Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Association between neonatal phototherapy and future cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Research
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phototherapy is the main treatment of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia to prevent encephalopathy. It is generally believed to be safe; however, some studies have shown it might be associated with cancer development. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the effect of neonatal phototherapy on future cancer risk. A systematic search in 13 databases was conducted in December 2018 and updated in August 2022 to identify studies that report cancer development after exposure to phototherapy. Throughout the study period, regular manual searches were also conducted to include new studies. A meta-analysis using R programming language was done in which the odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated and pooled using the reported adjusted and unadjusted data. Fifteen studies were included. A statistically significant association was detected between neonatal phototherapy and any type of cancer (OR 1.24; 95% CI 1.1, 1.4), any hematopoietic cancer (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.17, 1.91), any leukemia (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.08, 1.67), and myeloid leukemia (OR 2.86; 95% CI 1.4, 5.84). The other investigated cancers (lymphoid leukemia, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, kidney cancer, nervous system cancer, and skin cancer) were not associated with phototherapy.

  Conclusions: Phototherapy may carry a possible risk of future cancers. Future research is needed to quantify the magnitude of the cancer risk. These future studies should consider predictors of preterm birth or exclude premature babies from their analysis.

What is Known

• There were various reports about the possible association between phototherapy in neonates and the increased risk of cancer in the future.

What is New

• A statistically significant association between phototherapy and various hematopoietic cancers (especially myeloid leukemia) was recorded.

• The effect of the duration of phototherapy on the increased risk of hematopoietic cancers is yet unclear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available. However, the data can be provided by the corresponding author (Nguyen Tien Huy, tienhuy@nagasaki-u.ac.jp) on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence interval

GHL:

Global Health Library

ICD:

International Classification of Diseases

NHL:

Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma

NIH:

National Institutes of Health

NYAM:

New York Academy of Medicine

OR:

Odds ratio

PRISMA:

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis

PT:

Phototherapy

SD:

Standard deviation

SIGLE:

System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe

VHL:

Virtual Health Library

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Vreman HJ, Wong RJ, Stevenson DK (2004) Phototherapy: current methods and future directions. Semin Perinatol 28:326–333

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maisels MJ, McDonagh AF (2008) Phototherapy for neonatal jaundice. N Engl J Med 358:920–928

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Maisels MJ (2001) Phototherapy--traditional and nontraditional. J Perinatol: official journal of the California Perinatal Association 21 Suppl 1:S93–97; discussion S104–107

  4. Lightner DA, McDonagh AF (1984) Molecular mechanisms of phototherapy for neonatal jaundice. Acc Chem Res 17:417–424

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Polin RA (1990) Management of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: rational use of phototherapy. Biol Neonate 58(Suppl 1):32–43

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wang J, Guo G, Li A, Cai WQ, Wang X (2021) Challenges of phototherapy for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (Review). Exp Ther Med 21:231

    Google Scholar 

  7. Podvin D, Kuehn CM, Mueller BA, Williams M (2006) Maternal and birth characteristics in relation to childhood leukaemia. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 20:312–322

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cnattingius S, Zack M, Ekbom A, Gunnarskog J, Linet M, Adami HO (1995) Prenatal and neonatal risk factors for childhood myeloid leukemia. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology 4:441–445

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Steensel-Moll HA, Duijn CM, Valkenburg HA, Zanen GE (1992) Predominance of hospital deliveries among children with acute lymphocytic leukemia: speculations about neonatal exposure to fluorescent light. Cancer Causes Control 3:389–390

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cnattingius S, Zack MM, Ekbom A, Gunnarskog J, Kreuger A, Linet M, Adami HO (1995) Prenatal and neonatal risk factors for childhood lymphatic leukemia. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:908–914

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Roman E, Ansell P, Bull D (1997) Leukaemia and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in children and young adults: are prenatal and neonatal factors important determinants of disease? Br J Cancer 76:406–415

