Abstract
Recently, it has been demonstrated that sensorimotor representations are quickly updated following a brief period of limb non-use. The present study examined the potential of motor imagery practice (MIP) and investigated the role of motor imagery instructions (kinesthetic vs. visual imagery) to counteract the functional impairment induced by sensorimotor restriction. The participants were divided into four groups. Three groups wore a splint on their left hand for 24 h. Prior to the splint removal, two of the three groups performed 15 min of MIP, with kinesthetic or visual modalities (KinMIP and VisMIP groups, respectively). The third group did not practice motor imagery (NoMIP group). Immediately after the splint removal, the participants were assessed using a hand laterality task known for evaluating sensorimotor processes. A fourth group served as the control (i.e., without immobilization and MIP). The main results showed slower left-hand response times for the immobilized NoMIP group compared with the controls. Importantly, faster response times for the left-hand stimuli appeared for the KinMIP groups only compared with the NoMIP group. No difference between the four groups was observed for the right-hand stimuli. Overall, these results highlighted the somatotopic effect of limb non-use on the efficiency of sensorimotor processes. Importantly, the slowdown of the sensorimotor processes induced by 24 h of sensorimotor deprivation may be counteracted by a kinesthetic MIP, whereas no beneficial effect appeared with visual imagery. We discuss the importance of imagery modalities for sensorimotor reactivation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Note that visual imagery is less motor than kinesthetic imagery.
References
Allami, L., Paulignan, Y., Brovelli, A., & Boussaoud, D. (2008). Visuo-motor learning with combination of different rates of motor imagery and physical practice. Experimental Brain Research, 184, 105–113. doi:10.1007/s00221-007-1086-x.
Avanzino, L., Bassolino, M., Pozzo, T., & Bove, M. (2011). Use-dependent hemispheric balance. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 3423–3428. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4893-10.2011.
Avanzino, L., Pelosin, E., Abbruzzese, G., Bassolino, M., Pozzo, T., & Bove, M. (2013). Shaping motor cortex plasticity through proprioception. Cerebral Cortex,. doi:10.1093/cercor/bht139.
Bassolino, M., Bove, M., Jacono, M., Fadiga, L., & Pozzo, T. (2012). Functional effect of short-term immobilization: kinematic changes and recovery on reaching-to-grasp. Neuroscience, 215, 127–134. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.04.019.
Bassolino, M., Campanella, M., Bove, M., Pozzo, T., & Fadiga, L. (2013). Training the motor cortex by observing the actions of others during immobilization. Cerebral Cortex,. doi:10.1093/cercor/bht190.
Braun, S., Kleynen, M., van Heel, T., Kruithof, N., Wade, D., & Beurskens, A. (2013). The effects of mental practice in neurological rehabilitation; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00390.
Cerritelli, B., Maruff, P., Wilson, P., & Currie, J. (2000). The effect of an external load on the force and timing components of mentally represented actions. Behavioral Brain Research, 108, 91–96. doi:10.1016/S0166-4328(99)00138-2.
Conson, M., Mazzarella, E., Frolli, A., Esposito, D., Marino, N., Trojano, L., Massagli, A., Gison, G., Aprea, N., & Grossi, D. (2013). Motor imagery in asperger syndrome: testing action simulation by the hand laterality task. PLoS One, 8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070734.
Crews, R. T., & Kamen, G. (2006). Motor-evoked potentials following imagery and limb disuse. The International Journal of Neuroscience, 116, 639–651. doi:10.1080/00207450600592198.
Curtze, C., Otten, B., & Postema, K. (2010). Effects of lower limb amputation on the mental rotation of feet. Experimental Brain Research, 201, 527–534. doi:10.1007/s00221-009-2067-z.
de Vignemont, F., Zalla, T., Posada, A., Louvegnez, A., Koenig, O., Georgieff, N., et al. (2006). Mental rotation in schizophrenia. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 295–309. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2005.08.001.
de Vries, S., & Mulder, T. (2007). Motor imagery and stroke rehabilitation: a critical discussion. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 39, 5–13. doi:10.2340/16501977-0020.
