Skip to main content
Log in

Herbivore host plant selection: whitefly learns to avoid host plants that harbour predators of her offspring

  • Behavioural Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evidence is accumulating that herbivorous arthropods do not simply select host plants based on their quality, but also on the predation risk associated with different host plants. It has been suggested that herbivores exclude plant species with high predation risk from their host range. This assumes a constant, predictable predation risk as well as a rather static behaviour on the part of the herbivore; plants are ignored irrespective of the actual predation risk. We show that adult females of a small herbivore, the whitefly Bemisia tabaci, can learn to avoid plants with predatory mites that attack only juvenile whiteflies, while they accept host plants of the same species without predators. Predatory mites disperse more slowly than whiteflies; they cannot fly and walk from plant to plant. Hence, by avoiding plants with predators, the whiteflies create a temporary refuge for their offspring. We suggest that the experience of arthropod herbivores with risks associated with host plants plays an important role in their host plant selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ballabeni P, Wlodarczyk M, Rahier M (2001) Does enemy-free space for eggs contribute to a leaf beetle's oviposition preference for a nutritionally inferior host plant? Funct Ecol 15:318–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernays EA (1999) When host choice is a problem for a generalist herbivore: experiments with the whitefly, Bemisia tabaci. Ecol Entomol 24:260–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernays E, Graham M (1988) On the evolution of host specificity in phytophagous arthropods. Ecology 69:886–892

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne DN, Bellows TS (1991) Whitefly biology. Annu Rev Entomol 36:431–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesson J (1984) Effect of notonectids (Hermiptera: Notonectidae) on mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae): predation or selective oviposition? Environ Entomol 13:531–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham JP, West SA, Zalucki MP (2001) Host selection in phytophagous insects: a new explanation for learning in adults. Oikos 95:537–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Faraji F, Janssen A, Sabelis MW (2001) Predatory mites avoid ovipositing near counterattacking prey. Exp Appl Acarol 25:613–623

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freitas AVL, Oliveira PS (1996) Ants as selective agents on herbivore biology: effects on the behaviour of a non-myrmecophilous butterfly. J Anim Ecol 65:205–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Grostal P, Dicke M (1999) Direct and indirect cues of predation risk influence behavior and reproduction of prey: a case for acarine interactions. Behav Ecol 10:422–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Grostal P, Dicke M (2000) Recognising one's enemies: a functional approach to risk assessment by prey. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:258–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaenike J (1990) Host specialization in phytophagous insects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:243–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen A (1999) Plants with spider-mite prey attract more predatory mites than clean plants under greenhouse conditions. Entomol Exp Appl 90:191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keefe M (1992) Chemically mediated avoidance-behavior in wild brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis —the response to familiar and unfamiliar predaceous fishes and the influence of fish diet. Can J Zool 70:288–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurila A, Kujasalo J, Ranta E (1997) Different antipredator behaviour in two anuran tadpoles: effects of predator diet. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 40:329–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leather SR, Awmack CS (2002) Does variation in offspring size reflect strenght of preference performance index in herbivorous insects? Oikos 96:192–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Lill JT, Marquis RJ, Ricklefs RE (2002) Host plants influence parasitism of forest caterpillars. Nature 417:170–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mappes J, Kaitala A (1995) Host-plant selection and predation risk for offspring of the parent bug. Ecology 76:2668–2670

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew PJ (1997) Adaptive patterns of host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. Oikos 79:417–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Nomikou M, Janssen A, Schraag R, Sabelis MW (2001) Phytoseiid predators as potential biological control agents for Bemisia tabaci. Exp Appl Acarol 25:271–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nomikou M, Janssen A, Schraag R, Sabelis MW (2002) Phytoseiid predators suppress populations of Bemisia tabaci in the presence of alternative food. Exp Appl Acarol 27:57–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohsaki N, Sato Y (1994) Food plant choice of Pieris butterflies as a trade-off between parasitoid avoidance and quality of plants. Ecology 75:59–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Overmeer WPJ (1985) Rearing and handling. In: Helle W, Sabelis MW (eds) Spider mites, their biology, natural enemies and control, vol 1b. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 162–170

  • Pallini A, Janssen A, Sabelis MW (1999) Spider mites avoid plants with predators. Exp Appl Acarol 23:803–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persons MH, Walker SE, Rypstra AL, Marshall SD (2001) Wolf spider predator avoidance tactics and survival in the presence of diet-associated predator cues (Araneae: Lycosidae). Anim Behav 61:43–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petranka JW, Fakhoury K (1991) Evidence of a chemically-mediated avoidance-response of ovipositing insects to blue-gills and green frog tadpoles. Copeia 70:234–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Resetarits WJ, Wilbur HM (1989) Choice of oviposition site by Hyla chrysoscelis—role of predators and competitors. Ecology 70:220–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheirs J, De Bruyn L (2002) Temporal variability of top-down forces and their role in host choice evolution of phytophagous arthropods. Oikos 97:139–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Crowley P, McPeek M, Petranka JW, Strohmeier K (1985) Predation, competition and prey communities: a review of field experiments. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:269-311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JN (1988) Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between oviposition preference and performance of offspring in phytophagous insects. Entomol Exp Appl 47:3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JN, Pellmyr O (1991) Evolution of oviposition behavior and host preference in lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 36:65–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venzon M, Janssen A, Pallini A, Sabelis MW (2000) Diet of a polyphagous arthropod predator affects refuge seeking of its thrips prey. Anim Behav 60:369–375

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • West SA, Cunningham JP (2002) A general model for host plant selection in phytophagous insects. J Theor Biol 214:499–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaga Y, Ohgushi T (1999) Preference-performance linkage in a herbivorous lady beetle: consequences of variability of natural enemies. Oecologia 119:183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Sara Magalhães, Marta Montserrat, Erik van Gool, Nicola Tiën and Farid Faraji for discussions and Luděk Tikovský and Harold Lemereis for arrangements in the greenhouse. Two anonymous referees provided valuable comments. M. N. was financed by the Technology Foundation STW (ABI. 4165), A. J. by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) within the framework of a PIONIER grant (no. 030-84-469) awarded to A. M. de Roos.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arne Janssen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nomikou, M., Janssen, A. & Sabelis, M.W. Herbivore host plant selection: whitefly learns to avoid host plants that harbour predators of her offspring. Oecologia 136, 484–488 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1289-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1289-1

Keywords

Navigation