Skip to main content
Log in

The clinico-pathological conference, based upon Giovanni Battista Morgagni’s legacy, remains of fundamental importance even in the era of the vanishing autopsy

  • Review and Perspectives
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Walter Cannon and Richard Cabot inaugurated the clinico-pathological conference (CPC) at Harvard Medical School at the beginning of the twentieth century, but this approach to anatomo-clinical correlation was first introduced by Giovanni Battista Morgagni at the University of Padua in the eighteenth century. The CPC consists of the presentation of a clinical case, in which past and recent medical histories of the patient, with all relevant information about laboratory tests including biopsy results, therapy and, eventually in a fatal case, the autopsy, are discussed. This is done for an audience of trainees and all physicians involved in the care for the patient. The CPC is still in use in many academic hospitals, as a teaching tool not only for undergraduate and graduate medical trainees, but also for postgraduate continuous medical education, in spite of the progressively declining autopsy rate. CPCs represent the ideal occasion for fruitful discussion between the two “souls” of medicine, i.e., the clinical, with its focus on the patient, and the pathological, with its focus on understanding disease. To discontinue using them would be equal to denying that modern medicine originated in Morgagni’s method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morgagni GB (1761) De sedibus et causis morborum per anatomen indagatis. Venice: ex Typographia Remondiniana

  2. Jarcho S (1948) Giovanni Battista Morgagni: his interests, ideas and achievements. Bull Hist Med 22:503–527

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Riese W (1953) The conception of disease: its history, its versions and its nature. Philosophical Library, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zampieri F, Zanatta A, Thiene G (2014) An etymological “autopsy” of Morgagni’s title: De sedibus et causis morborum per anatomen indagatis (1761). Hum Pathol 45:12–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tawara S (1906) Das Reizleitungssystem des Säugetierherzens. Jena: Gustav Fischer

  6. His W (1893) Die thatigkeit des embryonalen herzens und deren bedeutung fur die lehre von der herzbewegung beim erwachsenen Med Klin Leipzig 1:14–49

  7. De Saint-Maur P (2012) The birth of the clinico-pathological method in France: the rise of morbid anatomy in France during the first half of the nineteenth century. Virch Arch 460:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zampieri F (2012) Da Morgagni alla patologia molecolare. Teorie e modelli dell’anatomia patologica. Padua: Libraria Padovana Editrice

  9. Castleman B, Dudley HR (1960) Clinicopathological conferences of the Massachusetts General Hospital. J. & A. Churchill

  10. Cannon WB (1900) The case method of teaching systematic medicine. Boston Med Surg J 142:31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eliot WC (1900) The inductive method applied to medicine. Boston Med Surg J 142:557–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harris NL, Scully RE (2011) The clinicopathological conferences (CPCs). In: Louis DN, Young RH (eds) Keen minds to explore the dark continents of disease. A history of the pathology services at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, pp 349–353

    Google Scholar 

  13. Malkin HM (2008) The history of the rise and fall in importance of the clinicopathologic conference in American medicine. Ann Diagn Pathol 12:381–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Skully RE (1982) Ben Castleman—champion of the CPC. N Engl J Med 307:370–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Eddy DM, Clanton CH (1982) The art of diagnosis. Solving the clinicopathological exercise. N Engl J Med 306(21):1263–1268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Engelberg J (1992) Complex medical case histories as portals to medical practice and integrative, scientific thought. Adv Physiol Educ 263:S45–S54

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rocha LOS (2013) Clinicopathological conferences: a testimonial. Autopsy Case Rep 3:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pisa R, Remotti D (2002) La conferenza clinico-patologica come strumento di miglioramento della performance diagnostica. Pathologica 94:38–43

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Baiser F (2008) Historicism and neo-Kantianism. Stud Hist Philos Science 39:554–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shojania KG, Burton EC (2008) The vanishing nonforensic autopsy. N Engl J Med 358:873–875

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Burton LJ, Underwood J (2007) Clinical, educational, and epidemiological value of autopsy. Lancet 369:1471–1477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. O’Grady G (2003) Death of the teaching autopsy. BMJ 327:802–804

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sanjay S, Alan SG, Craig F, Lawrence MT Jr (1995) Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital—a home-court advantage? N Engl J Med 333:883–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Edwards JE (1999) Determination of the cause of death: its relationship to cardiac disease and autopsy findings. Mayo Clin Proc 74:739

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Morgagni GB (1712) Nova institutionum medicarum idea. Padua: Apud Josephum Coronam sub signo Coronae

  26. Virchow R (1894) Morgagni und der anatomische gedanke. Berl Klin Wochenschr 31:5–28

  27. Fred HL, Buja M, Willerson JT (1995) A call for CPCs. Circulation 91:2283

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaetano Thiene.

Additional information

This study was supported by the Registry of Cardio-Cerebro-Vascular Pathology, Veneto Region, Venice, Italy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zampieri, F., Rizzo, S., Thiene, G. et al. The clinico-pathological conference, based upon Giovanni Battista Morgagni’s legacy, remains of fundamental importance even in the era of the vanishing autopsy. Virchows Arch 467, 249–254 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1785-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1785-9

Keywords

Navigation