Abstract
Purpose
Polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4) inhibitors, such as CFI-400945 and centrinone, are emerging as promising antineoplastic agents. However, their effectiveness against Ewing’s sarcoma, a highly aggressive childhood cancer, remains to be established.
Methods
CFI-400945 and centrinone were tested in three Ewing’s sarcoma cell lines with different TP53 status. Effects were assessed by flow-cytometric analyses of cell death, dissipation of the mitochondrial transmembrane potential and cell cycle distribution, by cell viability assay as well as by caspase 3/7 activity measurement, by immunoblotting and by immunofluorescence microscopy.
Results
CFI-400945 and centrinone elicited cell death in p53 wild-type and mutant Ewing’s sarcoma cells. Both agents induced mitochondrial membrane depolarisation, caspase 3/7 activation, PARP1 cleavage and DNA fragmentation, indicating an apoptotic form of cell death. In addition, the PLK4 inhibitors induced a G2/M cell cycle arrest, particularly when cell killing was attenuated by the pan-caspase inhibitor z-VAD-fmk. Moreover, CFI-400945 treatment produced polyploidy.
Conclusion
Our findings show that PLK4 inhibitors were effective against Ewing’s sarcoma cells in vitro and thus provide a rationale for their evaluation in vivo.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Ewing’s sarcoma (ES) is the second most common bone cancer in children and adolescents (Balamuth and Womer 2010; Grünewald et al. 2018). The pathognomonic feature of ES is the gene fusion of a member of the FET gene family (consisting of FUS, EWSR1 and TAF15), by far most frequently EWSR1 (EWS RNA binding protein 1), with a member of the ETS gene family of transcription factors, most commonly FLI1. The resulting fusion protein is causative for neoplastic transformation and tumour progression; other mutations at diagnosis are rare (Grünewald et al. 2018). ES is one of the most aggressive childhood cancers: patients with localised disease have a survival probability of about 75%, while of those with detectable metastasis at initial presentation less than 40% survive (Balamuth and Womer 2010; Grünewald et al. 2018). The standard of care is a treatment combination consisting of cytotoxic chemotherapy, surgery and radiation (Balamuth and Womer 2010). Of note, the prognosis for patients with ES has reached a plateau over the last two decades, as no further therapy improvement by optimising treatment protocols could be achieved (Casey et al. 2019). It is thus imperative to identify druggable targets to improve the outcome for ES patients.
This has spurred us to conduct a systematic exploration of potentially clinically actionable targets. So far, special emphasis was placed on the family of histone deacetylases (HDACs), i.e., on the inhibition of class I and II HDACs (Sonnemann et al. 2007) as well as on the modulation of the sirtuin class of HDACs (Marx et al. 2018; Sonnemann et al. 2016). Other efforts aimed at drugging the p53 system (Sonnemann et al. 2011, 2015). We have recently extended this exploration to polo-like kinases (PLKs), a family of five serine/threonine protein kinases, whose dysfunction is associated with cancer (Archambault et al. 2015). PLKs play a key role in cell cycle control and progression (Zitouni et al. 2014). Their structure contains a C-terminal polo-box (PB) domain consisting of two or three PBs which mediate substrate interaction. In addition, PLKs contain an amino-terminal kinase domain responsible for substrate phosphorylation (Zitouni et al. 2014).
To date, most attention on PLKs as anticancer targets has focused on PLK1 (Lee et al. 2015), yet presently also PLK4 is emerging as an opportunity for inferring antineoplastic strategies (Maniswami et al. 2018; Zhao and Wang 2019). PLK4 is essential for centriole biogenesis and plays an important role in the mediation of cytokinesis (Habedanck et al. 2005; Press et al. 2019). It differs in its structure from the other PLK family members in that it contains a cryptic PB domain with two PBs and an additional third single PB (Zitouni et al. 2014). The cryptic PB enables the homodimerization of PLK4, in turn leading to autophosphorylation and activation of its catalytic function. Active PLK4 is responsible for the initiation and control of centriole duplication (Zitouni et al. 2014). PLK4 is also involved in the regulation of cell motility and migration (Zhao and Wang 2019) and its overexpression can promote metastasis (Kazazian et al. 2017). PLK4 has been found to be aberrantly expressed in patient-derived tumour samples, further underscoring its potential as a therapeutic target (Zhao and Wang 2019).
A few PLK4-targeting small molecule compounds have been developed (Maniswami et al. 2018; Zhao and Wang 2019). A systematic drug discovery programme using breast cancer cells led to the identification of the PLK4 inhibitor (PLK4i) CFI-400945 (Mason et al. 2014; Sampson et al. 2015). CFI-400945 is an ATP-competitive inhibitor with a Ki of 0.26 nM and an IC50 of 2.8 nM. It is selective for PLK4 over PLK1-3, but inhibits aurora B kinase with an IC50 of 98 nM (Mason et al. 2014). CFI-400945 is orally active, and it is currently undergoing clinical trials in patients with diverse cancers (Zhao and Wang 2019). Other PLK4i are the structurally and functionally closely related centrinone and centrinone-B, which reversibly inhibit PLK4 with a Ki of 0.16 nM and 0.6 nM, respectively, and show > 1000-fold selectivity for PLK4 over aurora kinases (Wong et al. 2015). Centrinone-B was effective against melanoma cells in a preclinical study (Denu et al. 2018).
