Skip to main content
Log in

Task modulated brain connectivity of the amygdala: a meta-analysis of psychophysiological interactions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Brain Structure and Function Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding functional connectivity of the amygdala with other brain regions, especially task modulated connectivity, is a critical step toward understanding the role of the amygdala in emotional processes and the interactions between emotion and cognition. The present study performed coordinate-based meta-analysis on studies of task modulated connectivity of the amygdala which used psychophysiological interaction (PPI) analysis. We first analyzed 49 PPI studies on different types of tasks using activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis. Widespread cortical and subcortical regions showed consistent task modulated connectivity with the amygdala, including the medial frontal cortex, bilateral insula, anterior cingulate, fusiform gyrus, parahippocampal gyrus, thalamus, and basal ganglia. These regions were in general overlapped with those showed coactivations with the amygdala, suggesting that these regions and amygdala are not only activated together, but also show different levels of interactions during tasks. Further analyses with subsets of PPI studies revealed task specific functional connectivities with the amygdala that were modulated by fear processing, face processing, and emotion regulation. These results suggest a dynamic modulation of connectivity upon task demands, and provide new insights on the functions of the amygdala in different affective and cognitive processes. The meta-analytic approach on PPI studies may offer a framework toward systematical examinations of task modulated connectivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Suril Gohel for his insightful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. This research was supported by Grants from NIH R01AG032088, R01DA038895, and NSFC (National Natural Science Foundation of China) 31100747.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bharat B. Biswal.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 672 kb)

Appendix: Studies that were included in the current meta-analysis

Appendix: Studies that were included in the current meta-analysis

1. Akitsuki Y, Decety J (2009) Social context and perceived agency affects empathy for pain: an event-related fMRI investigation. Neuroimage 47:722–34.

2. Amting JM, Miller JE, Chow M, Mitchell DG V (2009) Getting mixed messages: the impact of conflicting social signals on the brain’s target emotional response. Neuroimage 47:1950–9.

3. Amting JM, Greening SG, Mitchell DG V (2010) Multiple mechanisms of consciousness: the neural correlates of emotional awareness. J Neurosci 30:10039–47.

4. Banks SJ, Eddy KT, Angstadt M, et al. (2007) Amygdala-frontal connectivity during emotion regulation. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2:303–12.

5. Bruneau EG, Jacoby N, Saxe R (2015) Empathic control through coordinated interaction of amygdala, theory of mind and extended pain matrix brain regions. Neuroimage 114:105–119.

6. Cohen MX, Elger CE, Weber B (2008) Amygdala tractography predicts functional connectivity and learning during feedback-guided decision-making. Neuroimage 39:1396–407.

7. Comte M, Schön D, Coull JT, et al. (2016) Dissociating bottom-up and top-down mechanisms in the cortico-limbic system during emotion processing. Cereb Cortex 26: 144–155.

8. Decety J, Porges EC (2011) Imagining being the agent of actions that carry different moral consequences: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 49:2994–3001.

9. Erk S, Mikschl A, Stier S, et al. (2010) Acute and sustained effects of cognitive emotion regulation in major depression. J Neurosci 30:15726–34.

10. Fakra E, Salgado-Pineda P, Delaveau P, et al. (2008) Neural bases of different cognitive strategies for facial affect processing in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 100:191–205.

11. Foland LC, Altshuler LL, Bookheimer SY, et al. (2008) Evidence for deficient modulation of amygdala response by prefrontal cortex in bipolar mania. Psychiatry Res 162:27–37.

12. Gianaros PJ, Onyewuenyi IC, Sheu LK, et al. (2012) Brain systems for baroreflex suppression during stress in humans. Hum Brain Mapp 33:1700–16.

13. Gold AL, Morey RA, McCarthy G (2015) Amygdala-prefrontal cortex functional connectivity during threat-induced anxiety and goal distraction. Biol Psychiatry 77:394–403.

14. Grabenhorst F, Schulte FP, Maderwald S, Brand M (2013) Food labels promote healthy choices by a decision bias in the amygdala. Neuroimage 74:152–63.

15. Hermans EJ, Henckens MJAG, Roelofs K, Fernández G (2012) Fear bradycardia and activation of the human periaqueductal grey. Neuroimage 66C:278–287.

16. Herrmann MJ, Boehme S, Becker MPI, Tupak S V., Guhn A, Schmidt B, et al. (2016): Phasic and sustained brain responses in the amygdala and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis during threat anticipation. Hum Brain Mapp 37:1091-1102.

17. Iidaka T, Omori M, Murata T, et al. (2001) Neural interaction of the amygdala with the prefrontal and temporal cortices in the processing of facial expressions as revealed by fMRI. J Cogn Neurosci 13:1035–47.

18. Kanske P, Heissler J, Schönfelder S, et al. (2011) How to regulate emotion? Neural networks for reappraisal and distraction. Cereb Cortex 21:1379–88.

19. Kienast T, Hariri AR, Schlagenhauf F, et al. (2008) Dopamine in amygdala gates limbic processing of aversive stimuli in humans. Nat Neurosci 11:1381–2.

20. Koelsch S, Skouras S, Fritz T, et al. (2013) The roles of superficial amygdala and auditory cortex in music-evoked fear and joy. Neuroimage 81:49–60.

21. Larson CL, Aronoff J, Sarinopoulos IC, Zhu DC (2009) Recognizing threat: a simple geometric shape activates neural circuitry for threat detection. J Cogn Neurosci 21:1523–35.

