Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental validation of the diffusion model based on a slow response time paradigm

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The diffusion model (Ratcliff, Psychol Rev 85(2):59–108, 1978) is a stochastic model that is applied to response time (RT) data from binary decision tasks. The model is often used to disentangle different cognitive processes. The validity of the diffusion model parameters has, however, rarely been examined. Only few experimental paradigms have been analyzed with those being restricted to fast response time paradigms. This is attributable to a recommendation stated repeatedly in the diffusion model literature to restrict applications to fast RT paradigms (more specifically, to tasks with mean RTs below 1.5 s per trial). We conducted experimental validation studies in which we challenged the necessity of this restriction. We used a binary task that features RTs of several seconds per trial and experimentally examined the convergent and discriminant validity of the four main diffusion model parameters. More precisely, in three experiments, we selectively manipulated these parameters, using a difficulty manipulation (drift rate), speed-accuracy instructions (threshold separation), a more complex motoric task (non-decision time), and an asymmetric payoff matrix (starting point). The results were similar to the findings from experimental validation studies based on fast RT paradigms. Thus, our experiments support the validity of the parameters of the diffusion model and speak in favor of an extension of the model to paradigms based on slower RTs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. dz = \(\frac{Mean(Condition 1-Condition 2)}{SD(Condition 1-Condition 2)}\).

  2. Participants had to work on another unrelated decision task (an anagram task) either before or after the figural task. The order of the two tasks was counterbalanced. The anagram task is not part of this manuscript. In further analyses, we included the order of tasks as additional factor and we did not find any significant interaction effects.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veronika Lerche.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This research was supported by a Grant from the German Research Foundation to Andreas Voss (Grant no. VO1288/2–2).

Conflict of interest

Both authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the studies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lerche, V., Voss, A. Experimental validation of the diffusion model based on a slow response time paradigm. Psychological Research 83, 1194–1209 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0945-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0945-8

Keywords

Navigation