Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Communication skills in diagnostic pathology

  • Annual Review Issue
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Communication is an essential element of good medical practice also in pathology. In contrast to technical or diagnostic skills, communication skills are not easy to define, teach, or assess. Rules almost do not exist. In this paper, which has a rather personal character and cannot be taken as a set of guidelines, important aspects of communication in pathology are explored. This includes what should be communicated to the pathologist on the pathology request form, communication between pathologists during internal (interpathologist) consultation, communication around frozen section diagnoses, modalities of communication of a final diagnosis, with whom and how critical and unexpected findings should be communicated, (in-)adequate routes of communication for pathology diagnoses, who will (or might) receive pathology reports, and what should be communicated and how in case of an error or a technical problem. An earlier more formal description of what the responsibilities are of a pathologist as communicator and as collaborator in a medical team is added in separate tables. The intention of the paper is to stimulate reflection and discussion rather than to formulate strict rules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Latif A, Rawat N, Pustavoitau A, Pronovost PJ, Pham JC (2013) National study on the distribution, causes, and consequences of voluntarily reported medication errors between the ICU and non-ICU settings. Crit Care Med 41:389–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. van Mook WN, De Grave WS, Gorter SL, Zwaveling JH, Schuwirth LW, van der Vleuten PM (2011) Intensive care medicine trainees’ perception of professionalism: a qualitative study. Anaesth Intensive Care 39:107–15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Plebani M (2006) Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine? Clin Chem Lab Med 44:750–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ribé A, Ribalta T, Lledó R, Torras G, Asenjo MA, Cardesa A (1998) Evaluation of turnaround times as a component of quality assurance in surgical pathology. Int J Qual Health Care 10:241–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Layfield LJ, Factor RE, Jarboe EA (2012) Clinician compliance with laboratory regulations requiring submission of relevant clinical data: a one year retrospective analysis. Pathol Res Pract 208:668–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rademaker M, Thorburn M (2010) Pathology referrals for skin lesions—are we giving the pathologist sufficient clinical information? N Z Med J 123:53–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nutt L, Zemlin AE, Erasmus RT (2008) Incomplete laboratory request forms: the extent and impact on critical results at a tertiary hospital in South Africa. Ann Clin Biochem 45:463–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bailey J, Jennings A, Parapia L (2005) Change of pathology request forms can reduce unwanted requests and tests. J Clin Pathol 58:853–5

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Muslin IS, Vardaman JM, Cornell PT (2014) Fostering acceptance of computerized physician order entry: insights from an implementation study. Health Care Manag 33:165–71

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kinonen CL, Watkin WG, Gleason BC, Johnson CE, Thomas AB, Cibull TL (2012) An audit of dermatopathology requisitions: hand written vs. electronic medical record data entry accuracy. J Cutan Pathol 39:850–2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrara G, Annessi G, Argenyi Z, Argenziano G, Beltraminelli H, Cerio R, Cerroni L, Cota C, Simonetti S, Stefanato CM, Zalaudek I, Kittler H, Soyer HP (2015) Prior knowledge of the clinical picture does not introduce bias in the histopathologic diagnosis of melanocytic skin lesions. J Cutan Pathol. doi:10.1111/cup.12589 [Epub ahead of print]

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Abbey LM, Kaugars GE, Gunsolley JC, Burns JC, Page DG, Svirsky JA, Eisenberg E, Krutchkoff DJ (1998) The effect of clinical information on the histopathologic diagnosis of oral epithelial dysplasia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 85:74–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Raab SS, Oweity T, Hughes JH, Salomao DR, Kelley CM, Flynn CM, D’Antonio JA, Cohen MB (2000) Effect of clinical history on diagnostic accuracy in the cytologic interpretation of bronchial brush specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 114:78–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ferrara G, Argenyi Z, Argenziano G, Cerio R, Cerroni L, Di Blasi A, Feudale EA, Giorgio CM, Massone C, Nappi O, Tomasini C, Urso C, Zalaudek I, Kittler H, Soyer HP (2009) The influence of clinical information in the histopathologic diagnosis of melanocytic skin neoplasms. PLoS One 4, e5375. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005375

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Manion E, Cohen MB, Weydert J (2008) Mandatory second opinion in surgical pathology referral material: clinical consequences of major disagreements. Am J Surg Pathol 32:732–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Talmon G, Horn A, Wedel W, Miller R, Stefonek A, Rinehart T (2013) How well do we communicate?: a comparison of intraoperative diagnoses listed in pathology reports and operative notes. Am J Clin Pathol 140:651–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Roy S, Parwani AV, Dhir R, Yousem SA, Kelly SM, Pantanowitz L (2013) Frozen section diagnosis: is there discordance between what pathologists say and what surgeons hear? Am J Clin Pathol 140:363–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ellis D, Shrigley J (2015) Does standardised structured reporting contribute to quality in diagnostic pathology? Virchows Archiv (this issue)

  19. Lankshear S, Srigley J, McGowan T, Yurcan M, Sawka C (2013) Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reports—so what and who cares? A population-based satisfaction survey of 970 pathologists, surgeons, and oncologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med 137:1599–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Patel S, Smith JB, Kurbatova E, Guarner J (2012) Factors that impact turnaround time of surgical pathology specimens in an academic institution. Hum Pathol 43:1501–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Volmar KE, Idowu MO, Souers RJ, Karcher DS, Nakhleh RE (2015) Turnaround time for large or complex specimens in surgical pathology: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 56 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 139:171–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Coffin CM, Spilker K, Lowichik A, Zhou H, Nielson K, Erickson L, Pysher TJ (2007) Critical values in pediatric surgical pathology: definition, implementation, and reporting in a children’s hospital. Am J Clin Pathol 128:1035–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zimmerman, Rachel. (2004) Doctors’ new tool to fight lawsuits: saying ‘I’m sorry’ malpractice insurers find owning up to errors soothes patient anger, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, 2004, May 18

  24. Bismark MM (2009) The power of apology. N Z Med J 122:96–106

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Pathologie im Medizin Campus Bodensee, Friedrichshafen, Germany

    Hans-Anton Lehr

  2. Institute of Pathology, University of Lausanne Medical Center, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Fred T. Bosman

Authors
  1. Hans-Anton Lehr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fred T. Bosman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans-Anton Lehr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lehr, HA., Bosman, F.T. Communication skills in diagnostic pathology. Virchows Arch 468, 61–67 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1848-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1848-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation