Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Joint action changes valence-based action coding in an implicit attitude task

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that co-acting with another person induces a problem to discriminate between one’s own and the other’s actions which can be resolved by emphasizing action features that discriminate best between both persons’ actions in a given task context. Mostly, overt action features like the spatial position of responses have been suggested as discriminating action features. In the present study, we tested whether non-externally perceivable, covert action features can be used for resolving the action discrimination problem during joint action. Therefore, we compared task performance between a joint and an individual version of the Go/Nogo Association Task, a task requiring the association of a valence to the response. We found a larger implicit attitude effect in the joint than in the individual setting for person-related (self and other, Experiment 1) as well as for non-person-related attitude objects (fruit and insect, Experiment 2) suggesting that the weight of valence information is increased in the internal coding of responses when valence discriminates between both responses. In contrast, we found a smaller implicit attitude effect in a person present setting than an individual setting (Experiment 3) indicating that the enhanced implicit attitude effect observed in the joint settings of Experiments 1 and 2 is not due to social facilitation. Our results suggest that action discrimination during joint action can rely on covert action features. The results are in line with the referential coding account, and specify the kind of action features that are represented when sharing a task with another person.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiello, J. R., & Douthitt, E. A. (2001). Social facilitation theory from Triplett to electronic performance monitoring. Group Dynamics, 5, 163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atmaca, S., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2011). The joint flanker effect: sharing tasks with real and imagined co-actors. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 371–385.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Atmaca, S., Sebanz, N., Prinz, W., & Knoblich, G. (2008). Action co-representation: the joint SNARC effect. Social Neuroscience, 3, 410–420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beckers, T., De Houwer, J., & Eelen, P. (2002). Automatic integration of non-perceptual action effect features: the case of the associative affective Simon effect. Psychological Research, 66, 166–173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 242–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bluemke, M., & Friese, M. (2011). On the validity of idiographic and generic self-concept implicit association tests: a core-concept model. European Journal of Personality, 26, 515–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Houwer, J. (2001). A structural and process analysis of the implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 443–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Houwer, J. (2003). A structural analysis of indirect measures of attitudes. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 219–244). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittrich, K., Rothe, A., & Klauer, K. C. (2012) Increased spatial salience in the social Simon task: a response-coding account of spatial compatibility effects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 911–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittrich, K., Dolk, T., Rothe-Wulf, A., Klauer, K. C., & Prinz, W. (2013). Keys and seats: spatial response coding underlying the joint spatial compatibility effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 1725–1736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., Schütz-Bosbach, S., Prinz, W., & Liepelt, R. (2011). How “social” is the social Simon effect? Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., Schütz-Bosbach, S., Prinz, W., & Liepelt, R. (2014). The joint Simon effect: a review and theoretical integration. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 974.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Prinz, W., & Liepelt, R. (2013). The (not so) Social Simon effect: A referential coding account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

  • Eder, A. B., Rothermund, K., & De Houwer, J. (2013). Affective compatibility between stimuli and response goals: a primer for a new implicit measure of attitudes. PLoS ONE, 8, e79210.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Eder, A. B., Rothermund, K., De Houwer, J., & Hommel, B. (2014). Directive and incentive functions of affective action consequences: an ideomotor approach. Psychological Research, 1–20.

  • Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75–109). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H. (2007). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25, 603–637.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., & Farnham, S. D. (2000). Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1022–1038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guagnano, D., Rusconi, E., & Umiltà, C. A. (2010) Sharing a task or sharing space? On the effect of the confederate in action coding in a detection task. Cognition, 114, 348–355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guerin, B. (1986). Mere presence effects in humans: a review. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 38–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, H. A., Czellar, S., Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2010). Malleability of attitudes or malleability of the IAT? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 286–298.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (2011). The Simon effect as tool and heuristic. Acta Psychologica, 136, 189–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., & Pelli, D. (2007). What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3? Perception, 36, ECVP Abstract Supplement.

  • Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus–response compatibility—a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liepelt, R., & Prinz, W. (2011). How two share two tasks: evidence of a social psychological refractory period effect. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 387–396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liepelt, R., Stenzel, A., & Lappe, M. (2012). Specifying social cognitive processes with a social dual-task paradigm. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Liepelt, R., Wenke, D., & Fischer, R. (2013). Effects of feature integration in a hands-crossed version of the social Simon paradigm. Psychological Research, 77, 240–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liepelt, R., Wenke, D., Fischer, R., & Prinz, W. (2011). Trial-to-trial sequential dependencies in a social and non-social Simon task. Psychological Research, 75, 366–375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, B. S., Hardin, C. D., & Sinclair, S. (2001). Social influence effects on automatic racial prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 842–855.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2013). Intentional weighting: a basic principle in cognitive control. Psychological Research, 77, 249–259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. P., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Contextual variations in implicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 455–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2001). The go/no-go association task. Social Cognition, 19, 625–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2009). Implicit and explicit measures of attitudes: the perspective of the MODE model. In R. E. Petty, R. H. Fazio, & P. Briñol (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures (pp. 19–63). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philipp, A. M., & Prinz, W. (2010). Evidence for a role of the responding agent in the joint compatibility effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2159–2171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2004). Underlying processes in the implicit association test: dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 139–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others’ actions: just like one‘s own? Cognition, 88, B11–B21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2005). How two share a task: co-representing stimulus–response mappings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1234–1246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellaro, R., Dolk, T., Colzato, L., Liepelt, R., & Hommel, B. (2015). Referential coding does not rely on location features: evidence for a non-spatial joint Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 186–195.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. R., Hinrichs, J. V., & Craft, J. L. (1970). Auditory SR compatibility: reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 97–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valiente, C., Cantero, D., Vázquez, C., Sanchez, Á., Provencio, M., & Espinosa, R. (2011). Implicit and explicit self-esteem discrepancies in paranoia and depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 691–699.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vesper, C., van der Wel, R. P., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2011). Making oneself predictable: reduced temporal variability facilitates joint action coordination. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 517–530.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, T. N., Higgins, L., Ray, M., & Weeks, D. J. (2007). Seeing vs. believing: is believing sufficient to activate the processes of response co-representation? Human Movement Science, 26, 853–866.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wenke, D., Atmaca, S., Holländer, A., Liepelt, R., Baess, P., & Prinz, W. (2011). What is shared in joint action? Issues of co-representation, response conflict, and agent identification. The Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2, 147–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present research was financially supported by the German Research Foundation Grants DFG LI 2115/1-1; 1-3 awarded to R. L. We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this article and Alena Steinert and Luke Bölling for their help with data acquisition.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Psychology, University of Muenster, Fliednerstraße 21, 48149, Münster, Germany

    Anna Stenzel & Roman Liepelt

Authors
  1. Anna Stenzel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roman Liepelt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Anna Stenzel or Roman Liepelt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stenzel, A., Liepelt, R. Joint action changes valence-based action coding in an implicit attitude task. Psychological Research 80, 889–903 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0684-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0684-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation