Skip to main content
Log in

Electroantennogram, flight orientation, and oviposition responses of Aedes aegypti to the oviposition pheromone n-heneicosane

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Parasitology Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Oviposition pheromones specifically influence the females of many insects to lay eggs in the sites resulting in more egg deposition. A previous report describes the principal role of n-heneicosane (C21) identified and characterized from the larval cuticle of Aedes aegypti (L.) in attracting the gravid mosquitoes to oviposit in treated substrates among other chemical components. However, the means by which this compound is perceived by the females for oviposition has not been reported. In this study, we have recorded the peripheral olfactory responses from the antenna of Ae. aegypti from 10−7 g to 10−3 g doses of n-heneicosane. The EAG response of female mosquitoes increased in a dose-dependent manner with increasing stimulus strength. In the orientation assay using Y-maze olfactometer, female mosquitoes were attracted to the odor plume of 10−6 g and 10−5 g dose, while the higher dose of 10−3 g plume enforced repellency to gravid mosquitoes. The response to oviposition substrates by gravid Ae. aegypti females differed across the range of concentrations of n-heneicosane under multiple choice conditions, larger number of eggs were deposited in 10 ppm (10 mg/l) solutions compared to lower and higher concentrations indicating 10 ppm was most attractive. Application of n-heneicosane at 10 ppm in breeding habitats will be a useful method to attract the gravid mosquitoes using ovitraps for surveillance and monitoring. The possible use of this compound in monitoring of mosquito population in endemic areas in relevance to integrated vector management strategies is discussed in detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bentley MD, Day FJ (1989) Chemical ecology and behavioural aspects of mosquito oviposition. Annu Rev Entomol 34:401–421

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley MD, McDaniel IN, Davis EE (1982) Studies of 4-methyl-cyclohexanal: an Aedes triseriatus (Diptera: Culicidae) oviposition attractant. J Med Entomol 19:589–592

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell A, Johnson SN (2000) Electrophysiological investigation of larval water and potential oviposition chemo-attractants for Anopheles gambiae s.s. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 94:389–398

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell A, Mordue (Luntz) AJ, Hansson BS, Wadhams LJ, Pickett JA (1993) A behavioural and electrophysiological study of oviposition cues for Culex quinquefasciatus. Physiol Entomol 18:343–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen MF (1991) The sensory physiology of host-seeking behavior in mosquitoes. Annu Rev Entomol 36:139–158

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson DA, Schlein Y (1991) Unusual polymethyl alkenes in tsetse flies acting as abstinon in Glossina morsitans. J Chem Ecol 17:267–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson DA, Mayer MS, Silhacek DL, James JD, Beroza M, Bierl BA (1971) Sex attractant pheromone of the house fly: isolation, identification and synthesis. Science 174:76–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson DA, Langley PA, Huyton P (1978) Sex pheromone of the tsetse fly: isolation, identification and synthesis of contact aphrodisiacs. Science 201:750–753

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chickos JS, Hanshaw W (2004) Vapor pressures and vaporization enthalpies of the n-alkanes from C21–C30 at T = 298.15 K by correlation gas chromatography. J Chem Eng Data 49:77–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ganesan K, Mendki MJ, Suryanarayana MVS, Prakash S, Malhotra RC (2006) Studies of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) ovipositional responses to newly identified semiochemicals from conspecific eggs. Aust J Entomol 45:75–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geier M, Boeckh J (1999) A new Y-tube olfactometer for mosquitoes to measure the attractiveness of host odours. Entomol Exp Appl 92:9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard RW, Blomquist GJ (1982) Chemical ecology and biochemistry of insect hydrocarbons. Annu Rev Entomol 27:149–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Howard RW, Blomquist GJ (2005) Ecological, behavioural, and biochemical aspects of insect hydrocarbons. Annu Rev Entomol 50:371–393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Walker ED, Giroux PY, Vulule J, Miller JR (2005) Ovipositional site selection by Anopheles gambiae: influences of substrate moisture and texture. Med Vet Entomol 19:442–450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Miller JR, Chen S, Vulule JM, Walker ED (2006) Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) oviposition in response to agarose media and cultured bacterial volatiles. J Med Entomol 43:498–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huyton PM, Langley PA, Carlson DA, Coates TW (1980) The role of sex pheromones in initiation of copulatory behaviour by male tsetse flies, Glossina morsitans morsitans. Physiol Entomol 5:243–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ikeshoji T, Mulla MS (1970) Over-crowding factors of mosquito larvae. J Econ Entomol 63:90–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikeshoji T, Mulla MS (1974) Overcrowding factors of mosquito larvae: isolation and chemical identification. Environ Entomol 3:482–486