All told, the targeting of PLK4 appears to be a promising new anticancer strategy. As to childhood cancers, PLK4 has been reported to be overexpressed in patient-derived rhabdoid tumour and neuroblastoma samples (Sredni et al. 2017b; Tian et al. 2018; Bailey et al. 2018). Moreover, PLK4i have been shown to exert anticancer activities against cultured rhabdoid tumour, medulloblastoma and neuroblastoma cells (Sredni et al. 2017a, b; Suri et al. 2019; Tian et al. 2018), but they have not yet been tested in ES cells. Therefore, we examined the PLK4i CFI-400945 and centrinone in ES cell lines in vitro, and we found them to be effective in inducing cell death and cell cycle arrest.
Material and methods
Cell culture
WE-68 cells were a gift from Dr F. van Valen (Münster, Germany). SK-ES-1 and HeLa cells were purchased from the DSMZ (Braunschweig, Germany). A673 cells were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Deisenhofen, Germany). WE-68, SK-ES-1 and HeLa cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium and A673 cells were cultured in DMEM (Lonza, Cologne, Germany). Media were supplemented with 10% foetal calf serum (Capricorn Scientific, Ebsdorfergrund, Germany), 2 mM l-glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin G sodium and 100 µg/ml streptomycin sulphate (Lonza). All tissue culture vessels used for the cultivation of ES cells were coated with rat tail collagen (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) at a concentration of 5 µg/cm2. Cells were maintained at a temperature of 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator and routinely passaged at a confluence of ~ 90%. Cells were tested to be negative for mycoplasma with the qPCR Mycoplasma Test Kit from Applichem (Darmstadt, Germany).
Treatment of cells
For flow-cytometric, caspase 3/7 activity and PCR analyses, WE-68 and SK-ES-1 cells were seeded in 12-well tissue culture plates and A673 cells were seeded in 6-well tissue culture plates. For flow-cytometric and PCR analyses, WE-68 and SK-ES-1 cells were seeded at a density of 150,000 cells/well, and A673 cells were seeded at a density of 100,000 cells/well. For measurement of caspase 3/7 activity, all cells were seeded at a density of 200,000 cells/well. For cell viability assays, cells were seeded in 96-well tissue culture plates; WE-68 and SK-ES-1 cells were seeded at a density of 3000 (72 h incubation) or 4000 (48 h incubation) cells/well, A673 cells were seeded at a density of 2000 (72 h incubation) or 3000 (48 h incubation) cells/well. Cells were treated with centrinone (0.5–3 µM; MedChem Express, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA) or CFI-400945 (10–50 nM; MedChem Express) for 12–72 h, depending on the read-out. In the respective experiments, cells were pre-exposed to 20 µM z-VAD-fmk (Enzo Life Sciences, Lörrach, Germany) 1 h before treatment with PLK4i. In the combination experiments, cells were coexposed to PLK4i and etoposide (provided by the Jena University Hospital Pharmacy) for 48 h and 72 h.
Real-time RT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated using the Peqgold Total RNA Kit including DNase digestion (Peqlab, Erlangen, Germany). RNA was transcribed into cDNA using Omniscript (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Real-time PCR for PLK4 was performed using the Thermo Fisher Scientific (Dreieich, Germany) Applied Biosystems 7900HT Real-Time PCR system. PLK4 expression levels were normalised to B2M expression levels. Reactions were done in duplicate using Applied Biosystems Gene Expression Assays (PLK4: Hs00179514_m1, B2M: Hs00187842_m1) and Universal PCR Master Mix. All procedures were performed according to the manufacturers’ protocols. The relative gene expressions were calculated by the 2(−ΔΔCt) method.
Flow-cytometric analysis of cell death
Cell death was measured by determining the integrity of the cell membrane by flow-cytometric analysis of propidium iodide (PI; Sigma Aldrich) uptake. Cells were incubated in 2 µg/ml PI in PBS for 5 min at 4 °C in the dark. 10,000 cells per sample were analysed on a BD (Heidelberg, Germany) FACSCanto II using BD FACSDiva software; data were gated to exclude debris.
Cell viability assay
The assays were done in quadruplicates in 96-well plates. At the end of the treatment period, 1/10 volume of the resazurin solution (Promocell, Heidelberg, Germany) was added and cells were incubated at 37 °C for additional 3 h. The fluorescent signal of reduced resazurin was measured on a Tecan (Crailsheim, Germany) Infinite M200 Pro plate reader using an excitation/emission wave length of 560/590 nM. Results are expressed as the ratio of fluorescence of treated to untreated cells.
Flow-cytometric analysis of mitochondrial transmembrane potential (Δψm) decay
The loss of Δψm was measured using 3,3′-dihexyloxacarbocyanine iodide [DiOC6(3)] (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Before harvesting, cells were incubated with 50 nM DiOC6(3) for 45 min at 37 °C. 10,000 cells per sample were analysed on a BD FACSCanto II; data were gated to exclude debris.