Decety, J., & Grèzes, J. (1999). Neural mechanisms subserving the percep- tion of human actions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 172–178. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01312-1.
Decety, J., & Jeannerod, M. (1995). Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: does Fitts’s law hold in motor imagery? Behavioral Brain Research, 72, 127–134. doi:10.1016/0166-4328(96)00141-6.
Dominey, P., Decety, J., Brousolle, E., Chazot, J., & Jeannerod, M. (1994). Motor imagery of a lateralized sequential task is asymmetrically slowed in hemi-Parkinson’s patients. Neuropsychologia, 33, 727–741. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(95)00008-Q.
Driskell, J. E., Copper, C., & Moran, A. (1994). Does mental practice enhance performance? Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 481–492. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.481.
Dunsky, A., Dickstein, R., Marcovitz, E., Levy, S., & Deutsch, J. E. (2008). Home-based MI training for gait rehabilitation of people with chronic post-stroke hemiparesis. Archive of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 1580–1588. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.039.
Feltz, D. L., & Landers, D. M. (1983). The effects of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 5, 25–57.
Féry, Y. A. (2003). Differentiating visual and kinesthetic imagery in mental practice. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 1–10.
Fiorio, M., Tinazzi, M., & Aglioti, S. M. (2006). Selective impairment of hand mental rotation in patients with focal hand dystonia. Brain, 129, 47–54. doi:10.1093/brain/awh630.
Funk, M., & Brugger, P. (2008). Mental rotation of congenitally absent hands. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 14, 81–89.
Gentili, R., Han, C. E., Schweighofer, N., & Papaxanthis, C. (2010). Motor learning without doing: trial-by-trial improvement in motor performance during mental training. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104, 774–783. doi:10.1152/jn.00257.2010.
Gentilucci, M., Benuzzi, F., Bertolani, L., Daprati, E., & Gangitano, M. (2000). Recognising a hand by grasp. Cognitive Brain Research, 9, 125–135. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(99)00049-X.
Gentilucci, M., Daprati, E., & Gangitano, M. (1998). Right-handers and left-handers have different representations of their own hand. Cognitive Brain Research, 6, 185–192. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(97)00034-7.
Gerardin, E., Sirigu, A., Lehericy, S., Poline, J. B., Gaymard, B., Marsault, C., et al. (2000). Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 1093–1104. doi:10.1093/cercor/10.11.1093.
Guillot, Di Rienzo, F., MacIntyre, T., Moran, A., & Collet, C. (2012). Imagining is not doing but involves specific motor commands: a review of experimental data related to motor inhibition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 247. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00247.
Guillot, A., & Collet, C. (2005). Contribution from neurophysiological and psychological methods to the study of motor imagery. Brain Research, 50, 387–397. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2005.09.004.
Guillot, A., & Collet, C. (2008). Construction of the motor imagery integrative model in sport: a review and theoretical investigation of motor imagery use. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1, 31–44. doi:10.1080/17509840701823139.
Guillot, A., Collet, C., & Dittmar, A. (2004). Relationship between visual vs. kinesthetic imagery, field dependence-independence and complex motor skills. Journal of Psychophysiology, 18, 190–199. doi:10.1027/0269-8803.18.4.190.
Guillot, A., Collet, C., Nguyen, V. A., Malouin, F., Richards, C., & Doyon, J. (2009). Brain activity during visual versus kinesthetic imagery: an fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 2157–2172. doi:10.1002/hbm.20658.
Hanakawa, T., Dimyan, M. A., & Hallett, M. (2008). Motor planning, imagery, and execution in the distributed motor network: a time- course study with functional MRI. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 2775–2788. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn036.
Hardy, L., & Callow, N. (1999). Efficacy of external and internal visual imagery perspectives for the enhancement of performance on tasks in which form is important. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 21, 95–112.
