Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Use of chloroacetate esterase staining for the histological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A heavy neutrophil polymorph infiltrate [>5 per high-power field (HPF) after examination of at least 5 HPF by Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria] is characteristically seen in peri-implant tissues of infected prosthetic hip and knee joints. We determined whether chloroacetate esterase (CAE) staining facilitated the identification of neutrophil polymorphs in peri-implant tissues in cases of hip and knee arthroplasty infection and reassessed MSIS criteria in the light of our findings. Frozen and paraffin sections of peri-prosthetic tissues of 76 cases of failed hip and knee arthroplasties classified as septic or aseptic loosening microbiologically were analysed histologically by both haematoxylin-eosin and CAE staining. The extent of the neutrophil polymorph infiltrate was determined semiquantitatively and correlated with the microbiological and clinical diagnosis. CAE staining facilitated identification of neutrophil polymorphs in arthroplasty tissues. All cases of aseptic loosening contained fewer than two neutrophil polymorphs per HPF. CAE staining showed that in some cases of septic loosening, fewer than five neutrophil polymorphs per HPF (on average) are present in peri-prosthetic tissues. The histological criterion of more than two neutrophil polymorphs per HPF showed increased sensitivity and accuracy for the diagnosis of septic loosening. CAE is a useful stain that facilitates the identification of neutrophil polymorphs in both frozen and paraffin sections of peri-implant tissues. CAE staining shows that some microbiologically confirmed cases of septic loosening contain relatively few neutrophil polymorphs, indicating that the MSIS histological criterion of more than five neutrophil polymorphs per HPF is too high an index figure for the diagnosis of all cases of hip and knee arthroplasty infection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Herberts P, Malchau H (2000) Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 71:111–121. doi:10.1080/000164700317413067

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM (2002) Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:7–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E et al (2010) The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:45–51. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-0945-0

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ (2009) The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:128–133. doi:10.2106/jbjs.h.00155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bauer TW, Parvizi J, Kobayashi N, Krebs V (2006) Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:869–882. doi:10.2106/jbjs.e.01149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Toms AD, Davidson D, Masri BA, Duncan CP (2006) The management of peri-prosthetic infection in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 88:149–155. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.88b2.17058

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Britt MW, Calhoun JH, Mander JT (1995) Principles of current management of prosthetic joint infections. In: Jauregui LE (ed) Diagnosis and management of bone infections. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 373–385

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brause BD (1989) Infected orthopaedic prostheses. In: Waldvogel FA, Bisno AL (eds) Infections associated with indwelling medical devices. ASM Press, Wahington, DC, pp 111–127

    Google Scholar 

  9. Parvizi J, Ghanem E, Menashe S, Barrack RL, Bauer TW (2006) Periprosthetic infection: what are the diagnostic challenges? J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:138–147. doi:10.2106/jbjs.f.00609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF et al (2011) New definition for periprosthetic joint infection. From the workgroup of Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:2992–2994. doi:10.1007/s11999-011-2102-9

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Charosky CB, Bullough PG, Wilson PD Jr (1973) Total hip replacement failures. A histological evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:49–58

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mirra JM, Amstutz HC, Mafos M, Gold R (1976) The pathology of the joint tissues and its clinical relevance in prosthesis failure. Clin. Orthop Relat Res 117:221–240

    Google Scholar 

  13. Athanasou NA, Pandey R, de Steiger CD, Smith PM (1995) Diagnosis of infection by frozen section during revision arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 77:28–33

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Feldman DS, Lonner JH, Desai P, Zuckerman JD (1995) The role of intraoperative frozen sections in revision total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1807–1913

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. The workgroup convened by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (2011) New definition for periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 26:1136–1138. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.09.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fehring TK, McAlister JA Jr (1994) Frozen histologic section as a guide to sepsis in revision joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 304:229–237

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pandey R, Drakoulakis E, Athanasou NA (1999) An assessment of the histological criteria used to diagnose infection in hip revision arthroplasty tissues. J Clin Pathol 52:118–123

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pandey R, Berendt AR, Athanasou NA (2000) Histological and microbiological findings in non-infected and infected revision arthroplasty tissues. The OSIRIS Collaborative Study Group. Oxford Skeletal Infection Research and Intervention Service. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120:570–574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Abdul-Karim FW, McGinnis MG, Kraay M, Emancipator SN, Goldberg V (1998) Frozen section biopsy assessment for the presence of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in patients undergoing revision of arthroplasties. Mod Pathol 11:427–431

