Skip to main content
Log in

Multicenter evaluation of a fully automated third-generation anti-HCV antibody screening test with excellent sensitivity and specificity

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Medical Microbiology and Immunology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Early detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an important step in preventing progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Serologic assays for anti-hepatitis C (anti-HCV) antibody are valuable first-line tests in the screening and diagnosis of HCV infection. The aim of this multicenter study was to compare the Elecsys® Anti-HCV assay with alternative CE-marked Anti-HCV antibody assays against a range of samples that included 1,138 blood donors, 3,553 unselected routine daily specimens, and 46 pre-selected seroconversion panels. Specificity of the Elecsys Anti-HCV assay was 99.5% with blood donor samples and 99.4% with routine clinical specimens. These were similar to those obtained with the Prism® Anti-HCV, Architect® Anti-HCV assay, ADVIA® Centaur Anti-HCV assay and Vitros® Eci aHCV assays. Seroconversion sensitivity for the Elecsys Anti-HCV assay was similar to that of the Architect Anti-HCV, AxSYM HCV version 3.0, ADVIA Centaur Anti-HCV, and Vitros Eci aHCV assays. In fact, seroconversion testing on 46 commercially available panels showed that the difference in first detecting a positive blood sample was less than one day between assays (not statistically significant). The Elecsys Anti-HCV assay as well as the Architect, Prism, and Vitros Anti-HCV immunoassays revealed a seroconversion sensitivity of 100%, whereas the ADVIA Centaur HCV immunoassay showed a sensitivity of only 97.5% (39/40). Overall, the performance of the Elecsys Anti-HCV assay was similar to the performances of the comparator CE-marked Anti-HCV antibody assays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Choo Q, Kuo G, Weiner A et al (1989) Isolation of a cDNA clone derived from a blood-borne non-A non-B viral hepatitis genome. Science 244:359–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Choo QL, Richman KH, Han JH (1991) Genetic organisation and diversity of the hepatitis C virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:2451–2455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lavanchy D (2009) The global burden of hepatitis C. Liver Int 29(Suppl 1):74–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hallam NF, Fletcher ML, Read SJ, Majid AM, Kurtz JB, Rizza CR (1993) Low risk of sexual transmission of hepatitis C virus. J Med Virol 40:251–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. The Global Burden of Hepatitis C Working Group (2004) Global burden of disease (GBD) for hepatitis C. J Clin Pharmacol 44:20–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Strader DB, Wright T, Thomas DL, Seeff LB, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (2004) Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C. Hepatology 39:1147–1171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jonas G, Pelzer C, Beckert C, Hausmann M, Kapprell HP (2005) Performance characteristics of the Architect® Anti-HCV assay. J Clin Virol 34:97–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Richter SS (2003) Laboratory assays for diagnosis and management of hepatitis C virus infection. J Clin Microbiol 41:530–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pawlotsky JM (2002) Use and interpretation of virological tests for hepatitis C. Hepatology 36:65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pawlotsky JM (1999) Diagnostic tests for hepatitis C. J Hepatol 31:71–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim S, Kim JH, Yoon S, Park YH, Kim HS (2008) Clinical performance evaluation of four automated chemiluminescence immunoassays for hepatitis C virus antibody detection. J Clin Microbiol 46:3919–3923

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tiller F, van Helden J, Alborino F et al (2009) Performance evaluation of Elecsys Anti-HCV on modular analytics E170. Clin Chem Lab Med 47:S248–S256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Naczinski A, Rieger T (2009) Comparability between Elecsys Anti-HCV (on MODULAR ANALYTICS E170) and Bio-Rad Access HCV Ab PLUS (on Beckman Coulter DxC 880i) in the field using routine samples. Clin Microbiol Infect 15(Suppl 4):P1925

    Google Scholar 

  14. Murk JLAN, Simoons-Smit AM, Savelkoul PHM et al (2009) Evaluation of the Roche Cobas HCV immunoassay. Presented at 19th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Helsinki, Finland 16–19 May 2009 (abstract P2018)

  15. Nick S, Scheiblauer H (2007) Sensitivities of CE-marked HIV, HCV, and HBsAg assays. J Med Virol 79:S59–S64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Germany. The authors wish to thank Walter Melchior, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Germany, for assistance with the design and implementation of this study. The authors wish to thank the personnel of all laboratories that took part in the evaluation for their technical assistance.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Stekel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alborino, F., Burighel, A., Tiller, FW. et al. Multicenter evaluation of a fully automated third-generation anti-HCV antibody screening test with excellent sensitivity and specificity. Med Microbiol Immunol 200, 77–83 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00430-010-0171-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00430-010-0171-0

Keywords

Navigation