Skip to main content
Log in

The value of XPD and XRCC1 genotype polymorphisms to predict clinical outcome in metastatic colorectal carcinoma patients with irinotecan-based regimens

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Previous studies have suggested that DNA repair enzyme polymorphisms may bear prognostic value in metastatic colorectal carcinoma (MCRC).

Methods

We prospectively treated 43 MCRC patients with irinotecan-based regimens (XELIRI or IFL). Allelic variants of the XRCC1 gene at codon 399 and XPD gene at codon 751 were analyzed in lymphocyte DNA by PCR–RFLP. Clinical outcome variables: overall survival (OAS), progression-free survival (PFS) and the occurrence of grade 3 or 4 hematological and gastrointestinal (GIS) toxicities were evaluated.

Results

In the univariate analysis for OAS (n = 43) only XPD and XRCC1 polymorphisms were significant (P = 0.05 and P = 0.04, respectively). After adjustment for performance status (ECOG = 0, 1 vs. 2) and disease extent (single vs. multiple metastatic site), XRCC1 genotype and performance status retained significance (HR = 2.85, P = 0.04, and HR = 3.19, P = 0.02, respectively). Gln/Gln genotype was associated with the greatest risk of death. Type of presentation (metastatic vs. local disease at first presentation) was the only significant predictor of PFS in the univariate analysis (n = 40, P = 0.003). After adjustment for performance status and disease extent, type of presentation retained its significance (HR = 4.35, P = 0.003). None of the toxicities was associated with these genotypes.

Conclusions

XRCC1 genotype independently predicted overall survival in metastatic colorectal carcinoma patients treated with irinotecan-based chemotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ando Y, Saka H, Ando M et al (2000) Polymorphisms of UDP glucuronosyltransferase gene and irinotecan toxicity: a pharmacogenetic analysis. Cancer Res 60:6921–6926

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balin-Gauthier D, Delord J-P, Pillaire M-J et al (2008) Cetuximab potentiates oxaliplatin cytotoxic effect through a defect in NER and DNA replication initiation. Br J Cancer 98:120–128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braun MS, Richman SD, Quirke P et al (2008) Predictive biomarkers of chemotherapy efficacy in colorectal cancer: results from UK MRC FOCUS Trial. J Clin Oncol 26:2690–2698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlini LE, Meropol NJ, Bever J et al (2005) UGT1A7 and UGT1A9 polymorphisms predict response and toxicity in colorectal cancer patients treated with capecitabine/irinotecan. Clin Cancer Res 11:1226–1236

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • El-Khamisy SF, Masutani M, Suzuki H, Caldecott KW (2003) A requirement for PARP-1 for the assembly or stability of XRCC1 nuclear foci at sites of oxidative DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res 31:5526–5533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferlay J, Bray F, Pisani P, Parkin DM (2004) GLOBOCAN 2002: cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide. IARC Cancer Base no. 5, version 2.0. IARC Press, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurubhagavatula S, Liu G, Park S et al (2004) XPD and XRCC1 genetic polymorphisms are prognostic factors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with platinum chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 22:2594–2601

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen RD, Sorensen M, Tjønneland A et al (2007) XPA A23G, XPC Lys939Gln, XPD Lys751Gln and XPD Asp312Asn polymorphisms, interactions with smoking, alcohol and dietary factors, and risk of colorectal cancer. Mutat Res 619(1–2):68–80

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horton JK, Watson M, Stefanick DF, Shaughnessy DT, Taylor JA, Wilson SH (2008) XRCC1 and DNA polymerase beta in cellular protection against cytotoxic DNA single-strand breaks. Cell Res 18(1):48–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins JM, Marcuello E, Altes A et al (2008) Irinotecan pharmacogenetics: influence of pharmacodynamic genes. Clin Cancer Res 14(6):1788–1796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer L, Ratain MJ (1998) Clinical pharmacology of camptothecins. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 42(Suppl):S31–S43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lenz HJ (2004) Pharmacogenomics and colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 15(Suppl 4):iv173–iv177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Balibrea E, Abad A, Aranda E et al (2008) Pharmacogenetic approach for capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil selection to be combined with oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 44(9):1229–1237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyerhardt JA, Mayer RJ (2005) Systemic therapy for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 352:476–487

