Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mechanisms behind positive diversity effects on ecosystem functioning: testing the facilitation and interference hypotheses

  • Ecosystems Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Little is known about the mechanisms behind positive effects of species richness on ecosystem functioning. In a previous study that showed a positive effect of aquatic detritivore species richness on leaf litter breakdown (process) rates, we proposed that facilitation and release from intra-specific interference were the two most likely mechanisms. To test the interference hypothesis, we performed an experiment using three densities of each of three detritivore species and found varying effects on leaf breakdown rates across species: one species showed no effect, one a positive, marginally insignificant, effect, and a third species showed a significant, positive effect of decreasing density. The density (interference) effect thus partly explained the results from our previous study. The facilitation hypothesis was tested by sequentially introducing and removing two species. We predicted that, if this hypothesis were true, facilitation would be expressed in higher process rates than when replacing with individuals of the same species. We found that process rate per unit biomass did increase when one species was introduced after the other species, while the opposite sequence did not show any increase. Hence, this result was also confirmative of our previous results. Therefore, we conclude that both intra-specific interference and inter-specific facilitation may explain the positive effect of species richness observed in our system. Since many species exhibit intra-specific interference that inhibits foraging efficiency, this may be a general mechanism generating effects of species richness per se. If facilitation is unidirectional, or if it involves few species, it is more likely to be species specific with species identities being more important than species richness per se. We conclude that species loss may be expected to have negative consequences on ecosystem functioning if any species is lost, with additional effects in the event of losing "facilitator" species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2a-c.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bazzaz FA (1975) Plant species diversity in old-field successional ecosystems in southern Illinois. Ecology 56:485–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Benfield EF (1996) Leaf breakdown in stream ecosystems. In: Hauer FR, Lamberti GA (eds) Methods in stream ecology. Academic, San Diego, pp 579–589

  • Cardinale BJ, Palmer MA, Collins SL (2002) Species diversity enhances ecosystem functioning through interspecific facilitation. Nature 415:426–429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins KW (1973) Trophic relations of aquatic insects. Annu Rev Entomol 18:183–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Dangles O, Jonsson M, Malmqvist B (2003) The importance of detritivore species richness for maintaining stream ecosystem functioning following the invasion of a riparian plant. Biol Invasions (in press)

  • Doube BM (1987) Spatial and temporal organization in communities associated with dung pads and carcasses. In: Gee JHR, Giller PS (eds) Organization of communities: past and present. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 255–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley TL, D'Antonio CM, Cooper SD (1990) Mechanisms and consequences of interspecific competition between two stream insects. J Anim Ecol 59:849–866

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafius E, Anderson NH (1979) Population dynamics, bioenergetics, and role of Lepidostoma quercina Ross (Trichoptera: Lepidostomatidae) in an Oregon woodland stream. Ecology 60:433–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassel MP, Varley GC (1969) New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control. Nature 223:1133–1136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heard SB, Richardson JS (1995) Shredder-collector facilitation in stream detrital food webs—is there enough evidence? Oikos 72:359–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston MA (1997) Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia 110:449–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson M, Malmqvist B (2000) Ecosystem process rate increases with animal species richness: evidence from leaf-eating, aquatic insects. Oikos 89:519–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson M, Dangles O, Malmqvist B, Guérold F (2002) Simulating species loss following disturbance: assessing the effects on process rates. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1047–1052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M (1998a) Separating sampling and other effects in biodiversity experiments. Oikos 82:600–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M (1998b) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a mechanistic model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:5632–5636

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M (2000) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances. Oikos 91:3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M, Behera N (1999) Phenotypic diversity and stability of ecosystem processes. Theor Popul Biol 56:29–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M, Hector A (2001) Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412:72–76

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P, Bengtsson J, Grime JP, Hector A, Hooper DU, Huston MA, Raffaelli D, Schmid B, Tilman D, Wardle DA (2001) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294:804–808

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lotka AJ (1932) The growth of mixed populations: two species competing for a common food supply. J Wash Acad Sci 22:461–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouquet N, Moore JL, Loreau M (2002) Plant species richness and community productivity: why the mechanism that promotes coexistence matters. Ecology Lett 5:56–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naeem S, Li S (1997) Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability. Nature 390:507–509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nijs I, Impens I (2000) Underlying effects of resource use efficiency in diversity-productivity relationships. Oikos 91:204–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberle D (1993) Interactions among stonefly larvae (Plecoptera) in a stream leaf pack community. Thesis, Julius-Maximilians University, Würzburg

  • Richardson JS (1991) Seasonal food limitation of detritivores in a montane stream: an experimental test. Ecology 72:873–887

    Google Scholar 

  • Short RA, Maslin PE (1977) Processing of leaf litter by a stream detritivore: effect on nutrient availability to collectors. Ecology 58:935–938

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith C, Good M, Murphy JF, Giller PS, O'Halloran J (2000) Life-history patterns and spatial and temporal overlap in an assemblage of lotic Plecoptera in the Araglin Catchment Study Area, Ireland. Arch Hydrobiol 150:117–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Soluk DA (1993) Multiple predatory effects: predicting combined functional response of stream fish and invertebrate predators. Ecology 74:219–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Soluk DA, Richardson JS (1997) The role of stoneflies in enhancing growth of trout: a test of the importance of predator-predator facilitation within a stream community. Oikos 80:214–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift MJ (1987) Organization of assemblages of decomposer fungi in space and time. In: Gee JHR, Giller PS (eds) Organization of communities: past and present. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 229–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Lehman CL, Thomson KT (1997) Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:1857–1861

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Lehman CL, Bristow CE (1998) Notes and comments: diversity-stability relationships: statistical inevitability or ecological consequence? Am Nat 151:277–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volterra V (1926) Variations and fluctuations of the numbers of individuals in animal species living together. In: Chapman RN (ed) Animal ecology. McGraw Hill, New York

  • Yachi S, Loreau M (1999) Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:1463–1468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Michel Loreau, Brendan McKie, Shahid Naeem, Lennart Persson and an anonymous referee for helpful comments on earlier versions of the manuscript, and Kristina Ulvcrona, Magnus Lindberg and Jens Råberg for technical assistance. Financial support was provided by the Swedish Council for Forestry and Agricultural Research (SJFR).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Micael Jonsson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jonsson, M., Malmqvist, B. Mechanisms behind positive diversity effects on ecosystem functioning: testing the facilitation and interference hypotheses. Oecologia 134, 554–559 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-1148-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-1148-5

Keywords

Navigation