Abstract
X-chromosome inactivation and the size of the CGG repeat number are assumed to play a role in the clinical, physical, and behavioral phenotype of female carriers of a mutated FMR1 allele. In view of the tight relationship between replication timing and the expression of a given DNA sequence, we have examined the replication timing of FMR1 alleles on active and inactive X-chromosomes in cell samples (lymphocytes or amniocytes) of 25 females: 17 heterozygous for a mutated FMR1 allele with a trinucleotide repeat number varying from 58 to a few hundred, and eight homozygous for a wild-type allele. We have applied two-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with FMR1 and X-chromosome α-satellite probes to interphase cells of the various genotypes: the α-satellite probe was used to distinguish between early replicating (active) and late replicating (inactive) X-chromosomes, and the FMR1 probe revealed the replication pattern of this locus. All samples, except one with a large trinucleotide expansion, showed an early replicating FMR1 allele on the active X-chromosome and a late replicating allele on the inactive X-chromosome. In samples of mutation carriers, both the early and the late alleles showed delayed replication compared with normal alleles, regardless of repeat size. We conclude therefore that: (1) the FMR1 locus is subjected to X-inactivation; (2) mutated FMR1 alleles, regardless of repeat size, replicate later than wild-type alleles on both the active and inactive X-chromosomes; and (3) the delaying effect of the trinucleotide expansion, even with a low repeat size, is superimposed on the delay in replication associated with X-inactivation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Electronic Publication
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yeshaya, J., Shalgi, R., Shohat, M. et al. FISH-detected delay in replication timing of mutated FMR1 alleles on both active and inactive X-chromosomes. Hum Genet 105, 86–97 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004399900081
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004399900081