Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among female BRCA mutation carriers: experience at the National Cancer Center of Korea

  • Original Article – Clinical Oncology
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to identify the uptake rate of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) and the factors affecting this rate among female BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers at the National Cancer Center of Korea.

Methods

Between April 2007 and December 2014, 450 women underwent BRCA gene testing, and 97 women were found to have BRCA1/2 mutations. Through the review of medical records, 42 candidates for RRSO were identified. Of these, 22 underwent RRSO. Demographic, clinical, and consultation-related factors were compared between the RRSO and non-RRSO groups.

Results

The uptake rate of RRSO was 52.4 %. The mean time interval between genetic testing and surgery in the RRSO group was 7.3 months (range 0.6–33.9). The prevalence of amenorrhea was greater in the RRSO group than in the non-RRSO group (59.1 % vs. 20.0 %; P = 0.010). More women in the RRSO group were consulted with gynecologic oncologists (95.5 % vs. 60.0 %; P = 0.008). In multivariate analyses, amenorrhea at the time of genetic counseling (OR 16.44; 95 % CI 1.16–232.82; P = 0.038) and consultation with gynecologic oncologists (OR 30.78; 95 % CI 1.34–707.21; P = 0.032) were identified as factors affecting the carrier’s decision to undergo RRSO. One patient in the non-RRSO group (5.0 %) developed primary peritoneal carcinoma, which was diagnosed 4.6 years after genetic testing.

Conclusions

The uptake rate of RRSO among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers was affected by the presence of amenorrhea and consultation with gynecologic oncologists. Gynecologic oncologists with clinical experience with ovarian cancer should play a major role in aiding carriers’ decision-making concerning RRSO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S, Risch HA, Eyfjord JE, Hopper JL et al (2003) Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet 72:1117–1130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong K, Schwartz JS, Randall T, Rubin SC, Weber B (2004) Hormone replacement therapy and life expectancy after prophylactic oophorectomy in women with BRCA1/2 mutations: a decision analysis. J Clin Oncol 22:1045–1054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie MS, Crawford B, Lin F, Vittinghoff E, Ziegler J (2009) Uptake, time course, and predictors of risk-reducing surgeries in BRCA carriers. Genet Test Mol Biomark 13:51–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borzekowski DL, Guan Y, Smith KC, Erby LH, Roter DL (2014) The Angelina effect: immediate reach, grasp, and impact of going public. Genet Med 16:516–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury AR, Ibe CN, Dignam JJ, Cummings SA, Verp M, White MA et al (2008) Uptake and timing of bilateral prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Genet Med 10:161–166

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Parmigiani G (2007) Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance. J Clin Oncol 25:1329–1333

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Choi DH, Lee MH, Bale AE, Carter D, Haffty BG (2004) Incidence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in young Korean breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 22:1638–1645

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daly MB, Pilarski R, Axilbund JE, Buys SS, Crawford B, Friedman S et al (2014) Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian, version 1.2014. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 12:1326–1338

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Domchek SM, Friebel TM, Singer CF, Evans DG, Lynch HT, Isaacs C et al (2010) Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality. JAMA 304:967–975

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Evans DG, Barwell J, Eccles DM, Collins A, Izatt L, Jacobs C et al (2014) The Angelina Jolie effect: how high celebrity profile can have a major impact on provision of cancer related services. Breast Cancer Res 16:442

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fang CY, Cherry C, Devarajan K, Li T, Malick J, Daly MB (2009) A prospective study of quality of life among women undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy versus gynecologic screening for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 112:594–600

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Finch A, Shaw P, Rosen B, Murphy J, Narod SA, Colgan TJ (2006) Clinical and pathologic findings of prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomies in 159 BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Gynecol Oncol 100:58–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finch A, Metcalfe KA, Chiang JK, Elit L, McLaughlin J, Springate C et al (2011) The impact of prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy on menopausal symptoms and sexual function in women who carry a BRCA mutation. Gynecol Oncol 121:163–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finch AP, Lubinski J, Møller P, Singer CF, Karlan B, Senter L et al (2014) Impact of oophorectomy on cancer incidence and mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. J Clin Oncol 32:1547–1553

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Grann VR, Jacobson JS, Thomason D, Hershman D, Heitjan DF, Neugut AI (2002) Effect of prevention strategies on survival and quality-adjusted survival of women with BRCA1/2 mutations: an updated decision analysis. J Clin Oncol 20:2520–2529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greene MH, Piedmonte M, Alberts D, Gail M, Hensley M, Miner Z et al (2008) A prospective study of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and longitudinal CA-125 screening among women at increased genetic risk of ovarian cancer: design and baseline characteristics: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 17:594–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst JE, Gard GB, McIllroy K, Nevell D, Field M (2009) High rates of occult fallopian tube cancer diagnosed at prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 19:826–829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jung KW, Won YJ, Oh CM, Kong HJ, Cho H, Lee DH, Lee KH (2015) Prediction of cancer incidence and mortality in Korea, 2015. Cancer Res Treat 47:142–148

