Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Involuntary memories and involuntary future thinking differently tax cognitive resources

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the past 20 years involuntary memories have been established as a noteworthy phenomenon, which occur spontaneously in everyday life and with greater frequency than expected. Other types of ideations also occur involuntarily and very frequently, both in the normal population and in clinical groups. The aim of this paper was to assess for the first time whether involuntary memories and involuntary future thoughts differ in the amount of cognitive resources, considering that both are experienced as being rather automatic. As in previous work on mind wandering, this was done by assessing the effect of different conditions on frequency of spontaneous thoughts about past and future. Involuntary memories and future thoughts were obtained in an experimental setting (vigilance task) that mimics a mind-wandering task. In it, participants saw slides (trials) with horizontal or vertical (target) lines. In half or one-fourth of the trials verbal cues were also presented. In a third condition one-fourth of the trials had verbal cues and one-fourth had simple arithmetic calculations. Participants were asked to report any mental content that crosses their mind when the vigilance task stopped. Results show that the manipulation modulates the number of both involuntary memories and future thoughts, and both engage cognitive resources. Future involuntary thoughts seem to require more cognitive effort than involuntary memories and, specifically, future scenarios require more cognitive resources than both involuntary memories and future plans. The results support previous findings showing that reporting spontaneous mental contents makes use of cognitive resources and are discussed linking the involuntary memory literature with mind wandering and metacognitive processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addis, D. R., Wong, A. T., & Schacter, D. L. (2007). Remembering the past and imagining the future: Common and distinct neural substrates during event construction and elaboration. Neuropsychologia, 45(7), 1363–1377.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Antrobus, J. S. (1968). Information theory and stimulus independent thought. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 5(4), 423–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antrobus, J. S., Singer, L., Goldstein, S., & Fortgang, M. (1970). Mind-wandering and cognitive structure. Transactions of the New York Academy of Science, 32(2), 242–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1986) Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, B., Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2011). Back to the future: Autobiographical planning and the functionality of mind-wandering. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1604–1611.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, C. T. (2007). Can we elicit involuntary autobiographical memories in the laboratory? In J. H. Mace (Ed.), Involuntary memory (pp. 127–152). Malden: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, C. T., Mace, J. H., & Corona, H. (2007). Cues to the gusts of memory. In J. H. Mace (Ed.), Involuntary memory (pp. 113–126). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barzykowski, K., & Niedwienska, A. (2018). Priming involuntary autobiographical memories in the lab. Memory, 26(2), 277–289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Batool, I., & Mazzoni, G. (2011). Involuntary memories: are pictorial cues more effective? New York: Poster presented at ICOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berntsen, D. (1996). Involuntary autobiographical memories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 435–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berntsen, D. (1998). Voluntary and involuntary access to autobiographical memory. Memory, 6, 113–141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berntsen, D. (2009). Involuntary autobiographical memories. An introduction to the unbidden past.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berntsen, D., & Hall, N. M. (2004). The episodic nature of involuntary autobiographical memories. Memory & Cognition, 32(5), 789–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berntsen, D., & Jacobsen, A. S. (2008). Involuntary (spontaneous) mental time travel into the past and future. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 1093–1104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berntsen, D., Staugaard, S. R., & Sørensen, L. M. T. (2013). Why am I remembering this now? Predicting the occurrence of involuntary (spontaneous) episodic memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 426–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandimonte, M. A., Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1995). Prospective MemoryTheory and Applications. NY: NY, Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckner, R. L. (2010). The role of the hippocampus in prediction and imagination. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 27–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, C., Mazzoni, G., & Kirsch, I. (2014). The effect of posthypnotic suggestion and task difficulty on adherence to health-related requests. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research and Practice. 1, 92–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1997). Nonconscious behavioral confirmation processes: the self-fulfilling consequences of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(5), 541–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2010) Meta-awareness. In W. P. Banks (Ed.), Encyclopedia of consciousness (pp. 33–41). New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoff, K., Gordon, A. M., Smallwood, J., Smith, R., & Schooler, J. W. (2009). Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering. PNAS, 106(21), 8719–8724.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. N., Staugaard, S. R., & Berntsen, D. (2016). Inducing involuntary and voluntary mental time travel using a laboratory paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 44(3), 376–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M. A. (2005). Memory and the self. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 597–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. (2000). The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system. Psychological Review, 107, 261–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D’Argembeau, A., Ortoleva, C., Jurmentier, S., & Van der Linden, M. (2010). Component processes underlying future thinking. Memory & Cognition, 38(6), 809–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Argembeau, A., Renaud, O., & Van der Linden, M. (2011). Frequency, characteristics and functions of future-oriented thoughts in daily life. