the theoretical value of m=0.6 from Oren et al. (1999). We use the latter value in the model.
The parameter g ref is a light-dependent function derived from fitting the intercept vector b as a logarithmic function of PAR. Here, we found that g ref is
Appendix C: night-time atmospheric stability considerations
Correcting night-time eddy-covariance fluxes under conditions of low u * with respiration models parameterized using night-time fluxes with high u * is standard eddy-covariance methodology (Goulden et al. 1996; Aubinet et al. 2000; Falge et al. 2001a). We conducted a sensitivity analysis on the annual NEE estimate by varying u *t between 0 and 0.3, and found that NEE did not vary appreciably for u *t between 0.12 and 0.18. Hence, we first filtered the data with u *t=0.12 m s−1. NEE is highly sensitive to the u * threshold value chosen (u *t; Barford et al. 2001), but the exclusive use of u *t has not been examined, and we propose additional meteorological constraints to filters used for night-time eddy-covariance data. Namely, we propose two additional constraints that only accept fluxes when atmospheric stability conditions are near-neutral and when the peak of the source-weight function (x p) lies within the dimensions of the study site (here 150 m). The atmospheric stability parameter in the atmospheric surface layer is defined as ς=(z−d)/L, and near-neutral conditions are defined as |ς|<0.1. We define the near-neutral atmospheric stability threshold of 0.1 to be ς n.
The importance of adding ς n, to model night-time respiration is illustrated by considering the flux footprint at night for all atmospheric conditions, which exceeds 5 km (Fig. 8a). Adding u *t alone results in a flux footprint that exceeds 2 km, an order of magnitude larger than the dimensions of our field (Fig. 8b). Filtering with both u *t and ς n (Fig. 8c) reduces the night-time flux footprint to ~1,000 m, which still exceeds field dimensions, so we further filter night-time flux measurements when the peak of the source-weight function (x p) exceeds 150 m, guaranteeing that measured night-time fluxes originate from our field in a probabilistic sense.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Novick, K.A., Stoy, P.C., Katul, G.G. et al. Carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange in a warm temperate grassland. Oecologia 138, 259–274 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1388-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1388-z