Flow-cytometric analysis of DNA content
DNA content was measured according to Riccardi and Nicoletti (2006). After harvesting, cells were washed with PBS and fixed in 70% ice-cold ethanol over night at − 20 °C. After washing with PBS, cells were incubated in 500 µl DNA extraction buffer consisting of 200 mM Na2HPO4 and 0.1% Triton X-100 (pH 7.8) for 5 min at room temperature. Cells were washed in PBS, resuspended in PBS containing 20 µg/ml PI and 200 µg/ml RNase A (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) and incubated for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. 20,000 cells per sample were analysed on a BD FACSCanto II. The different cell cycle phases were quantified using FACSDiva software; data were gated to exclude debris.
Caspase 3/7 activity
Caspase 3/7 activity was assessed by measuring the fluorogenic substrate Ac-DEVD-AMC (Bachem, Weil am Rhein, Germany). After harvesting, cells were lysed in 10 mM Tris–HCl, 10 mM NaH2PO4/NaHPO4 (pH 7.5), 130 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100 and 10 mM Na4P2O7 for 15 min at 4 °C in the dark. The samples were mixed with activation buffer consisting of 20 mM Hepes (pH 7.5), 10% glycerol, 2 mM DTT and 25 µg/ml Ac-DEVD-AMC and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. The release of AMC was measured with a BMG Labtech (Offenburg, Germany) FLUOstar Omega or a Tecan Infinite M200 Pro using excitation/emission wavelengths of 355/460 nM. The relative caspase 3/7 activities were calculated as a ratio of the emission of treated to untreated cells.
Immunoblotting
3 × 106 (WE-68, SK-ES-1) or 1.2 × 106 cells (A673) were seeded in petri dishes and harvested after a 2-h or 24-h treatment, washed with PBS and lysed in RIPA buffer [50 mM Tris/HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate and 0.1% SDS] supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (Roche) for 30 min at 4 °C, followed by sonication for 3 min and centrifugation at 4 °C for 15 min to separate lysate from debris. After SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to PVDF membrane (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) using NuPAGE Transfer Buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Membranes were blocked for 1 h with 5% dry milk in PBS at room temperature, followed by incubation with antibodies over night at 4 °C. Primary antibodies used were rabbit anti-PARP1 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA, #9542; 1:1000), mouse anti-vinculin (Bio-Rad, Feldkirchen, Germany, #MCA465GA; 1:10.000), mouse anti-p53 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany, #sc-126; 1:2000) and mouse anti-phospho-histone H2A.X Ser139 (Merck, #05–636; 1:1000). HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #31,460; 1:2000) or HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #31,430; 1:2000) was used as secondary antibodies followed by detection of specific signals using Supersignal West Pico Plus Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Imaging was carried out using a Fusion Solo S imager (Vilber Lourmat, Eberhardzell, Germany).
Immunofluorescence microscopy
WE-68 cells were seeded on collagen-coated cover slips. 24 h after treatment, cells were fixed in 1 ml methanol for 5 min at − 20 °C and washed three times in PBS. Prior to staining, each sample was blocked in 1% BSA in PBS for 20 min at room temperature. Cells were incubated with a rat anti-α-tubulin antibody (Bio-Rad, #MCA77G; 1:500) for 1 h at room temperature. Cover slips were washed three times with PBS, followed by incubation with a secondary Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rat antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch, Ely, UK, #112–165-167; 1:1000) for 45 min at room temperature in the dark. Finally, cover slips were washed three times with PBS and stained with 5 µg/ml DAPI (Sigma) for 20 min at room temperature, followed by repeated washing with PBS and sealing with Fluorescence Mounting Medium (Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany). Mounted cells were imaged using a Zeiss (Jena, Germany) Axiovert 200 microscope.
Statistical analysis
Statistical significance of differences between experimental groups was evaluated by the paired two-tailed Student’s t test.
Results
Antineoplastic effects of CFI-400945 and centrinone in ES cells
Of the compounds that have been developed to inhibit PLK4 (Maniswami et al. 2018; Zhao and Wang 2019), we selected CFI-400945 and centrinone for investigation in cultured ES cells. CFI-400945 is the only PLK4i that has been tested in a clinical trial (Veitch et al. 2019), and centrinone has been found to be the most selective PLK4i in a study exploring several agents for their PLK4-inhibitory action (Suri et al. 2019). Since a study on melanoma cells observed that centrinone-B was less effective in cells with mutant p53 (Denu et al. 2018), we used three ES cell lines with different TP53 status, i.e., wild-type p53 WE-68 cells, mutant p53 (C176F) SK-ES-1 cells (Sonnemann et al. 2015) and p53 null A673 cells (Ottaviano et al. 2010), to address a potential impact of p53 on the response of ES cells to PLK4 inhibition. Initially, we determined the relative gene expression levels of PLK4 in the three cell lines by real-time RT-PCR. These measurements revealed that PLK4 expression levels were considerably higher in ES cells than in HeLa cells (Fig. S1), thus underscoring the potential of PLK4 as drug target in ES. To examine the antineoplastic effects of CFI-400945 and centrinone in ES cells, we first measured cell death by flow-cytometric analysis of PI uptake. Figure 1a shows that the PLK4i induced cell death in a concentration-dependent manner in the three cell lines. CFI-400945 was active at nanomolar concentrations, while centrinone was effective in the low micromolar range, in accordance with their different Ki values (Mason et al. 2014; Wong et al. 2015). WE-68 and SK-ES-1 cells reacted similarly, albeit slightly more sensitively than A673 cells to the treatment, suggesting that PLK4i-mediated cell killing in ES cells did not hinge on functional p53. We also assessed the effects of CFI-400945 and centrinone by resazurin-based cell viability assay. As presented in Fig. 1b, the results of these assays reflect those of the PI uptake analyses: CFI-400945 and centrinone affected cell viability in a concentration- and time-dependent fashion and were somewhat more effective in WE-68 and SK-ES-1 cells than in A673 cells.
