Skip to main content
Log in

Primary tumor resection enhances the survival of pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma patients with liver metastasis under the definition of 2019 WHO classification

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

With the update and release of the newest version of WHO classification (2019) for neuroendocrine neoplasm, the clinical features, risk factors of prognosis and the effect of surgical treatment on newly classified pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (pNEC) patients with liver metastasis were not deeply analyzed. In the present study, we tried to reveal the clinical features, and prognostic factors of pNEC patients with liver metastasis with the newest definition of WHO 2019, and explore whether primary tumor resection (PTR), chemotherapy and radiotherapy affect overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in those patients.

Methods

We collected data from pNEC patients with liver metastasis from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database who were diagnosed between 2010 and 2019. We strictly selected pNEC patients according to the 2019 WHO classification criteria. The univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to determine independent predictors of the survival of these patients. The forest plots map was drawn by R-4.2.2 software to display the results of the multivariate analysis visually. Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate the OS and CSS. Based on the multivariate analysis outcomes, we established the predictable nomogram model to predict the prognosis of pNEC patients with liver metastasis. The calibration plots were shown to prove the predictive value of the nomogram predictable model.

Results

We identified 205 eligible pNEC patients with liver metastasis. According to the multivariable Cox regression analysis in this study, we found that PTR, chemotherapy, primary tumor size and diagnosis to treatment time were independent prognostic factors for both OS and CSS. Kaplan–Meier survival curves demonstrated that PTR and chemotherapy were correlated with increased survival for pNEC patients with liver metastasis. The accuracy of the nomogram model was visually proved by the calibration plot with acceptable predictive performance.

Conclusion

Four independent predictors of prognosis in pNEC patients with liver metastasis were identified in this study, including PTR, chemotherapy, tumor size and diagnosis to treatment time. PTR and chemotherapy for pNEC with liver metastasis could lead to a better prognosis, which may provide inspiration for practical clinical guidelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data were extracted from the SEER database (US National Cancer Institute).

References

  • Dasari A et al (2017) Trends in the incidence, prevalence, and survival outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. JAMA Oncol 3:1335–1342

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dasari A, Mehta K, Byers LA, Sorbye H, Yao JC (2018) Comparative study of lung and extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas: A SEER database analysis of 162,983 cases. Cancer 124:807–815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feng T et al (2019) Surgical resection of the primary tumor leads to prolonged survival in metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol 17:54

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Frizziero M et al (2019) Carboplatin in combination with oral or intravenous etoposide for extra-pulmonary, poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. Neuroendocrinology 109:100–112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Carbonero R et al (2016) ENETS consensus guidelines for high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas. Neuroendocrinology 103:186–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halfdanarson TR, Rabe KG, Rubin J, Petersen GM (2008) Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs): incidence, prognosis and recent trend toward improved survival. Ann Oncol 19:1727–1733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hua Y-Q et al (2017) Radiofrequency ablation for hepatic oligometastatic pancreatic cancer: an analysis of safety and efficacy. Pancreatology 17:967–973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein O et al (2020) Immunotherapy of ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors: a subgroup analysis of the CA209-538 clinical trial for rare cancers. Clin Cancer Res 26:4454–4459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nagtegaal ID et al (2020) The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Histopathology 76:182–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park HK, Kwon GY (2023) Comparison of metastatic patterns among neuroendocrine tumors, neuroendocrine carcinomas, and nonneuroendocrine carcinomas of various primary organs. J Korean Med Sci 38:e85

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rindi G et al (2018) A common classification framework for neuroendocrine neoplasms: an international agency for research on cancer (IARC) and world health organization (WHO) expert consensus proposal. Mod Pathol 31:1770–1786

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shah MH et al (2021) Neuroendocrine and adrenal tumors, version 2.2021, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 19:839–868

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Umetsu SE et al (2023) Integrated genomic and clinicopathologic approach distinguishes pancreatic grade 3 neuroendocrine tumor from neuroendocrine carcinoma and identifies a subset with molecular overlap. Mod Pathol 36:100065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge all the SEER database founders and data providers who made such studies possible. Thank you so much for making the SEER database available to us. We acknowledge the clinic staff and managers of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College for their valuable contributions to this research.

Funding

Research grant supports were provided by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFE0118600); National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81972258, No.81974376, No. 82103016, No. 82172836, No.82272917, No.82203158); CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (2021-1-I2M-002); China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021T140071 and 2021M690462); Youth Research Fund of Peking Union Medical College Hospital (pumch201911710, pumch201910819); National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (2022-PUMCH-A-056; 2022-PUMCH-A-133; 2022-PUMCH-A-245); National Multidisciplinary Cooperative Diagnosis and Treatment Capacity Building Project for Major Diseases.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LWH conceived the original idea, collected the data, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. ZTP supervised the project. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taiping Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Not applicable.

Ethical approval

All data were extracted from the SEER database (US National Cancer Institute) in this study. No relevant approval was required for the study according to the policy of Peking Union Medical College Hospital.

Consent for publication

We sincerely hope that this article can be accepted.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 16 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, W., Zhang, T. Primary tumor resection enhances the survival of pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma patients with liver metastasis under the definition of 2019 WHO classification. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 149, 9201–9212 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04847-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04847-3

Keywords

Navigation