Huber, R., Ghilardi, M. F., Massimini, M., Ferrarelli, F., Riedner, B. A., Peterson, M. J., et al. (2006). Arm immobilization causes cortical plastic changes and locally decreases sleep slow wave activity. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1169–1176. doi:10.1038/nn1758.
Ionta, S., & Blanke, O. (2009). Differential influence of hands posture on mental rotation of hands and feet in left and right handers. Experimental Brain Research, 195, 207–217. doi:10.1007/s00221-009-1770-0.
Isaac, A., Marks, D. F., & Russell, D. G. (1986). An instrument for assessing imagery of movement: the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire (VMIQ). Journal of Mental Imagery, 10, 23–30.
Jackson, P. L., Lafleur, M. F., Malouin, F., Richards, C., & Doyon, J. (2001). Potential role of mental practice using motor imagery in neurologic rehabilitation. Archive of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82, 1133–1141. doi:10.1053/apmr.2001.24286.
Jackson, P. L., Lafleur, M. F., Malouin, F., Richards, C. L., & Doyon, J. (2003). Functional cerebral reorganization following motor sequence learning through mental practice with motor imagery. Neuroimage, 20, 1171–1180. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00369-0.
Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage, 14, 429–439. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0832.
Jenkinson, P. M., Edelstyn, N. M. J., & Ellis, S. J. (2009). Imagining the impossible: motor representations in anosognosia for hemiplegia. Neuropsychologia, 47, 481–488. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.004.
Lacourse, M. G., Turner, J. A., Randolph-Orr, E., Schandler, S. L., & Cohen, M. J. (2004). Cerebral and cerebellar sensorimotor plasticity following motor imagery-based mental practice of a sequential movement. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 41, 505–524.
Malouin, F., Jackson, P., & Richards, C.L. (2013). Towards the integration of mental practice in rehabilitation programs. A critical review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00576.
Malouin, F., Richards, C. L., Durand, A., Descent, M., Poiré, D., Frémont, P., et al. (2009). Effects of practice, visual loss, limb amputation, and disuse on motor imagery vividness. Neurorehabilitation Neural Repair, 23, 449–463. doi:10.1177/1545968308328733.
Malouin, F., Richards, C. L., Durand, A., & Doyon, J. (2008). Clinical assessment of motor imagery after stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 22, 330–340. doi:10.1177/1545968307313499.
Meugnot, A., Almecija, Y., & Toussaint, L. (2014). The embodied nature of motor imagery processes highlighted by short-term limb immobilization. Experimental Psychology, 61, 180–186. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000237.
Moisello, C., Bove, M., Huber, R., Abbruzzese, G., Battaglia, F., Tononi, G., et al. (2008). Short-term limb immobilization affects motor performance. Journal of Motor Behavior, 40, 165–176. doi:10.3200/JMBR.40.2.165-176.
Mulder, T. (2007). Motor imagery and action observation: cognitive tools for rehabilitation. Journal of Neural Transmission, 114, 1265–1278. doi:10.1007/s00702-007-0763-z.
Munzert, J., Lorey, B., & Zentgraf, K. (2009). Cognitive motor processes: the role of motor imagery in the study of motor representations. Brain Research Review, 60, 306–326. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.12.024.
Ni Choisdealbha, A., Brady, N., & Maguinness, C. (2011). Differing roles for the dominant and non-dominant hands in the hand laterality task. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 73–85. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2652-9.
Nico, D., Daprati, E., Rigal, F., Parsons, L. M., & Sirigu, A. (2004). Left and right hand recognition in upper limb amputees. Brain, 127, 120–132. doi:10.1093/brain/awh006.
Papaxanthis, C., Pozzo, T., Skoura, X., & Schiappati, M. (2002). Does order and timing in performance of imagined and actual movements affect the motor imagery process? The duration of walking and writing task. Behavioral Brain Research, 134, 209–215. doi:10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00030-X.