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer WL, Mulla MS (1979) Oviposition attractants and repellents of mosquitoes: oviposition responses of Culex mosquitoes to organic infusions. Environ Entomol 8:1111–1117

    Google Scholar 

  • Law JH, Regnier FE (1971) Pheromones. Annu Rev Biochem 40:533–548

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leal WS (2005) Pheromone reception. Topics Curr Chem 240:1–36

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macklay JW (1977) Attractants and body hydrocarbon constituents of the horn fly, Haematobia irritans (L.). University of Florida, Gainesville, 129 p

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall PJ (2002) Chemoecology of oviposition in insects of medical and veterinary importance. In: Hilker M, Meiners T (eds) Chemoecology of insect eggs and egg deposition. Blackwell, Berlin, pp 265–290

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall PJ, Cameron MM (1995) Oviposition pheromones in insect vectors. Parasitol Today 11:352–355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mendki MJ, Ganesan K, Prakash S, Suryanarayana MVS, Malhotra RC, Rao KM, Vaidyanathaswamy R (2000) Heneicosane: an oviposition-attractant pheromone of larval origin in Aedes aegypti mosquito. Curr Sci 78:1295–1296

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Millar JG (2000) Polyene hydrocarbons and expoxides: a second major class of lepidopteran sex attractant pheromones. Annu Rev Entomol 45:575–604

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore CG, Fisher BR (1969) Competition in mosquitoes. Density and species ratio effects on growth, mortality, fecundity and production of growth retardant. Ann Entomol Soc Am 62:1325–1331

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muhammed S, Butler JF, Carlson DA (1975) Stable fly sex attractant and mating pheromones found in female body hydrocarbons. J Chem Ecol 1:387–398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oguma Y, Nemoto T, Kuwhara Y (1992a) (Z)-11-Pentacosane is the major sex pheromone component in Drosophila virilis (Diptera). Chemoecology 3:60–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oguma Y, Nemoto T, Kuwhara Y (1992b) A sex pheromone study of fruit fly Drosophila virilis Sturtevant (Diptera: Drosophilidae): additive effect of cuticular alkadienes to the major sex pheromone. Appl Ent Zool 27:499–505

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plimmer JR, Inscoe MN, McGovern TP (1982) Insect attractants. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 22:297–320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Puri SN, Mendki MJ, Sukumaran D, Ganesan K, Prakash S, Sekhar K (2006) Electroantennogram and behavioral responses of Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) females to chemicals found in human skin emanations. J Med Entomol 43:207–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Renou M, Guerrero A (2000) Insect parapheromones in olfaction research and semiochemical-based pest control strategies. Annu Rev Entomol 48:605–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff WM, Beltz AD, Johnson JD, Plapp FW (1964) A sex pheromone in the housefly Musca domestica L. J Insect Physiol 10:239–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma KR, Seenivasagan T, Rao AN, Ganesan K, Agarwal OP, Malhotra RC, Prakash S (2008) Oviposition responses of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus to certain fatty acid esters. Parasitol Res 103:1065–1073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Takken W, van Loon JJ, Adam W (2001) Inhibition of host-seeking response and olfactory responsiveness in Anopheles gambiae following blood feeding. J Insect Physiol 47:303–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uebel EC, Sonnet PE, Menzer RE, Miller RW, Lusby WR (1977) Mating-stimulant pheromone and cuticular lipid constituents of the little house fly, Fannia canicularis (L.). J Chem Ecol 3:269–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge all the members of Entomology Division (Defence Research and Development Establishment) for various help and technical support in maintaining the mosquito culture for bio-evaluation and the financial support from Project DRDE-175 of our establishment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Seenivasagan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seenivasagan, T., Sharma, K.R., Sekhar, K. et al. Electroantennogram, flight orientation, and oviposition responses of Aedes aegypti to the oviposition pheromone n-heneicosane. Parasitol Res 104, 827–833 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-008-1263-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-008-1263-2

Keywords

Navigation