Skip to main content
Log in

Pattern recognition makes search possible: Comments on Holding (1992)

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chase and Simon's chunking theory of expert memory, which emphasizes the role of pattern recognition in problem solving, has attracted much attention in cognitive psychology. Holding advanced a series of criticisms that, taken together, purported to refute the theory. Two valid criticisms – that chunk size and LTM encoding were underestimated – are dealt with by a simple extension of the theory. The remainder of Holding's criticisms either are not empirically founded or are based on a misunderstanding of the chunking theory and its role in a comprehensive theory of skill. Holding's alternative SEEK theory, which emphasizes the role of search, lacks key mechanisms that could be implemented by the type of pattern recognition proposed by Chase and Simon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 3 September 1997 / Accepted: 28 January 1998

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gobet, F., Simon, H. Pattern recognition makes search possible: Comments on Holding (1992). Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung 61, 204–208 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004260050025

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004260050025

Keywords

Navigation