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(1), 96–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J. P. (2005). Ongoing spontaneous activity controls access to consciousness: A neuronal model for inattentional blindness. PLoS Biology 3(5), e141.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S., Kerszberg, M., & Changeux, J. P. (1998). A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks. PNAS, 95(24), 14529–14534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, A., & D’Argembeau, A. (2017). Make it real: Belief in occurrence within episodic future thought. Memory & Cognition, 45(6), 1045–1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, J. M., Java, R. I. (1990). Recollective experience in word and nonword recognition. Memory & Cognition, 18(1), 23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, K. D., Spreng, N., Gilmore, A. W., & Schacter, D. L. (2011). Solving future problems: Default network and executive activity associated with goal-directed mental simulations. NeuroImage, 55(4), 1816–1824.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giambra, L. M. (1995). A laboratory method for investigating influences on switching attention to task-unrelated imagery and thought. Consciousness and Cognition, 4(1), 1–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108(3), 356–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeunehomme, O., & D’Argembeau, A. (2016). Prevalence and determinants of direct and generative modes of production of episodic future thoughts in the word cueing paradigm. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(2), 254–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., Hastroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson Laird, P. N. (1980). Mental models in cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 4, 71–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., et al. (2007). For whom the mind wanders, and when: An experience-sampling study of working memory and executive control in daily life. Psychological Science, 18, 614–621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Memory as something that can be counted vs. memory as something that can be counted on. In D. J. Herrmann, C. McEvoy, C. Hertzog, P. Hertel & M. K. Johnson (Eds.) Basic and applied memory research: Practical applications (vol. 2, pp 3–18). HillSDale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvavilashvili L., & Ellis J. (1996). Variety of intentions: Some distinctions and classifications. In M. Brandimonte, L. O. Einstein & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications. Hillside: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace, J. H. (2004). Involuntary autobiographical memories are highly dependent on abstract cuing: The proustian view is incorrect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 893–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mace, J. H. (2007). Involuntary memory: New perspectives in cognitive psychology. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kvavilashvili, L., & Mandler, G. (2004) Out of one’s mind: A study of involuntary semantic memories. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 47–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M. F., Norton, M. I., Van Horn, J. D., Wegner, D. M., Grafton, S. D., & Macrae, C. N. (2007). Wandering minds: The default network and stimulus independent thought. Science, 315, 393–395.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoni, G., Vannucci M., & Batool I. (2014). Manipulating cues in involuntary autobiographical memory: Are pictorial cues more effective? Memory & Cognition, 42(7), 1076–1085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoni, G., & Kirsch, I. (2002). Autobiographical memories and beliefs: a preliminary metacognitive model. In T. Perfect & B. Schwartz (Eds.) Applied metacognition (pp. 121–145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S127–S144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McVay, J. C., Unsworth, N., McMillan, B.D., Kane, M. J. (2013) Working memory capacity does not always support future-oriented mind-wandering. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Expérimentale, 67(1), 41–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2010). Does mind wandering reflect executive function or executive failure? Comment on Smallwood and Schooler (2006) and Watkins (2008). Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 188–197.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Moscovitch, M. (1995). Recovered consciousness: A hypothesis concerning modularity and episodic memory. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17(2), 276–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plimpton, B., Patel, P., & Kvavilashvili, L. (2015). Role of triggers and dysphoria in mind-wandering about past, present and future: A laboratory study. Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 261–276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, A. S., & Berntsen, D. (2011). The unpredictable past: spontaneous autobiographical memories outnumber autobiographical memories retrieved strategically. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 1842–1846.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. C. (Ed.). (1996). Remembering our past: Studies in autobiographical memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, L. R. (2007). Remembering the past to imagine the future: the prospective brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 657–661.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schlagman, S., & Kvavilashvili, L. (2008). Involuntary autobiographical memories in and outside the laboratory: How different are they from voluntary autobiographical memories? Memory& Cognition, 36, 920–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schooler, J. W. (2002). Re-representing consciousness: dissociations between experience and meta-consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6(8), 339–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schooler, J. W., Reichle, E. D., & Halpern, D. V. (2005). Zoning out while reading: evidence for dissociation between experience and metaconsciousness. In D. T. Levin. (Ed.), Thinking and seeing: Visual metacognition in adults and children. Cambridge: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schooler, J. W., & Smallwood, J. (2007) Meta-awareness. In K. Vohs, R. Baumeister (Eds.) Encyclopedia of social psychology. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schooler, J. W., Smallwood, J., Christoff, K., Handy, T. C., Reichle, E. D., et al. (2011). Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind. Trends in Cognitive Science, 15, 319–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoboria, A., Mazzoni, G., Ernst, A., & D’Argembeau, A. (2018). Measuring belief in occurrence for past and future autobiographical events. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research and Practice. Submitted for publication.