22. Maquet P, Phillips C (1998) Functional brain imaging of human sleep. J Sleep Res 7 Suppl 1:42–7.

23. Meier ML, Stämpfli P, Vrana A, Humphreys BK, Seifritz E, Hotz-Boendermaker S (2015): Fear avoidance beliefs in back pain-free subjects are reflected by amygdala-cingulate responses. Front Hum Neurosci. 9:424.

24. Mende-Siedlecki P, Verosky SC, Turk-Browne NB, Todorov A (2013) Robust selectivity for faces in the human amygdala in the absence of expressions. J Cogn Neurosci 25:2086–106.

25. Molapour T, Golkar A, Navarrete CD, Haaker J, Olsson A (2015) Neural correlates of biased social fear learning and interaction in an intergroup context. Neuroimage. 121:171–183.

26. Monk CS, Telzer EH, Mogg K, et al. (2008) Amygdala and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex activation to masked angry faces in children and adolescents with generalized anxiety disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 65:568–76.

27. Morris JS, Friston KJ, Büchel C, et al. (1998) A neuromodulatory role for the human amygdala in processing emotional facial expressions. Brain 121(Pt 1):47–57.

28. Morris JS, Dolan RJ (2001) Involvement of human amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex in hunger-enhanced memory for food stimuli. J Neurosci 21:5304–10.

29. Mukherjee P, Whalley HC, McKirdy JW, et al. (2014) Altered amygdala connectivity within the social brain in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 40:152–60.

30. Murray BD, Kensinger EA (2014) The route to an integrative associative memory is influenced by emotion. PLoS One 9:e82372.

31. Pasley BN, Mayes LC, Schultz RT (2004) Subcortical discrimination of unperceived objects during binocular rivalry. Neuron 42:163–72.

32. Pichon S, Rieger SW, Vuilleumier P (2012) Persistent affective biases in human amygdala response following implicit priming with negative emotion concepts. Neuroimage 62:1610–21.

33. Ponz A, Khatami R, Poryazova R, et al. (2010) Reduced amygdala activity during aversive conditioning in human narcolepsy. Ann Neurol 67:394–8.

34. Sato W, Kochiyama T, Uono S, Yoshikawa S, Toichi M (2016) Direction of amygdala–neocortex interaction during dynamic facial expression processing. Cereb Cortex. bhw036.

35. Schienle A, Ubel S, Schöngaßner F, et al. (2014) Disgust regulation via placebo: an fMRI study. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 9:985–990.

36. Schmitgen MM, Walter H, Drost S, Rückl S, Schnell K (2016): Stimulus-dependent amygdala involvement in affective theory of mind generation. Neuroimage. 129: 450–459.

37. Skelly LR, Decety J (2012) Passive and motivated perception of emotional faces: qualitative and quantitative changes in the face processing network. PLoS One 7:e40371.

38. Spielberg JM, Forbes EE, Ladouceur CD, et al. (2015) Pubertal testosterone influences threat-related amygdala-orbitofrontal cortex coupling. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 10:408–415.

39. Sripada C, Angstadt M, Kessler D, et al. (2014) Volitional regulation of emotions produces distributed alterations in connectivity between visual, attention control, and default networks. Neuroimage 89:110–21.

40. Stegmayer K, Usher J, Trost S, et al. (2015) Disturbed cortico-amygdalar functional connectivity as pathophysiological correlate of working memory deficits in bipolar affective disorder. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 265:303–311.

41. Sterpenich V, D’Argembeau A, Desseilles M, et al. (2006) The locus ceruleus is involved in the successful retrieval of emotional memories in humans. J Neurosci 26:7416–23.

42. Stevens JS, Jovanovic T, Fani N, et al. (2013) Disrupted amygdala-prefrontal functional connectivity in civilian women with posttraumatic stress disorder. J Psychiatr Res 47:1469–78.

43. Tottenham N, Shapiro M, Telzer EH, Humphreys KL (2012) Amygdala response to mother. Dev Sci 15:307–19.

44. Troiani V, Price ET, Schultz RT (2014) Unseen fearful faces promote amygdala guidance of attention. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 9:133–40.

45. Van Wingen GA, Geuze E, Vermetten E, Fernández G (2011) Perceived threat predicts the neural sequelae of combat stress. Mol Psychiatry 16:664–71.

46. Williams LM, Das P, Liddell BJ, et al. (2006) Mode of functional connectivity in amygdala pathways dissociates level of awareness for signals of fear. J Neurosci 26:9264–71.

47. Winecoff A, Labar KS, Madden DJ, et al. (2011) Cognitive and neural contributors to emotion regulation in aging. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 6:165–76.

48. Xu P, Gu R, Broster LS, et al. (2013) Neural basis of emotional decision making in trait anxiety. J Neurosci 33:18641–53.

49. Yoder KJ, Porges EC, Decety J (2015) Amygdala subnuclei connectivity in response to violence reveals unique influences of individual differences in psychopathic traits in a nonforensic sample. Hum Brain Mapp. 36: 1417–1428.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Di, X., Huang, J. & Biswal, B.B. Task modulated brain connectivity of the amygdala: a meta-analysis of psychophysiological interactions. Brain Struct Funct 222, 619–634 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-016-1239-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-016-1239-4

Keywords

Navigation