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Olsen JH, Hertz H, Kjaer SK, Bautz A, Mellemkjaer L, Boice JD Jr (1996) Childhood leukemia following phototherapy for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (Denmark). Cancer causes & control : CCC 7:411–414

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj 372

  14. Tawfik GM, Dila KAS, Mohamed MYF, Tam DNH, Kien ND, Ahmed AM, Huy NT (2019) A step by step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data. Tropical medicine and health 47:46

    Google Scholar 

  15. Auger N, Laverdiere C, Ayoub A, Lo E, Luu TM (2019) Neonatal phototherapy and future risk of childhood cancer. Int J cancer

  16. National Institutes of Health (2014) Quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Available from: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools. Accessed 5 Nov 2015

  17. Leung A, Heal C, Perera M, Pretorius C (2015) A systematic review of patient-related risk factors for catheter-related thrombosis. J Thromb Thrombolysis 40:363–373

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Valentine JC, Pigott TD, Rothstein HR (2010) How many studies do you need? A primer on statistical power for meta-analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 35:215–247

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cummings P (2009) The relative merits of risk ratios and odds ratios. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 163:438–445

    Google Scholar 

  20. Greenland S, Thomas DC (1982) On the need for the rare disease assumption in case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol 116:547–553

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses Bmj 327:557–560

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dalton JE, Bolen SD, Mascha EJ (2016) Publication bias: the elephant in the review. Anesth Analg 123:812

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wickremasinghe AC, Kuzniewicz MW, Grimes BA, McCulloch CE, Newman TB (2016) Neonatal phototherapy and infantile cancer. Pediatrics 137

  24. Berg P, Lindelof B (1998) Is phototherapy in neonates a risk factor for malignant melanoma development? Pediatr Dermatol 15:250

    Google Scholar 

  25. Newman TB, Wickremasinghe AC, Walsh EM, Grimes BA, McCulloch CE, Kuzniewicz MW (2016) Retrospective cohort study of phototherapy and childhood cancer in Northern California. Pediatrics 137

  26. Brewster DH, Tucker JS, Fleming M, Morris C, Stockton DL, Lloyd DJ, Bhattacharya S, Chalmers JW (2010) Risk of skin cancer after neonatal phototherapy: retrospective cohort study. Arch Dis Child 95:826–831

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ku M-S (2018) Neonatal phototherapy: a novel therapy to prevent allergic skin disease for at least 5 years. Neonatology 114:235–241

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sabzevari F, Sinaei R, Bahmanbijari B, Dehghan Krooki S, Dehghani A (2022) Is neonatal phototherapy associated with a greater risk of childhood cancers? BMC Pediatr 22:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kadivar M, Sangsari R, Saeedi M, Ghasemi Tehrani S (2020) Association between neonatal phototherapy and cancer during childhood. Iranian Journal of Neonatology IJN 11:104–108

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bugaiski-Shaked A, Shany E, Mesner O, Sergienko R, Wainstock T (2022) Association between neonatal phototherapy exposure and childhood neoplasm. J Pediatr

  31. Digitale JC, Kim M-O, Kuzniewicz MW, Newman TB (2021) Update on phototherapy and childhood cancer in a Northern California cohort. Pediatrics 148

  32. Hemati Z, Keikha M, Khoshhali M, Kelishadi R (2022) Phototherapy and risk of childhood cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neonatal Nurs

  33. Wintermeier K, von Poblotzki M, Genzel-Boroviczény O, Vogel S, Schotten K, Berking C, Giehl KA (2014) Neonatal blue light phototherapy increases café-au-lait macules in preschool children. Eur J Pediatr 173:1519–1525

    Google Scholar 

  34. Csoma Z, Toth-Molnar E, Balogh K, Polyanka H, Orvos H, Ocsai H, Kemeny L, Szell M, Olah J (2011) Neonatal blue light phototherapy and melanocytic nevi: a twin study. Pediatrics 128:e856-864

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mahé E, Beauchet A, Aegerter P, Saiag P (2009) Neonatal blue-light phototherapy does not increase nevus count in 9-year-old children. Pediatrics 123:e896–e900

