Skip to main content
Log in

Peritubular capillary basement membrane changes in chronic renal allograft rejection

Comparison of light microscopic and ultrastructural observations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Marked peritubular capillary basement membrane (PTCBM) multilayering, the ultrastructural feature of chronic antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) of kidney allografts, was found to correspond histologically to PTCs with thickened BMs; such PTCs have been suggested as a novel histological marker of chronic rejection. We investigated whether scoring of PTCBM thickening can substitute the ultrastructural search for PTCBM multilayering. The thickening was graded in PAS- and Jones-stained sections in 110 biopsies from recipients with a late dysfunction, all examined ultrastructurally for transplant capillaropathy (≥3 PTCs with ≥5 BM layers). Grade 0 indicated no thickening. Grade 1 and grade 2 were assigned when the PTCBMs were as thick as or thicker than those of the non-atrophic tubules, and duplication/chain-like lamination of the PTCBM was noted in ≤3 or ≥4 high-power fields, respectively. The series was enrolled in subgroups of those with and those without histopathological lesions of chronic rejection. Fifty-six biopsies displayed lesions of chronic ABMR. Transplant capillaropathy was demonstrated in 40 biopsies. Grade 2 thickening furnished a substantial interobserver concordance rate (κ = 0.803) and correlated with the transplant capillaropathy. Jones staining performed somewhat better in scoring than PAS staining. Grade 2 thickening was verified in 35 biopsies involving chronic ABMR, and in one control biopsy (sensitivity 61.4%, specificity 0.98). Grade 1 thickening was not suggestive of chronic ABMR at all. In conclusion, grade 2 thickening can be regarded as the histopathological lesion of chronic ABMR; however, electron microscopy remains the gold standard in the assessment of PTCBM changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Solez K, Colvin RB, Racusen LC et al (2007) Banff’05 meeting report: differential diagnosis of chronic allograft injury and elimination of chronic allograft nephropathy (‘CAN’). Am J Transplant 7:518–552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Solez K, Colvin RB, Racusen LC et al (2008) Banff 07 Classification of renal allograft pathology: updates and future directions. Am J Transplant 8:753–760

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hvala A, Ferluga D, Rott T, Kobenter T (2005) Peritubular capillary changes in Alport syndrome, diabetic glomerulopathy, Balkan endemic nephropathy and hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. Ultrastruct Pathol 29:451–459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hvala A, Ferluga D, Rott T, Kobenter T, Koselj-Kajtna M, Kaplan-Pavlovcic S, Bren A (2001) Interstitial capillary in normal and in transplanted kidneys: an ultrastructural study. Ultrastruct Pathol 25:295–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Aita K, Yamaguchi Y, Horita S, Ohno M, Tanabe K, Fuchinoue S, Teraoka S, Toma H, Nagata M (2007) Thickening of the peritubular capillary basement membrane is a useful diagnostic marker of chronic rejection in renal allografts. Am J Transplant 7:923–929

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mauiyyedi S, Della Pelle P, Saidman S, Collins AB, Pascual M, Tolkoff-Rubin NE, Williams WW, Cosimi AB, Schneeberger EE, Colvin RB (2001) Chronic humoral rejection: identification of antibody-mediated chronic renal allograft rejection by C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries. J Am Soc Nephrol 12:574–582

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilkinson A, Davidson J, Dotta F et al (2005) Guidelines for the treatment and management of new-onset diabetes after transplantation. Clin Transplant 9:291–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al (1999) The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int 55:713–723

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ivanyi B, Kemeny E, Szederkenyi E, Marofka F, Szenohradszky P (2001) The value of electron microscopy in the diagnosis of chronic renal allograft rejection. Mod Pathol 14:1200–1208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ivanyi B, Fahmy H, Brown H, Szenohradszky P, Halloran PF, Solez K (2000) Peritubular capillaries in chronic renal allograft rejection: a quantitative ultrastructural study. Hum Pathol 31:1129–1138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ivanyi B (2003) Transplant capillaropathy and transplant glomerulopathy: ultrastructural markers of chronic renal allograft rejection. Nephrol Dial Transplant 18:655–660

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nickeleit V, Zeiler M, Gudat F, Thiel G, Mihatsch MJ (1998) Histological characteristics of interstitial renal allograft rejection. Kidney Blood Press Res 21:230–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fleiss JL (2003) Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Bhalla V, Nast CC, Stollenwerk N, Tran S, Barba L, Kamil ES, Danovitch G, Adler SG (2003) Recurrent and de novo diabetic nephropathy in renal allografts. Transplantation 75:66–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Regele H, Böhmig GA, Habicht A, Gollowitzer D, Schillinger M, Rockenschaub S, Watschinger B, Kerjaschki D (2002) Capillary deposition of complement split product C4d in renal allografts is associated with basement membrane injury in peritubular and glomerular capillaries: a contribution of humoral immunity to chronic allograft rejection. J Am Soc Nephrol 13:2371–2380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sis B, Campbell PM, Mueller T, Hunter C, Cockfield SM, Cruz J, Meng C, Wishart D, Solez K, Halloran PF (2007) Transplant glomerulopathy, late antibody-mediated rejection and the ABCD tetrad in kidney allograft biopsies for cause. Am J Transplant 7:1743–1752

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Einecke G, Sis B, Reeve J, Mengel M, Campbell PM, Hidalgo LG, Kaplan B, Halloran PF (2009) Antibody-mediated microcirculation injury is the major cause of late kidney transplant failure. Am J Transplant 9:2520–2531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sis B, Jhangri GS, Bunnag S, Allanach B, Kaplan B, Halloran PF (2009) Endothelial gene expression in kidney transplants with alloantibody indicates antibody-mediated damage despite lack of C4d staining. Am J Transplant 9:2312–2323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sis B, Halloran PF (2010) Endothelial transcripts uncover a previously unknown phenotype: C4d-negative antibody-mediated rejection. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 15:42–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wavamunno MD, O’Conell PJ, Vitalone M, Fung CL-S, Allen RDM, Chapman JR, Nankivell BJ (2007) Transplant glomerulopathy: ultrastructural abnormalities occur early in longitudinal analysis of protocol biopsies. Am J Transplant 7:2757–2768

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was supported in part by a grant to B.I. (TÁMOP-4.2.1/B-09/1/KONV-2010-0005, Budapest, Hungary). The authors appreciate the highly constructive comments of Reviewer 2.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bela Ivanyi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ivanyi, B., Kemeny, E., Rago, P. et al. Peritubular capillary basement membrane changes in chronic renal allograft rejection. Virchows Arch 459, 321–330 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-011-1114-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-011-1114-x

Keywords

Navigation