Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Malignant mesothelioma with a pronounced myxoid stroma: a clinical and pathological evaluation of 19 cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mesothelioma with a pronounced myxoid stroma has been identified as a morphological pattern that might portend a better prognosis. Reports on this type of cases are few. Its clinical and pathological features are not defined. In this study, we identified 19 such cases from a series of 234 pleural mesotheliomas and performed a comprehensive clinical and pathological analysis. The inclusion criteria were mesotheliomas with at least 50% of the tumor exhibiting a pronounced myxoid stroma that occupied more than 50% of the tumor volume (designated as myxoid mesothelioma). There were ten males and nine females, with a median age of 58 years. Forty seven percent of the patients had probable or definite asbestos exposure. Patients presented at various stages [International Mesothelioma Interest Group (IMIG) stage II, 4; stage III, 9; and stage IV, 6]. Most (16/19) patients were treated by extrapleural pneumonectomy with adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy or both. Overall, the median survival rate was 36 months (median follow-up time, 17 months), and the 2-year survival rate was 79%. Histologically, the tumor cell component was entirely epithelioid without significant cytologic atypia. The myxoid material stained positive for Alcian blue, and the staining diminished after treatment with hyaluronidase in 12 of 12 cases. The tumor cells showed a typical mesothelial immunophenotype. Ultrastructurally, all six tumors examined had typical mesothelial-type surface microvilli and a moderately electron-dense extracellular amorphous material that often formed a haze enmeshing the surface microvilli. Hyaluronic acid-type, fern-like crystals were noted in all cases. These findings show that myxoid mesotheliomas represent a group of epithelioid mesotheliomas that have retained the secretory activity of normal mesothelium. Patients may present at different stages, but survival appears to be superior to that of epithelioid mesotheliomas in general. Our study emphasizes the need for better attention to histologic subtypes, particularly in the context of prognostically or therapeutically oriented investigations of this lethal disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baas P (2003) Predictive and prognostic factors in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Curr Opin Oncol 15:127–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Butchart EG (1999) Contemporary management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Oncologist 4:488–500

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Butchart EG, Ashcroft T, Barnsley WC, Holden MP (1976) Pleuropneumonectomy in the management of diffuse malignant mesothelioma of the pleura. Experience with 29 patients. Thorax 31:15–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cook DS, Attanoos RL, Jalloh SS, Gibbs AR (2000) “Mucin-positive” epithelial mesothelioma of the peritoneum: an unusual diagnostic pitfall. Histopathology 37:33–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Diaz LK, Okonkwo A, Solans EP, Bedrossian C, Rao MS (2002) Extensive myxoid change in well-differentiated papillary mesothelioma of the pelvic peritoneum. Ann Diagn Pathol 6:164–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goetz SP, Robinson RA, Landas SK (1992) Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma of the pleura. Report of a case clinically simulating mesothelioma. Am J Clin Pathol 97:498–502

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hammar SP, Bockus DE, Remington FL, Rohrbach KA (1996) Mucin-positive epithelial mesotheliomas: a histochemical, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural comparison with mucin-producing pulmonary adenocarcinomas. Ultrastruct Pathol 20:293–325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Johansson L, Linden CJ (1996) Aspects of histopathologic subtype as a prognostic factor in 85 pleural mesotheliomas. Chest 109:109–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Leonardo E, Zanconati F, Bonifacio D, Bonito LD (2001) Immunohistochemical MIB-1 and p27kip1 as prognostic factors in pleural mesothelioma. Pathol Res Pract 197:253–256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. MacDougall DB, Wang SE, Zidar BL (1992) Mucin-positive epithelial mesothelioma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 116:874–880

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Marcus PB (1981) Glycocalyceal bodies and their role in tumor typing. J Submicrosc Cytol 13:483–500

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mark EJ, Shin DH (1993) Diffuse malignant mesothelioma of the pleura: a clinicopathological study of six patients with a prolonged symptom-free interval or extended survival after biopsy and a review of the literature of long-term survival. Virchows Arch, A Pathol Anat Histopathol 422:445–451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Robb JA (1989) Mesothelioma versus adenocarcinoma: false-positive CEA and Leu-M1 staining due to hyaluronic acid. Hum Pathol 20:400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rusch VW (1996) A proposed new international TNM staging system for malignant pleural mesothelioma from the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Lung Cancer 14:1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rusch VW, Rosenzweig K, Venkatraman E, Leon L, Raben A, Harrison L, Bains MS, Downey RJ, Ginsberg RJ (2001) A phase II trial of surgical resection and adjuvant high-dose hemithoracic radiation for malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 122:788–795

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rusch VW, Venkatraman E (1996) The importance of surgical staging in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 111:815–825 (discussion 825–826)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rusch VW, Venkatraman ES (1999) Important prognostic factors in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, managed surgically. Ann Thorac Surg 68:1799–1804

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shia J, Erlandson RA, Klimstra DS (2002) Deciduoid mesothelioma: a report of 5 cases and literature review. Ultrastruct Pathol 26:355–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yao DX, Shia J, Erlandson RA, Klimstra DS (2004) Lymphohistiocytoid mesothelioma: a clinical, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study of four cases and literature review. Ultrastruct Pathol 28:213–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yates DH, Corrin B, Stidolph PN, Browne K (1997) Malignant mesothelioma in south east England: clinicopathological experience of 272 cases. Thorax 52:507–512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ms. Irina Linkov and Ms. Marina Asherova of the Immunohistochemistry Core Facility, Ms. Ann Baren and Ms. Elizabeth Weiss of the Electron Microscopy Laboratory, and Mr. Kin C. Kong and Ms. Allyne Manzo of the Photography Laboratory at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center for their technical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David S. Klimstra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shia, J., Qin, J., Erlandson, R.A. et al. Malignant mesothelioma with a pronounced myxoid stroma: a clinical and pathological evaluation of 19 cases. Virchows Arch 447, 828–834 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-005-0035-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-005-0035-y

Keywords

Navigation