It has been reported that polyploidy can render cancer cells more susceptible to DNA-damaging agents (Hau et al. 2006). Consistently, CFI-400945 has been shown to enhance the cytotoxic activity of the genotoxic drugs etoposide and doxorubicin in rhabdoid tumour and medulloblastoma cells (Sredni et al. 2017a). We thus tested whether CFI-400945 and centrinone could increase the susceptibility of ES cells to etoposide, a standard drug for the treatment of ES (Anderton et al. 2020), by cell viability assay. As shown in Fig. S2, the effect of combined treatment was not more than additve in ES cells.
To evaluate if cell death caused by CFI-400945 and centrinone involved apoptosis, we examined Δψm loss, caspase 3/7 activity, PARP1 cleavage and the effect of the pan-caspase inhibitor z-VAD-fmk on PLK4i-elicited cell death. Consistent with the cell death results, the PLK4i triggered a concentration-dependent decay of Δψm, with a weaker response again being observed in A673 cells (Fig. 2a). Caspase 3/7 activity measurements revealed that both agents activated caspase 3/7 in the three cell lines (Fig. 2b). As an additional marker for apoptotic cell death, we determined PARP1 processing in WE-68 cells by immunoblotting. Figure 2c depicts that CFI-400945 and centrinone treatment provoked the appearance of the 89-kDa PARP1 cleavage product in a concentration-dependent manner. To test whether caspase 3/7 activation was not a mere side action but essential for PLK4i-induced cell death, we applied z-VAD-fmk in the PI uptake analyses. Figure 2d shows that the pan-caspase inhibitor decreased cell killing caused by CFI-400945 and centrinone.
Cell cycle effects of CFI-400945 and centrinone in ES cells
As PLK4 is substantially involved in cell cycle processes, we examined effects of the PLK4i on the cell cycle of ES cells by staining the DNA of ethanol-fixed cells with PI, followed by determining the DNA content by flow cytometry. After a 48-h treatment, both inhibitors elicited an increase of cells with fragmented DNA < 2n in a concentration-dependent fashion (Fig. 3; the full data set is shown in Tables S1 to S6), further substantiating the apoptosis-inducing action of CFI-400945 and centrinone. However, the PLK4i differed in their effects on cell cycle progression in the three cell lines. Treatment with centrinone resulted in the accumulation of cells in the G2/M phase, i.e., in a G2/M arrest, while treatment with CFI-400945 predominantly promoted the emergence of polyploid cells (8n). Both these effects were even more evident when apoptosis was blocked by z-VAD-fmk.
To gain a more in-depth understanding of the cell cycle responses to PLK4i treatment, we conducted time course analyses over 72 h with fixed concentrations of CFI-400945 (30 nM) and centrinone (2 µM) in WE-68 cells. These analyses most notably revealed a more detailed picture of CFI-400945′s cell cycle effects: a CFI-400945-induced G2/M cell cycle arrest became visible after shorter treatment periods. The G2/M arrest unfolded after 12 h, peaked after 24 h and returned to baseline after 48 h (Fig. 4; the full data set is shown in Tables S7 and S8). Hence, the cell cycle arrest preceded the induction of apoptosis and the appearance of polyploid cells which set in after 36 h. Also in these analyses, G2/M arrest and polyploidy became especially manifest when caspase activities were repressed by z-VAD-fmk.
To complement these data, we assessed WE-68 cells by immunofluorescence microscopy using an α-tubulin antibody. In keeping with the results from the cell cycle analyses, CFI-400945 treatment led to the appearance of multinucleated cells and the formation of multipolar spindles (Fig. S3a). These effects became more noticeable upon coincubation with z-VAD-fmk (Fig. S3b).
Effects of CFI-400945 and centrinone on DNA damage
As the standard chemotherapy of ES rests on DNA-damaging drugs, such as ifosfamide, doxorubicin and etoposide (Anderton et al. 2020), which entail a considerable risk of causing secondary malignancies (Marina et al. 2017), the application of less genotoxic agents is desirable. We therefore examined whether the PLK4i caused DNA damage by determining the phosphorylation of histone H2AX (γH2AX) by immunoblotting. Figure 5a shows that CFI-400945 and centrinone induced H2AX phosphorylation in WE-68 cells. In line with the occurrence of γH2AX, we also observed an increase in the abundance of p53, another typical feature of the DNA damage response (Williams and Schumacher 2016) (Fig. 5b). PLK4i thus do not spare DNA damage.
