Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Detection of smoothelin expression in the urinary bladder is strongly dependent on pretreatment conditions: a critical analysis with possible consequences for cancer staging

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Distinguishing urinary bladder muscularis propria (MP) from muscularis mucosae (MM) is crucial in bladder cancer staging. Immunohistochemical staining for the smooth muscle-specific protein smoothelin has been reported to be a robust marker for MP. The aim of this study was to investigate how smoothelin immunostaining in the bladder varies with pretreatment techniques and if it can be used to discriminate between MM and MP. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for smoothelin was performed on nontumoral sections from 18 cystectomy specimens using three different pretreatment protocols. The immunoreactivity of MM, MP and blood vessels was scored semiquantitatively. Staining intensity depended strongly on the different pretreatment protocols used. Heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER) in alkaline buffer resulted in the strongest staining with a moderate or strong immunostaining of the MP in 18/18 (100%) of cases, but in 11/18 (61%), the MM was moderately or strongly stained. HIER in acidic buffer resulted in a suboptimal staining of the MP. Enzymatic pretreatment resulted in absent or weak staining. In conclusion, smoothelin IHC is strongly dependent on epitope retrieval, and smoothelin staining did not discriminate reliably between MP and MM with any of the tested pretreatment protocols.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parkin DM (2008) The global burden of urinary bladder cancer. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 218:12–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ploeg M, Aben KK, Kiemeney LA (2009) The present and future burden of urinary bladder cancer in the world. World J Urol 27:289–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Greene FLPD, Fleming ID et al (2002) AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. Springer, New York, 2002

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Dixon JS, Gosling JA (1983) Histology and fine structure of the muscularis mucosae of the human urinary bladder. J Anat 136:265–271

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Aydin A, Ucak R, Karakok M, Guldur ME, Kocer NE (2002) Vascular plexus is a differentation criterion for muscularis mucosa from muscularis propria in small biopsies and transurethral resection materials of urinary bladder? Int Urol Nephrol 34:315–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ro JY, Ayala AG, el-Naggar A (1987) Muscularis mucosa of urinary bladder. Importance for staging and treatment. Am J Surg Pathol 11:668–673

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vakar-Lopez F, Shen SS, Zhang S, Tamboli P, Ayala AG, Ro JY (2007) Muscularis mucosae of the urinary bladder revisited with emphasis on its hyperplastic patterns: a study of a large series of cystectomy specimens. Ann Diagn Pathol 11:395–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuijpers KA, Heesakkers JP, Jansen CF, Schalken JA (2007) Cadherin-11 is expressed in detrusor smooth muscle cells and myofibroblasts of normal human bladder. Eur Urol 52:1213–1221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Paner GP, Ro JY, Wojcik EM, Venkataraman G, Datta MW, Amin MB (2007) Further characterization of the muscle layers and lamina propria of the urinary bladder by systematic histologic mapping: implications for pathologic staging of invasive urothelial carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 31:1420–1429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Paner GP, Shen SS, Lapetino S, Venkataraman G, Barkan GA, Quek ML, Ro JY, Amin MB (2009) Diagnostic utility of antibody to smoothelin in the distinction of muscularis propria from muscularis mucosae of the urinary bladder: a potential ancillary tool in the pathologic staging of invasive urothelial carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 33:91–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Council L, Hameed O (2009) Differential expression of immunohistochemical markers in bladder smooth muscle and myofibroblasts, and the potential utility of desmin, smoothelin, and vimentin in staging of bladder carcinoma. Mod Pathol 22:639–650

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. van der Loop FT, Schaart G, Timmer ED, Ramaekers FC, van Eys GJ (1996) Smoothelin, a novel cytoskeletal protein specific for smooth muscle cells. J Cell Biol 134:401–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Miyamoto H, Sharma RB, Illei PB, Epstein JI (2010) Pitfalls in the use of smoothelin to identify muscularis propria invasion by urothelial carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 34:418–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Paner GP, Brown JG, Lapetino S, Nese N, Gupta R, Shen SS, Hansel DE, Amin MB (2010) Diagnostic use of antibody to smoothelin in the recognition of muscularis propria in transurethral resection of urinary bladder tumor (TURBT) specimens. Am J Surg Pathol 34:792–799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bovio IM, Al-Quran SZ, Rosser CJ, Algood CB, Drew PA, Allan RW (2010) Smoothelin immunohistochemistry is a useful adjunct for assessing muscularis propria invasion in bladder carcinoma. Histopathology 56:951–956

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claes Lindh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindh, C., Nilsson, R., Lindstrom, M.L. et al. Detection of smoothelin expression in the urinary bladder is strongly dependent on pretreatment conditions: a critical analysis with possible consequences for cancer staging. Virchows Arch 458, 665–670 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-011-1076-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-011-1076-z

Keywords

Navigation