Skip to main content
Log in

Nanoduct® sweat testing for rapid diagnosis in newborns, infants and children with cystic fibrosis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Determination of chloride concentration in sweat is the current diagnostic gold standard for Cystic Fibrosis (CF). Nanoduct® is a new analyzing system measuring conductivity which requires only 3 microliters of sweat and gives results within 30 minutes. The aim of the study was to evaluate the applicability of this system in a clinical setting of three children’s hospitals and borderline results were compared with sweat chloride concentration. Over 3 years, 1,041 subjects were tested and in 946 diagnostic results were obtained. In 95 children, Nanoduct® failed (9.1% failure rate), mainly due to failures in preterm babies and newborns. Assuming 59 mmol/L as an upper limit of normal conductivity, all our 46 CF patients were correctly diagnosed (sensitivity 100%, 95% CI: 93.1–100; negative predicted value 100% (95% CI: 99.6–100) and only 39 non CF’s were false positive (39/900, 4.3%; specificity 95.7%, 95%CI: 94.2–96.9, positive predicted value 54.1% with a 95%CI: 43.4–65.0). Increasing the diagnostic limit to 80 mmol/L, the rate fell to 0.3% (3/900). CF patients had a median conductivity of 115 mmol/L; the non-CF a median of 37 mmol/L. In conclusion, the Nanoduct® test is a reliable diagnostic tool for CF diagnosis: It has a failure rate comparable to other sweat tests and can be used as a simple bedside test for fast and reliable exclusion, diagnosis or suspicion of CF. In cases with borderline conductivity (60–80 mmol/L) other additional methods (determination of chloride and genotyping) are indicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CF:

Cystic fibrosis

CI:

Confidence interval

DC:

Direct current

GA:

Gestational age

IRT:

Immune reactive trypsinogen

NCCLS:

National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards

PPA:

Post partal age

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristics

SD:

Standard deviation

References

  1. Barben J, Ammann RA, Metlagel A, Schöni MH (2005) Conductivity determined by a new sweat analyzer compared with chloride concentrations for the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr 146:183–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barben J, Desax MC, Ammann RA, Schöni MH (2005) Limitations of sweat conductivity determinations with Nanoduct analyzing system for rapid sweat testing in patients with cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir J 26:403s, (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beauchamp M, Lands LC (2005) Sweat-testing: a review of current technical requirements. Pediatr Pulmonol 39:507–511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Carter EP, Barrett AD, Heeley AF, Kuzemko JA (1984) Improved sweat test method for the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Arch Dis Child 59:919–922

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation CDC (1993) Update 1. In. Bethesda: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

  6. Desax MC, Barben J, Hammer J, Ammann RA, Schöni MH (2006) Nanoduct sweat conductivity measurements in 1000 subjects. J Cystic Fibrosis 5:S105, (abstract)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Desax MC, Barben J, Hammer J, Ammann RA, Schöni MH (2006) Nanoduct sweat conductivity measurements: a good method for sweat testing in patients with cystic fibrosis. Swiss Med Wkly 136(Suppl 151):38S, (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  8. di Sant’Agnese PA, Darling RC, Perera GA, Shea E (1953) Abnormal electrolyte composition of sweat in cystic fibrosis of the pancreas: clinical significance and relationship to the disease. Pediatrics 12:549–563

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eng W, LeGrys VA, Schechter MS, Laughon MM, Barker PM (2005) Sweat-testing in preterm and full-term infants less than 6 weeks of age. Pediatr Pulmonol 40:64–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Funk MJ, LeGrys VA (2005) Testing diagnostic tests: why size matters. J Pediatr 146:159–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gibson LE, Cooke RE (1959) A test for concentration of electrolytes in sweat in cystic fibrosis of the pancreas utilizing pilocarpine by iontophoresis. Pediatrics 23:545–549

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Green A, Elborn S, Fahie-Wilson MN, Kirk JM, Wallis CE, Weller P (2003) Guidelines for the performance of the sweat test for the investigation of cystic fibrosis in the UK. In. http://www.acb.org.uk

  13. Hammond KB, Nelson L, Gibson LE (1994) Clinical evaluation of the macroduct sweat collection system and conductivity analyzer in the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr 124:255–260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Heeley ME, Woolf DA, Heeley AF (2000) Indirect measurements of sweat electrolyte concentration in the laboratory diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Arch Dis Child 82:420–424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Knowles MR, Durie PR (2002) What is cystic fibrosis? N Engl J Med 347:439–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. LeGrys VA (1992) Assessing quality assurance for sweat chloride testing. Clin Lab Sci 5:354–357

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. LeGrys VA, Rosenstein BJ, Doumas BT et al (2000) Sweat testing: sample collection and quantitative analysis; approved Guideline, 2nd edn. C34-A2. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards

  18. Losty HC, Wheatley H, Doull I (2006) The evaluation of a novel conductmetric device for the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Ann Clin Biochem 43:375–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mastella G, Di Cesare G, Borruso A, Menin L, Zanolla L (2000) Reliability of sweat-testing by the Macroduct collection method combined with conductivity analysis in comparison with the classic Gibson and Cooke technique. Acta Paediatr 89:933–937

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rosenstein BJ, Cutting GR, for the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Consensus Panel (1998) The diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: a consensus statement. J Pediatrics 132:589–595

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Webster HL, Quirante CG (2000) Micro-flowcell conductometric sweat analysis for cystic fibrosis diagnosis. Ann Clin Biochem 37:399–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank PD Dr. M. Nelle, Neonatology Unit Dept. of Pediatrics, University of Berne and Dr. M. Travaglini, Neonatology Unit of Lindenhofspital, Berne, for their support to perform sweat tests in newborns.

If needed the genotyping was provided by the Molecular Genetic Laboratory of the University of Berne (Prof. Sabina Gallati), University of Basel (Prof. Peter Miny) and the University of Zurich (Prof. Wolfgang Berger).

No financial support was received by the Wescor Company.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jürg Barben.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Desax, MC., Ammann, R.A., Hammer, J. et al. Nanoduct® sweat testing for rapid diagnosis in newborns, infants and children with cystic fibrosis. Eur J Pediatr 167, 299–304 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-007-0485-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-007-0485-0

Keywords

Navigation