Discussion
ES is one of the most malignant childhood cancers and its prognosis has not improved over the past two decades (Casey et al. 2019; Vornicova and Bar-Sela 2016). There thus is an urgent need for the development of new therapeutic approaches (Bailey et al. 2019). Recent studies point to PLK4 as a promising antineoplastic target (Maniswami et al. 2018; Zhao and Wang 2019). The PLK4i CFI-400945 and centrinone have shown anticancer activity in several tumours including a few paediatric malignancies (Sredni et al. 2017a, b; Suri et al. 2019; Tian et al. 2018), but they have not yet been investigated in ES. Our study demonstrates that CFI-400945 and centrinone were effective against ES cells.
Although cell death can proceed via several pathways, the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis is viewed as most relevant to cancer treatment, for it is typically harnessed by anticancer agents (Bhola and Letai 2016). Likewise, the PLK4i have been reported to trigger cell death by inducing apoptosis (Denu et al. 2018; Kawakami et al. 2018a). Several lines of evidence emerging from our study indicate that they invoked cell death through mitochondrial apoptosis also in ES cells. We found that exposure to CFI-400945 or centrinone led to Δψm dissipation, caspase 3/7 activation and DNA fragmentation, three common characteristics of apoptosis. Induction of apoptosis was additionally confirmed by detection of PLK4i-mediated PARP1 cleavage. Most importantly, experiments using the pan-caspase inhibitor z-VAD-fmk revealed that active caspases were essential for PLK4i-elicited cell death. z-VAD-fmk impinged slightly more effectively on CFI-400945-induced than on centrinone-induced cell death, pointing to a somewhat greater role of caspases in CFI-400945-elicited cell killing.
The results from our examination of PLK4i-mediated cell death in ES cells suggest that CFI-400945 and centrinone act in a largely similar way. However, certain differences between the compounds emerged from the cell cycle analyses. When cell cycle effects were determined at a fixed time point (at 48 h; see Fig. 3 and Tables S1 to S6), CFI-400945 treatment predominantly produced polyploid cells, while centrinone treatment resulted in a G2/M cell cycle arrest. Different effects of CFI-400945 and centrinone have already been observed in a lung cancer cell line, leading to the conclusion that CFI-400945′s effects were not solely due to PLK4 inhibition (Oegema et al. 2018). An alternative explanation for the dissimilar effects, however, has been put forward in support of a PLK4-selective activity of CFI-400945 (Kawakami et al. 2018b). Our findings do not provide a conclusive answer to this debate, but they indicate that differences between the two PLK4i could be in part due to the chosen measurement time: when the cell cycle was monitored at 12-h intervals, both agents were found to induce a G2/M cell cycle arrest, albeit with different kinetics (see Fig. 4). It should also be noted that CFI-400945 and centrinone inhibit PLK4 with considerably different dissociation constants (Mason et al. 2014; Wong et al. 2015), necessitating different dosages of the compounds and, consequently, complicating their comparability. CFI-400945 has been described to exert a concentration-dependent bimodal effect: low concentrations led to centriole overduplication, whereas high concentrations blocked centriole duplication (Kawakami et al. 2018a; Mason et al. 2014). However, as a general note on the specificity of protein kinase inhibitors, it may be taken into account that these agents are rarely fully selective. A comprehensive study on kinase inhibitor selectivity of 243 clinically tested kinase drugs revealed that the vast majority of the inhibitors interfered with kinases in addition to the one intended (CFI-400945 and centrinone were not included in the study) (Klaeger et al. 2017).
In any case, the response of ES cells to PLK4i treatment was dominated by apoptosis induction, especially after longer treatment periods. When cells were protected from apoptosis by the pan-caspase inhibitor z-VAD-fmk, however, CFI-400945 and centrinone treatment produced a pronounced cell cycle effect. This finding implies that the PLK4i were capable of eliciting growth arrest when their apoptosis-inducing activity was blocked. Disabled apoptosis can reduce the efficacy of chemotherapy (Holohan et al. 2013). CFI-400945 and centrinone thus may be useful for the treatment of ES with curtailed apoptotic responsiveness due to defects in the caspase system.
Even more importantly, we found that CFI-400945 and centrinone exerted anticancer activity in ES cells with different TP53 status, indicating that their action was independent of functional p53. This finding is in contrast to results obtained in melanoma cells, in which centrinone-B was found to be less effective in cells with mutant TP53 (Denu et al. 2018), yet in line with p53-independent effects of CFI-400945 observed in lung cancer cells (Kawakami et al. 2018a). These dissimilar results point to a context-dependent role of p53 in the response to PLK4 inhibition. In any case, the evidently p53-independent action of CFI-400945 and centrinone in ES cells is a welcome finding from the clinical perspective: TP53 mutations are relatively rare in ES though (Grünewald et al. 2018), the subset of patients with mutant TP53 has a considerably poorer outcome than average (Crompton et al. 2014; Tirode et al. 2014). It is therefore of clinical relevance that the PLK4i were effective against ES cells irrespective of their TP53 status.
