Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A revision of the Tokuhashi revised score improves the prognostic ability in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression

  • Original Article – Cancer Research
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The Tokuhashi revised score from 2005 (TR2005) is the most recommended prognostic scoring system in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). However, recent studies have questioned its prognostic ability and the need for a new revision has been proposed. We aimed to assess whether a revision of the TR2005 can improve the prognostic ability of the scoring system.

Methods

In 2011 and 2012, a total of 1143 consecutive patients admitted with MSCC were prospectively included in a 2011 and a 2012 cohort. For the patients admitted in 2011 (n = 544), the components of the TR2005 including primary cancer diagnosis were analyzed regarding the prognostic ability. Based on these findings, a revision of the TR2005 score was defined as the Tokuhashi revised score 2017 (TR2017). The prognostic abilities of the TR2005 and the TR2017 were compared by Kaplan Meyer (KM) curves, and receiver-operating characteristics’ (ROC) analysis was compared in a cohort of patients admitted in 2012 (n = 599).

Results

KM curves and ROC analysis showed that the TR2017 had better prognostic ability compared to the TR2005. The ROC areas were as follows: <6-months survival, TR2017 = 0.71 and TR2005 = 0.65, and p = 0.003; for ≥6-month survival, TR2017 = 0.71 and TR2005 = 0.65, and p = 0.003; for ≥12-month survival TR2017 = 0.72 and TR2005 = 0.67, and p = 0.0015.

Conclusions

The TR2017 can improve the prognostic ability of the TR2005 in patients with MSCC. This could affect the preoperative evaluation of patients suffering from MSCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akram H, Allibone J (2010) Spinal surgery for palliation in malignant spinal cord compression. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 22:792–800

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balain B, Jaiswal A, Trivedi JM et al (2013) The Oswestry Risk Index: an aid in the treatment of metastatic disease of the spine. Bone Joint J 95-B:210–216. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.29323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels RHMA, van der Linden YM, van der Graaf WTA (2010) Spinal extradural metastasis: review of current treatment options. CA Cancer J Clin 58:245–259. doi:10.3322/CA.2007.0016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr LL, Finigan JH, Kern JA (2011) Evaluation and treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Med Clin North Am 95:1041–1054. doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2011.08.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feige J-J (2010) Tumor angiogenesis: recent progress and remaining challenges. Bull Cancer 97:1305–1310. doi:10.1684/bdc.2010.1208

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory TM, Coriat R, Mir O (2013) Prognostic scoring systems for spinal metastases in the era of anti-VEGF therapies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:965–966. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182609d38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hessler C, Vettorazzi E, Madert J et al (2011) Actual and predicted survival time of patients with spinal metastases of lung cancer: evaluation of the robustness of the Tokuhashi score. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:983–989. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e8f7f8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loblaw DA, Mitera G, Ford M, Laperriere NJ (2012) A 2011 updated systematic review and clinical practice guideline for the management of malignant extradural spinal cord compression. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84:312–317. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgen SS, Lund-Andersen C, Larsen CF et al (2013) Prognosis in patients with symptomatic metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC): survival in different cancer diagnosis in a cohort of 2321 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:1362–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgen SS, Nielsen DH, Larsen CF et al (2014) Moderate precision of prognostic scoring systems in a consecutive, prospective cohort of 544 patients with metastatic spinal cord compression. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. doi:10.1007/s00432-014-1776-2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H, Toriyama S et al (1990) Scoring system for the preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 15:1110–1113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H, Oda H et al (2005) A revised scoring system for preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2186–2191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokuhashi Y, Ajiro Y, Umezawa N (2009) Outcome of treatment for spinal metastases using scoring system for preoperative evaluation of prognosis excisional surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:69–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokuhashi Y, Uei H, Oshima M, Ajiro Y (2014) Scoring system for prediction of metastatic spine tumor prognosis. World J Orthop 5:262–271. doi:10.5312/wjo.v5.i3.262

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tomita K, Kawahara N, Kobayashi T et al (2001) Surgical strategy for spinal metastases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:298–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden YM, Dijkstra SPDS, Vonk EJA et al (2005) Prediction of survival in patients with metastases in the spinal column: results based on a randomized trial of radiotherapy. Cancer 103:320–328. doi:10.1002/cncr.20756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zoccali C, Skoch J, Walter CM et al (2016) The Tokuhashi score: effectiveness and pitfalls. Eur Spine J 25:673–678. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4339-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Søren Schmidt Morgen.

Ethics declarations

Funding

BD and MG receive research financial support from Medtronic, Globus Medical, Rigshospitalet, K2M, and the Lundbeck Foundation for studies unrelated to the present study.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morgen, S.S., Fruergaard, S., Gehrchen, M. et al. A revision of the Tokuhashi revised score improves the prognostic ability in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 144, 33–38 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-017-2519-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-017-2519-y

Keywords

Navigation