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kauff ND, Satagopan JM, Robson ME, Scheuer L, Hensley M, Hudis CA et al (2002) Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med 346:1609–1615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim H, Cho DY, Choi DH, Choi SY, Shin I, Park W et al (2012) Characteristics and spectrum of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in 3,922 Korean patients with breast and ovarian cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 134:1315–1326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim D, Kang E, Hwang E, Sun Y, Hwang Y, Yom CK et al (2013) Factors affecting the decision to undergo risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among women with BRCA gene mutation. Fam Cancer 12:621–628

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laki F, Kirova YM, This P, Plancher C, Asselain B, Sastre X et al (2007) Prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy in a series of 89 women carrying a BRCA1 or a BRCA2 mutation. Cancer 109:1784–1790

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levy-Lahad E, Friedman E (2007) Cancer risks among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Br J Cancer 96:11–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lim MC, Kang S, Seo SS, Kong SY, Lee BY, Lee SK et al (2009) BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in Korean ovarian cancer patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 135:1593–1599

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lim MC, Moon EK, Shin A, Jung KW, Won YJ, Seo SS et al (2013) Incidence of cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancer in Korea, 1999-2010. J Gynecol Oncol 24:298–302

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (2013) Prophylactic salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01907789/. Accessed 30 June 2015

  • Madalinska JB, van Beurden M, Bleiker EM, Valdimarsdottir HB, Hollenstein J, Massuger LF et al (2006) The impact of hormone replacement therapy on menopausal symptoms in younger high-risk women after prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy. J Clin Oncol 24:3576–3582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Madalinska JB, van Beurden M, Bleiker EM, Valdimarsdottir HB, Lubsen-Brandsma L, Massuger LF et al (2007) Predictors of prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy compared with gynecologic screening use in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 25:301–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mai PL, Loud JT, Greene MH (2014) A major step forward for BRCA1/2-related cancer risk management. J Clin Oncol 32:1531–1533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meijers-Heijboer EJ, Verhoog LC, Brekelmans CT, Seynaeve C, Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Wagner A et al (2000) Presymptomatic DNA testing and prophylactic surgery in families with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Lancet 355:2015–2020

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meijers-Heijboer H, van Geel B, van Putten WL, Henzen-Logmans SC, Seynaeve C, Menke-Pluymers MB et al (2001) Breast cancer after prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med 345:159–164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe KA, Birenbaum-Carmeli D, Lubinski J, Gronwald J, Lynch H, Moller P et al (2008a) International variation in rates of uptake of preventive options in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Int J Cancer 122:2017–2022

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe KA, Foulkes WD, Kim-Sing C, Ainsworth P, Rosen B, Armel S et al (2008b) Family history as a predictor of uptake of cancer preventive procedures by women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Clin Genet 73:474–479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NICE guidelines (2013) Familial breast cancer: classification and care of people at risk of familial breast cancer and management of breast cancer and related risks in people with a family history of breast cancer. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg164. Accessed 30 June 2015

  • Powell CB, Kenley E, Chen LM, Crawford B, McLennan J, Zaloudek C et al (2005) Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA mutation carriers: role of serial sectioning in the detection of occult malignancy. J Clin Oncol 23:127–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rebbeck TR, Lynch HT, Neuhausen SL, Narod SA, Van’t Veer L, Garber JE et al (2002) Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med 346:1616–1622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rebbeck TR, Friebel T, Wagner T, Lynch HT, Garber JE, Daly MB et al (2005) Effect of short-term hormone replacement therapy on breast cancer risk reduction after bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE Study Group. J Clin Oncol 23:7804–7810

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeler KM, Sun CC, Bodurka DC, White KG, Soliman PT, Uyei AR et al (2006) Prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy compared with surveillance in women with BRCA mutations. Obstet Gynecol 108:515–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz MD, Kaufman E, Peshkin BN, Isaacs C, Hughes C, DeMarco T et al (2003) Bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy and ovarian cancer screening following BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing. J Clin Oncol 21:4034–4041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seo JH, Cho DY, Ahn SH, Yoon KS, Kang CS, Cho HM et al (2004) BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in Korean patients with sporadic breast cancer. Hum Mutat 24:350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seong MW, Cho S, Noh DY, Han W, Kim SW, Park CM et al (2009) Comprehensive mutational analysis of BRCA1/BRCA2 for Korean breast cancer patients: evidence of a founder mutation. Clin Genet 76:152–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stuckey A, Dizon D, Scalia Wilbur J, Kent J, Tejada-Berges T, Gass J, Legare R (2010) Clinical characteristics and choices regarding risk-reducing surgery in BRCA mutation carriers. Gynecol Obstet Invest 69:270–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uyei A, Peterson SK, Erlichman J, Broglio K, Yekell S, Schmeler K et al (2006) Association between clinical characteristics and risk-reduction interventions in women who underwent BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing: a single-institution study. Cancer 107:2745–2751

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2015) World Health Statistics 2015. http://who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/2015/en/. Accessed 30 June 2015

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myong Cheol Lim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of human rights

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Statement on the welfare of animals

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, S.I., Lim, M.C., Lee, D.O. et al. Uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among female BRCA mutation carriers: experience at the National Cancer Center of Korea. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 142, 333–340 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-015-2051-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-015-2051-x

Keywords

Navigation