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Banit DM, Kaufer H, Hartford JM (2002) Intraoperative frozen section analysis in revision total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 40:230–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bori G, Soriano A, Garcia S, Mallofre C, Riba J, Mensa J (2007) Usefulness of histological analysis for predicting the presence of microorganisms at the time of reimplantation after hip resection arthroplasty for the treatment of infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1232–1237. doi:10.2106/jbjs.f.00741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bori G, Soriano A, Garcia S, Gallart X, Mallofre C, Mensa J (2009) Neutrophils in frozen section and type of microorganism isolated at the time of resection arthroplasty for the treatment of infection. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:591–595. doi:10.1007/s00402-008-0679-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bori G, Soriano A, Garcia S et al (2006) Low sensitivity of histology to predict the presence of microorganisms in suspected aseptic loosening of a joint prosthesis. Mod Pathol 19:874–877. doi:10.1038/modpathol.3800606

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Musso AD, Mohanty K, Spencer-Jones R (2003) Role of frozen section histology in diagnosis of infection during revision arthroplasty. Postgrad Med J 79:590–593

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tohtz SW, Muller M, Morawietz L, Winkler T, Perka C (2010) Validity of frozen sections for analysis of periprosthetic loosening membranes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:762–768. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-1102-5

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Freemont AJ, Denton J, Mangham DC (2011) Tissue pathways for bone and soft tissue pathology. The Royal College of Pathologists. p6. http://www.rcpath.org/Resources/RCPath/Migrated%20Resources/Documents/G/g105tpforboneandsofttissuefinalfeb11.pdf. Accessed 9 June 2014

  27. Smith H (1983) The leukaemias. In: Filipe MI, Lake BD (eds) Histochemistry in pathology. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 206–214

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mackie PH, Mistry DK, Wozniak JT, Dodds WN, Gredds AM, Stuart J (1979) Neutrophil cytochemistry in bacterial infection. J Clin Pathol 32:26–30

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Parvizi J, Jacovides C, Antoci V, Ghanem E (2011) Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: the utility of a simple yet unappreciated enzyme. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:2242–2248. doi:10.2106/jbjs.j.01413

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wetters NG, Berend KR, Lombardi AV, Morris MJ, Tucker TL, Della Valle CJ (2012) Leukocyte esterase reagent strips for the rapid diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 27(8 Suppl):8–11. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2012.03.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bancroft JD, Gamble M (2002) Theory and practice of histological techniques, 6th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 615–616

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pizzoferrato A, Fiori F, Savarino L (1980) Microbiological investigation on 161 cases of hip endo-arthroprosthesis failure. Chir Organi Mov 66:297–307

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lonner JH, Desai P, Dicesare PE, Steiner G, Zuckerman JD (1996) The reliability of analysis of intraoperative frozen sections for identifying active infection during revision hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78(10):1553–1558

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Krenn V, Otto M, Morawietz L, Hopf T, Jakobs M, Klauser W, Schwantes B, Gehrke T (2009) Histopathologische diagnostik in der endoprothetik: periprothetische neosynovialitis, hypersensitivitätsreaktion und arthrofibrose. Orthopade 38:520–530. doi:10.1007/s00132-008-1400-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tsaras G, Maduka-Ezeh A, Inwards CY et al (2012) Utility of intraoperative frozen section histopathology in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1700–1711. doi:10.2106/jbjs.j.00756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Deirmengian C, Kardos K, Kilmartin P, Cameron A, Schiller K, Parvizi J (2014) Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection: has the era of the biomarker arrived? Clin Orthop Relat Res. doi:10.1007/s11999-014-3543-8

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is dedicated to the memory of Takeshi Kashima, whose ideas inspired this study. The authors acknowledge the support of the Rosetrees Trust, the Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Unit and the Sasakawa Foundation.

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest with regard to this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7HE, UK

    T. G. Kashima, Y. Inagaki, G. Grammatopoulos & N. A. Athanasou

Authors
  1. T. G. Kashima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Y. Inagaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Grammatopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. N. A. Athanasou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. A. Athanasou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kashima, T.G., Inagaki, Y., Grammatopoulos, G. et al. Use of chloroacetate esterase staining for the histological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. Virchows Arch 466, 595–601 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1722-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1722-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation