Abstract
Chase and Simon's chunking theory of expert memory, which emphasizes the role of pattern recognition in problem solving, has attracted much attention in cognitive psychology. Holding advanced a series of criticisms that, taken together, purported to refute the theory. Two valid criticisms – that chunk size and LTM encoding were underestimated – are dealt with by a simple extension of the theory. The remainder of Holding's criticisms either are not empirically founded or are based on a misunderstanding of the chunking theory and its role in a comprehensive theory of skill. Holding's alternative SEEK theory, which emphasizes the role of search, lacks key mechanisms that could be implemented by the type of pattern recognition proposed by Chase and Simon.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 3 September 1997 / Accepted: 28 January 1998
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gobet, F., Simon, H. Pattern recognition makes search possible: Comments on Holding (1992). Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung 61, 204–208 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004260050025
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004260050025