  • Shiffman, S. (2000). Real-time self-report of momentary states in the natural environment: Computerized ecological momentary assessment. In A. A. Stone, C. A. Bachrach, J. B. Jobe, H. S. Kurtzman, & V. S. Cain (Eds.), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates (pp. 277–296). The Science of Self-Report: Implications for Research and Practice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. L. (1966). Daydreaming: An introduction to the experimental study of inner experience. New York: Crown Publishing Group/Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, J., Baracaia, S. F., Lowe, M., & Obonsawin, M. (2003). Task unrelated thought whilst encoding information. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 452–484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, J., Brown, K., Baird, B., & Schooler, J. W. (2012). Cooperation between the default mode network and the frontal-parietal network in the production of an internal train of thought. Brain Research, 1428, 60–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, J., Davies, J. B., Heim, D., Finnigan, F., Sudberry, M. V., O’Connor, R. C., et al. (2004). Subjective experience and the attentional lapse. Task engagement and disengagement during sustained attention. Consciousness and Cognition, 13(4), 657–690.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, J., Nind, L., & O’Connor, R. C. (2009). When is your head at? An exploration of the factors that influence the temporal focus of the wandering mind. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 118 – 125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, J., Obonsawin, M., & Heim, D. (2003). Task unrelated thought: The role of distributed processing. Consciousness and Cognition, 12(2), 169–189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, J., Riby, L., Heim, D., & Davies, J. D. (2006). Encoding during the attentional lapse: Accuracy of encoding during the semantic sustained attention to response task. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(1), 218–231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2006). The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), 946–958.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, J. M., Baracaia, S. F., Lowe, M., & Obonsawin, M. (2003). Task unrelated thought whilst encoding information. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 452–484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, J. (2010). Why the global availability of mind wandering necessitates resource competition: Reply to McVay and Kane (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 202–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somos, E., Mazzoni, G., & Jellema, T. (2015). The effortfulness of direct versus generative retrieval of autobiographical memories. Paper presented at ICOM6, 17–22 July, Budapest.

  • Teasdale, J. D., Proctor, L., Lloyd, C. A., & Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Working-memory and stimulus-independent thought: effects of memory load and presentation rate. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5(4), 417–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, J. D., et al. (1995). Stimulus-independent thought depends on central executive resources. Memory & Cognition, 23, 551–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80(5), 352–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzer, T., Lee, P. J., & Brown, N. R. (2012). On the prevalence of directly retrieved autobiographical memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 1296–1308.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vannucci, M., Batool, I., Pelagatti, C., & Mazzoni, G. (2014). Modifying the frequency and characteristics of involuntary autobiographical memories. PLoS One, 9(4), e89582.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vannucci, M., Hanczakowski, M., Pelagatti, C., Mazzoni, G., Paccani, C. (2014). Why aren’t we flooded by involuntary autobiographical memories? Few cues are more effective than many, Psychological Research. 1, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannucci, M., Pelagatti, C., Hanczakowski, M., Mazzoni, G., & Rossi Paccani, C. (2015). Why are we not flooded by involuntary autobiographical memories? Few cues are more effective than many. Psychological Research, 79(6),1077–1085.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, O. C., & Watkins, M. J. (1975). Buildup of proactive inhibition as a cue-overload effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1, 442–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyer, N. A., Neilens, H. L., Perfect, T. J., & Mazzoni, G. (2011). Automatic and ironic behavior are both mediated by changes in the self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1300–1303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull, HU67RX, UK

    Giuliana Mazzoni

Authors
  1. Giuliana Mazzoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuliana Mazzoni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mazzoni, G. Involuntary memories and involuntary future thinking differently tax cognitive resources. Psychological Research 83, 684–697 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1123-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1123-3

Search

Navigation