Abstract
Purpose
We investigated the oncologic effect of palliative transurethral resection of the prostate (pTURP) in patients with prostate cancer who received primary androgen deprivation therapy.
Methods
We reviewed 614 patients, including 83 who underwent pTURP; those with incidental prostate cancer were excluded. Patients were divided into the TURP group and non-TURP group. Propensity score matching was performed for comorbidity, initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA), TNM stage, and Gleason score (GS). The Kaplan–Meier method was used to confirm castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Cox regression was performed to confirm factors affecting CSS.
Results
Before matching, the TURP group had a worse TNM stage (p < 0.01) and GS (p = 0.028) and larger prostate volume (50.1 vs. 39.0 cc, p = 0.005) than the non-TURP group. The most common reason for pTURP was acute urinary retention. After matching, the TURP group showed worse outcomes in CRPC (p = 0.003), CSS (p = 0.003), and OS (p = 0.026). In multivariate analysis, factors for predicting CSS were a positive core percent [hazard ratio (HR) 1.015, p = 0.0272], GS (10 vs. ≤8; HR 6.716, p = 0.0008), and TURP within 3 months after biopsy (HR 2.543, p = 0.0482). The resection weight (HR 1.000, p = 0.9730), resection time (HR 1.000, p = 0.3670), and blood transfusion (HR 0.630, p = 0.1860) were not associated with CSS.
Conclusions
The oncologic effect of pTURP as cytoreductive operation seems to be limited. Patients who had to receive pTURP due to cancer-related symptoms, especially early necessity of pTURP (within 3 months after biopsy), showed worse clinical courses; therefore, they should be treated more carefully and actively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamowicz J, Pakravan K, Bakhshinejad B, Drewa T, Babashah S (2017) Prostate cancer stem cells: from theory to practice. Scand J Urol 51(2):95–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681805.2017.1283360
Chen JW, Shin JH, Tsao TF, Ko HG, Yoon HK, Han KC et al (2017) Prostatic arterial embolization for control of hematuria in patients with advanced prostate cancer. J Vasc Interv Radiol 28(2):295–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2016.10.010
Crain DS, Amling CL, Kane CJ (2004) Palliative transurethral prostate resection for bladder outlet obstruction in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. J Urol 171(2 Pt 1):668–671. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000104845.24632.92
Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB, Egevad LL (2005) The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29(9):1228–1242
Estevez SV, Herranz UA, Calvo OF, Afonso Afonso FJ, Couto LS, Quintela ML et al (2016) Prostate cancer perspectives after chaarted: optimizing treatment sequence. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 107:119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.08.007
Forman JD, Order SE, Zinreich ES, Lee DJ, Wharam MD, Mellits ED (1986) The correlation of pretreatment transurethral resection of prostatic cancer with tumor dissemination and disease-free survival. A univariate and multivariate analysis. Cancer 58(8):1770–1778
Gratzke C, Engel J, Stief CG (2014) Role of radical prostatectomy in metastatic prostate cancer: data from the Munich Cancer Registry. Eur Urol 66(3):602–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.04.009
Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, van der Kwast T et al (2014) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: Treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol 65(2):467–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.002
Heng DY, Wells JC, Rini BI, Beuselinck B, Lee JL, Knox JJ et al (2014) Cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastases from renal cell carcinoma: results from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium. Eur Urol 66(4):704–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.05.034
Heung YM, Walsh K, Sriprasad S, Mulvin D, Sherwood RA (2000) The detection of prostate cells by the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in the circulation of patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate. BJU Int 85(1):65–69
Kim CS, Theeuwes A, Kwon DD, Choi YD, Chung BH, Lee HM et al (2016) The PREVAIL trial of enzalutamide in men with chemotherapy-naive, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: post hoc analysis of Korean patients. Investig Clin Urol 57(3):174–183. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.2016.57.3.174
Krupski TL, Stukenborg GJ, Moon K, Theodorescu D (2010) The relationship of palliative transurethral resection of the prostate with disease progression in patients with prostate cancer. BJU Int 106(10):1477–1483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09356.x
Kryvenko ON, Diaz M, Meier FA, Ramineni M, Menon M, Gupta NS (2012) Findings in 12-core transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy that predict more advanced cancer at prostatectomy: analysis of 388 biopsy-prostatectomy pairs. Am J Clin Pathol 137(5):739–746. https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCPWIZ9X2DMBEBM
Marszalek M, Ponholzer A, Rauchenwald M, Madersbacher S (2007) Palliative transurethral resection of the prostate: functional outcome and impact on survival. BJU Int 99(1):56–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06529.x
Mucci LA, Powolny A, Giovannucci E, Liao Z, Kenfield SA, Shen R et al (2009) Prospective study of prostate tumor angiogenesis and cancer-specific mortality in the health professionals follow-up study. J Clin Oncol 27(33):5627–5633. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8876
Murray NP, Reyes E, Fuentealba C, Orellana N, Jacob O (2014) Primary circulating prostate cells are not detected in men with low grade small volume prostate cancer. J Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/612674
Oefelein MG (2004) Prognostic significance of obstructive uropathy in advanced prostate cancer. Urology 63(6):1117–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2004.01.026
Pindoria N, Raison N, Blecher G, Catterwell R, Dasgupta P (2017) Cytoreductive nephrectomy in the era of targeted therapies: a review. BJU Int 120(3):320–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13860
Psaila B, Lyden D (2009) The metastatic niche: adapting the foreign soil. Nat Rev Cancer 9(4):285–293. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2621
Qin XJ, Ma CG, Ye DW, Yao XD, Zhang SL, Dai B et al (2012) Tumor cytoreduction results in better response to androgen ablation—a preliminary report of palliative transurethral resection of the prostate in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 30(2):145–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.02.010
Reich O, Gratzke C, Bachmann A, Seitz M, Schlenker B, Hermanek P et al (2008) Morbidity, mortality and early outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective multicenter evaluation of 10,654 patients. J Urol 180(1):246–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.058
Santoni M, Piva F, Scarpelli M, Cheng L, Lopez-Beltran A, Massari F et al (2015) The origin of prostate metastases: emerging insights. Cancer Metastasis Rev 34(4):765–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-015-9597-6
Scher HI, Halabi S, Tannock I, Morris M, Sternberg CN, Carducci MA et al (2008) Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group. J Clin Oncol 26(7):1148–1159. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.12.4487
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2016) Cancer statistics, 2016. CA: A Cancer. J Clin 66(1):7–30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21332
Sooriakumaran P, Karnes J, Stief C, Copsey B, Montorsi F, Hammerer P et al (2016) A multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes in 106 men who underwent radical prostatectomy for distant metastatic prostate cancer at presentation. Eur Urol 69(5):788–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.05.023
Wiegand LR, Hernandez M, Pisters LL, Spiess PE (2011) Surgical management of lymph-node-positive prostate cancer: improves symptomatic control. BJU Int 107(8):1238–1242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09657.x
Funding
This study was supported by a grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute, funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (Grant Number: HI15C0972).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Asan Medical Center (2017-0129). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board of the Asan Medical Center and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
The Institutional Review Board of the Asan Medical Center waived the requirement for informed consent because of the retrospective design of this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Choi, S.Y., Ryu, J., You, D. et al. Oncological effect of palliative transurethral resection of the prostate in patients with advanced prostate cancer: a propensity score matching study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 144, 751–758 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-018-2597-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-018-2597-5