    Google Scholar 

  36. Csoma Z, Hencz P, Orvos H, Kemeny L, Dobozy A, Dosa-Racz E, Erdei Z, Bartusek D, Olah J (2007) Neonatal blue-light phototherapy could increase the risk of dysplastic nevus development. Pediatrics 119:1269

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bauer J, Büttner P, Luther H, Wiecker TS, Möhrle M, Garbe C (2004) Blue light phototherapy of neonatal jaundice does not increase the risk for melanocytic nevus development. Arch Dermatol 140:493–494

    Google Scholar 

  38. Matichard E, Le Henanff A, Sanders A, Leguyadec J, Crickx B, Descamps V (2006) Effect of neonatal phototherapy on melanocytic nevus count in children. Arch Dermatol 142:1599–1604

    Google Scholar 

  39. Speck WT, Rosenkranz HS (1979) Phototherapy for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia—a potential environmental health hazard to newborn infants: a review. Environ Mutagen 1:321–336

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kahveci H, Dogan H, Karaman A, Caner I, Tastekin A, Ikbal M (2013) Phototherapy causes a transient DNA damage in jaundiced newborns. Drug Chem Toxicol 36:88–92

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Spikes JD (1984) Photobiology of porphyrins. Prog Clin Biol Res 170:19–39

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Buettner GR, Oberley LW (1979) Superoxide formation by protoporphyrin as seen by spin trapping. FEBS Lett 98:18–20

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Evensen JF, Moan J (1982) Photodynamic action and chromosomal damage: a comparison of haematoporphyrin derivative (HpD) and light with X-irradiation. Br J Cancer 45:456–465

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Karakukcu C, Ustdal M, Ozturk A, Baskol G, Saraymen R (2009) Assessment of DNA damage and plasma catalase activity in healthy term hyperbilirubinemic infants receiving phototherapy. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 680:12–16

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. El-Abdin MYZ, El-Salam MA, Ibrhim MY, Koraa SS, Mahmoud E (2012) Phototherapy and DNA changes in full term neonates with hyperbilirubinemia. Egypt J Med Hum Genet 13:29–35

  46. Yahia S, Shabaan AE, Gouida M, El-Ghanam D, Eldegla H, El-Bakary A, Abdel-Hady H (2015) Influence of hyperbilirubinemia and phototherapy on markers of genotoxicity and apoptosis in full-term infants. Eur J Pediatr 174:459–464

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Aycicek A, Kocyigit A, Erel O, Senturk H (2008) Phototherapy causes DNA damage in peripheral mononuclear leukocytes in term infants. J Pediatr 84:141–146

    Google Scholar 

  48. Harder T, Plagemann A, Harder A (2008) Birth weight and subsequent risk of childhood primary brain tumors: a meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 168:366–373

    Google Scholar 

  49. Caughey RW, Michels KB (2009) Birth weight and childhood leukemia: a meta-analysis and review of the current evidence. Int J Cancer 124:2658–2670

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Heuch JM, Heuch I, Akslen LA, Kvåle G (1998) Risk of primary childhood brain tumors related to birth characteristics: a Norwegian prospective study. Int J Cancer 77:498–503

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Bjørge T, Cnattingius S, Lie RT, Tretli S, Engeland A (2008) Cancer risk in children with birth defects and in their families: a population based cohort study of 5.2 million children from Norway and Sweden. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 17:500–506

    Google Scholar 

  52. de Fine LS, Schmidt L, Rod N, Schmiegelow K, Lähteenmäki P, Kogner P, Träger C, Stokland T, Schüz J (2012) Hepatoblastoma in the Nordic countries. Int J Cancer 131:E555–E561

    Google Scholar 

  53. Bjørge T, Sørensen HT, Grotmol T, Engeland A, Stephansson O, Gissler M, Tretli S, Troisi R (2013) Fetal growth and childhood cancer: a population-based study. Pediatrics 132:e1265–e1275