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monzo M, Moreno I, Navarro A et al (2007) Single nucleotide polymorphisms in nucleotide excision repair genes XPA, XPD, XPG and ERCC1 in advanced colorectal cancer patients treated with first line oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidine. Oncology 72(5–6):364–370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park DJ, Stoehlmacher J, Zhang W, Tsao-Wei DD, Groshen S, Lenz HJ (2001) A xeroderma pigmentosum group D gene polymorphism predicts clinical outcome to platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 61(24):8654–8658

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park SY, Lam W, Cheng YC (2002) X-ray repair cross-complementing gene I protein plays an important role in camptothecin resistance. Cancer Res 62(2):459–465

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quinney SK, Sanghani SP, Davis WI et al (2005) Hydrolysis of capecitabine to 5′-deoxy-5-5-fluorocytidine by human carboxylesterases and inhibition by loperamide. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 313(3):1011–1016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rea DW, Nortier JWR, Ten Bokkel Huinink WW et al (2005) A phase I/II and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan in combination with capecitabine as first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 16(7):1123–1132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruzzo A, Graziano F, Loupakis F et al (2008) Pharmacogenetic profiling in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with first-line FOLFIRI chemotherapy. Pharmacogenomics J 8:278–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saltz LB, Cox JV, Blanke C et al (2000) Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan Study Group. N Engl J Med 343:905–914

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stelzner S, Hellmich G, Koch R, Ludwig K (2005) Factors predicting survival in stage for colorectal carcinoma patients after palliative treatment: a multivariate analysis. J Surg Oncol 89:211–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoehlmacher J, Ghaderi V, Iobal S et al (2001) A polymorphism of the XRCC1 gene predicts for response to platinum based treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 21:3075–3079

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoehlmacher J, Park DJ, Zhang W et al (2004) A multivariate analysis of genomic polymorphisms: prediction of clinical outcome to 5-FU/oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy in refractory colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 91(2):344–354

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suh KW, Kim JH, Kim DY, Kim YB, Lee C, Choi S (2006) Which gene is a dominant predictor of response during FOLFOX chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, the MTHFR or XRCC1 gene? Ann Surg Oncol 13:1379–1385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sung P, Bailly V, Weber C, Thompson LH, Prakash L, Prakash L (1993) Human xeroderma pigmentosum group D gene encodes a DNA helicase. Nature (Lond) 365:852–855

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RM, Thistlethwaite A, Caldecott KW (2002) Central role for the XRCC1 BRCT I domain in mammalian DNA single-strand break repair. Mol Cell Biol 22:2556–2563

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ünal M, Güven M, Batar B, Özaydın A, Sarici A, Devranoglu K (2007) Polymorphisms of DNA repair genes XPD and XRCC1 and risk of cataract development. Exp Eye Res 85:328–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vallböhmer D, Iqbal S, Yang DY et al (2006) Molecular determinants of irinotecan efficacy. Int J Cancer 119:2435–2442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Yin MB, Hapke G, Toth K, Rustum YM (2002) Induction of biphasic DNA double strand breaks and activation of multiple repair protein complexes by DNA topoisomerase I drug 7-ethyl-10-hydroxy-camptothecin. Mol Pharmacol 61:742–748

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

There are no financial disclosures from any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Artac.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Artac, M., Bozcuk, H., Pehlivan, S. et al. The value of XPD and XRCC1 genotype polymorphisms to predict clinical outcome in metastatic colorectal carcinoma patients with irinotecan-based regimens. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 136, 803–809 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-009-0720-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-009-0720-3

Keywords

Navigation