Abstract
This study was designed to directly compare the accuracy, reproducibility, and efficiency of three methods commonly used to measure blood-stage malaria parasite density from Giemsa-stained blood films. Parasites and white blood cells (WBCs) were counted in 154 thick films by two independent microscopists. Forty-six slides were read by counting parasitized red blood cells (RBCs) in the thin film. Using these same slides, parasites were again counted by two independent microscopists using an ocular grid. Overall, parasite densities were significantly lower and discrepancy between readers was higher when using the grid method compared to the WBC method, but there was no difference when compared to the RBC method. When one reader who had difficulty with the grid method was excluded, the discrepancy between readers was equivalent for the three methods. Densities and discrepancy between readers were indistinguishable when parasites were counted until 200 or 500 WBCs. Counting beyond 200 WBCs may not significantly improve parasite density measurements. Using an ocular grid directly measures parasites per volume rather than using a WBC per microliter conversion factor and eliminates the need to switch from the thick film to the thin film for high parasitemias. However, significant differences in densities measured by the grid method and the WBC method need to be evaluated.
References
Beadle C, McElroy PD, Oster CN, Beier JC, Oloo AJ, Onyango FK, Chumo DK, Bales JD, Sherwood JA, Hoffman SL (1995) Impact of transmission intensity and age on plasmodium–falciparum density and associated fever—implications for malaria vaccine trial design. J Infect Dis 172(4):1047–1054
Dowling MAC, Schute GT (1966) A comparative study of thick and thin films in the diagnosis of scanty malaria parasitemia. Bull World Health Organ 34:249–267
Earle WC, Perez M (1932) Enumeration of parasites in the blood of malarial patients. J Lab Clin Med 17(11):1124–1130
Greenwood BM, Armstrong JRM (1991) Comparison of 2 simple methods for determining malaria parasite density. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 85(2):186–188
Kilian AHD, Metzger WG, Mutschelknauss EJ, Kabagambe G, Langi P, Korte R, von Sonnenburg F (2000) Reliability of malaria microscopy in epidemiological studies: results of quality control. Trop Med Int Health 5(1):3–8
McKenzie FE, Prudhomme WA, Magill AJ, Forney JR, Lucas C, Permpanich B, Gasser RA Jr, Wongsrichanalai C (2005) WBC counts and malaria. J Infect Dis 192:323–330
Mwangi TW, Ross A, Snow RW, Marsh K (2005) Case definitions of clinical malaria under different transmission conditions in Kilifi District, Kenya. J Infect Dis 191(11):1932–1939
Prudhomme O’Meara WA, McKenzie FE, Magill AJ, Forney JR, Permpanich B, Lucas C, Gasser RA Jr, Wongsrichanalai C (2005) Sources of variability in determining malaria parasite density by microscopy. Am J Trop Med Hyg 73(3):593–598
Schellenberg J, Smith T, Alonso PL, Hayes RJ (1994) What is clinical malaria—finding case definitions for field-research in highly endemic areas. Parasitol Today 10(11):439–442
Acknowledgement
All experiments comply with the laws of the country where they were performed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the author, and are not to be construed as official, or as reflecting true views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prudhomme O’Meara, W., Remich, S., Ogutu, B. et al. Systematic comparison of two methods to measure parasite density from malaria blood smears. Parasitol Res 99, 500–504 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-006-0135-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-006-0135-x