Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Putting patient participation into practice in pediatrics—results from a qualitative study in pediatric oncology

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adequate participation of children and adolescents in their healthcare is a value underlined by several professional associations. However, little guidance exists as to how this principle can be successfully translated into practice. A total of 52 semi-structured interviews were carried out with 19 parents, 17 children, and 16 pediatric oncologists. Questions pertained to participants’ experiences with patient participation in communication and decision-making. Applied thematic analysis was used to identify themes with regard to participation. Three main themes were identified: (a) modes of participation that captured the different ways in which children and adolescents were involved in their healthcare; (b) regulating participation, that is, regulatory mechanisms that allowed children, parents, and oncologists to adapt patient involvement in communication and decision-making; and (c) other factors that influenced patient participation. This last theme included aspects that had an overall impact on how children participated. Patient participation in pediatrics is a complex issue and physicians face considerable challenges in facilitating adequate involvement of children and adolescents in this setting. Nonetheless, they occupy a central role in creating room for choice and guiding parents in involving their child.

Conclusion: Adequate training of professionals to successfully translate the principle of patient participation into practice is required.

What is Known:

Adequate participation of pediatric patients in communication and decision-making is recommended by professional guidelines but little guidance exists as to how to translate it into practice.

What is New:

The strategies used by physicians, parents, and patients to achieve participation are complex and serve to both enable and restrict childrens and adolescentsinvolvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SPOG:

Swiss Pediatric Oncology Group

References

  1. Alderson P, Montgomery J (1996) Health care choices: making decisions with children. Institute for Public Policy Research, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alderson P, Sutcliffe K, Curtis K (2006) Children as partners with adults in their medical care. Arch Dis Child 91:300–303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics (1994) Guidelines on forgoing life-sustaining medical treatment. Pediatrics 93:532–536

    Google Scholar 

  4. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics (1995) Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 95:314–317

    Google Scholar 

  5. André N (2004) Involving children in paediatric oncology decision-making. Lancet Oncol 5:467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Angst DB, Deatrick JA (1996) Involvement in health care decisions: parents and children with chronic illness. J Fam Nurs 2:174–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bartholome WG (1995) Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 96:981–982

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Björk M, Wiebe T, Hallström I (2005) Striving to survive: families’ lived experiences when a child is diagnosed with cancer. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 22:265–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. British Medical Association (2000) Involving children and assessing a child’s competence. In: Consent, rights and choices in health care for children and young people. BMJ Books, London, pp 92–103

    Google Scholar 

  10. Coyne I (2006) Consultation with children in hospital: children, parents’ and nurses’ perspectives. J Clin Nurs 15:61–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Coyne I (2008) Children’s participation in consultations and decision-making at health service level: a review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud 45:1682–1689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Coyne I, Amory A, Kiernan G, Gibson F (2014) Children’s participation in shared decision-making: children, adolescents, parents and healthcare professionals’ perspectives and experiences. Eur J Oncol Nurs 18:273–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Coyne I, Gallagher P (2011) Participation in communication and decision‐making: children and young people’s experiences in a hospital setting. J Clin Nurs 20:2334–2343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Coyne I, O’Mathúna DP, Gibson F, Shields L, Sheaf G (2013) Interventions for promoting participation in shared decision making for children with cancer. In Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

  15. de Vries MC, Bresters D, Kaspers GJ, Houtlosser M, Wit JM, Engberts DP et al (2013) What constitutes the best interest of a child? Views of parents, children, and physicians in a pediatric oncology setting. AJOB Prim Res 4:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dedding C, Schalkers I, Willekens T (2012) Children’s participation in hospital

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gabe J, Olumide G, Bury M (2004) ‘It takes three to tango’: a framework for understanding patient partnership in paediatric clinics. Soc Sci Med 59:1071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gatta G, Botta L, Rossi S, Aareleid T, Bielska-Lasota M, Clavel J et al (2014) Childhood cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007: results of EUROCARE-5—a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 15:35–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey EE. Applied thematic analysis. Sage: 2011.

