Skip to main content
Log in

Resistance differences between chlorpyrifos and synthetic pyrethroids in Cimex lectularius population from Denmark

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Parasitology Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bed bug, Cimex lectularius L., populations were investigated for resistance against permethrin and chlorpyrifos in a topical application bioassay, after an initial establishment of a discriminating dose with a susceptible population. For both insecticides, ca. two times the lethal dose LD99 was selected: 2,560 ng of permethrin and 200 ng of chlorpyrifos per bed bug, respectively. Bed bugs were collected from infested homes in Denmark at ten locations and bred in the laboratory. The frequency of permethrin-resistant individuals was high in Danish bed bug populations as susceptible individuals were only found in three of ten populations. In contrast, the frequency of chlorpyrifos-resistant individuals was low in Danish bed bug populations, but resistant individuals were found in five of ten populations. To test the significance of the observed resistance, we performed tarsal contact test with commercially available insecticides. The test indicated that both a permethrin and a deltamethrin product had very low efficacy against the field-collected bed bug populations. Despite the reduced sensitivity to synthetic pyrethroids, all populations tested in the tarsal test on the commercial product with micro-encapsulated chlorpyrifos resulted in close to 100% mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  • Benoit JB, Phillips SA, Croxall TJ, Christensen BS, Yoder JA, Denlinger DL (2009) Addition of pheromone components improves the effectiveness of desiccant dusts against Cimex lectularius. J Med Entomol 46:572–579

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boase C (2001) Bed bugs—back from the brink. Pesticide Outlook. RSC, Cambridge 12:159–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Boase C (2007) Bed bugs: research and resurgence. In: Takken W, Knols BGJ (eds) Emerging pests and vector-borne diseases in Europe, vol 1. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp 261–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Boase C, Small G, Naylor R (2006) Interim report on insecticide susceptibility status of UK bedbugs. Prof Pest Control Summer 2006:12–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Doggett SL, Geary MJ, Russell RC (2004) The resurgence of bed bugs in Australia: with notes on their ecology and control. Environ Health 4:30–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Feroz M (1971) Biochemistry of malathion resistance in a strain of Cimex lectularius resistant to organophosphorus compounds. Bull WHO 45:795–804

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ffrench-Constant RH, Roush RT (1990) Resistance detection and documentation: the relative roles of pesticidal and biochemical assays. In: Roush RT, Tabashnik BE (eds) Pesticide resistance in arthropods. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 4–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard J, deShazo R (2009) Bed bugs (Cimex lectularius) and clinical consequences of their bites. JAMA 301:1358–1366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang SW, Svoboda TJ, De Jong IJ, Kabasele KJ, Gogosis E (2005) Bed bug infestations in an urban environment. Emerg Infect Dis 11:533–538

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kilpinen O, Vagn-Jensen KM, Kristensen M (2008) Bed bug problems in Denmark, with a European perspective. In: Robinson WH, Bajomi D (eds) Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Urban Pests. OOK-Press, Papai, pp 395–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer RD (2004) Closing in on bed bugs. Pest Contr Tech. November 2004, 62–68

  • Kristensen M, Knorr M, Rasmussen AM, Jespersen JB (2006) Survey of permethrin and malathion resistance in human head lice populations from Denmark. J Med Entomol 43:533–538

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montes C, Cuadrikkero C, Vilella D (2002) Maintance of a laboratory colony of Cimex lectularius (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) using an artificial feeding technique. J Med Entomol 39:675–679

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore DJ, Miller DM (2006) Laboratory evaluations of insecticide product efficacy for control of Cimex lectularius. J Econ Entomol 99:2080–2086

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Romero A, Potter MF, Potter DA, Haynes KF (2007) Insecticide resistance in the bedbug: a factor in the pest’s sudden resurgence? J Med Entomol 44:175–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Romero A, Potter MF, Haynes KF (2009) Evaluation of piperonyl butoxide as a deltamethrin synergist for pyrethroid-resistant bed bugs. J Econ Entomol 102:2310–2315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roush RT, McKenzie JA (1987) Ecological genetics of insecticide and acaricide resistance. Annu Rev Entomol 32:361–380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steelman CD, Szalanski AL, Trout R, McKern JA, Solorzano C, Austin JW (2008) Susceptibility of the bed bug Cimex lectularius L. (Heteroptera: Cimicidae) collected in poultry production facilities to selected insecticides. J Agric Urban Entomol 25:41–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Harold Harlan for providing us with bed bugs from his laboratory colony and Nicolai Hansen and Kristian Hansen for technical assistance. This study was supported by the Danish Environmental Protection Agency.

Ethical standards

All experiments comply with the current laws of Denmark.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ole Kilpinen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kilpinen, O., Kristensen, M. & Vagn Jensen, KM. Resistance differences between chlorpyrifos and synthetic pyrethroids in Cimex lectularius population from Denmark. Parasitol Res 109, 1461–1464 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-011-2423-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-011-2423-3

Keywords

Navigation