Our results presented here establish the potential of CFI-400945 and centrinone for the treatment of ES, although further studies are certainly required to confirm that these findings hold up in vivo. It should also not be overlooked that PLK4i exposure resulted in DNA damage, raising the concern that these agents may entail the long-term sequelae typical of genotoxic drugs. Nonetheless, the potent anticancer effects of CFI-400945 and centrinone—which did neither spare p53 mutant nor apoptotically impaired ES cells—render them a promising new option for the treatment of ES.
Data availability
All data sets on which the conclusions of the manuscript rely are presented in the paper and its supplementary information files.
References
Anderton J, Moroz V, Marec-Berard P, Gaspar N, Laurence V, Martin-Broto J, Sastre A, Gelderblom H, Owens C, Kaiser S, Fernandez-Pinto M, Fenwick N, Evans A, Strauss S, Whelan J, Wheatley K, Brennan B (2020) International randomised controlled trial for the treatment of newly diagnosed EWING sarcoma family of tumours - EURO EWING 2012 Protocol. Trials 21:96. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-4026-8
Archambault V, Lepine G, Kachaner D (2015) Understanding the Polo Kinase machine. Oncogene 34:4799–4807. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2014.451
Bailey AW, Suri A, Chou PM, Pundy T, Gadd S, Raimondi SL, Tomita T, Sredni ST (2018) Polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4) is overexpressed in central nervous system neuroblastoma (CNS-NB). Bioengineering (Basel) 5:96. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering5040096
Bailey K, Cost C, Davis I, Glade-Bender J, Grohar P, Houghton P, Isakoff M, Stewart E, Laack N, Yustein J, Reed D, Janeway K, Gorlick R, Lessnick S, DuBois S, Hingorani P (2019) Emerging novel agents for patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) new agents for Ewing sarcoma task force. J F1000Res 8:493. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18139.1
Balamuth NJ, Womer RB (2010) Ewing’s sarcoma. Lancet Oncol 11:184–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70286-4
Bhola PD, Letai A (2016) Mitochondria-judges and executioners of cell death sentences. Mol Cell 61:695–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2016.02.019
Casey DL, Lin TY, Cheung NV (2019) Exploiting signaling pathways and immune targets beyond the standard of care for Ewing sarcoma. Front Oncol 9:537. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00537
Crompton BD, Stewart C, Taylor-Weiner A, Alexe G, Kurek KC, Calicchio ML, Kiezun A, Carter SL, Shukla SA, Mehta SS, Thorner AR, de Torres C, Lavarino C, Sunol M, McKenna A, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Lawrence MS, Stojanov P, Rosenberg M, Ambrogio L, Auclair D, Seepo S, Blumenstiel B, DeFelice M, Imaz-Rosshandler I, Schwarz-Cruz YCA, Rivera MN, Rodriguez-Galindo C, Fleming MD, Golub TR, Getz G, Mora J, Stegmaier K (2014) The genomic landscape of pediatric Ewing sarcoma. Cancer Discov 4:1326–1341. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-1037
Denu RA, Shabbir M, Nihal M, Singh CK, Longley BJ, Burkard ME, Ahmad N (2018) Centriole overduplication is the predominant mechanism leading to centrosome amplification in melanoma. Mol Cancer Res 16:517–527. https://doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0197
Grünewald TGP, Cidre-Aranaz F, Surdez D, Tomazou EM, de Alava E, Kovar H, Sorensen PH, Delattre O, Dirksen U (2018) Ewing sarcoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers 4:5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-018-0003-x
Habedanck R, Stierhof YD, Wilkinson CJ, Nigg EA (2005) The Polo kinase Plk4 functions in centriole duplication. Nat Cell Biol 7:1140–1146. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1320
Hau PM, Siu WY, Wong N, Lai PB, Poon RY (2006) Polyploidization increases the sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents in mammalian cells. FEBS Lett 580:4727–4736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2006.07.059
Holohan C, Van Schaeybroeck S, Longley DB, Johnston PG (2013) Cancer drug resistance: an evolving paradigm. Nat Rev Cancer 13:714–726. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3599
Kawakami M, Mustachio LM, Zheng L, Chen Y, Rodriguez-Canales J, Mino B, Kurie JM, Roszik J, Villalobos PA, Thu KL, Silvester J, Cescon DW, Wistuba II, Mak TW, Liu X, Dmitrovsky E (2018a) Polo-like kinase 4 inhibition produces polyploidy and apoptotic death of lung cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:1913–1918. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719760115
Kawakami M, Mustachio LM, Zheng L, Chen Y, Rodriguez-Canales J, Mino B, Kurie JM, Roszik J, Villalobos PA, Thu KL, Silvester J, Cescon DW, Wistuba II, Mak TW, Liu X, Dmitrovsky E (2018b) Reply to Oegema et al.: CFI-400945 and Polo-like kinase 4 inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:E10810–E10811. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1813967115
