Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnostic approach to neonatal hypotonia: retrospective study on 144 neonates

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objectives of our study were to determine the actual frequency of the different disorders causing neonatal hypotonia and to assess the reliability of the first physical examination as well as the contribution of the main standard diagnostic tests. One hundred and forty-four infants diagnosed with neonatal hypotonia between January 1st 1999 and June 30th 2005 in our tertiary care facility were retrospectively included in the study. Perinatal history, clinical type of hypotonia, results of standard diagnostic tests, final diagnosis and outcome were abstracted from the original charts. A final diagnosis was reached in 120 cases. Central (cerebral) causes represented 82% of the elucidated cases, mostly hypoxic and hemorrhagic lesions of the brain (34%), chromosomal aberrations and syndromic disorders (26%) and brain malformations (12%). Peripheral (neuromuscular) causes were mainly represented by spinal muscular atrophy (6%) and myotonic dystrophy (4%). Positive predictive value of the initial clinical examination was higher in central type hypotonia. Neuroimaging, karyotype analysis and DNA-based tests were the most helpful diagnostic tools. These recent clinical data can be used to improve our strategy in investigating neonatal hypotonia and a diagnostic algorithm is proposed based on our findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Birdi K, Prasad AN, Prasad C, Chodirker B, Chudley AE (2005) The floppy infant: retrospective analysis of clinical experience (1990–2000) in a tertiary care facility. J Child Neurol 20:803–808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bodensteiner JB, Byler DL, Jaynes ME (1999) The utility of the determination of CTG trinucleotide repeat length in hypotonic infants. Semin Pediatr Neurol 6:243–246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Carboni P, Pisani F, Crescenzi A, Villani C (2002) Congenital hypotonia with favorable outcome. Pediatr Neurol 26:383–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Crawford TO (1992) Clinical evaluation of the floppy infant. Pediatr Ann 21348–21354

  5. David WS, Jones HR Jr (1994) Electromyography and biopsy correlation with suggested protocol for evaluation of the floppy infant. Muscle Nerve 17:424–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dua T, Das M, Kabra M, Bhatia M, Sarkar C, Arora S, Sharma MC, Kalra V (2001) Spectrum of floppy children in Indian scenario. Indian Pediatr 38:1236–1243

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dubowitz V (1980) The floppy infant. JB Lippincott Company, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dumitrescu AM, Liao XH, Best TB, Brockmann K, Refetoff S (2004) A novel syndrome combining thyroid and neurological abnormalities is associated with mutations in a monocarboxylate transporter gene. Am J Hum Genet 74:168–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Floriach-Robert M, Cabello A, Simon De Las Heras R, Mateos Beato F (2001) Neonatal hypotonia of muscular origin: analysis of 50 cases. Neurologia 16:245–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jebsen RH, Johnson EW, Knobloch H, Grant DK (1961) Differential diagnosis of infantile hypotonia. Am J Dis Child 101:8–17

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnston HM (2003) The floppy weak infant revisited. Brain Dev 25:155–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kang PB, Lidov HG, David WS, Torres A, Anthony DC, Jones HR, Darras BT (2003) Diagnostic value of electromyography and muscle biopsy in arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. Ann Neurol 54:790–795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Miller VS, Delgado M, Iannaccone ST (1993) Neonatal hypotonia. Semin Neurol 13:73–83

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Paine RS (1963) The future of the ‘floppy infant’: a follow-up study of 133 patients. Dev Med Child Neurol 5:115–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Paro-Panjan D, Neubauer D (2004) Congenital hypotonia: is there an algorithm? J Child Neurol 19:439–442

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Prasad AN, Prasad C (2003) The floppy infant: contribution of genetic and metabolic disorders. Brain Dev 25:457–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Richer LP, Shevell MI, Miller SP (2001) Diagnostic profile of neonatal hypotonia: an 11-year study. Pediatr Neurol 25:32–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Russell JW, Afifi AK, Ross MA (1992) Predictive value of electromyography in diagnosis and prognosis of the hypotonic infant. J Child Neurol 7:387–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shuper A, Weitz R, Varsano I, Mimouni M (1987) Benign congenital hypotonia. A clinical study in 43 children. Eur J Pediatr 146:360–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Steinmann B, Eyre DR, Shao P (1995) Urinary pyridinoline cross-links in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VI. Am J Hum Genet 57:1505–1508

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Thompson CE (2002) Benign congenital hypotonia is not a diagnosis. Dev Med Child Neurol 44:283–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Trifiro G, Livieri C, Bosio L, Gargantini L, Corrias A, Pozzan G, Crino A (2003) Neonatal hypotonia: don’t forget the Prader-Willi syndrome. Acta Paediatr 92:1085–1089

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vasta I, Kinali M, Messina S, Guzzetta A, Kapellou O, Manzur A, Cowan F, Muntoni F, Mercuri E (2005) Can clinical signs identify newborns with neuromuscular disorders ? J Pediatr 146:73–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zellweger H (1983) The floppy infant: a practical approach. Helv Paediatr Acta 38:301–306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank P. Meyer for advice in statistical analysis, F. Schmitz and E. Reiss for technical assistance in gathering the data, M. Koenig, A. Reeber and V. Biancalana for their help in carrying out the study and C. Schultz for proofreading the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Laugel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laugel, V., Cossée, M., Matis, J. et al. Diagnostic approach to neonatal hypotonia: retrospective study on 144 neonates. Eur J Pediatr 167, 517–523 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-007-0539-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-007-0539-3

Keywords

Navigation