    Google Scholar 

  54. Barahmani N, Dorak MT, Forman MR, Sprehe MR, Scheurer ME, Bondy ML, Okcu MF, Lupo PJ (2015) Evaluating the role of birth weight and gestational age on acute lymphoblastic leukemia risk among those of Hispanic ethnicity. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 32:382–389

    Google Scholar 

  55. Lupo PJ, Schraw JM, Desrosiers TA, Nembhard WN, Langlois PH, Canfield MA, Copeland G, Meyer RE, Brown AL, Chambers TM (2019) Association between birth defects and cancer risk among children and adolescents in a population-based assessment of 10 million live births. JAMA Oncol 5:1150–1158

    Google Scholar 

  56. Huang MJ, Kua KE, Teng HC, Tang KS, Weng HW, Huang CS (2004) Risk factors for severe hyperbilirubinemia in neonates. Pediatr Res 56:682–689

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Watchko JF (2021) Review of the contribution of genetic factors to hyperbilirubinemia and kernicterus risk in neonates: a targeted update. Pediatric Medicine 4

  58. Lamola AA, Bhutani VK, Du L, Castillo Cuadrado M, Chen L, Shen Z, Wong RJ, Stevenson DK (2015) Neonatal bilirubin binding capacity discerns risk of neurological dysfunction. Pediatr Res 77:334–339

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Hansen TWR, Wong RJ, Stevenson DK (2020) Molecular physiology and pathophysiology of bilirubin handling by the blood, liver, intestine, and brain in the newborn. Physiol Rev 100:1291–1346

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Kuzniewicz MW, Escobar GJ, Newman TB (2009) Impact of universal bilirubin screening on severe hyperbilirubinemia and phototherapy use. Pediatrics 124:1031–1039

    Google Scholar 

  61. American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Hyperbilirubinemia (2004) Management of hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn infant 35 or more weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 114:297–316

    Google Scholar 

  62. Tyson JE, Pedroza C, Langer J, Green C, Morris B, Stevenson D, Van Meurs KP, Oh W, Phelps D, O’Shea M (2012) Does aggressive phototherapy increase mortality while decreasing profound impairment among the smallest and sickest newborns? J Perinatol 32:677–684

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Hansen T (2012) Let there be light—but should there be less? J Perinatol 32:649–651

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Newman TB, Kuzniewicz MW, Liljestrand P, Wi S, McCulloch C, Escobar GJ (2009) Numbers needed to treat with phototherapy according to American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines. Pediatrics 123:1352

    Google Scholar 

  65. Wu YW, Kuzniewicz MW, Wickremasinghe AC, Walsh EM, Wi S, McCulloch CE, Newman TB (2015) Risk for cerebral palsy in infants with total serum bilirubin levels at or above the exchange transfusion threshold: a population-based study. JAMA Pediatr 169:239–246

    Google Scholar 

  66. Wickremasinghe AC, Risley RJ, Kuzniewicz MW, Wu YW, Walsh EM, Wi S, McCulloch CE, Newman TB (2015) Risk of sensorineural hearing loss and bilirubin exchange transfusion thresholds. Pediatrics 136:505–512

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to Professor Thor Willy Ruud Hansen (t.w.r.hansen@medisin.uio.no) for his thorough revision and his contributions to improving the overall quality of the manuscript. We also thank Lina Hemmeda for her contributions to the previous version of the manuscript. Finally, we would like to express our gratitude to Dr. Julia Wang (wang.julia.m@gmail.com) for proofreading and editing the manuscript before its publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NTH developed the idea. All authors screened the articles for eligibility and collected the data using the standardized extraction Excel sheet. MA, AMM, and NTH performed the data analysis. MA created the tables and figures. All authors contributed to writing the manuscript. All authors approved of the final version of the manuscript before submission for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nguyen Tien Huy.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by Gregorio Milani

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdellatif, M., Tawfik, G.M., Makram, A.M. et al. Association between neonatal phototherapy and future cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pediatr 182, 329–341 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04675-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04675-6

Keywords

Navigation