Kazazian K, Go C, Wu H, Brashavitskaya O, Xu R, Dennis JW, Gingras AC, Swallow CJ (2017) Plk4 promotes cancer invasion and metastasis through Arp2/3 complex regulation of the actin cytoskeleton. Cancer Res 77:434–447. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2060
Klaeger S, Heinzlmeir S, Wilhelm M, Polzer H, Vick B, Koenig PA, Reinecke M, Ruprecht B, Petzoldt S, Meng C, Zecha J, Reiter K, Qiao H, Helm D, Koch H, Schoof M, Canevari G, Casale E, Depaolini SR, Feuchtinger A, Wu Z, Schmidt T, Rueckert L, Becker W, Huenges J, Garz AK, Gohlke BO, Zolg DP, Kayser G, Vooder T, Preissner R, Hahne H, Tonisson N, Kramer K, Götze K, Bassermann F, Schlegl J, Ehrlich HC, Aiche S, Walch A, Greif PA, Schneider S, Felder ER, Ruland J, Medard G, Jeremias I, Spiekermann K, Kuster B (2017) The target landscape of clinical kinase drugs. Science 358:eaan4368. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan4368
Lee KS, Burke TR Jr, Park JE, Bang JK, Lee E (2015) Recent advances and new strategies in targeting Plk1 for anticancer therapy. Trends Pharmacol Sci 36:858–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2015.08.013
Maniswami RR, Prashanth S, Karanth AV, Koushik S, Govindaraj H, Mullangi R, Rajagopal S, Jegatheesan SK (2018) PLK4: a link between centriole biogenesis and cancer. Expert Opin Ther Targets 22:59–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728222.2018.1410140
Marina NM, Liu Q, Donaldson SS, Sklar CA, Armstrong GT, Oeffinger KC, Leisenring WM, Ginsberg JP, Henderson TO, Neglia JP, Stovall MA, Yasui Y, Randall RL, Geller DS, Robison LL, Ness KK (2017) Longitudinal follow-up of adult survivors of Ewing sarcoma: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Cancer 123:2551–2560. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30627
Marx C, Marx-Blümel L, Lindig N, Thierbach R, Hoelzer D, Becker S, Wittig S, Lehmann R, Slevogt H, Heinzel T, Wang ZQ, Beck JF, Sonnemann J (2018) The sirtuin 1/2 inhibitor tenovin-1 induces a nonlinear apoptosis-inducing factor-dependent cell death in a p53 null Ewing’s sarcoma cell line. Invest New Drugs 36:396–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-017-0541-1
Mason JM, Lin DC, Wei X, Che Y, Yao Y, Kiarash R, Cescon DW, Fletcher GC, Awrey DE, Bray MR, Pan G, Mak TW (2014) Functional characterization of CFI-400945, a Polo-like kinase 4 inhibitor, as a potential anticancer agent. Cancer Cell 26:163–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2014.05.006
Oegema K, Davis RL, Lara-Gonzalez P, Desai A, Shiau AK (2018) CFI-400945 is not a selective cellular PLK4 inhibitor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:E10808–E10809. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1813310115
Ottaviano L, Schaefer KL, Gajewski M, Huckenbeck W, Baldus S, Rogel U, Mackintosh C, de Alava E, Myklebost O, Kresse SH, Meza-Zepeda LA, Serra M, Cleton-Jansen AM, Hogendoorn PCW, Buerger H, Aigner T, Gabbert HE, Poremba C (2010) Molecular characterization of commonly used cell lines for bone tumor research: a trans-European EuroBoNet effort. Gene Chromosome Canc 49:40–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/gcc.20717
Press MF, Xie B, Davenport S, Zhou Y, Guzman R, Nolan GP, O'Brien N, Palazzolo M, Mak TW, Brugge JS, Slamon DJ (2019) Role for polo-like kinase 4 in mediation of cytokinesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:11309–11318. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1818820116
Riccardi C, Nicoletti I (2006) Analysis of apoptosis by propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry. Nat Protoc 1:1458–1461. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.238
Sampson PB, Liu Y, Forrest B, Cumming G, Li SW, Patel NK, Edwards L, Laufer R, Feher M, Ban F, Awrey DE, Mao G, Plotnikova O, Hodgson R, Beletskaya I, Mason JM, Luo X, Nadeem V, Wei X, Kiarash R, Madeira B, Huang P, Mak TW, Pan G, Pauls HW (2015) The discovery of Polo-like kinase 4 inhibitors: identification of (1R,2S).2-(3-((E).4-(((cis).2,6-dimethylmorpholino)methyl)styryl). 1H.indazol-6-yl)-5’-methoxyspiro[cyclopropane-1,3’-indolin]-2’-one (CFI-400945) as a potent, orally active antitumor agent. J Med Chem 58:147–169
Sonnemann J, Dreyer L, Hartwig M, Palani CD, le Hong TT, Klier U, Bröker B, Völker U, Beck JF (2007) Histone deacetylase inhibitors induce cell death and enhance the apoptosis-inducing activity of TRAIL in Ewing’s sarcoma cells. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 133:847–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-007-0227-8
Sonnemann J, Palani CD, Wittig S, Becker S, Eichhorn F, Voigt A, Beck JF (2011) Anticancer effects of the p53 activator nutlin-3 in Ewing’s sarcoma cells. Eur J Cancer 47:1432–1441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2011.01.015
Sonnemann J, Grauel D, Blümel L, Hentschel J, Marx C, Blumrich A, Focke K, Becker S, Wittig S, Schinkel S, Krämer OH, Beck JF (2015) RETRA exerts anticancer activity in Ewing’s sarcoma cells independent of their TP53 status. Eur J Cancer 51:841–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.02.016