  20. Harrison C, Kenny NP, Sidarous M, Rowell M (1997) Bioethics for clinicians: 9. Involving children in medical decisions. Can Med Assoc J 156:825–828

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hickey K (2007) Minors’ rights in medical decision making. JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul 9:100–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hinds PS, Drew D, Oakes LL, Fouladi M, Spunt SL, Church C et al (2005) End-of-life care preferences of pediatric patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:9146–9154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ishibashi A (2001) The needs of children and adolescents with cancer for information and social support. Cancer Nurs 24:61–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kearney JA, Lederberg MS (2014) Ethical issues in pediatric oncology. In: Pediatric psycho-oncology: a quick reference on the psychosocial dimensions of cancer symptom management. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 313–324

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mack JW, Joffe S (2014) Communicating about prognosis: ethical responsibilities of pediatricians and parents. Pediatrics 133:S24–S30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Massimo LM, Wiley TJ, Casari EF (2004) From informed consent to shared consent: a developing process in paediatric oncology. Lancet Oncol 5:384–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. McCabe MA (1996) Involving children and adolescents in medical decision making: developmental and clinical considerations. J Pediatr Psychol 21:505–516

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Miller VA, Drotar D, Kodish E (2004) Children’s competence for assent and consent: a review of empirical findings. Ethic Behav 14:255–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Miller VA, Harris D (2012) Measuring children’s decision-making involvement regarding chronic illness management. J Pediatr Psychol 37:292–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Spinetta JJ, Masera G, Jankovic M, Oppenheim D, Martins AG, Arush B et al (2003) Valid informed consent and participative decision-making in children with cancer and their parents: a report of the SIOP working committee on psychosocial issues in pediatric oncology. Med Pediatr Oncol 40:244–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Young B, Dixon-Woods M, Windridge KC, Heney D (2003) Managing communication with young people who have a potentially life threatening chronic illness: qualitative study of patients and parents. BMJ 326:305

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Prof. Dr. Lainie Ross (Department of Pediatrics, Medicine, and Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA) and Prof. Dr. Benjamin Wilfond (Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, USA) for their fruitful collaboration.

Authors’ contributions

Katharina Maria Ruhe collected and analyzed the data, drafted the initial manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Dr. Tenzin Wangmo drafted the study design, designed the data collection instruments, supervised data collection, analyzed the data, critically revised the initial manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Dr. Eva De Clercq collected and analyzed the data, critically revised the initial manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Dominata Oana Badarau assisted in analyzing the data, critically revised the initial manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Dr. Marc Ansari assisted with recruitment, critically revised the initial manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Dr. Thomas Kühne assisted with the proposal and recruitment for this study, critically revised the initial manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Dr. Felix Niggli assisted with the proposal and recruitment for this study, critically revised the initial manuscript, and approved the final version as submitted.

Dr. Bernice Simone Elger conceived the study, drafted the design, supervised data collection, analyzed the data, critically revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript submitted.

The Swiss Pediatric Oncology Group (SPOG) endorsed the study and made a substantial contribution to recruitment and data collection. The members mentioned critically revised and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tenzin Wangmo.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The study was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF), National Research Programme 67 “End of Life,” Grant No. 406740_139283/1. Domnita Oana Badarau was funded by the Botnar Grant of the University of Basel.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Communicated by Jaan Toelen

Authors in the Swiss Pediatric Oncology Group are: Regula Angst, MD (Aarau); Maja Beck Popovic, MD (Lausanne); Pierluigi Brazzola, MD (Bellinzona); Heinz Hengartner, MD (St. Gallen); Johannes Rischewski, MD (Luzern).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ruhe, K.M., Wangmo, T., De Clercq, E. et al. Putting patient participation into practice in pediatrics—results from a qualitative study in pediatric oncology. Eur J Pediatr 175, 1147–1155 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-016-2754-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-016-2754-2

Keywords

Navigation