Parsons, L. M. (1987). Imagined spatial transformations of one’s body. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 178–241. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(87)90011-9.
Parsons, L. M. (1994). Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavioral reflected in mentally simulated action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 709–730. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.709.
Pascual-Leone, A., Nguyet, D., Cohen, L. G., Brasil-Neto, J. P., Cammarota, A., & Hallett, M. (1995). Modulation of muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during the acquisition of new fine motor skills. Journal of Neurophysiology, 74, 1037–1045.
Petit, L. S., Pegna, A. J., Mayer, E., & Hauert, C. A. (2003). Representation of anatomical constraints in motor imagery: mental rotation of a body segment. Brain and Cognition, 51, 95–101. doi:10.1016/S0278-2626(02)00526-2.
Ruby, P., & Decety, J. (2003). What you believe versus what you think they believe: a neuroimaging study of conceptual perspective-taking. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 2475–2480. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02673.x.
Silva, S., Loubinoux, I., Olivier, M., Bataille, B., Fourcade, O., Samii, K., et al. (2011). Impaired visual hand recognition in Preoperative patients during Brachial Plexus. Anesthesiology, 1, 126–134. doi:10.1097/ALM.0b013e31820164f1.
Sirigu, A., Daprati, E., Pradat-Diehl, P., Franck, N., & Jeannerod, M. (1999). Perception of self-generated movement following left parietal lesion. Brain, 122, 1867–1874. doi:10.1093/brain/122.10.1867.
Sirigu, A., Duhamel, J. R., Cohen, L., Pillon, B., Dubois, B., & Agid, Y. (1996). The mental representation of hand movements after parietal cortex damage. Science, 273, 1564–1568.
Solodkin, A., Hlustik, P., Chen, E. E., & Small, S. L. (2004). Fine modulation in network activation during motor execution and motor imagery. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 1246–1255. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh086.
Stenekes, M. W., Geertzen, J. H., Nicolai, J. P., De Jong, B. M., & Mulder, T. (2009). Effects of motor imagery on hand function during immobilization after flexor tendon repair. Archive of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90, 553–559. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.10.029.
Stinear, C. M., Byblow, W. D., Steyvers, M., Levin, O., & Swinnen, S. P. (2006). Kinesthetic, but not visual, motor imagery modulates cortico-motor excitability. Experimental Brain Research, 168, 157–164. doi:10.1007/s00221-005-0078-y.
ter Horst, A. C., Cole, J., van Lier, R., & Steenbergen, B. (2012). The effect of chronic deafferentation on mental imagery: a case study. PLoS One, 7, e42742. doi:10.1371/jounal.pone.0042742.
Toussaint, L., & Blandin, Y. (2010). On the role of imagery modalities on motor learning. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28, 497–504. doi:10.1080/02640410903555855.
Toussaint, L., & Meugnot, A. (2013). Short-term limb immobilization affects cognitive motor processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 623–632. doi:10.1037/a0028942.
Wang, Y., & Morgan, W. P. (1992). The effects of imagery perspectives on the physiological responses to imagined exercise. Behavioral Brain Research, 52, 167–174. doi:10.1016/S0166-4328(05)80227-X.
White, A., & Hardy, L. (1995). Use of different imagery perspectives on the learning and performance of different motor skills. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 191–216.
Wilson, P. H., Maruff, P., Butson, M., Williams, J., Lum, J., & Thomas, P. R. (2004). Internal representation of movement in children with developmental coordination disorder: a mental rotation task. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 46, 754–759. doi:10.1017/S001216220400129X.
Wolpert, D. M., & Flanagan, J. R. (2001). Motor prediction. Current Biology, 11, 729–732. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00432-8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meugnot, A., Agbangla, N.F., Almecija, Y. et al. Motor imagery practice may compensate for the slowdown of sensorimotor processes induced by short-term upper-limb immobilization. Psychological Research 79, 489–499 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0577-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0577-1