Sonnemann J, Kahl M, Siranjeevi PM, Blumrich A, Blümel L, Becker S, Wittig S, Winkler R, Krämer OH, Beck JF (2016) Reverse chemomodulatory effects of the SIRT1 activators resveratrol and SRT1720 in Ewing’s sarcoma cells: resveratrol suppresses and SRT1720 enhances etoposide- and vincristine-induced anticancer activity. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 142:17–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-015-1994-2
Sredni ST, Bailey AW, Suri A, Hashizume R, He X, Louis N, Gokirmak T, Piper DR, Watterson DM, Tomita T (2017a) Inhibition of polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4): a new therapeutic option for rhabdoid tumors and pediatric medulloblastoma. Oncotarget 8:111190–111212. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22704
Sredni ST, Suzuki M, Yang JP, Topczewski J, Bailey AW, Gokirmak T, Gross JN, de Andrade A, Kondo A, Piper DR, Tomita T (2017b) A functional screening of the kinome identifies the Polo-like kinase 4 as a potential therapeutic target for malignant rhabdoid tumors, and possibly, other embryonal tumors of the brain. Pediatr Blood Cancer 64:e26551. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.26551
Suri A, Bailey AW, Tavares MT, Gunosewoyo H, Dyer CP, Grupenmacher AT, Piper DR, Horton RA, Tomita T, Kozikowski AP, Roy SM, Sredni ST (2019) Evaluation of protein kinase inhibitors with PLK4 cross-over potential in a pre-clinical model of cancer. Int J Mol Sci 20:2112. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092112
Tian X, Zhou D, Chen L, Tian Y, Zhong B, Cao Y, Dong Q, Zhou M, Yan J, Wang Y, Qiu Y, Zhang L, Li Z, Wang H, Wang D, Ying G, Zhao Q (2018) Polo-like kinase 4 mediates epithelial-mesenchymal transition in neuroblastoma via PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Cell Death Dis 9:54. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-017-0088-2
Tirode F, Surdez D, Ma X, Parker M, Le Deley MC, Bahrami A, Zhang Z, Lapouble E, Grossetete-Lalami S, Rusch M, Reynaud S, Rio-Frio T, Hedlund E, Wu G, Chen X, Pierron G, Oberlin O, Zaidi S, Lemmon G, Gupta P, Vadodaria B, Easton J, Gut M, Ding L, Mardis ER, Wilson RK, Shurtleff S, Laurence V, Michon J, Marec-Berard P, Gut I, Downing J, Dyer M, Zhang J, Delattre O (2014) Genomic landscape of Ewing sarcoma defines an aggressive subtype with co-association of STAG2 and TP53 mutations. Cancer Discov 4:1342–1353. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0622
Veitch ZW, Cescon DW, Denny T, Yonemoto LM, Fletcher G, Brokx R, Sampson P, Li SW, Pugh TJ, Bruce J, Bray MR, Slamon DJ, Mak TW, Wainberg ZA, Bedard PL (2019) Safety and tolerability of CFI-400945, a first-in-class, selective PLK4 inhibitor in advanced solid tumours: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Br J Cancer 121:318–324. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0517-3
Vornicova O, Bar-Sela G (2016) Investigational therapies for Ewing sarcoma: a search without a clear finding. Expert Opin Inv Drug 25:679–686. https://doi.org/10.1517/13543784.2016.1168398
Williams AB, Schumacher B (2016) p53 in the DNA-damage-repair process. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 6:a026070. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a026070
Wong YL, Anzola JV, Davis RL, Yoon M, Motamedi A, Kroll A, Seo CP, Hsia JE, Kim SK, Mitchell JW, Mitchell BJ, Desai A, Gahman TC, Shiau AK, Oegema K (2015) Cell biology. Reversible centriole depletion with an inhibitor of Polo-like kinase 4. Science 348:1155–1160. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa5111
Zhao Y, Wang X (2019) PLK4: a promising target for cancer therapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 145:2413–2422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-02994-0
Zitouni S, Nabais C, Jana SC, Guerrero A, Bettencourt-Dias M (2014) Polo-like kinases: structural variations lead to multiple functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 15:433–452. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3819
Acknowledgements
Open Access funding provided by Projekt DEAL. Sophie Kerschner-Morales received a fellowship from the “IZKF des Universitätsklinikum Jena”.
Funding
Sophie Kerschner-Morales received a fellowship from the “IZKF des Universitätsklinikum Jena”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The study conception and design were done by Sophie Kerschner-Morales, Marie Kühne, James Beck and Jürgen Sonnemann. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Sophie Kerschner-Morales, Marie Kühne, Sabine Becker and Jürgen Sonnemann. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Sophie Kerschner-Morales and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kerschner-Morales, S.L., Kühne, M., Becker, S. et al. Anticancer effects of the PLK4 inhibitors CFI-400945 and centrinone in Ewing’s sarcoma cells. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 146, 2871–2883 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-020-03346-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-020-03346-z