Abstract
The manifestation of psychology as an academic discipline more than a 100 years ago was accompanied by a paradigm shift in our understanding of psychological phenomena—with both its light and shadow sides. On the one hand, this development allowed for a rigorous and experimentation-based approach to psychological phenomena; on the other, it led to an alienation from the experiential—or qualia—facets as the topics under inquiry were researched increasingly through third-person (e.g., behavioral or physiological) measures. At the turning point of this development stood an eminent but little known European scholar, Franz Brentano, who called for a synthesis of both third-person and first-person research methods in the study of psychological phenomena. On the occasion of his death, a hundred years ago on March 17, 1917 we wish to illustrate the historical background, introduce the reader to Brentano’s approach and work and discuss its relevance for experimental psychology today.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antonelli, M. (2001). Seiendes, Bewusstsein, Intentionalität im Frühwerk von Franz Brentano [Being, consciousness, intentionality in the early work of Franz Brentano]. Freiburg im Breisgau: Alber.
Baumgartner, W., & Burkhard, F. P. (1990). Franz Brentano. Eine Skizze seines Lebens und seiner Werke [Franz Brentano. A sketch of his life and work]. In W. L. Gombocz, R. Haller, & N. Henrichs (Eds.), Internationale Bibliographie zur Österreichischen Philosophie (pp. 17–53). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Bitbol, M., & Petitmengin, C. (2013). A defense of introspection from within. Constructivist Foundations, 8, 269–279.
Brentano, F. (1874a). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkte [Psychology from an empirical standpoint]. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
Brentano, F. (1874b). Aristoteles und seine Weltanschauung [Aristotle and his worldview]. Leipzig: Quelle & Meyer.
Brentano, F. (1895). Meine letzten Wünsche für Österreich [My last wishes for Austria]. Stuttgart: J.W. Cottasche Buchhandlung.
Brentano, F. (1907). Untersuchungen zur Sinnespsychologie [Studies on the psychology of senses]. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
Hoyningen-Huene, P. (1987). Context of discovery and context of justification. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 18, 501–515. doi:10.1016/0039-3681(87)90005-7.
Johnston, W. M. (1974). Österreichische Kultur- und Geistesgeschichte. Gesellschaft und Ideen im Donauraum 1848 bis 1938 [Austrian history of culture and ideas. Society and ideas in the Danube region 1848 to 1938]. Wien: Böhlhaus.
Kraus, O. (1919). Franz Brentano. Zur Kenntnis seines Lebens und seiner Lehre mit Beiträgen von Carl Stumpf und Edmund Husserl [Franz Brentano. About knowledge of his life and his teaching with articles from Carl Stumpf and Edmund Husserl]. München: C.H. Beck.
Kraus, O. (Ed.). (1973). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt. Erster Band [Psychology from an empirical standpoint. First volume]. Hamburg: Meiner.
Lau, M. A., Bishop, S. R., Segal, Z. V., Buis, T., Anderson, N. D., Carlson, L., … et al. (2006). The Toronto mindfulness scale: Development and validation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 1445–1467. doi:10.1002/jclp.20326.
Lüer, G. (1991). Psychologie im Spiegel ihrer wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft: Historische Fakten, Entwicklungen und ihre Konsequenzen [Psychology in the light of its scientific society: Facts, developments, and ist consequences]. Psychologische Rundschau, 42, 1–11.
Marras, Ausonio. (1976). Scholastic roots of Brentano`s concept of intentionality. In L. McAlister (Ed.), The philosophy of Franz Brentano (pp. 128–139). London: Duckworth.
McDonnell, C. (2006). Brentano’s revaluation of the scholastic concept of intentionality into a root-concept of descriptive psychology. Yearbook of the Irish Philosophical Society, 2006, 124–171.
Merlan, P. (1945). Brentano and freud. Journal of the History of Ideas, 6, 375–377. doi:10.2307/2707299.
Merlan, P. (1949). Brentano and freud—a sequel. Journal of the History of Ideas, 10, 451–452. doi:10.2307/2707048.
Metzinger, T. (2009). The ego tunnel: The science of the mind and the myth of the self. New York: Basic Books.
Meyer, A. (2016). Was heilt? Wege zu einer Heilung durch Bewusstseinskräfte [What does heal? Ways to healing through powers of consciousness]. In A. Meyer, J. Wagemann, & U. Weger (Eds.), Psychologie, Bewusstseinsforschung und Heilung im Kontext westlicher Spiritualität (pp. 15–34). Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
Piccinini, G. (2003). Data from introspective reports: Upgrading from common sense to science. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10, 141–156.
Reisberg, D., Pearson, D. G., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2003). Intuitions and introspections about imagery: The role of imagery experience in shaping an investigator’s theoretical views. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 147–160. doi:10.1002/acp.858.
Schönpflug, W. (2004). Geschichte und Systematik der Psychologie. Ein Lehrbuch für das Grundstudium [History and system of psychology. A textbook for undergraduate studies] (2nd ed.). Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.
Seidl, H. (Ed.). (1989). Aristoteles’ Metaphysik. Bücher I(A)—VI(E). Griechisch-Deutsch [Aristotles metaphysics. Books I(A)—VI(E). Greek-German].Hamburg: Meiner.
Spiegelberg, H. (1976). Intention and intentionality in the scholastics, Brentano and Husserl. In L. McAlister (Ed.), The philosophy of Franz Brentano (pp. 108–127). London: Duckworth.
Wagemann, J. (2010). Gehirn und menschliches Bewusstsein. Neuromythos und Strukturphänomenologie [Brain and human consciousness. Neuromyth and structural phenomenology]. Aachen: Shaker.
Walach, H. (2016). Geist und Gesundheit: Grundzüge einer spirituellen Psychologie. Brentano und die Introspektion [Mind and health: Principles of a spiritual psychology. Brentano and introspection]. In A. Meyer, J. Wagemann, & U. Weger (Eds.), Psychologie, Bewusstseinsforschung und Heilung im Kontext westlicher Spiritualität (pp. 15–33). Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
Weger, U., Meyer, A., & Wagemann, J. (2016). The behavioral, experiential and conceptual dimensions of the self: Introducing a new phenomenological approach. European Psychologist, 21, 180–194. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000263
Weger, U., & Wagemann, J. (2015a). The challenges and opportunities of first-person inquiry in experimental psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 36, 38–49. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.09.001.
Weger, U., & Wagemann, J. (2015b). The Behavioral, experiential and conceptual dimensions of psychological phenomena: Body, soul and spirit. New Ideas in Psychology, 39, 23–33.
Weger, U., Wagemann, J., & Meyer, A. (2016). Introspection in psychology. Its contribution to theory and method in memory research. (Manuscript in preparation).
Werle, J. M. (1989). Franz Brentano und die Zukunft der Philosophie. Studien zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte und Wissenschaftssystematik im 19. Jahrhundert [Franz Brentano and the future of philosophy. Studies about the history and system of science in the 19th century]. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Winning, A. P., & Boag, S. (2015). Does brief mindfulness training increase empathy? The role of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 492–498. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.011.
Wundt, W. (1874). Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie [Principles of physiological psychology]. Leipzig: Engelman.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Raeschke-Stiftung.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meyer, A., Hackert, B. & Weger, U. Franz Brentano and the beginning of experimental psychology: implications for the study of psychological phenomena today. Psychological Research 82, 245–254 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0825-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0825-7